Sponsor Message:
Aviation Photography Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
I'M Totally Confused!  
User currently offlineFinnair MD-11 From Finland, joined Dec 1999, 158 posts, RR: 1
Posted (12 years 11 months 3 weeks 1 day 4 hours ago) and read 1222 times:

Hi there!

Please tell me what is wrong with these photos!!!!!
http://www.airliners.net/procphotos/rejphoto.main?filename=OY-MMM.jpg
http://www.airliners.net/procphotos/rejphoto.main?filename=KF.jpg
http://www.airliners.net/procphotos/rejphoto.main?filename=eyetoeye.jpg
http://www.airliners.net/procphotos/rejphoto.main?filename=EFHK.jpg
http://www.airliners.net/procphotos/rejphoto.main?filename=OH-SAH_5.jpg
http://www.airliners.net/procphotos/rejphoto.main?filename=OH-SAH_1.jpg
http://www.airliners.net/procphotos/rejphoto.main?filename=OH-SAH_2.jpg
http://www.airliners.net/procphotos/rejphoto.main?filename=LN-RDJ.jpg
http://www.airliners.net/procphotos/rejphoto.main?filename=HB-IGH_3.jpg
http://www.airliners.net/procphotos/rejphoto.main?filename=D-CPRU.jpg
http://www.airliners.net/procphotos/rejphoto.main?filename=D-ACPA_1.jpg
http://www.airliners.net/procphotos/rejphoto.main?filename=D-ACPA_3.jpg

The reason for the rejections was low image quality!
The funniest thing was that my friend uploaded the same kind of photos and they looked same as my photos and his photos were accepted WITHOUT warnings!!!! And also I uploaded one photo a while ago and Johan rejected it, but I wanted to try again without correcting the photo and it was accepted by the Screeners. I uploaded 34 photos and 3 were accepted with warnings... Have I made Johan angry or what is the reason??????? - I REALLY DON'T KNOW!!


Finnair MD-11





MD-11
3 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineLGW From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 1, posted (12 years 11 months 3 weeks 1 day 3 hours ago) and read 1191 times:

I had a lot of rejections this time as have many people. Johan seemes to be being ruthless at the mo!

I really like some of the shots, I think you where unlucky

LGW



User currently offlineLGB Photos From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 2, posted (12 years 11 months 3 weeks 1 day 3 hours ago) and read 1183 times:

Try sending them again is what I say! Sooner or later they will be accepted. I like all the photos.

Stephen


User currently offlineDa fwog From United Kingdom, joined Aug 1999, 867 posts, RR: 8
Reply 3, posted (12 years 11 months 3 weeks 1 day 2 hours ago) and read 1175 times:

Some of the pics are ok, and seem to be hasrh rejections, but I'm sorry to say that I think most are justified. My opinions:

1. (Maersk) Harsh. On another day it might well get in.
2. A bit dark and blurry (especially at the lefthand edge)
3. I don't think this is really sharp enough. The focus of this shot is the nose of the 737, and that's a bit on the soft side. The light is also rather poor. This is probably a borderline case that didn't quite make it.
4. Nice idea - but there's probably a little too much contrast, and not enough detail in the aircraft themselves. In other words, the aircraft look a little overexposed and washed out, while the foreground of the shot is rather dark.
5. Too blurry and dark.
6. Not enough depth of field. Plus, the overhead panel is a little boring by itself.
7. Low depth of field - and in fact, no area of this pic seems really sharp. But even if the main panel was sharp, the out of focus area at the top would distract.
8. A better shot, but look at what you have: the eye is instantly drawn to the area at the top where the light is brightest, and this is the area out of focus. Spoils the pic, rather.
9. (Swissair) Sorry - not a good shot. Poor light, not sharp - a definite rejection, no question.
10. (D-CPRU) See 1. This one is worth another try.
11. Not bad at all, but the out-of-focus area again spoils the shot. How about cropping it out?
12. Same again, except this time the panels are slightly blurry.

I hope you don't mind the criticisms too much. I think it is more useful to have someone say why they think your shots don't make the grade, rather than people just encouraging you to submit them all again. Some should probably have got in (1, 10, 11), but I think most were reasonably rejected.

Chris.


Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
"Double" Rejections - Confused! posted Mon Jan 2 2006 00:12:51 by Norfolkjohn
So... I'm A Bit Confused... posted Tue Nov 29 2005 05:02:50 by Eadster
Confused About TC's For Canon posted Sun Oct 2 2005 04:16:46 by WakeTurbulence
My 100-400 Is Totally Screwed Again! posted Mon Aug 29 2005 10:01:29 by Jkw777
Confused By NOA_size Rejection - Advice Please posted Fri Aug 26 2005 21:52:29 by Norfolkjohn
Confused When Levelling posted Thu Aug 11 2005 00:55:38 by AirKas1
Queue Percentage (im Confused) posted Thu Aug 11 2005 00:05:17 by LHRSIMON
Confused On A Rejection And Appeal. posted Sat Jul 30 2005 22:53:31 by Fiveholer
Confused As To What Reg To Use posted Fri Jul 8 2005 20:24:13 by GPHOTO
Sobering Experience And Completely Confused posted Fri Jul 1 2005 15:51:16 by DLKAPA