Bustin From Spain, joined May 2005, 249 posts, RR: 0 Reply 1, posted (4 years 7 months 6 days 2 hours ago) and read 8488 times:
I have this picture rejected with centered reason. I know I have a little tail high, but the nose is centered and some screeners prefer this way to center the frame. The problem is that if I surely low the tail to another screener will say me this looks low.
I would like some help to correct and re-uploaded the picture or if is worth appeal.
JakTrax From United Kingdom, joined Jun 2005, 4735 posts, RR: 8 Reply 6, posted (4 years 7 months 6 days 1 hour ago) and read 8445 times:
AA173HVY,
Post-capture processing will normally help, however I'm afraid all these have serious quality issues which I doubt can be corrected.
Once again guys, feedback on these edits I did for a friend (were at the bottom of last pre-screen thread and will therefore now not be scrutinised) - different to my normnal workflow so I was worried about any softness.
Really nice and shiny aircraft, but borderline oversharpened. There are some jaggies in the windows and the star logo. And possibly a bit higher in the frame. I really like your shot, love the p-51
7D, 17-40 F4 L, 70-200 F2.8 L IS, EF 1.4x II, EF 2x III, Metz 58-AF1
JohnKrist From Sweden, joined Jan 2005, 1340 posts, RR: 5 Reply 9, posted (4 years 7 months 6 days 1 hour ago) and read 8441 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW HEAD SUPPORT
Karl, I gave feedback on the Finnair in the other thread. The SAS is possibly ever so slightly soft on the front section of the fuselage, but those SAS titles are pain to photograph.
7D, 17-40 F4 L, 70-200 F2.8 L IS, EF 1.4x II, EF 2x III, Metz 58-AF1
Mke717spotter From United States of America, joined Dec 2005, 2310 posts, RR: 5 Reply 12, posted (4 years 7 months 5 days 14 hours ago) and read 8348 times:
Will you watch the Cleveland Browns and the Detroit Lions on Sunday? Only if coach Eric Mangini resigned after a loss.
Michlis From United States of America, joined Jul 2007, 737 posts, RR: 2 Reply 13, posted (4 years 7 months 5 days 7 hours ago) and read 8316 times:
Quoting JohnKrist (Reply 7): Really nice and shiny aircraft, but borderline oversharpened. There are some jaggies in the windows and the star logo. And possibly a bit higher in the frame. I really like your shot, love the p-51
Thanks for the input everyone! The shot was accepted!
If you know the enemy and know yourself, you need not fear the outcome of a hundred battles.
Daleaholic From UK - England, joined Oct 2005, 3184 posts, RR: 15 Reply 14, posted (4 years 7 months 5 days 3 hours ago) and read 8297 times:
I have just uploaded this but I think it is too big... can anybody give me some advice on 'big' picture sizes. This one is 1600x1200... what size should I be aiming for?
Religion is an illusion of childhood... Outgrown under proper education.
Mke717spotter From United States of America, joined Dec 2005, 2310 posts, RR: 5 Reply 17, posted (4 years 7 months 5 days 3 hours ago) and read 8285 times:
Can someone please give me some feedback on the shots I've posted above? Thanks.
Will you watch the Cleveland Browns and the Detroit Lions on Sunday? Only if coach Eric Mangini resigned after a loss.
JakTrax From United Kingdom, joined Jun 2005, 4735 posts, RR: 8 Reply 18, posted (4 years 7 months 5 days 3 hours ago) and read 8281 times:
Quoting Mke717spotter (Reply 17): Can someone please give me some feedback on the shots I've posted above? Thanks
US Airways
No chance - there is a ground vehicle obstructing the nose-gear and it seems to be the wrong size.
Northwest
Nice shot but bad crop (not centered properly), wrong upload size and appears to need slight CCW rotation.
Wing shot
Just doesn't do it for me I'm afraid. Boring; not much to look at and there's a curious streak top-right, about 3cm from the edge of the frame. Also wrong size.
Midwest
Possible but I'd crop closer in on the nose right-hand side. Also looks slightly soft on my monitor.
ANITIX87 From United States of America, joined Mar 2005, 3233 posts, RR: 14 Reply 21, posted (4 years 7 months 4 days 23 hours ago) and read 8253 times:
Quoting Othic (Reply 19): how about the photos below?
Sorry, Othic. These both have quality issues that I don't think can be helped. These are for the personal collection, I'm afraid.
Quoting ZakHH (Reply 10): Please let me have your comments on this one:
Zak, we need to see the full-size version. It is possible that when you make it bigger, some quality issues and other flaws will emerge. Post a larger version and you'll get better feedback.
