Sponsor Message:
Aviation Photography Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
When Is Common 'common'?  
User currently offlineVarig767 From Netherlands, joined Jan 2005, 243 posts, RR: 4
Posted (5 years 4 months 19 hours ago) and read 2205 times:

Hi to everyone!

I 've had a picture of PH-BXR @ AMS rejected for 'common' and 'colour'. There are 80 photo's of this plane in the database and 33 of them are made @ AMS. Without judging the screener's decision (therefore, I didn't include the rejected photo), is there some (unwritten?) guideline I can follow for estimating the chance the picture can be rejected for common? In other words, when is common common??

kind regards, Martijn

[Edited 2008-12-22 12:45:14]

6 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineOly720man From United Kingdom, joined May 2004, 6604 posts, RR: 11
Reply 1, posted (5 years 4 months 19 hours ago) and read 2189 times:



Quoting Varig767 (Thread starter):
is there some (unwritten?) guideline I can follow for estimating the chance the picture can be rejected for common?

Here's the (written) guideline.

http://www.airliners.net/procphotos/reasons.php


COMMON
The aircraft depicted in your photos was very common in the Airliners.net database, with many photos of this aircraft already present on the website.

In this case the standards for acceptance are higher than for aircraft of which we have fewer or no photographs on the database, and only photos of exceptional quality will be accepted.

Please understand that this is not a judgement on your abilities, as your picture may be of a technical quality which may be very decent. However, due to the common nature of the aircraft photographed, the highest standard is applied to avoid substantial duplication.

When uploading you should always check our database for the amount of photos we have of the particular aircraft you are uploading. If a particular aircraft or registration is common in our database, you may increase the likelihood your photos of it will be accepted by photographing it from an unusual angle, under exceptional lighting conditions, or with interesting scenery in the background.


Basically if your photo looks very much like others already accepted then you'll need to have the highest quality.

And with KLM aircraft at AMS you're going to find few aircraft that aren't well represented in the db - the recent deliveries, E190, B773 will give you the best chances without having to find a new angle for the older aircraft.



wheat and dairy can screw up your brain
User currently offlineVarig767 From Netherlands, joined Jan 2005, 243 posts, RR: 4
Reply 2, posted (5 years 4 months 19 hours ago) and read 2182 times:



Quoting Oly720man (Reply 1):
Basically if your photo looks very much like others already accepted then you'll need to have the highest quality

So it is not just about the amount of pictures, but also the angle or other characteristics of the picture. That is helpful, thank you.

regards, Martijn


User currently offlineAirKas1 From Netherlands, joined Dec 2003, 3944 posts, RR: 56
Reply 3, posted (5 years 4 months 19 hours ago) and read 2181 times:

Also, common is usually given together with 1 (or more) rejection reasons. In your case this was together with colour.
I think once an aircraft has near 100 photos in the DB, you risk getting common.


User currently offlineDlowwa From Canada, joined Apr 2005, 7328 posts, RR: 31
Reply 4, posted (5 years 4 months 19 hours ago) and read 2179 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

My take of the 'common' rejection is that it will be used alongside any other slight flaw to give reason for the rejection.

i.e. Even though there may be many other shots of a given plane/reg., even from the same location (any KL at AMS, for example), if the photo is technically perfect (no issues with colour/contrast/etc...) it will be accepted.

If, however, there is some small flaw (colour in your case) that might be overlooked if the plane was UNcommon, the screeners will add 'common' to the rejection reasons.

I don't know if that makes sense, but basically, I've never had a photo rejected for "common' alone, but always in conjunction with some other flaw. So, if your shot was an uncommon plane with a slight colour problem, (probably) accepted, but a common plane with the same colour problem, rejected.

Please, anyone correct me if my interpretation/experience is not correct.


User currently offlineOly720man From United Kingdom, joined May 2004, 6604 posts, RR: 11
Reply 5, posted (5 years 4 months 18 hours ago) and read 2165 times:



Quoting Varig767 (Reply 2):
So it is not just about the amount of pictures, but also the angle or other characteristics of the picture

Yes, that's about it. You can have a side on view of the aircaft, but it will be "different" if it's in the air, landing, taking off, cloudy, sunny, etc. The background can add interest to the photo. Then there are the locations you take the photo from and the angle of the aircraft in the photo.

At many major airports there are a limited number of photo locations - if only because some locations give better photos than others - and the number of photographers can mean that some aircraft will, inevitably, be photographed quite regularly.



wheat and dairy can screw up your brain
User currently offlineStil From Spain, joined exactly 8 years ago today! , 345 posts, RR: 7
Reply 6, posted (5 years 4 months 10 hours ago) and read 2103 times:

Hi.

Funny how, according to this info:
http://news.nationalgeographic.com/n...081211-biggest-brightest-moon.html
A picture of mine showing this very special moon and an extra bright blue sky was rejected aplying the "common" guideline. The aircraft has 61 pictures here. The screeners were informed about it

Stil



....... Gueropppa! ......
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
When Is It OK To Take Pictures In The Plane? posted Fri Feb 29 2008 20:01:20 by StarAlliance38
When Is Private Prop Not Private? posted Fri Jun 16 2006 11:10:10 by Frippe
When Is Level Not Level? posted Mon Mar 27 2006 01:39:39 by DC10Tim
When Is It "Too Much" Dust In Your Lense... posted Tue Nov 29 2005 10:04:50 by Speedbird128
When Is A Gate Shot Motivated? posted Mon Jun 20 2005 05:04:02 by Pilottim747
Is This "bad Double" ,"bad Common" Or Non? posted Wed Oct 13 2004 02:03:02 by Eksath
Most Common Fault You Do When Photographing? posted Sat Jul 10 2004 15:27:35 by Spencer
An-124 At DEN - When Is It Departing? posted Mon Aug 25 2003 07:48:47 by An-225
When Is Nikon Coming Out With A New Dslr? posted Fri Mar 7 2003 06:50:38 by Alaskaairlines
When Is It Far Enough Or Too Far? posted Fri Nov 9 2001 21:50:21 by Airplanenut