Sponsor Message:
Aviation Photography Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Pre-Screening Thread Number 7  
User currently offlineModerators From United States of America, joined Apr 2004, 513 posts, RR: 0
Posted (5 years 7 months 2 weeks 3 days 3 hours ago) and read 7037 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
FORUM MODERATOR

Number 6 took already again quite some time to load, so here is number 7.

Once again the link to number 6, if you need to check there:

http://www.airliners.net/aviation-fo...on_photography/read.main/323879/1/

Thanks and happy uploading.


Please use moderators@airliners.net to contact us.
208 replies: All unread, showing first 25:
 
User currently offlineFlipdewaf From United Kingdom, joined Jul 2006, 1572 posts, RR: 0
Reply 1, posted (5 years 7 months 2 weeks 3 days 1 hour ago) and read 7012 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

1.
http://img207.imageshack.us/img207/3791/dsc1932ps3.jpg

2.
http://img238.imageshack.us/img238/5568/dsc1909rv7.jpg

3.
http://img443.imageshack.us/img443/6685/dsc3822mb6.jpg

4.
http://img443.imageshack.us/img443/2992/dsc3686rf1.jpg

I know the first two are probably not salvageable but I toiled in the extreme cold for them.

Thanks

Fred


User currently offlineJetplaner From Canada, joined Mar 2008, 158 posts, RR: 0
Reply 2, posted (5 years 7 months 2 weeks 2 days 22 hours ago) and read 6990 times:

Any luck on these?

http://i468.photobucket.com/albums/rr46/mr_jon_95/P1040192.jpg

http://i468.photobucket.com/albums/rr46/mr_jon_95/PC280066.jpg

http://i468.photobucket.com/albums/rr46/mr_jon_95/IMG_1577_2.jpg

-Jetplaner


User currently offlineBubbles From Canada, joined Apr 2005, 1195 posts, RR: 51
Reply 3, posted (5 years 7 months 2 weeks 2 days 21 hours ago) and read 6984 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
PHOTO SCREENER



Quoting Jetplaner (Reply 2):
Any luck on these?

Sorry, no. Many issues in your photos, such as, grainy, soft, level, dirty.

_Hongyin_


User currently offlineDlowwa From Canada, joined Apr 2005, 7328 posts, RR: 30
Reply 4, posted (5 years 7 months 2 weeks 2 days 20 hours ago) and read 6974 times:



Quoting Flipdewaf (Reply 1):
I know the first two are probably not salvageable but I toiled in the extreme cold for them.

Actually, they're not bad. #1 is over-sharpened, and #2 is a bit grainy and a touch soft, but both only need a bit of work. I couldn't promise they'd get in, but it might be worth a shot after a bit of work.

#3 is also slightly over-sharpened, and needs a lot more contrast. #4 is just about right, but also suffers from a touch of over-sharpening (see the leading/trailing edges of the wing).

Overall, I think all four would stand a chance if you put a little time into fixing the minor issues they each have.

Quoting Jetplaner (Reply 2):
Any luck on these?

As Hongyin said, not a chance on the first two, the quality is way too low. The third one is better, but the contrast is too harsh, and you can see all the dirt spots on the window, so also no.

Dana


User currently offlinePlainplane From United States of America, joined Mar 2008, 844 posts, RR: 1
Reply 5, posted (5 years 7 months 2 weeks 2 days 18 hours ago) and read 6962 times:

This was taken on a cloudy, gloomy day but I think it has potential, what do you think?
http://img101.imageshack.us/img101/261/n706jbla4.jpg

Also what should I do to eliminate the noise here?
http://img516.imageshack.us/img516/4701/spmuo8.jpg


User currently offlineCaliSam From United States of America, joined Sep 2008, 55 posts, RR: 0
Reply 6, posted (5 years 7 months 2 weeks 2 days 16 hours ago) and read 6954 times:

How are these? Thanks

http://www.3d-realm.com/files/0117_NW.jpg


http://www.3d-realm.com/files/IMG_8523.jpg


User currently offlineJetfreak From Austria, joined Jul 2007, 286 posts, RR: 0
Reply 7, posted (5 years 7 months 2 weeks 2 days 14 hours ago) and read 6942 times:



Quoting Plainplane (Reply 5):

1: too dark (i know it's because of the weather, but if you lighten it just a bit, it's a perfect shot Smile)

2: I don't think it's that noisy, but unfortunately very blurry.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Quoting CaliSam (Reply 6):

1: not enough contrast (the "nwa" title isn't black enough, but you can easily correct this in Photoshop)

2: like number one; a bit to bright

btw: I love both shots, so please upload them  Smile
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Regards;

Bernhard


User currently offlineBubbles From Canada, joined Apr 2005, 1195 posts, RR: 51
Reply 8, posted (5 years 7 months 2 weeks 2 days 8 hours ago) and read 6915 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
PHOTO SCREENER



Quoting Plainplane (Reply 5):

#1: dark, contrast
#2: grainy dark, contrast, center, and maybe border

Quoting CaliSam (Reply 6):

I think ok to both. The second one's angle looks a little odd, maybe tiny CW rotation will help, but I am not sure.

_Hongyin_


User currently offlinePlainplane From United States of America, joined Mar 2008, 844 posts, RR: 1
Reply 9, posted (5 years 7 months 2 weeks 2 days 5 hours ago) and read 6899 times:



Quoting Bubbles (Reply 8):

I don't think #2 is fixable. I will try to brighten #1. Would that fix the contrast issue also or is there something else I would have to do?


User currently offlinePlainplane From United States of America, joined Mar 2008, 844 posts, RR: 1
Reply 10, posted (5 years 7 months 2 weeks 2 days 1 hour ago) and read 6877 times:

Updated:

I maxed the saturation and slightly increased the exposure. Am I going in the right direction with it?
http://img21.imageshack.us/img21/7761/n706jb2ao7.jpg


User currently offlineSpurusho From Singapore, joined Feb 2009, 91 posts, RR: 0
Reply 11, posted (5 years 7 months 2 weeks 1 day 6 hours ago) and read 6834 times:

Any chance of this making it through?
Click to enlarge.
http://img27.imageshack.us/img27/5536/qantas747vhojety9.jpg


User currently offlineOthic From Sweden, joined Jun 2007, 171 posts, RR: 0
Reply 12, posted (5 years 7 months 2 weeks 1 day 5 hours ago) and read 6824 times:



Quoting Spurusho (Reply 11):

the A/C is too low in frame



A boy learn's much more at the airport then he do at school
User currently offlineSpurusho From Singapore, joined Feb 2009, 91 posts, RR: 0
Reply 13, posted (5 years 7 months 2 weeks 1 day 4 hours ago) and read 6817 times:



Quoting Othic (Reply 12):
the A/C is too low in frame

How about now? Also changed the PP a little.

Click to enlarge
http://img21.imageshack.us/img21/3032/qantas747vhojerecropvd1.jpg


User currently offlineAirKas1 From Netherlands, joined Dec 2003, 3992 posts, RR: 55
Reply 14, posted (5 years 7 months 2 weeks 1 day 3 hours ago) and read 6806 times:



Quoting Spurusho (Reply 13):

Why make it so big? 1024 is enough. Personal choice however..
IMHO the hor.stab. is too closely cropped.


User currently offlineSpurusho From Singapore, joined Feb 2009, 91 posts, RR: 0
Reply 15, posted (5 years 7 months 2 weeks 21 hours ago) and read 6777 times:



Quoting AirKas1 (Reply 14):
Why make it so big? 1024 is enough

Thanks for the tip on the hor.stab., I shall recrop it.

Larger it is, easier to edit on my 24" LCD (1920x1200). At 1024x768 some of the details are too small to see/edit clearly. Actually 1600x1063 or thereabouts would be ideal for me.

