Sponsor Message:
Aviation Photography Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Any Rumors On A Canon 100-400 L Replacement?  
User currently offlineSNATH From United States of America, joined Mar 2004, 3238 posts, RR: 22
Posted (5 years 8 months 3 weeks 6 days 22 hours ago) and read 10012 times:

Hi all (and happy Thanksgiving to the US members!),

I'm looking for a bit more reach for my Canon gear (currently, I can only go up to 200mm) and I'm considering a few alternatives. I've read on a couple of forums that there have been rumors of a replacement for the 100-400 L but there's nothing concrete from Canon yet. Has anyone heard anything?

Thanks,

Tony


Nikon: we don't want more pixels, we want better pixels.
13 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineTimdeGroot From Netherlands, joined Apr 2002, 3674 posts, RR: 64
Reply 1, posted (5 years 8 months 3 weeks 6 days 21 hours ago) and read 10002 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Go By rumors and you'll never buy something when waiting for the next best thing.

I doubt a replacement will come anytime soon though, maybe they can put in a new IS unit...



Alderman Exit
User currently offlineSNATH From United States of America, joined Mar 2004, 3238 posts, RR: 22
Reply 2, posted (5 years 8 months 3 weeks 6 days 20 hours ago) and read 9985 times:

Hi Tim,

Quoting TimdeGroot (Reply 1):
Go By rumors and you'll never buy something when waiting for the next best thing.

Yeah, I know... but I'm not in a hurry for it, so maybe it's worth the wait...

Quoting TimdeGroot (Reply 1):
I doubt a replacement will come anytime soon though, maybe they can put in a new IS unit...

My thoughts exactly. Latest IS would be nice. A bit more reach and a bit more sharpness on the long end would be great. And I would not say no to weather sealing (not that my bodies are weather sealed).

Tony



Nikon: we don't want more pixels, we want better pixels.
User currently offlineFlynavy From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 3, posted (5 years 8 months 3 weeks 6 days 20 hours ago) and read 9980 times:



Quoting SNATH (Reply 2):
And I would not say no to weather sealing

I'll second that notion. A weather sealed 100-400L would be a godsend!  cloudnine 


User currently offlineUA935 From United Kingdom, joined Feb 2004, 610 posts, RR: 6
Reply 4, posted (5 years 8 months 3 weeks 6 days 17 hours ago) and read 9939 times:



Quoting SNATH (Reply 2):
Latest IS would be nice. A bit more reach and a bit more sharpness on the long end would be great. And I would not say no to weather sealing

That's why they sell the EF 500 F4 L IS USM.



Live every second like you mean it
User currently offlineINNflight From Switzerland, joined Apr 2004, 3766 posts, RR: 60
Reply 5, posted (5 years 8 months 3 weeks 6 days 17 hours ago) and read 9926 times:

I am not sure what they could improve apart from the IS unit actually. Better optics on exactly the same lens won't really be a huge seller, new IS unit ok, but that's not worth the effort I guess.

They cannot make it a 100-400 f/4 all the way either, because that would probably double the price of the lens and as well its weight.

I'd love to see a 100-400 without the push/pull zoom tho!! That'd be something nice.



Jet Visuals
User currently offlinePaulinbna From United States of America, joined Feb 2003, 1114 posts, RR: 5
Reply 6, posted (5 years 8 months 3 weeks 6 days 14 hours ago) and read 9880 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!



Quoting INNflight (Reply 5):
I am not sure what they could improve apart from the IS unit actually

I agree with you, other then maybe making is 80-400 like the Nikon lens. There has been a few times where I would like to have the little extra wide part.



Canon 50D user; 100-400 MM L IS 10-22 MM, 60MM Macro
User currently offlineAviopic From Netherlands, joined Mar 2004, 2681 posts, RR: 42
Reply 7, posted (5 years 8 months 3 weeks 6 days 10 hours ago) and read 9844 times:



Quoting INNflight (Reply 5):
I am not sure what they could improve apart from the IS unit actually.

The best improvement would be a seal to keep the dust out, it's not called "DustPump" for no reason  Big grin



The truth lives in one’s mind, it doesn’t really exist
User currently offlineSpencer From United Kingdom, joined Apr 2004, 1635 posts, RR: 17
Reply 8, posted (5 years 8 months 3 weeks 5 days 23 hours ago) and read 9776 times:

Willem, I've got exactly the same problem with mine, the thing just seems to suck in as much dust as possible! Having said that I've had it for 5 years now so it's relative. On the other hand sealing it in some way or another would've been better. As Flo said, a zoom ring system could be the way to go?
Spencer.



EOS1D4, 7D, 30D, 100-400/4.5-5.6 L IS USM, 70-200/2.8 L IS2 USM, 17-40 f4 L USM, 24-105 f4 L IS USM, 85 f1.8 USM
User currently offlineWalter2222 From Belgium, joined Sep 2005, 1293 posts, RR: 28
Reply 9, posted (5 years 8 months 3 weeks 5 days 22 hours ago) and read 9770 times:



Quoting Aviopic (Reply 7):
it's not called "DustPump" for no reason

I have had no problems with mine, the camera sensor collects some dust, but it does this also with every lens change... I have no indication that this lens pumps in more dust than my other lenses. I clean the sensor 3 to 4 times per year (300D), but I have not yet cleaned my 40D's sensor since I purchased it (but I will need to do that soon, because I have seen a big dust spot on my most recent shots, but photoshop can still handle it...).

Quoting INNflight (Reply 5):
I'd love to see a 100-400 without the push/pull zoom tho!! That'd be something nice.

On the other hand, I must say that I got used to the push-pull fairly quickly. I am not "pumping" while shooting, I most cases I determine the zoom position I want for the shot and then I tighten the zoom position.

Best regards,

Walter



canon 340d ;-) - EFS10-22mm f/3.5-4.5 USM - EFS18-55mm - EF28-105mm f3.5/4.5 - EF100-400mm f4.5-5.6l is usm - ...
User currently offlineSNATH From United States of America, joined Mar 2004, 3238 posts, RR: 22
Reply 10, posted (5 years 8 months 3 weeks 5 days 21 hours ago) and read 9762 times:

So, we have a wish list:

- latest IS
- a big more sharpness
- weather sealing
- a zoom ring

Canon, are you reading this?  Smile

Quoting UA935 (Reply 4):
That's why they sell the EF 500 F4 L IS USM.

(a) I can't afford it and (b) it'd be too damn heavy!  Smile

Quoting INNflight (Reply 5):
Better optics on exactly the same lens won't really be a huge seller,

If this is the case, why has Canon released mk II versions of the 14mm L and the 24mm L? I think the main selling point of the mk II versions is that they have better optics (this is of course still to be determined for the 24mm, as it's just come out). Even though I'm sure the 100-400mm L is still selling quite well, I can't believe that those two primes will sell more copies (combined!) than a potential 100-400mm L replacement.

Quoting Paulinbna (Reply 6):
There has been a few times where I would like to have the little extra wide part.

I would personally sacrifice some low end to get more reach (a la Sigma 150-500), as I have the lower end covered with the 70-200mm.

Tony



Nikon: we don't want more pixels, we want better pixels.
User currently offlineAKE0404AR From United States of America, joined May 2000, 2535 posts, RR: 46
Reply 11, posted (5 years 8 months 3 weeks 5 days 21 hours ago) and read 9751 times:



Quoting SNATH (Reply 10):

Quoting UA935 (Reply 4):
That's why they sell the EF 500 F4 L IS USM.

(a) I can't afford it and (b) it'd be too damn heavy!

It is not heavy....you get used to the weight. You can easily shoot it handheld.

Vasco


User currently offlineCodeshare From Poland, joined Sep 2002, 1854 posts, RR: 1
Reply 12, posted (5 years 8 months 3 weeks 5 days 18 hours ago) and read 9726 times:



Quoting Paulinbna (Reply 6):


Quoting INNflight (Reply 5):
I am not sure what they could improve apart from the IS unit actually

I agree with you, other then maybe making is 80-400 like the Nikon lens. There has been a few times where I would like to have the little extra wide part.

There is a rumour that Nikon will be bringing out a new 80-400, but who knows.

Quoting AKE0404AR (Reply 11):
It is not heavy....you get used to the weight. You can easily shoot it handheld.

Vasco

Agreed, and I know a person who always shoots it handheld.

KS/codeshare



How much A is there is Airliners Net ? 0 or nothing ?
User currently offlineSpencer From United Kingdom, joined Apr 2004, 1635 posts, RR: 17
Reply 13, posted (5 years 8 months 3 weeks 5 days 18 hours ago) and read 9714 times:



Quoting Walter2222 (Reply 9):
I have had no problems with mine, the camera sensor collects some dust, but it does this also with every lens change... I have no indication that this lens pumps in more dust than my other lenses. I clean the sensor 3 to 4 times per year (300D), but I have not yet cleaned my 40D's sensor since I purchased it (but I will need to do that soon, because I have seen a big dust spot on my most recent shots, but photoshop can still handle it...).

This isn't what (Willem) and I are talking about. The lens itself draws dust particles in, nothing to do with the sensor at all. When I look at the front element it has a fair amount of dust behind the outermost surface and as such is impossible for me to clean.
Spencer.



EOS1D4, 7D, 30D, 100-400/4.5-5.6 L IS USM, 70-200/2.8 L IS2 USM, 17-40 f4 L USM, 24-105 f4 L IS USM, 85 f1.8 USM
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Canon 100-400 Lens Questions. posted Sun Oct 19 2008 12:37:22 by Apollo13
Have You Had This Problem With Canon 100-400 posted Tue Jan 8 2008 08:20:27 by Mirrodie
Canon 100-400 L Is? posted Fri Jun 22 2007 00:20:08 by Wolverine
Canon 100-400 Seizing Up. posted Mon Jul 31 2006 09:54:09 by Spencer
Canon 100-400 Or 300 L Or 400 L? posted Sat May 13 2006 00:37:44 by LHRSIMON
Canon 100-400 Is And The Sigma 50-500mm posted Thu Oct 20 2005 05:07:51 by LOT767-300ER
Sigma 80-400 VS Canon 100-400 posted Tue Sep 13 2005 22:03:56 by Mrk25
What Lens To Complement Canon 100-400? posted Tue Apr 19 2005 11:47:09 by Gerardo
Canon 100-400 Lens; Dust Spot posted Wed Dec 15 2004 13:26:35 by Miamiair
Sigma 80-400/Canon 100-400 posted Fri Oct 1 2004 13:32:02 by Ua935