Centered? — Aviation Photography Forum

Sponsor Message:


My Starred Topics \| Profile \| New Topic \| Forum Index \| Help \| Search

Centered?

Derstatic From Sweden, joined Aug 2007, 49 posts, RR: 0
Posted (5 years 2 months 3 weeks 4 days 15 hours ago) and read 764 times:

Obviously not! However I don't know in which direction I should move it. IMO it's quite centered, maybe a tiny bit too high in the frame. Please give some feedback!

http://www.airliners.net/procphotos/...20080229_Kastrup080219_008_JB1.jpg

5 replies: All unread, jump to last

Psych From United Kingdom, joined Nov 2004, 2968 posts, RR: 60
Reply 1, posted (5 years 2 months 3 weeks 4 days 15 hours ago) and read 759 times:

Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Joakim.

I think the screener felt the aircraft was slightly high in the frame. Was that the only rejection reason given? I ask because I see slight oversharpening of the cheat line and also quality issues in the fuselage - take a look in the blue area just above the engine - a bit like jpeg compression. Contrast is very tricky too in such lighting conditions.

All the best.

Paul

Derstatic From Sweden, joined Aug 2007, 49 posts, RR: 0
Reply 2, posted (5 years 2 months 3 weeks 4 days 13 hours ago) and read 728 times:

Yeah, centered was the only reason. The jpg compression is strange, because I shot this one raw, and worked it in photoshop.

Scotland1979 From United States of America, joined Feb 2005, 546 posts, RR: 13
Reply 3, posted (5 years 2 months 3 weeks 4 days 7 hours ago) and read 710 times:

Quoting Psych (Reply 1):
slight oversharpening of the cheat line

At what dpi are you using? 300? I did lower than 300 to reduce cheatline. Did you?

Jesus said "I am the Way and the Truth and the Life. No one comes to the Father except through Me" - John 14:6

Derstatic From Sweden, joined Aug 2007, 49 posts, RR: 0
Reply 4, posted (5 years 2 months 3 weeks 4 days 1 hour ago) and read 701 times:

Yeah I believe it's 300, I haven't actually found the number in Photoshop but I recall that 300 is default setting isn't that right? And I haven't changed the resolution.

Derstatic From Sweden, joined Aug 2007, 49 posts, RR: 0
Reply 5, posted (5 years 2 months 3 weeks 4 days ago) and read 695 times:

Continuing this thread. Had the second shot of my session rejected at second screening for contrast and level. Any ideas? Didn't know it had to be level when there's no horizon. The planes do land with a slight nose up angle obviously, which this photo shows. Can I do anything about the contrast stuff? Shot it raw. And does the level rejection make any sense when there's no horizon in the picture? IMO, it doesn't, naturally the horizon should be horisontal, it's in the nature of the wording, but this?!

http://www.airliners.net/procphotos/...20080301_Kastrup080219_007_JB3.jpg

Top Of Page

Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics: