Sponsor Message:
Aviation Photography Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Your Comments On This Rejection Please  
User currently offlineEDIpic From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Posted (12 years 11 months 2 weeks 6 days 5 hours ago) and read 3209 times:

I don't bother with rejections much nowadays, but would I like to hear your comments on this one. What is wrong with it that causes "J" to state this a low "image quality". I'll rework and upload it again if you can identify the flaw.

http://www.airliners.net/procphotos/rejphoto.main?filename=g-ezjh-1-edi-31-10-2001-p1.jpg

Thanks

Gerry/EDI

7 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineJwenting From Netherlands, joined Apr 2001, 10213 posts, RR: 19
Reply 1, posted (12 years 11 months 2 weeks 6 days 5 hours ago) and read 3183 times:

Can't put my finger on anything in particular, but it looks somehow weird.
Maybe it is TOO bright, because the boundaries between the white and orange on the fuselage and tail almost seem to shimmer (rendering the impression of being blurry).
The outline of the tail also looks blurry.
Try reducing brightness a tad, maybe that will help.



I wish I were flying
User currently offlineSukhoi From Sweden, joined May 2006, 373 posts, RR: 8
Reply 2, posted (12 years 11 months 2 weeks 6 days 5 hours ago) and read 3177 times:

Gerry,

Could be my eyes after looking through Peter's selection but the tail and engine titles look a little soft?? It just doesnt look as sharp as your normal shots.

Maybe i need glasses  Wink/being sarcastic

Cheers

Paul


User currently offlineKingWide From United Kingdom, joined Aug 2001, 838 posts, RR: 19
Reply 3, posted (12 years 11 months 2 weeks 6 days 4 hours ago) and read 3165 times:

If I didn't know better I'd say this was overly compressed. None of the edges around the orange lettering are clearly defined at all.

J



Jason Taperell - AirTeamImages
User currently offlineIl76 From Netherlands, joined Jan 2004, 2237 posts, RR: 48
Reply 4, posted (12 years 11 months 2 weeks 6 days 4 hours ago) and read 3160 times:

it looks fine by me...
There are much crappier pictures that actually make it to a.net, and good ones that get rejected. Don't ask me why...


User currently offlineDa fwog From United Kingdom, joined Aug 1999, 867 posts, RR: 8
Reply 5, posted (12 years 11 months 2 weeks 6 days 4 hours ago) and read 3162 times:

The colours don't look quite natural - the whole thing seems a little too bright, and the engine and tail definitely seem TOO orange! Too much colour saturation maybe?

Things aren't as sharp as they should be either - the lettering all looks soft - this can often be caused by the contrast of an image being too high, rather than the original being out of focus or blurred through camera shake.

I think the answer is probably a pic that's not so bright, maybe slightly less contrast or saturation of the colours. Whether or not you can effectively fix this depends on the original - in my experience it's much more difficult to fix a pic suffering from overexposure or too much contrast than it is to fix one that needs the contrast boosting.


User currently offlineEDIpic From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 6, posted (12 years 11 months 2 weeks 6 days 4 hours ago) and read 3151 times:

Thanks for all your comments. Yes, I agree that this is a wierd one.
The template .tif version I've kept on my PC looks much better than the this example.
Obviously, the a.net compression is killing the shot too.
The uncompressed shot I uploaded @ 600k jpeg.
This was actually my second attempt with even "more" sharpening than before.

I have to agree too that the saturation is a bit high, now that you've pointed it out. My eyes can't seem to cope with it...and Chris's assertion of too much contrast? Maybe caused by my application of auto-balance (I think)...

I've taken quite a few sundown shots lately with variable results.
Now that I've got a handle on it, I might have one more go on the original.
If not, it's going into the bin....(do I look like a worried man?)

Cheers

Gerry/EDI


User currently offlineEDIpic From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 7, posted (12 years 11 months 2 weeks 6 days 2 hours ago) and read 3127 times:

Looking at all the other "rejection" threads today, it looks like "J" has been having a cull  Wink/being sarcastic  Wink/being sarcastic  Wink/being sarcastic

Gerry/EDI


Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Your Thought On This Rejection... posted Wed Aug 16 2006 02:49:33 by Globalpics
Your Opinions On This Shot Please? posted Sun Aug 7 2005 11:46:45 by Cxsjr
Your Opinion On This Photo Please :) posted Tue Jul 12 2005 17:41:33 by MartinairYYZ
Your Opinion On This Photo Please. posted Mon Mar 14 2005 18:36:19 by B076
Interested In Your Views On This Rejection posted Wed Feb 23 2005 08:14:07 by Psych
Comments On This Badmotiv Please posted Mon May 10 2004 20:52:20 by Codeshare
Need Your Advice On This Rejection! posted Mon Dec 31 2001 12:25:09 by Finnair MD-11
Your Comments On This Photo? posted Wed Aug 15 2001 01:17:52 by CYKA
Some Comments On This Second Rejection Please. posted Thu Mar 16 2006 12:40:11 by BrianW999
Your Thoughts On This Motive Rejection? posted Sun Aug 6 2006 08:29:49 by Futterman