TIS
www.stellaryear.com: Canon EOS 50D, Canon EOS 5DMkII, Sigma 50mm 1.4, Canon 24-70 2.8L II, Canon 100mm 2.8L, Canon 100-4
Points From Netherlands, joined Jul 2006, 46 posts, RR: 0 Reply 22, posted (4 years 7 months 4 days 21 hours ago) and read 8239 times:
I just took this one. I can't get the plane vertical centered since the crop (1024*683) touches the edge of the picture. Does the former Fokker factory with the Fokker planes still justify the shown crop ?
CaptainStefan From United States of America, joined May 2007, 338 posts, RR: 0 Reply 23, posted (4 years 7 months 4 days 21 hours ago) and read 8234 times:
Which of these shots have a chance? and how should I fix those that don't? Please see the "Dobbins ARB" post. (And yes I know, that Blue Angels Sneak Pass was not at Dobbins
Varig767 From Netherlands, joined Jan 2005, 243 posts, RR: 3 Reply 24, posted (4 years 7 months 4 days 21 hours ago) and read 8233 times:
Hello,
Are these ones good enough to upload?? If yes, which one does make the most chance?? The first picture was also provided in pre-screening thread 4, but in this one, the levels are enhanced.
kind regards, Martijn
25 Neophyte: Here are two pictures from my trip to Vienna. What do you think about them? Cheers Timo
26 TransIsland: I'd accept the crop, but then again, I'm no screener. Front edge of vertical stabiliser and winglets look jaggy though.
27 Bustin: Hi to all: Again, I have other picture rejected with centered reason. I know I have a little tail high, but some screeners prefer this way to center t
28 Alasdair1982: Made a couple of changes to bring this one into the accepted dimensions, rather than a 'panoramic' shot of the entire aircraft and wingspan, and sorte
30 Nobbsie: Uploaded this one for the 3rd time, was rejected for over-sharpening the first and softness the second time, I think I've struck the right balance thi
31 LHSebi: Any takers? Thanks for any input! Sebastian
33 Duane: Both pictures look distorted, plane doesnt look the right shape and fuzzy, sorry just my opinion.
34 NWA783: The planes shape looks fine, its just the angle that makes it seem weird, both look over exposed to me. - Josh -
35 Flipdewaf: I was just wondering what you guys thought of this shot and whether it is worth a go? http://www.airliners.net/uf/view.fil...d=536916305&filename=phpo
36 Cptkilroy: how's this one? Any suggestions? -Chris
38 Othic: ok so found this one on my computer this was taken 27th of march 08 should I upload it? [Edited 2008-10-24 07:06:27]
39 Whappeh: Was that photoshoped to look like that or is the lighting natural/artificial sources? Could be creative enough to merit, however the crop is weird (w
40 Othic: I've to agree it look very wierd to me[Edited 2008-10-24 12:16:02]
41 Cptkilroy: well, here's the original unedited jpeg. http://www.facebook.com/photo.php?pid=32461198&l=8c5b4&id=201401911 the lighting was late evening with clouds
42 JakTrax: In my recent attempt to upload more interesting and creative images here (which of course is a risky business) I came up with this one, which I rather
43 Gliderpilot08: My view is that the aircraft in the background is soft and too dull. Motive: I think that may be a problem. you have two aircraft in the frame and re
44 Nobbsie: Here's a couple I'm thinking about uploading: Is the fence too distracting in this one? I love this shot, it's cropped quite heavily but the wider vie
45 Gliderpilot08: Your second picture, I can't see any issues with except the left wing is croped too much and is cut off. Other than that, it's the only thing i can t
46 Nobbsie: Thanks for the comments, I may have a go at removing the fence when I have more time. Here's a wider crop of the second shot, there's a spot just bel
47 Lufthansi: Well next to all the rejections I have a question concerning my last two uploads. I didn't receive a rejection nor did they show up in the database. B
48 Othic: both cases it is quality I can say I think the photo of D-HDAC could make to Airliners if you resize it to 1024x683 and some sharpening[Edited 2008-10
49 Whappeh: Why are you not going closer to the right wing? The left wing is closely cropped, yet there is a good inch from the tip to the end of the photo on th
50 ANITIX87: I like the crop the way it is, since there is far more of the left wing visible. It makes the fuselage look more centered, even if the wings aren't.
