Sponsor Message:
Aviation Photography Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Blurry Rejection  
User currently offlineIngo From Austria, joined Jan 2005, 20 posts, RR: 0
Posted (5 years 12 months 3 days 6 hours ago) and read 2737 times:

Any chance to get this one in?
http://img204.imageshack.us/img204/1693/ngpkq0.jpg

Got a blurry rejection, but don't see what the problem is.
Maybe the screener who rejected the photo can comment on his decision?!...

thx,
Ingo

10 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineCodeshare From Poland, joined Sep 2002, 1854 posts, RR: 1
Reply 1, posted (5 years 12 months 3 days 6 hours ago) and read 2723 times:

Did you appeal? It looks a little dark to me (inside of cockpit).

KS/codeshare



How much A is there is Airliners Net ? 0 or nothing ?
User currently offlineScotland1979 From United States of America, joined Feb 2005, 548 posts, RR: 12
Reply 2, posted (5 years 12 months 3 days 3 hours ago) and read 2689 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

At back of seats - abit off focus which can lead to blurry (could be the one). There is other issue I can see is jagged on cheatline in middle frame of windshield


Jesus said "I am the Way and the Truth and the Life. No one comes to the Father except through Me" - John 14:6
User currently offlineFlynavy From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 3, posted (5 years 12 months 3 days 1 hour ago) and read 2664 times:



Quoting Ingo (Thread starter):

Great shot!

The only issue I can see being blurry is the F/O's left arm. Other than that, I think it's a minor flaw and the photo should be added. After all, a shot with a completely out of focus and blurry subject was just added with much fanfare.


User currently offlineIngo From Austria, joined Jan 2005, 20 posts, RR: 0
Reply 4, posted (5 years 12 months 1 day 16 hours ago) and read 2564 times:

@flynavy

Thanks!
Yes, the F/O's left arm ist motion blurred - that shouldn't be a problem, right?
Unfortunately no comment from the screener in question...

rgds,
Ingo


User currently offlineIndyzachn224wn From United States of America, joined Aug 2008, 15 posts, RR: 0
Reply 5, posted (5 years 11 months 2 weeks 6 days 1 hour ago) and read 2400 times:

The picture isn't blurry but is very vague in what you mean.

User currently offlineEadster From Australia, joined Jan 2005, 2216 posts, RR: 14
Reply 6, posted (5 years 11 months 2 weeks 5 days 20 hours ago) and read 2379 times:



Quoting Scotland1979 (Reply 2):
At back of seats

Why would that cause a rejection? It's not what people are even drawn to in the shot...


User currently offlineDM From United States of America, joined Aug 2006, 336 posts, RR: 0
Reply 7, posted (5 years 11 months 2 weeks 5 days 20 hours ago) and read 2376 times:



Quoting Eadster (Reply 6):
Why would that cause a rejection? It's not what people are even drawn to in the shot...

True. With the kind of lense being used to take the shot it could very well be the lens distortion that causes that "blurry" look.

For me it would be the upper left hand portion of the overhead panel that has that effect to it.

Daniel.


User currently offlineGliderpilot08 From Canada, joined Jun 2008, 136 posts, RR: 0
Reply 8, posted (5 years 11 months 2 weeks 5 days 3 hours ago) and read 2339 times:

Well Ingo, i think it's an outstanding effort. and good pic.

Quoting Scotland1979 (Reply 2):
There is other issue I can see is jagged on cheatline in middle frame of windshield

With respect to Scotland1979, the jagged edge on the windshield is a problem but i don't think that's nothing Photoshop can't fix.

Quoting Ingo (Reply 4):
the F/O's left arm ist motion blurred - that shouldn't be a problem, right?

Also, with respect to Ingo's reply, I like the fact that the F/O's arm is blured; and your right, it shouldn't be a problem.

But, in order for a photo to be A.net worthy, it has to be near perfect.

Don't be afraid of Photoshop. It does wonders with photos


gliderpilot-



Gimli Advisory. Sierra, Oscar, Romeo on right downwind for Rwy 15
User currently offlineViv From Ireland, joined May 2005, 3142 posts, RR: 29
Reply 9, posted (5 years 11 months 2 weeks 4 days 17 hours ago) and read 2316 times:

I bit too dark for my taste. Use of a small flash unit while manually setting the exposure for the scene ouitside would have resulted in a much better shot.


Nikon D700, Nikkor 80-400, Fuji X Pro 1, Fujinon 35 f/1.4, Fujinon 18 f/2
User currently offlineIngo From Austria, joined Jan 2005, 20 posts, RR: 0
Reply 10, posted (5 years 11 months 2 weeks 4 days 5 hours ago) and read 2281 times:

Thanks for your comments!
I uploaded another picture of this flight, which was accepted today.

rgds,
Ingo


Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Blurry Rejection posted Tue Sep 18 2007 15:47:33 by D L X
Blurry Rejection Help Please posted Mon Dec 4 2006 18:19:13 by Kukkudrill
Blurry Rejection Advice Please posted Sun Oct 22 2006 19:58:16 by INNflight
Question For Quality/Blurry Rejection .... posted Sat Sep 16 2006 07:37:03 by TriStar501
Quality Blurry Rejection - Advice Please posted Mon Mar 20 2006 09:37:20 by UA935
Blurry Rejection Help Please (again) posted Wed Mar 15 2006 20:57:37 by Kukkudrill
Blurry Rejection Help Please posted Sun Mar 12 2006 10:45:51 by Kukkudrill
Blurry And Level Rejection - Help Needed posted Wed Dec 26 2007 15:27:17 by Apache
Rejection For Quality And Blurry posted Tue May 29 2007 00:27:27 by Walter2222
Rejection Post-mortem: Quality And Blurry? posted Sat Feb 18 2006 16:55:01 by D L X