On the flip side, these larger images lose this advantage on my notebook's smaller LCD which has a max res of 1280x800  Sad


User currently offlinePlainplane From United States of America, joined Mar 2008, 844 posts, RR: 1
Reply 16, posted (5 years 7 months 2 weeks 20 hours ago) and read 6775 times:

I submitted my modified JetBlue into the queue, if somebody has last-minute advice for that one I will pull it and work on it some more.

I am also wondering if this might also have a chance if I edit it, but I doubt it. (It was taken on a day with even worse weather than the B6 pic):
http://img17.imageshack.us/img17/5387/img0655eo9.jpg


User currently offlineSpurusho From Singapore, joined Feb 2009, 91 posts, RR: 0
Reply 17, posted (5 years 7 months 2 weeks 20 hours ago) and read 6774 times:

Smaller images.
Opinions welcome.

Click to enlarge.
http://img10.imageshack.us/img10/997/imgp4105acr2wb1200qa5.jpg

http://img7.imageshack.us/img7/1047/imgp4156acr2wb1200by3.jpg

[Edited 2009-02-06 18:48:00]

User currently offlineConoramoia From Ireland, joined Oct 2007, 499 posts, RR: 2
Reply 18, posted (5 years 7 months 2 weeks 7 hours ago) and read 6730 times:

any chance?

http://qa.airliners.net/addphotos/bi...ady/v1234021797.4796aeratr4724.jpg


User currently offlineConoramoia From Ireland, joined Oct 2007, 499 posts, RR: 2
Reply 19, posted (5 years 7 months 2 weeks 1 hour ago) and read 6690 times:

and this one...sorry!!


http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/b.../w1234041517.3059737conoramoia.jpg


User currently offlineConoramoia From Ireland, joined Oct 2007, 499 posts, RR: 2
Reply 20, posted (5 years 7 months 2 weeks ago) and read 6684 times:

thanks for veiwing in advance

[Edited 2009-02-07 14:31:28]

User currently offlineAirKas1 From Netherlands, joined Dec 2003, 3992 posts, RR: 55
Reply 21, posted (5 years 7 months 1 week 6 days 14 hours ago) and read 6653 times:



Quoting Plainplane (Reply 16):

It's too dark and you cut off the tip of the tail.

Quoting Spurusho (Reply 17):

Nice shots, they look fine to me.

Quoting Conoramoia (Reply 19):

#1 looks unlevel (see verticals in the background)
#2 looks ok, besides the fact that it might get motive


User currently offlineConoramoia From Ireland, joined Oct 2007, 499 posts, RR: 2
Reply 22, posted (5 years 7 months 1 week 6 days 11 hours ago) and read 6634 times:

I tried to re-level it but the runway is unlevel aswell but have a look and see what you think!!thanks ...conor.


http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/b...4220.9076imgaar4724editedited1.jpg


User currently offlineRuudb From Netherlands, joined Jun 2005, 164 posts, RR: 5
Reply 23, posted (5 years 7 months 1 week 6 days 9 hours ago) and read 6624 times:



Quoting Conoramoia (Reply 18):
any chance?

No, I think it doesn't have a chance, the quality isn't there and the crop looks awkward.


User currently offlineSpurusho From Singapore, joined Feb 2009, 91 posts, RR: 0
Reply 24, posted (5 years 7 months 1 week 6 days 7 hours ago) and read 6603 times:

Since I am new here and I don't have any photos in the databases (first 2 got rejected) I need to be careful what I upload, so I am trying to get an idea here.