52 Daleaholic: Looks as though it's heading straight for that building! Great shot
53 Gliderpilot08: Picture looks alot more complete. Way better presentation of the Qantas A380! Regards
54 HAL: Any thoughts on this one? It's another attempt to get an in-flight photo on A.net. The biggest problem for me is the thickness of the cockpit glass I
55 TupolevTu154: Fantastic shot! Perhaps sharpen around the horizontal stabilizers and wing tips and it's good to go. I think due to the rare type of shot, it could p
56 Varig767: I like the first one Tom! What do you think of this GOL 737?? kind regards, Martijn
57 TupolevTu154: Martijn, Nice colours, but I feel the distortion on the bottom left kills it, and there's not much of interest in the image. You also have a nice dus
59 ANITIX87: Is this edited? If so, with an improved editing process and a much smaller image size, this should be OK. If it's not edited, then it may still be goo
60 AirKas1: It's also got a huge stain on it, running over the registration. Looks like a dirty window.
61 Varig767: Thanks for the input; I will save this one for my own collection. kind regards, Martijn
62 Carlos: Hi All, I need help with a rejection that I definately can't understand. This one has been rejected with the reason "centered": http://www.airliners.n
63 Epten: Hi! What about theese? Do they have a chance?
64 Deaphen: Any screeners can give me their advice on this shot? Regards Nitin
65 Nobbsie: I cropped it like that so there's a since of direction, I find that cropping on both sides loses the sense of movement. That's entirely personal pref
66 Varig767: I like the TUI Fly, although I am afraid the crop doesn't feel good for the screeners. The speedbird and the Croatia have some serious quality issues
74 NWA783: The way you desaturated the picture makes the plane look like it doesn't even belong there. Still an interesting photo though - Josh -
75 Freeze3192: What about this shot? http://img88.imageshack.us/img88/8292/dsc9140zp5.jpg
76 Coxmaster: Might work as a creative, maybe. Though it seems like the crop is too wide. I dont know much about how they deal with creative stuff
77 ANITIX87: The shot should be brought down to 1024 pixels across and it could use some contrast, brightness, and more saturation. It's evident the shot was take
78 Neophyte: Here are two pictures from HAM. What do you think about them? D-ABOF TC-JNA best regards Timo
79 Jetfreak: 1: a bit soft; not enough contrast 2: also not enough contrast Kind regards, Bernhard
80 Haphadon: Here are two I took yesterday at CYYZ how are they? Here they are: http://img340.imageshack.us/img340/1567/img1747jf1.jpg http://img519.imageshack.us/
81 Haphadon: Sorry for double posting but here are edits of those plus some more pictures:
82 NWA783: First Picture looks overexposed to me, Second and Third pictures would most likely be rejected because of the stop sign, 4th photo is very unlevel, 5
83 Daleaholic: Any advice as to whether or not this will make it is appreciated...
84 CaptainStefan: Stellar shot- captured the beacons, nose wheels not quite on the ground. inboard reversers deploying- just great! screeners may have gotten out of be
86 TupolevTu154: The lack of main gear on the left gives the image a really un-balanced look I'm afraid. There's also some leveling issues (look at the terminal, it's
88 UltimateDelta: Thanks. I'll try to send it to you soon.
89 Gliderpilot08: ??? Maybe this is an error on my screen or just a joke, but all I see is a blured picture of "Defalt Image"
90 Daleaholic: Yeh I removed it from the queue, please see reply 87....
91 BrianPuhl: I must say, my first photo was rejected. My first thread in response to it was deleted, WHICH I followed the instructions IN MY REJECTION email. I've
92 Whisperjet: Hi, would something like this be acceptable to a.net? I am talking about the motive only as it is just a quick edit. Thanks Stefan
93 Jetfreak: i think, you can't see enough. Regards, Jetfreak
94 Calfo: http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/big/ready/IMG_0130.JPG Yes I know its already in the queue, but is this an acceptable motive? BTW, I'm the one bein
95 Gliderpilot08: Euh, really pushing Motiv. I think it will get rejected because of motive. I hate to say it but I'm going to say it. You can't really see the aircraf
96 Ptrjong: Not always true. Does it matter what people say? A truly unique shot... surely you aren't going to pull it just because it may get rejected? Although
97 TropicalSQ744: Hey guys. I just uploaded my first 2 pics. Do comment. Thanks! http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/big/ready/HL7740_cabin_rev1.jpg http://www.airliners
98 G-CIVP: Might help if I place my request on the correct thread. Judgements please. www.airliners.net/addphotos/middle/ready/N786ANtaalhr120108.jpg www.airline
