I think I know why the second picture was rejected - it did not include the entire tail assembly (I was too concerned with capturing the Douglas logo). Any help and advice would be really appreciated. The place where I took these pictures is somewhere that I can readily go back to, so if any of you have some ideas on some better angles, I'd appreciate those as well. There are two other photos of mine that passed the first screening, so I'll keep my fingers crossed on those.
Screener5 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 1, posted (12 years 9 months 1 week 5 days 3 hours ago) and read 1201 times:
Unfortunately I was the one that rejected them. Both pics seem not to show enough of whats lower in the frame, and had been cropped/framed out of the pics. They both left me with the feeling of wanting to see more, but the rest just isn't there.
Are these dig pics? If so, #2 is very soft and you cannot read the text within the Douglas logo. If the logo was your intent, well it didn't work. Sorry about that.
You say you can go back to this place. If so, zoom out and try to get more of the subject, and not just a portion thereof.
MDL_777 From United States of America, joined Aug 2001, 267 posts, RR: 0
Reply 2, posted (12 years 9 months 1 week 5 days 2 hours ago) and read 1185 times:
S5: Thanks for the feedback. No, the pictures aren't digital - I used a point & shoot with Fuji 100 speed film. On number two, I was trying for a tail shot and I wound up cutting off the bottom. I just swung and missed on this one. I have a couple of other shots from this roll that show more of the airplane that i hope to submit within the next few days.