Sponsor Message:
Aviation Photography Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Final Approach Pictures  
User currently offlineThom@s From Norway, joined Oct 2000, 11951 posts, RR: 47
Posted (12 years 8 months 6 days 7 hours ago) and read 2573 times:

Hi.

Just wondering, is it better to take pictures of aircrafts on final approach like this:

http://www1.airpics.com/avimg/big/15549.jpg

....like this:

http://www1.airpics.com/avimg/big/15548.jpg

....or seen completely from the side, like this:


Click for large version
Click here for full size photo!

Photo © Arthur Yu



I'm asking this question because i wanted to find out if the angle on final approach makes a big deal when uploaded to airliners.net. (In other words a pic won't get added because of the angle.)

Should I rather take pictures like the last example to have a better chance of getting them added?

Just curious

Thom@s


"If guns don't kill people, people kill people - does that mean toasters don't toast toast, toast toast toast?"
13 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineMirage From Portugal, joined May 1999, 3122 posts, RR: 14
Reply 1, posted (12 years 8 months 6 days 7 hours ago) and read 2510 times:

In my opinion, you should take pictures in the way YOU like. If you're taking pictures to satisfy other people likes I'm afraid you're loosing something.

Luis


User currently offlineJderden777 From United States of America, joined Jan 2000, 1754 posts, RR: 29
Reply 2, posted (12 years 8 months 6 days 7 hours ago) and read 2507 times:

Thom@s,
I would go with either the first of the last kind...the front 3/4 angle looks awesome..i just love it...check out some of Colin K. Work's new approach shots...absolutely incredible!!! fantastic work Colin!  Big thumbs up


Click for large version
Click here for full size photo!

Photo © Colin K. Work



Click for large version
Click here for full size photo!

Photo © Colin K. Work



i personally prefer the front 3/4 angle over the side-on approach shot...but it also depends on the scenery..i like a side-on approach shot with some nice scenery...wish i could find a good example...same with takeoff shots...

jonathan d.



"my soul is in the sky" - shakespeare
User currently offlineJderden777 From United States of America, joined Jan 2000, 1754 posts, RR: 29
Reply 3, posted (12 years 8 months 6 days 7 hours ago) and read 2500 times:

Thom@s,
I agree with Luis...you should take the pictures you want...and according to your own tastes and desires...the pictures above and my comments are just tailored to my tastes...no pressure on you to take those kinds of pics though...

jonathan d.



"my soul is in the sky" - shakespeare
User currently offlineCfalk From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 4, posted (12 years 8 months 6 days 7 hours ago) and read 2502 times:

Johan has made it clear in the past that he does not particularly like the rear 3/4 view. I would keep to front quarter or side views unless there is a particular reason to show the rear quarter.

Charles


User currently offlineEGGD From United Kingdom, joined Feb 2001, 12443 posts, RR: 35
Reply 5, posted (12 years 8 months 6 days 6 hours ago) and read 2469 times:

I agree with Luis and Johnathan, i'd hate to just take pictures of aircraft side on as they approach, so every time i go to the airport i try something completely stupid and different, in terrible conditions and with the camera settings all wrong, just in the off chance something my click and it will come out as a great picture.

If you have a decent camera like a Canon D30, Nikon D1X or Fuji S1 then you can do this on a regular basis.

I think this would be really cool to try (looking for somewhere that do rentals  Smile Big grin :P

I have seen some websites that do 35mm SLR rentals, but not digital  Sad

Regards

Dan


User currently offlineCkw From UK - England, joined Aug 2010, 730 posts, RR: 16
Reply 6, posted (12 years 8 months 6 days 3 hours ago) and read 2422 times:

Thanks for the mention Jonathan! As far as I'm concerned, both types of shots have validity. In fact in the examples shown, these were taken at 400mm as the aircraft came towards me - once I got that shot I switched cameras and took a standard profile. After processing the films, almost without exception I found the 3/4 approach much more interesting, so in most cases chose to upload those instead of the profile. Personally, I get a real buzz as the approaching aircraft looms ever larger in the viewfinder, and I hope the final results convey a little of that excitement.

Cheers,

Colin



Colin K. Work, Pixstel
User currently offlineAviasian From Singapore, joined Jan 2001, 1485 posts, RR: 15
Reply 7, posted (12 years 8 months 5 days 21 hours ago) and read 2393 times:

Hi all,

I was interested in Charles Falk's comments about 3/4 rear shots.

Some airliners - such as the widebodied TriJets are rather beautiful from the 3/4 rear! There are also many instances when liveries are better appreciated from this angle.

