Paulinbna From United States of America, joined Feb 2003, 1114 posts, RR: 5
Reply 1, posted
Mon Aug 18 2008 00:02:15 UTC (6 years 10 months 3 weeks 19 hours ago) and read 6221 times:
1st on looks good.
Next two you will properly get a distance rejection on both of them.
Canon 50D user; 100-400 MM L IS 10-22 MM, 60MM Macro
JakTrax From United Kingdom, joined Jun 2005, 4936 posts, RR: 7
Reply 2, posted
Mon Aug 18 2008 06:17:07 UTC (6 years 10 months 3 weeks 13 hours ago) and read 6199 times:
I like the second one, though I suspect it will probably fall foul of a distance rejection. Could it perhaps be cropped a little more to remove much of that sea (i.e. dead space)?
INNflight From Switzerland, joined Apr 2004, 3782 posts, RR: 59
Reply 3, posted
Mon Aug 18 2008 08:57:24 UTC (6 years 10 months 3 weeks 10 hours ago) and read 6180 times:
2nd is absolutely brilliant, 3rd is nice, but not as good as the one above.
Chances of acceptances are pretty slim, however I'd give it a shot nonetheless - give the screeners something nice to look at and then reject it heavy-hearted
Airplanenut From United States of America, joined Sep 2001, 664 posts, RR: 1
Reply 4, posted
Mon Aug 18 2008 10:56:10 UTC (6 years 10 months 3 weeks 8 hours ago) and read 6155 times:
Thanks for the suggestions so far. I certainly fear the distance rejection, but thought the shot just isn't the same when cropped. I can take the tall shot in some more (it was resized after being cropped, so the plane can still get larger), but again, the effect of the skyline is why I like it.
Why yes, in fact, I am a rocket scientist...
Indyzachn224wn From United States of America, joined Aug 2008, 15 posts, RR: 0
Reply 5, posted
Mon Aug 18 2008 17:25:31 UTC (6 years 10 months 3 weeks 2 hours ago) and read 6138 times:
the first one is good, but the last two have dead space and could be smaller.