Sponsor Message:
Aviation Photography Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Can't Understand It .....  
User currently offlineKWINNY From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Posted (12 years 5 months 1 day 20 hours ago) and read 1639 times:

I know I'm not the first and won't be the last but I can't figure out what the **** I'm doing wrong scanning my photo's in.
Every one I've ever sent in as been rejected and before I get complaints about moaning, YES it is obviously something I'm not doing right.
My camera is a Nikon 801 with a good selection of Sigma lenses (nothing wrong there then) I use Kodacolour Gold Royale film (not everyones choice but we are all different) I've a Canon N650U scanner and an ADSL connection (so far so good) + probably the most important thing of all I'm an ex semi pro photographer, but when it comes to computers....well er.
Right down to bussiness, I scan my photo's using Arcsoft Photo studio 2000, and I've tried 300dpi right up to 1200dpi then I reduce the image to 1024 width and the height is done auto, I then save it as a jpeg.
When I open up the file again I can zoom in a few times before it begins to break up. I can send photo's as E-Mail attachments and nobody says the quality is bad? I've got loads of brilliant quality slides from Manchester Airport (1970s) etc, but until I sort this problem out I can't be bothered spending so much time scanning them in.
Somebody help pleeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeease...
Cheers.

7 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlinePUnmuth@VIE From Austria, joined Aug 2000, 4162 posts, RR: 54
Reply 1, posted (12 years 5 months 1 day 20 hours ago) and read 1558 times:

What about some examples?
Peter



-
User currently offlineLGW From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 2, posted (12 years 5 months 1 day 19 hours ago) and read 1543 times:

Yeah, a few examples and we may be able to help.

LGW


User currently offlineAviationIvi From Germany, joined Feb 2001, 777 posts, RR: 7
Reply 3, posted (12 years 5 months 1 day 19 hours ago) and read 1538 times:

Hello,
as Peter said, please let us see some pics.

You wrote that you scan with 300-1200dpi, right? So I guess you scan prints. By scanning prints with 300dpi you "can" get some good results. Before I started with slides, I´ve had a really hard time getting prints accepted. Later some of them made it. I used to scan at 300 dpi, resized to 1024, used the unsharpen tool and saved the picture with jpg-wizard and NO compression! Maybe the best way getting prints accepted???

Hope it helps!

Regards from FRA
Ivica



User currently offlineKWINNY From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 4, posted (12 years 5 months 1 day 18 hours ago) and read 1516 times:

If you send your E-mail address to me quinnie@talk21.com and I'll send you a couple of examples, but it may not be tonight.
Thanks for your help and patience.


User currently offlineDa fwog From United Kingdom, joined Aug 1999, 867 posts, RR: 8
Reply 5, posted (12 years 5 months 1 day 13 hours ago) and read 1488 times:

Hm. The comment about examples meant "post some here". Or rather, stick some on a website somewhere, and provide links in this thread so we can all take a look.

Regarding your old photos from the '70s - the acceptance standards for older material are more relaxed, so you might get these accepted with the technique you're using now. However, if it's possible to improve things, then obviously you should do so - we would like to see these old photos in their best possible light!  Smile/happy/getting dizzy



User currently offlineWietse From Netherlands, joined Oct 2001, 3809 posts, RR: 56
Reply 6, posted (12 years 5 months 17 hours ago) and read 1444 times:

They don't work.

Here are the right links:

http://www.robquinn.btinternet.co.uk/EI-CDF.jpg
http://www.robquinn.btinternet.co.uk/G-6-386.jpg
http://www.robquinn.btinternet.co.uk/G-DOCB.jpg

Wietse



Wietse de Graaf
User currently offlineJwenting From Netherlands, joined Apr 2001, 10213 posts, RR: 19
Reply 7, posted (12 years 5 months 14 hours ago) and read 1403 times:

blurry, maybe a bit of noise or grain as well.
Either the shots are not well focussed or the scanner needs adjustment. You might be able to improve them a bit in Photoshop or similar.
Composition is quite nice.



I wish I were flying
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Info Rejection...can't Figure It Out. posted Mon Nov 20 2006 04:51:19 by Thetford569
Do You Think These Photos Can Make It? posted Mon Aug 8 2005 19:27:33 by Airfly
Bad Quality? And How Can I Fix It? posted Sat Jun 18 2005 04:31:32 by DLX737200
MIA For 3 Hours - Can I Make It? posted Tue Jan 18 2005 20:18:23 by BA747-436
Badmotive? I Can't Find It... posted Tue Dec 7 2004 14:30:51 by AirKas1
Misspelled Name On Photo..how Can I Fix It, It posted Sat Nov 6 2004 00:34:47 by Iranair747sp
Bad Quality? Can I Fix It? posted Wed Jun 2 2004 14:36:17 by Dlx737200
I Can't Believe It Made 1000! posted Thu Sep 20 2001 21:28:17 by Thom@s
Can It Be Saved? posted Sat Jun 16 2007 17:57:45 by Fiveholer
Quality Rejection - Can It Be Improved? posted Thu Jan 18 2007 22:26:51 by Walter2222