99 Kentauta: Any chance on these two? Both were taken at KSAN. Thank you in advance.
100 Coxmaster: Might just be my tired eyes.. but that first pic looks like the color is off a bit. Same with the second, though im not quite sure how to go about fi
101 Kentauta: Thanks for your comment. I will try playing with the color.
102 Cpd: I've put three images in the queue (instead of my usual conservative one at a time): Just want to be sure I didn't miss anything obvious. It was one o
103 Neophyte: Here are two pictures from XFW (30th of Oktober) What do you think about them? Cheers Timo
104 AirKas1: Chris, on all 3 pics you have jaggies. Timo, nice shots.
105 Michlis: This one is in the queue. http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/big/ready/N515AF_2_mjl.jpg
106 Sharktt: What do you think of this one ? It was rejected for being overexposed, so i darkened it a litle: http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/big/ready/XV101.jp
107 Ruudb: Reply 102: The A330 is to high in the frame. Can't see the rest because i am at a laptop now.
108 Austrian722: Hi Guys Caught before on some night shooting an USAF BBJ. I wanted to know if that kind a motiv works out?
109 Deaphen: Brilliant shot! Yes the motive does work, one with the similar motive is almost top of the day right now. But someone else might be able to tell you
110 Sharktt: Can someone please reply to post nº106 please ?? Paulo
111 G-CIVP: For Paulo; your photo does look blown on my monitor.
112 BrianPuhl: How does this website treat formation shots? I worked with some military aircraft in formation, two different airframes and after chillin out a bit I
113 Ruudb: Paulo, if you like you can sent the original of the VC10 to me,maybe I am be able to help you. Ruud.
114 WithaK: Hello all. http://i172.photobucket.com/albums/w...01/Prescreen/20071107_9VSWE_G1.jpg Oversharpened?? Kris
115 NWA783: The one place i can see it being oversharped is on the bottom of the plane near the back. - Josh -
116 Neophyte: Now, it´s in the db http://www.airliners.net/photo/Air-India/Airbus-A319-132/1424866/L/ Special thanks to the screeners! Cheers Timo
117 Concord977: I'd appreciate feedback on these. It's been a while since I attempted any uploads! http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v1...977/Aircraft%20Photos/_DCA22
118 TupolevTu154: The first three photos could all do with being cropped a bit closer and mostly some sharpening. Nice to see such rare birds! The last two shots are u
119 Cpd: I removed the BA 747 (a bit boring), but left the sharpness unchanged on the other 2. They have been accepted. Thanks for the feedback. Thanks - I
120 JGR: Xtreme panning shot : http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/big/ready/IMG_18304z2fdr.jpg Taked at 1/20 s., ISO 800, f/5.6 & handheld. What do you think a
121 Jetfreak: amazing sharpness for such a long exposure time, but unfortunately not sharp enough; it also is too grainy. Regards, Jetfreak
122 R12055p: Hi all, I got this shot of a MD-10 at sunset into KSEA. Do you think that the motive is off? Quality too low? http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/big/r
123 NWA783: Ross, Looks to me like there are jaggies all around the aircraft - Josh -
124 Flynavy: Thoughts on this one's motive, new creative rules considered? Wanted to try a different crop. Thanks, Chris in Atlanta
125 Ruudb: I got one rejected like this for motive, so think it doesn't have a change.
126 Flynavy: Thanks for the input, I'll keep it in mind! I also have this shot... Certainly some clutter involved, however a clear shot is not possible due to the
127 Gabriel3630: Hello all, I need some help, what you guys think about this photo?
128 R12055p: Gabriel, The level of the red and white tower in the background seems off. There is also quite a bit of heat haze on the aircraft.
