Would Accept This Pic On A.net...? — Aviation Photography Forum

Sponsor Message:


My Starred Topics \| Profile \| New Topic \| Forum Index \| Help \| Search

Would Accept This Pic On A.net...?

Did From France, joined Aug 2005, 2 posts, RR: 0
Posted (4 years 10 months 5 days 19 hours ago) and read 1916 times:

Hi every body,
Is any (good) reason why this picture was rejected for airliners.net..? i'dont understand what's really wrong (sometimes i'do..; ;<) ). Tanks for help. Did

http://www.flickr.com/photos/9302672@N08/2695874179/

10 replies: All unread, jump to last

TransIsland From Bahamas, joined Mar 2004, 2031 posts, RR: 11
Reply 1, posted (4 years 10 months 5 days 19 hours ago) and read 1902 times:

Well, it's kinda hard to tell from the small flickr image... how about posting the actual rejected file that you uploaded to a.net.

At first glance though, the highlights look blown out.

I'm an aviation expert. I have Sky Juice for breakfast.

NIKV69 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 2, posted (4 years 10 months 5 days 2 hours ago) and read 1781 times:

Nice subject! Would have to see the original though. Can you post it?

Granite From UK - Scotland, joined May 1999, 5542 posts, RR: 67
Reply 3, posted (4 years 10 months 5 days 2 hours ago) and read 1778 times:

AIRLINERS.NET CREW
HEAD SCREENER

Hello

Yes, need to tell us why it was rejected also.

Small image looks good but you need to show/tell us more.

Regards

Gary

Scotland1979 From United States of America, joined Feb 2005, 546 posts, RR: 13
Reply 4, posted (4 years 10 months 5 days ago) and read 1732 times:

Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting TransIsland (Reply 1):
hard to tell from the small flickr image

Need larger photo so we can tell from there

Jesus said "I am the Way and the Truth and the Life. No one comes to the Father except through Me" - John 14:6

Did From France, joined Aug 2005, 2 posts, RR: 0
Reply 5, posted (4 years 10 months 4 days 19 hours ago) and read 1677 times:

Hi,
Here is the original pictures that was rejected (any size problem...?)
i'dont see...
thanks for your comments :

http://www.airliners.net/procphotos/...main?filename=20080723_bucker2.jpg

NIKV69 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 6, posted (4 years 10 months 4 days 18 hours ago) and read 1673 times:

Yes 1024 by 780 is too big, try using 1024 by 683 would look better.

StealthZ From Australia, joined Feb 2005, 5433 posts, RR: 49
Reply 7, posted (4 years 10 months 4 days 17 hours ago) and read 1658 times:

Quoting NIKV69 (Reply 6):
Yes 1024 by 780 is too big

Well, no it isn't 4:3 aspect ratio is perfectly acceptable here, Agree it might look better at a 3:2 crop.(a personal & subjective opinion)

Might be an info rejection as location is clearly NOT "In Flight"... the dreaded "Level" reject might be a possibility as well

Nice Pic though,

Cheers

Chris

If your camera sends text messages, that could explain why your photos are rubbish!

Bubbles From Canada, joined Apr 2005, 1193 posts, RR: 52
Reply 8, posted (4 years 10 months 4 days 17 hours ago) and read 1653 times:

Quoting StealthZ (Reply 7):
Might be an info rejection as location is clearly NOT "In Flight"

And other info also has problems.

Quoting StealthZ (Reply 7):
"Level" reject might be a possibility

Yes, clockwise rotation is needed.

_Hongyin_

Jonny From United States of America, joined Dec 2007, 45 posts, RR: 0
Reply 9, posted (4 years 10 months 4 days 16 hours ago) and read 1629 times:

Well, the photo isn't level for one thing. I happen to think that there is too much sharpening around the tail area. A somewhat clockwise rotation is needed, just as Bubbles has mentioned.
I also agree with size ratios.

It might have some info problems since it is not very what I call "today's edge". What I mean is it is an old aircraft meaning there might be some info problems.

Hope this helps!

Jonny

Qswags From United States of America, joined Feb 2006, 3 posts, RR: 0
Reply 10, posted (4 years 10 months 4 days 12 hours ago) and read 1596 times:

Looking at the edges that outline the plane it might be rejected for 'soft'. I have had some pictures that were rejected for that reason and they looked as sharp as the edges you have here. I would have to agree that the tail does look a little bit oversharpened since you can see jaggies on the x. If you have Photoshop some time should be invested in careful sharpening. Great picture otherwise.

Quentin

"I think your problem is low self-esteem, that's a common problem with losers."

Top Of Page

Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics: