Sponsor Message:
Aviation Photography Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
3 Rejections That I Can't Understand  
User currently offlineCarlos From Germany, joined Feb 2006, 225 posts, RR: 1
Posted (5 years 11 months 6 days 8 hours ago) and read 3133 times:

Hi All,

today I got three rejections that I don't understand:

1:

http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/r...tions/big/20080811_D-AKNT_0405.jpg

2.

http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/r...tions/big/20080811_D-AKNF_0405.jpg

3:

http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/b...dy/APPEAL_20080811_G-EUPY_0405.jpg

I don't write the reason for the rejection. What do you think about these pictures? Are they really so bad that one has to reject them?

I'm very upset about some harsh screening decisions in the last days and I am thinking about stopping uploading photos to A-Net (as most of the people in Munich already did).

Thanks for your help and for your comments.
Klaus

15 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineWithaK From Australia, joined Apr 2007, 255 posts, RR: 0
Reply 1, posted (5 years 11 months 6 days 8 hours ago) and read 3127 times:

What were the rejection reasons? Am I right in saying they were rejected for "oversharpened?"

Kris


User currently offlineCarlos From Germany, joined Feb 2006, 225 posts, RR: 1
Reply 2, posted (5 years 11 months 6 days 8 hours ago) and read 3117 times:

Hi Kris,

no, that was the rason for not writing the reasons.

1: soft, quality, level
2: soft, level
3: contrast, soft

What are you thinking about?


User currently offlineGamzo From Poland, joined Aug 2008, 13 posts, RR: 0
Reply 3, posted (5 years 11 months 6 days 8 hours ago) and read 3116 times:

If THAT photos are rejected, I can pack my toys ...

User currently offlineNIKV69 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 4, posted (5 years 11 months 6 days 7 hours ago) and read 3093 times:

All are a little soft. A little off level and if I am not mistaken a little low in the frame. The capture seems fine just needs a little better edit. Not the end of the world.

User currently offlineJid From Barbados, joined Dec 2004, 972 posts, RR: 32
Reply 5, posted (5 years 11 months 6 days 7 hours ago) and read 3093 times:

Hi Klaus,

All your shots are dark and soft. Nothing that can not be fixed in processing. A quick play with one of your shots should show what you are aiming for. Of course it is always best to re-work your image right from the start.
http://www.airliners.net/uf/536886657/phpxVSGm6.jpg

Good luck .. Jid



G7EPN is back after 15 years! Operating all Bands 80mtrs -> 70cms QRZ DX
User currently offlineCarlos From Germany, joined Feb 2006, 225 posts, RR: 1
Reply 6, posted (5 years 11 months 6 days 7 hours ago) and read 3088 times:

Thats right, not the end of the world. But as you see. Kris thought that the pictures were oversharpened and you think they are too soft. Believe me, all pictures are level because I know the photopoint very good. The middle of all pictures is the window row so all pictures are centered. The effort to edit pictures for A-Net is too high for me now.

User currently offlineAcontador From Chile, joined Jul 2005, 1421 posts, RR: 30
Reply 7, posted (5 years 11 months 6 days 7 hours ago) and read 3081 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
PHOTO SCREENER

Hi Klaus,

I haven't seen your pics before, but let me please try to give you my impression:
- D-AKNT: Looks a bit soft to me, in particular tail and in the shadows below the wing. It also looks like it would benefit from some small CCW (verticals on the right side look a bit leaning). The engine cowling looks a bit oversharpened.
- D-AKNF: Here both extremes (tail and nose) are definitely soft, and there's an overall milky look to the picture, that is it needs a kick more contrast. Again, it would benefit from some small CCW (verticals on the right side look a bit leaning).
- G-EUPY: I see you have appealed this one, but here the contrast is very off, just have a look at the supposedly white upper surface, it's not really white. Overall the look is flat and dark, and if you have a look at the titles you may see also it needs an extra kick of sharpening.

Now, I hope you don't feel so upset any more, and maybe you can have a second more critical look at your pictures and try to see if what I am indicating looks the same to you (or not). Afterwards, you may choose to appeal, or alternatively improve the pictures and reupload.

Hope it helps, and please keep'em coming  Smile !



Just sit back, relax and have a glass of Merlot...enjoy your life!
User currently offlineWithaK From Australia, joined Apr 2007, 255 posts, RR: 0
Reply 8, posted (5 years 11 months 6 days 7 hours ago) and read 3080 times:



Quoting Carlos (Reply 2):
What are you thinking about?

Curse of the laptop monitor I guess. The writing and reg on the first shot looks like there's jaggies but as I just mentioned I am on the laptop. Sorry if I've confused you even more.

Cheers

Kris


User currently offlineG7KES From United Kingdom, joined Aug 2005, 6 posts, RR: 0
Reply 9, posted (5 years 11 months 3 hours ago) and read 2864 times:

I'm in the same position. Everything I upload is rejected. Here's the latest:

http://www.airliners.net/procphotos/...ilename=20080817_G7KES-B717MAD.jpg

They site several reasons, and after carefully looking at the picture again, none of them make sense.