129 Gabriel3630: That is common problem here in Salvador. Was 34°C (93°F) of temperature when I took this photo. Correcting the red, there will be a chance? Thanks
130 Gabriel3630: Hello, I don't know if this is acceptable, It is a Panorama of Salvador's Airport SBSV. May be at airport view classification. Check (1600 pixels): 60
131 Cpd: Unfortunately - it's very hot, and the heat haze is just one of those things. I battle it as well. You either have to get closer, or resize the photo
132 WithaK: Hello again. I've been going through some of my shots from earlier in the year and came up with these two. Problem is the final result just doesn't lo
133 Cpd: QF looks fine to me, but "Virginia Blue" looks too low in the frame. Open the image in photoshop, press CTRL+R to get rulers (switch them to per-cent
134 Will342: HI there, Any chance to salvage these? http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/rejections/big/20081123_pak1c.jpg http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/rejecti
135 JohnKrist: Hello, just want to run these by you people. I like both for obvious reasons :D Malmö Aviation http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/b...g/ready/mavia
136 R12055p: JohnKrist, The first photo looks good. There might be a slight problem with the level of the photo but other than that, should be fine. Mayby a little
137 JensOBreuer: Hi, I've got the following pic. I searched the FAQ if there are problems regarding the people in foreground - but I didn't find anything: Sorry - the
138 JohnKrist: Will most likely get a "People" rejection as they are clearly recognizable. I have leveled it using the runway that is level, and the taxiway is slop
139 Flynavy: Due to the weather, I wasn't really expecting this shot to be worthy for Airliners.net, but figured I'd throw it in this thread to get some opinions o
140 Neophyte: Here are two pictures, one from VIE and one from HAM. What do think about them, should I try a upload? Best regards Timo
141 JohnKrist: Flynavy, motive wise I prefer number one, but the visible Mona-Lisa is not bad either. Quality wise the second shot is a tad clearer and sharper. Pers
142 NWA783: I have seen pictures in worse weather get accepted. The first one would probably get rejected because you cut off the left wingtip. - Josh -
144 NWA783: True, but i still think it would especially since the other wing tip is clearly visisble
145 Neophyte: For the Emirates: which categories should I take? Is it a dawn/dusk picture? I´m not sure. PS: Thanks for the nice comment Cheers Timo
146 JohnKrist: Nope, it's not dark enough for a dusk/dawn category submission.
147 Sjmurphy: help with this before i try to upload them
148 Sjmurphy: Tryed to post this on site but rejected Reject reason: quality blurry grainy oversharpened To me it looks ok
149 NWA783: All three look overexposed, The first one of the SQ 380 is also very grainy - Josh -
150 JohnKrist: What kind of camera do you use? My guess is a point&shoot and it seems to limit the outcome pretty much. All pictures have serious quality issues, pa
151 Sjmurphy: The camera i use FujiFilm FinePix S6500fd i use the mode setting set to auto
153 Flynavy: I'd pass. The light pole kills the shot. It would be different perhaps if it wasn't smack dab in the center of the shot. Quality is also an issue. Th
154 Sjmurphy: I give up on this one then Will this one pass any advice to get this on
155 Concord977: I have a feeling that these are no-chancers, but I thought I'd ask anyway. N707JT was at Dulles this past weekend. He arrived from Newburgh, NY and de
156 Sjmurphy: just adjust some on this to this level and noise will it pass
157 NWA783: Looks like it could still use a bit of CW rotation, but quality is still an issue. What program are you using to edit? - Josh -
158 Sjmurphy: I'm using Corel Paint Shop Pro Photo X2 i just got this so i'm still learning how do i improve quality
159 Cpd: To me, this looks over-exposed, but it also looks to have a number of quality issues. I don't think it will get through. Sorry about that.
160 Flynavy: Welcome to Airliners.net, I noticed you are new here. Unfortunately none of these shots are worthy. Take a look at the photo database once in a while
161 SA7700: Hi there. I'm new to aviation photography and would like to get some opinions before I try to upload to a.net. Thanks, SA7700
162 JohnKrist: First of all your images are too small to judge. What I can see though is that they are to far in the distance ie too much space around the aircraft
163 SA7700: Thanks for the feedback JohnKrist. Here is another try. Argh! I've got no idea what I'm doing. [Edited 2008-11-27 12:08:16][Edited 2008-11-27 12:09
164 Flynavy: Then why are you asking for pre-screening?
165 SA7700: Because I'm uncertain and did not think it was an offence to ask for help. I'm trying my best. Sorry for the inconvenience I have caused you.
166 Flynavy: No offense was taken. Your Dreamlifter shots for example. They're all way too small. The minimum size for photos here is 1000 pixels-wide. They're al
168 JohnKrist: Like Flynavy said, read the IGRR, it's really good and the main reason Thierry is on my respected list About your photos: 1st one will never get acce
169 Deaphen: would a motive like this work? Ofcourse this is not the finally edited version... Regards Nitin
170 Flynavy: Nitin, I like your photo there. I'm unsure if it would be allowed here but its certainly something different and I'm sure it would generate a fair sh
171 Lanas: I don´t know if the rules have changed, but the ground equipment before the wing kills it, motive-wise speaking. It would have been a nice shot, tho
172 ANITIX87: I agree, unfortunately. I think the motive would work very well, but the exposure (or lack thereof) hurts the shot. This may have been an interesting
173 Jetplaner: Any advice on this one? Thanks in advance
175 ANITIX87: All the images (in both posts) are way too blurry, and many have quality issues. They are also the wrong size. You must be between 3:2 and 4:3 aspect
176 JohnKrist: Antix87, love the lot, only things I have is that the whites on Air India are borderline, but it is a very white livery, other than that it's a great
177 Tbanger: Appreciate a comment on this one. I haven't uploaded previously because the sun was at an awful angle and the photo took a lot of "lightening". I also
178 JohnKrist: The Malmö Aviation one got accepted, and I pulled the SAS Caravelle tail for now. Now I would like an opinion on this one. Winter evening and the su
180 Nikog: Any opinion on these photos: http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/big/ready/IMG_8004_3c.jpg http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/big/ready/IMG_8020_3f.jpg
181 NSMike: How's this one... motive or otherwise? http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/b...g/ready/CAF_CT-114_114058_4990.jpg
182 Sjmurphy: Any chance of this getting NOT getting rejected
183 Flynavy: Are you doing ANY post-processing on these shots? Theres's a bit more to it than just taking the photo. In other words, no, they won't get accepted.