Would any of these stand a better chance of acceptance? Any comments are most welcome. Thanks for your time and help  Smile

BTW, the green 'shadow' on the underside of the fuselage is the reflection of the sea. These were shot from the coastline. Weather was lousy yesterday, to add to the misery (all white cloud cover...sigh), it was hot too. I am finding it very difficult to get the WB right on these :/

Click to enlarge
#1
http://img10.imageshack.us/img10/491/imgp4432acr2wbfeb7pp150ni5.jpg

#2
http://img25.imageshack.us/img25/5681/lufthansa747dabvuku6.jpg

#3
http://img7.imageshack.us/img7/107/imgp4418acr2wbusmee8.jpg

#4
http://img7.imageshack.us/img7/7977/imgp4440acr2wbcrrq3.jpg

#5
http://img10.imageshack.us/img10/7991/imgp4675acr2wbfeb71500ah2.jpg

#6
http://img10.imageshack.us/img10/1816/imgp4587acr2wbfeb71500ri7.jpg


25 Spurusho : Thank you for the kind words, AirKas1. You input is greatly appreciated.
26 Plainplane : Evil weather, and yes the shot cut the tail off. That one was just resized to 1024. When I take more shots I will post for advice.
27 Post contains links and images Arjenp : One for the pre-screening Thanks!
28 Dazbo5 : It'll get a motive rejection I'm afraid because of the loader blocking the front landing gear. I'm not sure it's level either (looks like it could do
29 Post contains links and images DeltaBravo90 : What about these two?
30 Post contains links and images Nozilla : Can I have your opinion about this picture.
31 Post contains links and images NicolasRubio : Is this one too dark? Thanks guys!
32 Post contains links and images WithaK : I'll have to pass on the first one but the second would certainly be rejected for dark at least. I love the shot but I think your right in saying it'
33 Post contains links and images NicolasRubio : Fixed it... what about this version?
34 Post contains links Stevemchey : Hello everybody, I am new to the photographer section of Airliners and have already submitted images that were rejected. Now I just found this thread
35 Post contains links Othic : Is there any chance for this one http://img26.imageshack.us/img26/5906/hbjzklv0.jpg /othic
36 TimdeGroot : Needs ccw rotation Looks blurry and oversharpened to compensate. Also lacks contrast and is grainy (shadow highlight tool used?) and could do with so
37 Post contains links and images CaliSam : Thoughts on these 3? Thanks!
38 Cpd : Distance/motive for the AA I believe.
39 Post contains links and images AviatorG : VS744 @ TLPL. Any chance? Thanks in advance. G
40 Bubbles : #1: Blurry, oversharpened #2: Looks ok. #3: Grainy, distant, soft Grainy, oversharpened, contrast _Hongyin_
41 Post contains links and images Spurusho : I have finalized two for submission. Do either stand a chance? Both taken under cloudy conditions. Resized to 1500px and post-processed. Is the WB off
42 Post contains links and images AviatorG : Thanks Hongyin! It originally got rejected for contrast only. How's this one? G
43 PRM : I'd say it's too dark (too much contrast?), and could take some more USM Paul
44 TimdeGroot : Quality is good. Did you by any chance use the shadown/highlight tool or fiddle with the contrast? The bellies look a bit washed out
45 Spurusho : Thanks for the input Tim; very much appreciated. I did adjust the levels in Photoshop CS3 to increase the contrast, but have not used any highlight/s
46 Post contains links and images Neophyte : Hey guys, I found a picture from DL accident in HAM (1995) it´s just a paperscan. I can´t find the negatives. Should I try an upload? Cheers Timo
47 Post contains images NicolasRubio : Nobody?
48 TimdeGroot : That would explain it Yes, looks like a rare shot
49 Post contains links Conoramoia : http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/b.../ready/m1234303554.8451img6009.jpg what are the chances? thanks, conor
50 PRM : Looks ok to me from a lighting perspective, however the sky's a bit grainy and the you've got some oversharpening issues Cheers, Paul
51 PRM : Quality looks good to me; I'm not as sure on the motive... Cheers,Paul
52 Post contains links and images AviatorG : Thx for the reply PRM. How are these?
53 Post contains links Nozilla : Can me give somebody an opinion for this picture. http://img7.myimg.de/airfrance66ff2.jpg
54 Dlowwa : 1. Too much contrast. 2. Also too much contrast; over-sharpened. And although not too bad, both would probably get quality rejections too. Soft, espe
55 Bubbles : Looks okay to me. #1: Level, dark, contrast. #2: Dark. Too blurry. _Hongyin_
56 Post contains links and images FlyFloats : Hi all, this will be my last attempt for this photo. It was rejected first for contrast, then for quality and contrast. I set the white and black poin
57 Post contains links and images CaliSam : I appreciate the help i got with my previous pics (especially Bubbles) Here are 3 more I'm looking to get input on. Thanks in advance
58 PRM : First one will be done for dark, and nose is soft/blurry (probably out of the DoF) Quality is fine on the second (a touch dark?), but you'll get a ba
59 Conoramoia : thanks for reply
60 Post contains links and images Aero145 : Evening! I got this one rejected tonight: Is it really unlevel? I see that the AirBerlin on the left side is unlevel and that thing on the right are u
61 PRM : Needs a little ccw rotation. Cheers, Paul
62 Post contains links and images AirKas1 : Hi guys, I'd love to get some comments on this one: [Edited 2009-02-12 06:30:47]
63 PRM : Nice! A bit too contrasty perhaps due the backlighting, a little oversharp, and perhaps a bit distant (but that's being picky). If you can lighten it
64 CaliSam : Appreciate your reply!
65 Post contains links and images CaliSam : Two more I'd love to get feedback on:
66 Post contains links and images Nozilla : Looks this picture good?
67 Dlowwa : #1. Dark, over-sharpened, and contrast is off. #2. Better, but contrast still a bit off, and not sure if the sharpness/quality level is high enough "
68 Spurusho : I tried to post this question yesterday, but the system kept giving me a server load error. Hope it succeeds this time. ---- My monitor is calibrated
69 Ruudb : I used this some years ago too on my monitor but to be honest I think it doesn't work well, to get your pictures on A.net and using this calibration
70 Nozilla : When you use Windows XP or Vista, you can download the Safari browser on apple.com. Than you can open the picture with safari. Now you can see the pi
71 Spurusho : Ruudb, I'll check that out. But from what I can make out so far, the spyder2express seems to have improved the colors on my monitor. Does it not calib
72 Nozilla : @ Spurusho You can ask the screeners, what they use. It is the best way.
73 Spurusho : @Nozilla, thanks for the tip on Safari. Makes a good difference now- the colors are the same as that I see in Photoshop I shall process according to t
74 AirKas1 : Will try to improve it a bit, thanks for your reply.
75 Post contains links and images Nozilla : Now I gave it some more contrast.
76 Post contains images LH4116 : Ok, so I'm a new beginner, and I don't have a tele-zoom lens yet, I've only got a Nikon D80 and an 18-105 VR lens. I'm not sure this one would ever pa
77 Post contains links and images Neophyte : Hi at all, here are 3 pictures from EDDH. What do you think about them? Cheers Timo
78 Nozilla : The sky is too white and the aircraft is too dark. The image section is also not very good.
79 Post contains links and images FLY2HMO : Alright after a 3 year hiatus I'm back in the spotting business, or so I hope. I took the following today, they have been minimally processed: Any goo
80 Dlowwa : Personally, I'd add even more, but I'm not a screener so take my opinion for what it is. Poor choice of crop, but other than that, the size is too sm
81 Post contains links and images Jetfreak : Hi, is the following motive/crop acceptable? thanks in advance, Bernhard
82 Post contains images ChiefNWA : How about these two? [Edited 2009-02-14 14:17:17]
83 AirKas1 : Crop looks fine. I can't view them large. Probably due to the bug?
84 Post contains links ChiefNWA : Here they are on photobucket... http://i418.photobucket.com/albums/pp266/ChiefNWA/DSC04570.jpg http://i418.photobucket.com/albums/pp266/ChiefNWA/DSC04
85 Post contains links and images CaliSam : This one have a chance? Thanks in advance!
86 Post contains links XPJets : For your review: http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/b...ady/p1234685953.118n918wn_2-14.jpg
87 Post contains links and images LHRlocal : Hi folks, i havent got any images in the database yet, had 4 rejected. I am going to try posting here first in case anyone can help me before i re-upl
88 Dlowwa : No, both are over-sharpened and suffer from the effects of heat haze. Maybe ok, but it's got a bit of a color cast. Yeah, I'd give that a go. Sorry t
89 LHRlocal : Ok thanks for your honesty, guess ill have to find another hobby. Shame really. Such is life .
90 Post contains links and images Spurusho : I've put these 2 in the upload queue. Any chance? I am going by the colors in Safari when doing the PP.
91 Ruudb : Never trust a monitor or your own eyes when editing, just get the values right of your white, grey and black point, if these are right your picture i
92 AirKas1 : The ANA looks nice, the KLM is a little bit too high in the frame IMO.
93 Post contains links and images JohnKrist : Hello people, been a while since I've been spotting due to never ending dull weather, so I thought I should check this one with you: Taken in 2007. Th
94 Othic : looks like Quality/Oversharpened to me /othic
95 JohnKrist : Quality? Based on?
96 Post contains links and images Spurusho : @AirKas1, thanks. Thanks for the tip. I have been doing that 'loosely', and any comments about color cast, Wb etc are most welcome, so I can correct i
97 Ruudb : If you want to use the eyedroppertool, which I personally never use you have to use a neutral color in the picture, the best would be to use a part w
98 Dlowwa : Why find another hobby? Just because you can't get those shots on a.net doesn't mean they're not suitable for your own collection. What is more, if y
99 Post contains links UnitedJumboJet : Any thoughts on this Mad Dog? http://www.flickr.com/photos/10037058@N08/3283258162/sizes/o/ Is it underexposed? Also need thoughts on this 319. http:/
100 Dlowwa : Sorry, but no on both of them. First is really soft, and yes, underexposed. Second is too small in the frame and has a lot of noise/grain. Neither ar
101 Post contains links UnitedJumboJet : How about this? http://www.flickr.com/photos/10037058@N08/3283993566/sizes/o/ Also I found this extremely effective grain and noise remover. http://ci
102 Silver1SWA : Please browse the database to find good examples of the kind of quality expected here. I'm guessing you used it on that shot you provided in your las
103 Dlowwa : Yeah, I think you (UnitedJumboJet) missed the main point I was diplomatically trying to get at... Yes, your last shot has less noise, but it also ver
104 Post contains links and images JohnKrist : Any better? Applied less sharpening and adjusted the shadows to lessen grain. I have switched from CRT to TFT so I have a hard time knowing when the b
105 Spurusho : Ruud, Thank You for the kind offer of help. I have sent you an email via this forum. Please check
106 Post contains links and images Spurusho : Comments and criticisms welcome. Moderators, can you kindly delete my duplicate post in the Post-Screening Thread? I posted in the wrong forum. Sincer
107 Post contains links and images Spurusho : Another two. [Edited 2009-02-17 00:52:23]
108 Dlowwa : Sharpening looks better than before, yes. 1. (JAL) yeah, pretty good. just add a bit more contrast and lower it a bit in the frame, and you'll be goo
109 Post contains links and images Spurusho : Dlowwa, I appreciate the feedback. I have re-edited the JAL. Is this okay now? I upped the contrast a bit and re-centered it.
110 Post contains links and images Conoramoia : what do you think?
111 Post contains links and images FighterPilot : I too am coming off a sort of hiatus as well, hopefully I can get a few photos accepted. I'll start with these: C-FCSB C-FVWH AC Embraer AC A330 AC Ja
112 AirKas1 : IMO it looks a bit soft up front and the "JAL" titles. Why don't you give 1024x... a try? Might look fine with that resolution. Maybe a little bit da
113 FighterPilot : Thanks, I'll give them a shot. Cal
114 Post contains links and images Neophyte : Hi folks, here a 4 pictures from LOWW and EDDH. What do you think about them? best regards Timo
115 Dlowwa : I agree with all of those... 1. Looks good, just needs a little more contrast. 2. A little dark, but otherwise good. 3. Needs a little tighter crop,
