Sponsor Message:
Aviation Photography Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Are Some Photos Impossaible To Appear Level?  
User currently offlineWhappeh From United States of America, joined Mar 2006, 1563 posts, RR: 2
Posted (6 years 2 weeks 1 day 13 hours ago) and read 3570 times:

Such as photos with too many lines or verticals? I've had this one photo, that I've done everything I possibly know how to do in photoshop to get it "level" and no matter what I do, from leveling by eye, to using the Measurement tool, to just leaving it normal, gets it a "level" rejection. I'm starting to think there is no possible way to get it level.

After its 8th level rejection, this is what I have come up with now: rotated 2.99 CCW. It appears level, but I got a rejection at 3.0 CCW on this photo before. Also, I'd use the "PreScreen" thread, but after posting this image twice in the old one and having people say LOOKS GREAT! and getting the rejections, I tossed it in as part of the question posed above...

http://img142.imageshack.us/img142/6678/nx1204fa08big9fe1.jpg


-Travel now, journey infinitely.
5 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineJakTrax From United Kingdom, joined Jun 2005, 4936 posts, RR: 7
Reply 1, posted (6 years 2 weeks 1 day 13 hours ago) and read 3567 times:

A touch of CCW I'd say - the hangar on the right is leaning slightly in that direction (to be expected due to lens distortion) but the hangar just to the right of the tail also seems to lean in the same direction. I think if you got both vertical it'd be level, or if anything have the right-hand one lean slightly to the right and the left-hand one slightly to the left by an equal degree.

Karl


User currently offlineWhappeh From United States of America, joined Mar 2006, 1563 posts, RR: 2
Reply 2, posted (6 years 2 weeks 1 day 13 hours ago) and read 3561 times:

I'm 99% sure the hanger in the background isn't level to the same ground I am on. Its near a lake and is a good distance away, between where I am standing is a grass runway, and a marshy swamp land that the other hanger is built over. Like I said, I've for sure had a 3.0CCW photo rejected for level...

Quick edit: I gave it up to 3.3 and it looks good, I think I'll requeue it, but the original point of this thread was a more general question: Is it impossible to get some photos to look level? We always use arbitrary verticals that may or may not be vertical in person to the plane of ground we are standing on.

[Edited 2008-09-01 09:48:11]


-Travel now, journey infinitely.
User currently offlinePhotopilot From Canada, joined Jul 2002, 2734 posts, RR: 18
Reply 3, posted (6 years 2 weeks 1 day 13 hours ago) and read 3556 times:

Ok, have a look at this. When an image gets rejected so many times for "level" it's time to go into the bag of tricks and think differently.

I rotated this slightly CCW to bring the verticals into line. But it still looked somewhat off. So then I went and used the SKEW command to lower the left side of the image a bit further. The skew command allows you to adjust the horizontals without affecting the vertical axis. I'm not sure if the "rules" allow this, but visually it works. Then crop slightly to take out the white corners from the rotate.

Hope this helps.

http://i3.photobucket.com/albums/y55/Steve_YYZ/Misc_Photos/test-1.jpg


User currently offlineViv From Ireland, joined May 2005, 3142 posts, RR: 28
Reply 4, posted (6 years 2 weeks 1 day 13 hours ago) and read 3542 times:

Needs a little more CCW rotation.


Nikon D700, Nikkor 80-400, Fuji X Pro 1, Fujinon 35 f/1.4, Fujinon 18 f/2
User currently offlineJakTrax From United Kingdom, joined Jun 2005, 4936 posts, RR: 7
Reply 5, posted (6 years 2 weeks 1 day 12 hours ago) and read 3527 times:



Quoting Whappeh (Reply 2):
We always use arbitrary verticals that may or may not be vertical in person to the plane of ground we are standing on

Believe me, been through this argument many times in this forum and haven't manage to convince anyone. If the verticals are level, you can consider the image level (in A.net terms anyway).

Karl


Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Photos Added To DB, But Where Are They? posted Thu Nov 18 2004 11:36:07 by Thom@s
Just Some Photos posted Sun Feb 10 2008 04:46:46 by Raoulr
Are These Photos Really Soft? posted Tue Nov 27 2007 14:29:07 by SVOLNI
Help For Some Photos (please) posted Tue Aug 7 2007 23:53:08 by CactusHP
Requesting Advice On Some Photos posted Fri Jul 27 2007 21:49:18 by GeorgL
Just Another Thread Asking About Some Photos posted Fri Jul 6 2007 23:31:50 by Flyboyseven
Need Your Oppinion Of Some Photos posted Fri Jun 8 2007 00:12:39 by DABZF
Opinion On Some Photos posted Thu May 3 2007 00:50:44 by AMSA
Are These Good Enough To Upload? posted Sat Apr 7 2007 07:58:17 by DL777LAX
Are These Pics Up To A.net Standard? posted Sat Dec 9 2006 05:39:51 by Acontador