184 NSMike: They look a tad oversharpened to me. I think they'd look better cropped 3x2 rather than 4x3 but that's a personal preference. Mike.
185 ANITIX87: Please look at other images in the galleries before asking about images like this. Your pictures, as FlyNavy said, are very compressed. In addition,
186 Sjmurphy: Not straight off the memory card done some work on them i have keeped the originals just in case this are the originals I know them are NOT level is t
187 Flynavy: Scrap them and start over. They are severely compressed. Read your camera's user guide and IGRR along with it. I don't know how else to put it, hones
188 Flynavy: We gave you advice earlier in this thread which you have completely ignored by all accounts.
189 Sjmurphy: I have got Picasa and Corel Paint Shop Pro Photo X2 Can you recap me please
190 ANITIX87: Really? It's that tough to scroll up and read the replies to your posts? All your shots have had questionable quality and post-processing leaves a lo
191 Sjmurphy: I have a look at Photoshop will redone photo's from my originals again
192 Flynavy: Fine and dandy, but Photoshop won't cure your photos. Part of the game we play here is knowing when to give up on a shot you royally screw up. I've t
193 Sjmurphy: So what you are saying my photo's are all screw So i stop trying to upload them all togrther My camera is set auto when i take a picture so a bad ide
194 Sunandan: I don't think he said that. What he meant is that you obviously need to devote more time to the entire process. It seems to me that you're in a hurry
195 Sjmurphy: should i upload one or both any advice on this two take with the same camera and setting
196 Deaphen: I wouldnt upload either, unless you want rejections. The quality is just not there, plus its grainy, unlevel, etc etc. Also another way to have bette
197 JohnKrist: Seriously Stephen, listen to what we are telling you, and not only us. You are doing the same thing over at "the other side" as well, and you don't s
198 Dkarpezo: Input on this Il-62 would be appreciated. It seems dark but it's real conditions. What do you think? http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/b...ady/UR-865
199 ANITIX87: No, neither should be uploaded, and it's BECAUSE you used the same settings. I edited the Cypria image, since Deaphen edited the other. Here is my at
200 Bottie: If some of you could take a look on these: http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/big/ready/N702TZ-MZJ-30112008.jpg http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/big
201 ANITIX87: Standard etiquette for these thread is to post one or two images as thumbnails instead of links, so that we can see the motive, and, if it works, then
202 Dkarpezo: Input on this Il-62 would be appreciated. It seems dark but it's real conditions. What do you think? Thank you!
203 ANITIX87: Umm...you just asked about this shot like 4 posts ago! Give us some time to review things, haha. Having said that, the shot won't get in as is. It's
204 JohnKrist: Antix87 & Flynavy, welcome to my respected list!
205 JohnKrist: That function does not seem to work right now...but you will be on it
206 Sjmurphy: I will take some this week and read my manual before that and hopefully I MITE have a good photo i checked the DB and my photos i have and i think th
208 Varig767: Hello all, What do you think about these two pictures ?? kind regards, Martijn
209 ANITIX87: Color looks a but funky on both (yellow casts in both images) and they are both soft, especially EasyJet. TIS
210 BWphoto: Hi, everyone. I'd like to upload my first image. It's an overview of Dar Es Salaam airport - would be first in the database. But contrast was off, too