116 Post contains links Dahemody : I'm having a hard time getting my first photo accepted. The screeners don't like my leveling. Any tips on selecting the correct landmark to use for le
117 Post contains links and images Dyno152 : Found an image I decided to play with - Worth an upload? Thanks!
118 Post contains images XPJets : Few more: Thanks!
119 Post contains links MidEx216 : Uploaded this one. Got rejected for quality, grainy, and compression. 1) Compression? Uhh... 2) What can I do to fix quality, or what's wrong with it?
120 Dlowwa : Appears to need a little CCW rotation somewhere around .25 and .3 degrees I'd say. Not sure about the altering, but there is something funky going on
121 Post contains links WILCO737 : I have 2 shots in the queue, any opinions? http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/b...y/f1234913901.4355img_5138_no2.jpg http://www.airliners.net/addphoto
122 AirKas1 : Phil! That first shot is awesome, give it a go. Not sure about the second one though.
123 WILCO737 : Yeah, the 2nd gives me some headaches as well... wilco737
124 Post contains images Sketty222 : I was wondering about these two. Any chances of being uploaded? The U2 pic was rejected for being two soft and too much space, so this is the re-edite
125 WILCO737 : Is this the uploaded image? It is rather small, only 640x492 px. It is better if you put the large version (1024px wide) in here, then it is easier t
126 Post contains images Sketty222 : Yeah, I think its because Im not at home so Ive had to save the images from my upload page to the PC im using now and then post them from here. These
127 Post contains links and images Conoramoia : Any chance?thanks!
128 Conoramoia : The first looks fine but th second has the ''L'' from lufthansa cut-off aswell as the ''M'' in md-11 but otherwise i liked it!!
129 WILCO737 : Thanks for the feedback. problem is: I couldn't step back any further and it is already a full 10mm shot (don't have any other lense). I thought it m
130 Conoramoia : well give a try!!no harm in doing that!! any advice on mine?
131 WILCO737 : only that my acceptance ratio drops below 30% again Well, I dunno, it looks good to me... It is level or is it leaning to the right? I need glasses..
132 MidEx216 : I fully understand the difference between cameras, but I'm trying to find out what exactly is wrong with my pictures. Like I said, I understand the g
133 Dlowwa : Ok, I'd like to help you. You can tell me a couple things if you really want me to be able to give the best advice. 1) What kind of camera and lens c
134 Post contains links MidEx216 : Mmk, thanks. 1) In this picture, I was using a Kodak Z740, which I'll admit was a lower level camera, but it's above regular point & shoot quality. I
135 Post contains links and images JohnKrist : It made it into the DB, and my 10th so far. Another milestone passed Thanks for your input! View Large View MediumPhoto © Johnny Kristensen
136 Post contains links and images MidEx216 : Update, thanks to Diamond
137 JohnKrist : On imageshack there are code for clickable thumbnails in forums and I think they work here too.
138 Post contains links Nikog : Hi to all, How about this one? http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/b...ady/g1235022447.215img_1305_1b.jpg It was once rejected because was not centered
139 Post contains links and images Dlowwa : Hey congrats!, Let's see some more, and soon enough you'll be at 50! OK, I can see the problem. I think there are three (maybe just two) things at pl
140 JohnKrist : Well at this rate it will be in 2025, 10 accepted in 4 years On the other hand I am my own worst critic so I have only uploaded 29 in that time...
141 MidEx216 : Mmk...that helps some. Disappointing, yes. Though I do already have a Digital Rebel XT that I'm shooting with, I don't have a proper lens to use on i
142 JohnKrist : It's a way of getting a smaller file size for an image. This is achieved by calculating a pixel and comparing it with adjacent pixels to see if they
143 Post contains links and images Dlowwa : Yeah, it does take a while to get it straight, but when you do, it'll feel a lot easier. I had about 10 years experience in general/landscape/portrai
144 Post contains links and images Spurusho : I have 2 upload slots. Thinking of submitting this one. Too noisy?
