Psych From United Kingdom, joined Nov 2004, 3048 posts, RR: 58
Reply 1, posted (6 years 4 months 3 weeks 6 days ago) and read 1192 times:
I think the screener felt the aircraft was slightly high in the frame. Was that the only rejection reason given? I ask because I see slight oversharpening of the cheat line and also quality issues in the fuselage - take a look in the blue area just above the engine - a bit like jpeg compression. Contrast is very tricky too in such lighting conditions.
Derstatic From Sweden, joined Aug 2007, 49 posts, RR: 0
Reply 5, posted (6 years 4 months 3 weeks 5 days 9 hours ago) and read 1128 times:
Continuing this thread. Had the second shot of my session rejected at second screening for contrast and level. Any ideas? Didn't know it had to be level when there's no horizon. The planes do land with a slight nose up angle obviously, which this photo shows. Can I do anything about the contrast stuff? Shot it raw. And does the level rejection make any sense when there's no horizon in the picture? IMO, it doesn't, naturally the horizon should be horisontal, it's in the nature of the wording, but this?!