211 Gabriel3630: Hello all, What do you think about these? Thanks. Gabriel Nogueira.
212 Sezer: Hi everyone! I want to upload this pictures. Think you that have a chance? http://focuspictures.de/airliners/2/DSC_0178.jpg http://focuspictures.de/ai
213 Cpd: Sezer, The first one isn't centred properly, the window line on the Avroliner should be closer to the 50% mark. Apart from that, it looks good enough
214 Varig767: Hello all, Is this Onur centered correctly?? kind regards, Martijn
215 Sjmurphy: Today photo's any idea to improve them i known their are not centered
216 Varig767: Sjmurphy, the planes in your pictures are too far in distance. regards, Martijn
217 NWA783: Looks pretty good to me, similar to other shots in the db. - Josh -
218 ANITIX87: Did you use digital zoom? Or only optical zoom? The quality is still not good enough and there is a lot of grain. You need to get much, much, much cl
219 Lanas: Hi I´d leave a bit more space to the right of the fin. Vertically it seems OK. Hope it helps Cheers Lanas.-
220 Gabriel3630: Hello all, What do you think about? Thanks. Gabriel Nogueira.
221 DeltaBravo90: Would appreciate feedback and criticism on the two following photos. Vintage Wings Tiger Moth Gene Soucy Showcat
222 Lanas: Hi I can´t comment on quality, but on other aspects I notice the following: I don´t quite like the composition on this pic. The subject is correctly
223 Sjmurphy: I used the digital zoom I have not edit anything to them this are the original photo's i will be working on them some time this week when i get some
224 ANITIX87: That is a major problem. Do not ever, ever use digital zoom on a point and shoot camera. I recommend you turn it off immediately. You have to get clo
225 DeltaBravo90: Lanas thanks a lot for your input. The Tiger Moth: I cropped tighter on the right side, unfortunatley that is the full frame and if i play with rotati
226 Sjmurphy: I will not use the digital zoom the only troublem is i had th use it for Boeing C17A Globemaster III as it turn their for take off
227 JohnKrist: Stephen, you never HAVE TO use digital zoom. Digital zoom is the same as cropping in close, and then set a larger image size in photoshop, and photos
228 JohnKrist: I suppose silence is approval Was accepted at first instance, it didn't even get the "In screening" in the queue, I got the email before that View La
229 Sezer: Hi! what do you think about this photo? What can I do better?
230 Lanas: Hi Better with the crop, but the overexposed issue is still there I´m afraid. Also, I think the contrast was better in the first version. Be careful
231 Comair25: Im still trying to get my first uploaded to A.net So far I have only taken the noise out of them. Im really not a photo editing pro, so any help would
232 Bottie: 2 requests from my side: http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/big/ready/Pinal-Overview-1200.jpg http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/big/ready/N39367-KLAX
233 RMgrantonic: I would like to hear peoples thoughts on these. Do you think any could make it through screening? Thanks for looking!
234 RMgrantonic: Could someone tell me about my shots please?
235 JohnKrist: 1 Center, needs closer crop, soft and contrast, also the colour seems off 2 Blurry, needs closer crop, colour 3 Your best shot, but too much noise re
236 WithaK: Any point trying to upload this one? Any work that could be done to get it up to scratch? http://i172.photobucket.com/albums/w...ithaK_01/Prescreen/20
237 JohnKrist: It's a nice motive but focus is behind the main subject. Don't know if it can be saved, but it is one pretty picture IMO.
238 Ketko2: Hi all, do any of these photos stand a chance or should I pull them from the Q? Also, should I pick the nose category for the 737 nightshot? http://ww
239 ANITIX87: CO - soft all around, and could use some more contrast. ANA - this motive just doesn't do anything for me. The plane is very low in the frame, and th
241 JohnKrist: Impossible to judge properly, need to be at least 1024 pixels wide. What I can see is that it seems blurry, high contrast and have a green cast.
244 DeltaBravo90: Sorry about that, photobucket was set to resize at 640x480, if you right click and click view image you should be able to see 1024x683. Any suggestio
245 Zacsg132: Hello, is this one good enough? Thanks http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/big/ready/767791221.jpg
246 Cptkilroy: Any of these have a shot? havent resized them yet. and also, which ones stand the best shot, because I cant upload all of them at once yet.