They complain about the quality, but then put a limit of 1MB on the size - what do you expect? The photo was taken at 8MP, but of course then has to be sub-sampled to be accepted byAirliners.net. They say that I've used too much compression, but they want 1600 pixel wide images, in 1MB. How?

They complain about the colours - I can't see a problem with the colours.

And finally they say the image is "soft", which it doesn't seem to me. I'd be iinterested if people think I can use GIMP to modify this pic so that it might actually make it through the quality control procedure.

Best Regards,

Paul
~~~~~


User currently offlineTransIsland From Bahamas, joined Mar 2004, 2041 posts, RR: 9
Reply 10, posted (5 years 11 months 3 hours ago) and read 2854 times:



Quoting G7KES (Reply 9):
I'd be iinterested if people think I can use GIMP to modify this pic so that it might actually make it through the quality control procedure.

On this one? I doubt it. All rejection reasons you mentioned apply, and then some...

Besides, nobody insists on 1600 pixels. If you took a few minutes to look at photos that are accepted (several hundred each day), you will see that the most common size is 1024 pixels wide.



I'm an aviation expert. I have Sky Juice for breakfast.
User currently offlineNIKV69 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 11, posted (5 years 11 months 3 hours ago) and read 2850 times:



Quoting TransIsland (Reply 10):
On this one? I doubt it. All rejection reasons you mentioned apply, and then some...

Yes, horrid light and motive and size as well.

Quoting G7KES (Reply 9):
And finally they say the image is "soft", which it doesn't seem to me. I'd be iinterested if people think I can use GIMP to modify this pic so that it might actually make it through the quality control procedure.

Unfortunatley not, the poor lighting and the fact the viewer is drawn to the person blocking the gear and bus kill it.


User currently offlineWhappeh From United States of America, joined Mar 2006, 1562 posts, RR: 2
Reply 12, posted (5 years 11 months 3 hours ago) and read 2848 times:



Quoting TransIsland (Reply 10):
Besides, nobody insists on 1600 pixels. If you took a few minutes to look at photos that are accepted (several hundred each day), you will see that the most common size is 1024 pixels wide.

Very true. I can't even think of a situation in which I've been shooting of a photo I've taken yet that would even come close to being acceptable at 1600 pixels.



-Travel now, journey infinitely.
User currently offlineG7KES From United Kingdom, joined Aug 2005, 6 posts, RR: 0
Reply 13, posted (5 years 11 months 2 hours ago) and read 2842 times:



Quoting TransIsland (Reply 10):
Besides, nobody insists on 1600 pixels. If you took a few minutes to look at photos that are accepted (several hundred each day), you will see that the most common size is 1024 pixels wide.

Thanks for that - I must have read the instructions incorrectly. I had a seperate reply on another thread (after I'd run the image through GIMP's sharpen) saying that the image sufferred because it was taken behind glass, so thats another lesson, I guess.

I should have come on the forums with my helicopter pictures (one taken from the deck of a ship) that weren't behind glass, and got some guidance for them. But it sounds like this one is definately not wanted.

Thanks!

Paul
~~~~


User currently offlinePaulinbna From United States of America, joined Feb 2003, 1114 posts, RR: 5
Reply 14, posted (5 years 10 months 4 weeks 1 day 20 hours ago) and read 2808 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Big version: Width: 1024 Height: 687 File size: 739kb


This is a very fast edit, it is a lot better. Just try to take the image with the sun shinning on the side you are and not through glass.



Canon 50D user; 100-400 MM L IS 10-22 MM, 60MM Macro
User currently offlineG7KES From United Kingdom, joined Aug 2005, 6 posts, RR: 0
Reply 15, posted (5 years 10 months 4 weeks 1 day 14 hours ago) and read 2764 times:



Quoting Paulinbna (Reply 14):
This is a very fast edit, it is a lot better. Just try to take the image with the sun shinning on the side you are and not through glass.

If I could have got ouside, I would have.

Apart from when I go gliding, this is about as close as I can get to aircraft. And I think that there are already enough photos of ASK-21's, Blanik L13's and Piper Cubs  Smile

But thanks for having a play. What were the stages you used to do that?

Paul
~~~~


Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Any TLV Photographers That Can Help Me? posted Thu Mar 13 2008 08:29:50 by AirTran737
Rejections That Made Me Smile posted Mon Oct 1 2007 21:21:53 by DerekF
Anything That I Can Do To This Picture? posted Wed Aug 31 2005 20:49:11 by Lindy
Program That Can Make Nice Photoalbums? posted Sat Aug 2 2003 15:12:47 by Oystein
Can't Understand It ..... posted Wed Nov 21 2001 18:55:22 by KWINNY
Can You Read Personal Rejections Online? posted Thu Jul 31 2008 20:22:28 by Airplanenut
Help To Understand Rejections posted Sat Mar 10 2007 10:53:25 by Jajo
Motive Rejections- Can You Please Help? posted Wed Jan 17 2007 22:53:30 by Opso1
Do We Think That These Can Be Saved? posted Fri Apr 7 2006 02:55:55 by Eadster
Possible That The Fence Can Play A Part In A Shot? posted Sat Mar 18 2006 08:54:04 by DLKAPA