Sponsor Message:
Aviation Photography Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Prescreen (Exposure)  
User currently offlineLHSebi From Germany, joined Jan 2004, 1049 posts, RR: 8
Posted (6 years 11 months 5 days 19 hours ago) and read 2198 times:

Hi all,

just a quick question to the screeners (or other knowledgeable people  Wink), how far does the exposure rejection reason go? Would the image below be considered overexposed?

Thanks!
Sebastian

Big version: Width: 1024 Height: 696 File size: 643kb



I guess that's what happens in the end, you start thinking about the beginning.
12 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineMAN23R From United Kingdom, joined Aug 2007, 256 posts, RR: 0
Reply 1, posted (6 years 11 months 5 days 17 hours ago) and read 2185 times:

good morning,

i personally think this photo is fine, might need abit of sharpening....

you might get motive as the A318 is not perpendicular to the camera.


just my 2 cent

scott


User currently offlineScx737 From United States of America, joined Feb 2008, 10 posts, RR: 0
Reply 2, posted (6 years 11 months 3 days 10 hours ago) and read 2140 times:

it looks fine  airplane 


josh williams suncountry fan
User currently offlineJeffM From United States of America, joined May 2005, 3266 posts, RR: 51
Reply 3, posted (6 years 11 months 3 days 6 hours ago) and read 2115 times:



Quoting MAN23R (Reply 1):
you might get motive as the A318 is not perpendicular to the camera.

??? What the ????


User currently offlineFly747 From Canada, joined Apr 2005, 1497 posts, RR: 9
Reply 4, posted (6 years 11 months 3 days 6 hours ago) and read 2114 times:

Looks acceptable to me.

Quoting MAN23R (Reply 1):
you might get motive as the A318 is not perpendicular to the camera.

Care to elaborate?

Ivan


User currently offlineSilver1SWA From United States of America, joined Mar 2004, 4873 posts, RR: 25
Reply 5, posted (6 years 11 months 3 days 6 hours ago) and read 2108 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!



Quoting MAN23R (Reply 1):
you might get motive as the A318 is not perpendicular to the camera.

Are you being facetious?



ALL views, opinions expressed are mine ONLY and are NOT representative of those shared by Southwest Airlines Co.
User currently offlineViv From Ireland, joined May 2005, 3142 posts, RR: 28
Reply 6, posted (6 years 11 months 2 days 23 hours ago) and read 2095 times:



Quoting MAN23R (Reply 1):
the A318 is not perpendicular to the camera.

What on earth???

Is your brain perpendicular to your wisdom teeth?



Nikon D700, Nikkor 80-400, Fuji X Pro 1, Fujinon 35 f/1.4, Fujinon 18 f/2
User currently offlineMAN23R From United Kingdom, joined Aug 2007, 256 posts, RR: 0
Reply 7, posted (6 years 11 months 2 days 18 hours ago) and read 2081 times:

just my perfectionist side coming through......  Wink

User currently offlineFlynavy From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 8, posted (6 years 11 months 2 days 18 hours ago) and read 2073 times:



Quoting MAN23R (Reply 7):
just my perfectionist side coming through...

 eyepopping  Keep that "side" bottled up. It might get you into trouble some day.

The OP's photo is fine.


User currently offlineJakTrax From United Kingdom, joined Jun 2005, 4936 posts, RR: 7
Reply 9, posted (6 years 11 months 2 days 17 hours ago) and read 2071 times:



Quoting MAN23R (Reply 1):
you might get motive as the A318 is not perpendicular to the camera.

Think he means it requires a touch of CCW rotation - look at the lightpoles in the back and they are leaning slightly. Odd way to word it though dude...

Other than that it looks fine to me. I'd have done a less tight crop myself but that's just personal preference.

Karl


User currently offlineLHSebi From Germany, joined Jan 2004, 1049 posts, RR: 8
Reply 10, posted (6 years 11 months 2 days 12 hours ago) and read 2052 times:

Thanks for the posts from everyone!

Quoting JakTrax (Reply 9):
Think he means it requires a touch of CCW rotation - look at the lightpoles in the back and they are leaning slightly.

Does anyone else agree? I used the closer poles by the A10 sign to level the image...

Thanks!



I guess that's what happens in the end, you start thinking about the beginning.
User currently offlineSulman From United States of America, joined Mar 2004, 2037 posts, RR: 31
Reply 11, posted (6 years 11 months 2 days 11 hours ago) and read 2044 times:

Nice light, I do think it's a tiny, tiny bit soft though. I'd be happy with it, but they like them pin sharp here...


james



It takes a big man to admit they are wrong, and I am not a big man.
User currently offlinePtrjong From Netherlands, joined Mar 2005, 4016 posts, RR: 18
Reply 12, posted (6 years 11 months 2 days 11 hours ago) and read 2038 times:

Quoting LHSebi (Reply 10):
Does anyone else agree?



Quoting JakTrax (Reply 9):
it requires a touch of CCW rotation - look at the lightpoles in the back and they are leaning slightly.

Yes I agree, everything seems to be leaning to the right.

Peter 

[Edited 2008-03-04 12:49:07]


The only difference between me and a madman is that I am not mad (Salvador Dali)
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Prescreen Advice Please posted Sun Feb 24 2008 09:54:37 by EMA747
Prescreen Advice Please posted Sun Feb 24 2008 06:21:29 by LHRjc
Prescreen Please posted Sun Feb 24 2008 03:28:07 by WithaK
Quick Prescreen posted Thu Feb 21 2008 20:02:47 by Jetmatt777
A C17 Prescreen... posted Thu Feb 21 2008 10:49:37 by Mictheslik
First Photos With New Lens - Opinions? (Prescreen) posted Wed Feb 20 2008 08:05:59 by JonathanJet
Upload Not Working? (and Prescreen) posted Tue Feb 19 2008 03:08:14 by LHSebi
Prescreen Advice posted Tue Feb 12 2008 17:43:37 by Bruin787
D-ACSC Ex TC-OGN-- Prescreen Please posted Sat Feb 9 2008 12:50:18 by Johnsiebert
Prescreen For Motive? posted Thu Feb 7 2008 16:17:46 by Sovietjet