247 NWA783: I would say the first one is the only one that might stand a shot, but even that motive might get rejected. - Josh -
248 Xenon: Hi, Can some comment this foto please: http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/big/ready/IMG_0382-N249AU-anet.jpg Thx all. Daniel Alaerts
249 Lanas: Daniel hi You may have some problems with the centering, IMO. Looks too 'full' on the right but quite empty on the left part of the image. Maybe addin
250 JohnKrist: The larger version does not show a green cast IMO, but the histogram is weird. I tried to adjust it but could not come up with anything better than y
251 Zacsg132: Hello, is there any chance this would make it? http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/big/ready/67865766.jpg[Edited 2008-12-15 02:23:07]
252 Xenon: Lanas and JohnKrist, Thx for your input! Does the picture shows to much 'noise'? I have a new LCD and i'm not sure anymore of quality and noise levels
253 ZeleniPas: Hi, this photo has been kind of mind boggling to me as to whether i should modify it or do anything before I submit it. There's a very tiny, hard-to-n
254 Lanas: Hi Yes, I see it a bit noisy, but I can´t be certain actually, due to my notebook monitor. I´ll have a look at it when I get to my desktop PC. Th
255 AnonymousInSAN: Hey all, This is my first time asking for help in this forum. I am unable to post the photo in question due to the fact that I can't upload any photos
256 Xenon: Image was re-edited. http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/big/ready/IMG_0382-N249AU-anet1.jpg Cheers and thx! Daniel.
257 JohnKrist: Post the link to the rejected photo in the Post-Screen topic and we'll have a look In my opinion it's much better, and you have also changed the leve
258 AnonymousInSAN: Hope this link works... http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/r...big/20081215_vlp-n470wn-san-01.jpg Thanks!
259 Zacsg132: Can someone please give me some feedback on my photo, Reply 251
260 JohnKrist: It is a bit oversharpened, there are jaggies on the winglet and the titles. Other than that I am afraid you will get a motive rejection since part of
261 JohnKrist: The center rejection is because the aircraft is low in the frame, if you raise it and thereby also add a bit more of the sun it will look better moti
262 HAL: Here's my latest attempt. I know the color seems a bit off, but there was a lot of vog (volcanic haze) that day. If I fix the color, am I altering it
263 AnonymousInSAN: JohnKrist - thank you for helping me and so many others here on this thread! I will re-edit my original photo and submit it once I get over this kille
264 ZeleniPas: Thanks as to telling me what to do, and I also understand now that this could be an easy rejection due to only a bit of the engine being included in
265 JohnKrist: Yoe will need a good photo editing program like photoshop to do that. I seriously doubt it can be fixed with what photobucket offers (and I really do
266 Idiotdoc: this pic of mine got rejected : and the rejection reasons are: quality, motive and grain. do you guys think that after some photoshopping it'll be acc
267 JohnKrist: First of all, wrong topic, should go in the Post-Screening topic. Other than that, do not upload in 1200px wide. Especially not from a 6mp POS camera
268 Idiotdoc: thanks for your helpful advice. i thought the wing is out of focus too. unfortunately that's the only decent shot i took during my trip so i guess i'
269 JGR: Merry Xtmas Anutters ! What do you think about these "dark" pics ? ? ? http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/big/ready/Imagen_131z2fd3.jpg http://www.air
270 Bistro1200: I have two in the DB already, but I am having trouble with noise, especially with a solid blue background. Here are my two latest in the queue, any co
272 Bistro1200: First one is nice, second is too dark, IMO.
273 JohnKrist: Sometimes I wonder if anyone reads mine or others advice? DO NOT upload in 1200px unless it's a 100% perfect picture, and if you need to ask in the p
274 Neophyte: Hey guys, here are two new pictures. What do you think about them, any advice? Best regards Timo
275 JohnKrist: Emirates could possibly do with a little closer crop to the right engine, not much. Just to make it look centered. Second one has some small jaggies
276 Mkwiat: Hello all, Two from me that i could do with some advice on: Shot 1 Shot 2 Thanks in advance Mark
277 Jetfreak: hi, the first one would be a 5star shot if there weren't the strange contours , i think it's heat haze, in the left wing area around the flaps. but i
278 Cptkilroy: any advice on these two? http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/big/ready/CY_N518FX_1.jpg http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/big/ready/CY_N403LM_1.jpg Tha
279 JohnKrist: Just the level on the second one. First one might get motive due to the truck, but I hope not.
280 Cptkilroy: i tried leveling off of the square of the emergency exit, should i have leveled to the lines on the ramp instead? When I did this, the airplane seemed
282 Moderators: As this thread is now approaching 300 replies we will now archive it for those who find it slow to load and ask that you continue to discuss pre-scree
Sponsor Message: 
From United States of America, joined Apr 2004, 459 posts, 
From Spain, joined May 2005, 249 posts, 
From Sweden, joined Jan 2005, 1340 posts, 
From United Kingdom, joined Jun 2005, 4735 posts, 
From , joined Dec 1969, posts, 
From UK - England, joined Oct 2005, 3184 posts, 
From Netherlands, joined Jul 2006, 46 posts, 
Printer friendly format 
){kind=link}
){kind=link}
){kind=link}