Two recent examples of 3/4 rear shots I have uploaded to Airliners.net include:

Biman Bangladesh Airlines DC-10-30 in Canadian hybrid livery


Click for large version
Click here for full size photo!

Photo © Kok Chwee SIM




Euro Atlantic Airways L-1011-500 CS-TEB


Click for large version
Click here for full size photo!

Photo © Kok Chwee SIM




and British Airways B747-436 with DREAMFLIGHT titles


Click for large version
Click here for full size photo!

Photo © Kok Chwee SIM




KC Sim
Bangkok



User currently offlineThom@s From Norway, joined Oct 2000, 11951 posts, RR: 47
Reply 8, posted (12 years 8 months 5 days 16 hours ago) and read 2352 times:

Thanks for all the replies.

Those shots by colin there is something I can only dream of copying, besides I only have a 100mm lense.

Anyway, I noticed how the pics I added in my first post here were with white background, compared to colins with blue. It's obvious that weather plays an important role in shots like these.

So, I shouldn't start taking just sideways pictures then, but if I do like you EGGD and try to be creative, it turns out a mess, and nothing gets added anyway.  Smile

I will stop taking the 3/4 shots, though I though they looked fine.  Smile

But, I noticed how easy it is to end up "underneath" the aircraft when trying to get close enough, and I suppose pics taken underneath planes is of no intrest to a.net.

Hmmmm, I've got some planning to do before I go spotting again. Better cook up a nice strategy.  Smile

Thanks again everyone.  Big thumbs up

Thom@s



"If guns don't kill people, people kill people - does that mean toasters don't toast toast, toast toast toast?"
User currently offlineJwenting From Netherlands, joined Apr 2001, 10213 posts, RR: 19
Reply 9, posted (12 years 8 months 5 days 14 hours ago) and read 2327 times:

Having some background is nice, as it adds location (and indication of the altitude).

Click for large version
Click here for full size photo!

Photo © J.T. Wenting



Click for large version
Click here for full size photo!

Photo © J.T. Wenting

also adds a sense of speed when panning.
These shots have the aircraft over the runway seconds before touchdown.



I wish I were flying
User currently offlineCfalk From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 10, posted (12 years 8 months 5 days 13 hours ago) and read 2323 times:

Nice shot on the Iberia, J.T., you remember what speed you used?

Charles


User currently offlineThom@s From Norway, joined Oct 2000, 11951 posts, RR: 47
Reply 11, posted (12 years 8 months 5 days 13 hours ago) and read 2317 times:

I find panning difficult. Sure I manage to make the background look blurry, but the aircraft doesn't look much better.  Smile

Thom@s



"If guns don't kill people, people kill people - does that mean toasters don't toast toast, toast toast toast?"
User currently offlineChris28_17 From United States of America, joined Jul 2000, 1439 posts, RR: 10
Reply 12, posted (12 years 8 months 5 days 12 hours ago) and read 2307 times:

Whoa... just wanted to say, that IB shot is great!!!


Click for large version
Click here for full size photo!

Photo © J.T. Wenting



that is bad ass!



C


User currently offlineJwenting From Netherlands, joined Apr 2001, 10213 posts, RR: 19
Reply 13, posted (12 years 8 months 5 days 12 hours ago) and read 2304 times:

Thanks. One of my favourites as well (and cost enough film to get right  Wink/being sarcastic )  Big thumbs up


I wish I were flying
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Night Final Approach Shot - Keep Or Withdraw? posted Sat Jun 17 2006 06:44:01 by ElpinDAB
Best Final Approach Shots! posted Tue Feb 3 2004 21:44:19 by Usnseallt82
Hey What A Wild Final Approach. posted Sun Nov 25 2001 01:55:08 by Alaskaairlines
Your Top 3 Final Approach Pictures On A.net posted Tue Aug 14 2001 16:36:38 by Thom@s
IAH Pictures On Approach - With Approach Lights posted Mon May 14 2001 22:42:51 by Airbus380
Sunset/night Pictures At SCL posted Tue Dec 5 2006 20:00:03 by Acontador
Your Opinion On These Sunset Pictures posted Thu Nov 30 2006 17:08:22 by Acontador
Are This Pictures Really Bad Quality? posted Tue Nov 28 2006 04:27:29 by XAAPB
Bright Red Sunset Pictures - For Real? posted Sat Nov 25 2006 19:49:53 by PPVRA
Please Your Opinion On These Pictures posted Sat Nov 18 2006 14:23:26 by Acontador