Sponsor Message:
Aviation Photography Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Rejection--again  
User currently offlineC133 From United States of America, joined Jan 2005, 225 posts, RR: 0
Posted (5 years 11 months 3 weeks 13 hours ago) and read 2765 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Hey guys, I'm having a hard time swallowing this one, rejected for Quality grainy. Maybe I need to upgrade my eyes. Any comments appreciated. Oh, and I realize the airplane is 'common', but the tail number wasn't in the database when I uploaded.

http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/rejections/big/20080722_N909WNlax080701tw.jpg


Fine: Tax for doing wrong. Tax: Fine for doing well.
11 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineTupolevTu154 From Germany, joined Aug 2004, 2178 posts, RR: 28
Reply 1, posted (5 years 11 months 3 weeks 13 hours ago) and read 2759 times:

Nice photograph, but it is indeed very grainy. Did you use a high ISO?

Tom Big grin



Atheists - Winning since 33 A.D.
User currently offlineFly747 From Canada, joined Apr 2005, 1497 posts, RR: 9
Reply 2, posted (5 years 11 months 3 weeks 13 hours ago) and read 2749 times:

Very grainy and too saturated as well,

Ivan



Contrails Aviation Photography
User currently offlineC133 From United States of America, joined Jan 2005, 225 posts, RR: 0
Reply 3, posted (5 years 11 months 3 weeks 1 hour ago) and read 2688 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Very grainy. Wow. Okay, it's very grainy if you say so, but it's grainy at 200 ISO on a D3. I only wish I could see it, and thanks for the replies.


Fine: Tax for doing wrong. Tax: Fine for doing well.
User currently offlineUA935 From United Kingdom, joined Feb 2004, 610 posts, RR: 6
Reply 4, posted (5 years 11 months 3 weeks ago) and read 2670 times:

The lower fuselage is very, very grainy.


Live every second like you mean it
User currently offlinePaulinbna From United States of America, joined Feb 2003, 1114 posts, RR: 5
Reply 5, posted (5 years 11 months 3 weeks ago) and read 2669 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!



Quoting UA935 (Reply 4):
The lower fuselage is very, very grainy.

Along with the blue part of the nose.



Canon 50D user; 100-400 MM L IS 10-22 MM, 60MM Macro
User currently offlineFly747 From Canada, joined Apr 2005, 1497 posts, RR: 9
Reply 6, posted (5 years 11 months 2 weeks 6 days 18 hours ago) and read 2642 times:



Quoting C133 (Reply 3):
Very grainy. Wow. Okay, it's very grainy if you say so, but it's grainy at 200 ISO on a D3. I only wish I could see it, and thanks for the replies.

I don't just say so, compare it with this picture and judge for yourself  Wink

Ivan
View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Ben Wang




Contrails Aviation Photography
User currently offlineFYODOR From Russia, joined May 2005, 658 posts, RR: 15
Reply 7, posted (5 years 11 months 2 weeks 6 days 17 hours ago) and read 2635 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Problem might can be solved if you'll use NeatImage program to reduce the noise. But you have start to work with your image from the beginning then.

Regards,

Fyodor


User currently offlineCodeshare From Poland, joined Sep 2002, 1854 posts, RR: 1
Reply 8, posted (5 years 11 months 2 weeks 6 days 17 hours ago) and read 2629 times:



Quoting C133 (Reply 3):
Very grainy. Wow. Okay, it's very grainy if you say so, but it's grainy at 200 ISO on a D3. I only wish I could see it, and thanks for the replies.

The photo is from a D3? You have to be joking. Looks to me like something wrong with post-processing.

KS/codeshare



How much A is there is Airliners Net ? 0 or nothing ?
User currently offlineC133 From United States of America, joined Jan 2005, 225 posts, RR: 0
Reply 9, posted (5 years 11 months 2 weeks 6 days 17 hours ago) and read 2624 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Time to go back to square one and see what I'M doing wrong....


Fine: Tax for doing wrong. Tax: Fine for doing well.
User currently offlineBubbles From Canada, joined Apr 2005, 1193 posts, RR: 51
Reply 10, posted (5 years 11 months 2 weeks 6 days 16 hours ago) and read 2621 times:



Quoting UA935 (Reply 4):
The lower fuselage is very, very grainy.

 checkmark 

And also under wing area. In short, the shadow area is very grainy.

_Hongyin_


User currently offlineC133 From United States of America, joined Jan 2005, 225 posts, RR: 0
Reply 11, posted (5 years 11 months 2 weeks 6 days 12 hours ago) and read 2603 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Thanks for all the comments--I need to sharpen my eyes ans well as procedures. There's no excuse for grain on that picture. Jid has a step for edge sharpening in his sample workflow and I need to give that a try. I CAN produce acceptable images, I know I can, but nobody said it would be easy.......


Fine: Tax for doing wrong. Tax: Fine for doing well.
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Rejection Help Again Please! posted Tue Jan 1 2008 22:32:11 by Mnazarinia
Again, Help For Level Rejection. posted Wed Dec 5 2007 03:08:00 by Paparadzi
Rejection Help Requested (again) posted Tue Aug 22 2006 13:41:08 by DerekF
Rejection Help... Again posted Mon Aug 14 2006 00:55:51 by Eadster
Rejection Help....Again posted Tue May 9 2006 07:04:59 by TWAMD-80
Blurry Rejection Help Please (again) posted Wed Mar 15 2006 20:57:37 by Kukkudrill
Rejection Help...again! posted Tue Nov 15 2005 09:41:58 by Pumaknight
Rejection Advice (again) posted Fri Feb 18 2005 08:47:17 by Scbriml
Rejection Help (again). posted Mon Feb 14 2005 10:49:06 by Pepef
Rejection Help Needed Again posted Fri Oct 1 2004 23:20:59 by Derekf