145 Dlowwa : Well, you got them both in, so what do we know? Congratulations! I'm on my laptop, but doesn't seem to have too much noise...looks almost good enough
146 WILCO737 : Hehe, thanks. I am pretty happy about it wilco737
147 Post contains links and images Conoramoia : thank you for advice i have tried a CCW rotation any luck with this?.....apart from motive By conoramoia
148 Dlowwa : Just gave it a look again. Noise level looks ok, but the contrast is a little harsh, and it's a little dark. Otherwise looks to be ready to go. Level
149 Post contains links Alasdair1982 : Any hope for this? http://myaviation.net/search/photo_search.php?id=01512696
150 Conoramoia : emm ,I think there is too much saturation or blu-ray.It can be confusing getting rid of blu-ray,you can tell by the backround and judging by the fenc
151 Post contains links and images Conoramoia : have a look at this edit By conoramoia
152 Dlowwa : Yes, it looks better, and close enough that you wouldn't embarrass yourself to submit it, but I think it's lacking still in the quality area, mostly
153 Post contains links and images FighterPilot : I've got a few more that I'm unsure of. Thanks again Cal
154 Post contains links and images CaliSam : Here are some I’d love to get input on before I upload. A lot of my uploads are getting shot down for “color” which I don’t seem to notice. Th
155 Dlowwa : 1. Looks good, just too dark 2. Quality's ok, not sure about the motive. Plus there's a speck in the sky near the left border. It might be a bird or
156 FighterPilot : Thanks, I ticked the Dusk/night box with the first one so we'll see how that pans out. The speck on the second one is another plane in the circuit. A
157 Post contains links Dlowwa : That's what I thought, just warning you that screeners will reject if they can't easily see what it is... this is from experience, as I once had a sh
158 CaliSam : Interesting.. how do you avoid it? Before I shoot I always adjust my white balance. For that day I set the white balance on my 50D to "daylight", for
159 Dlowwa : Shoot RAW. White balance can then be manipulated after the fact. That is, of course, assuming WB is the culprit here. Otherwise, 'daylight' setting s
160 Post contains links and images Tills : Hi all, This is my first time submitting any photos for consideration. Would any of these come close? -Rob
161 Dlowwa : Just a little over-sharpened (see the jaggies around the cockpit, markings on the fuselage, etc.), otherwise looks good. Dana
162 Post contains links and images Diamond : Well I am officially a photo-uploader now. I have a few hundred photos taken over the last year, about 10 of which I'd consider uploading. I'm as novi
163 Dlowwa : We'll try to take it easy on you... The AirTran is grainy and soft. That one will need a major re-edit before it's ready to go. The Continental is be
164 Sketty222 : This is my problem as well, they look great on my laptop but when I upload them they get rejected for quality. Hey Ho, I'll just have to keep working
165 Conoramoia : First of all, I want to thank you for all your advice!! I have uploaded that second re-edit, and i am currently waiting a result, if however it dosen
166 Braby : With the workflow that i use on my images i remove any dustspots and crop on the full size image, any other work that is needed i do on a re-sized im
167 Post contains links Mclaudio : Hi. As my acceptance ratio is getting worst everytime I upload thanks to some silly changes I did on my monitor, I would like to have a second opinion
168 Post contains links and images Oly720man : Certainly dark. I used Gimp and the auto black and white points to get the left side of the image. Might need the contrast adjusting slightly.
169 Conoramoia : truth be said I'd brighten it up a bit and upload it because I think it has a good chance.
170 Mclaudio : hmmm...the same "old" problem thanks to the adjustments I did on the monitor... After editing the photos they look fine for me, but dark and contrast
171 Post contains links and images Neophyte : Hi at all, in addition my picture of N172DN: http://www.airliners.net/photo/Delta...Lines/Boeing-767-332-ER/1482435/L/ is here a panorama picture whic
172 Post contains links and images Nozilla : Can I have your opinion about this picture?
173 AirKas1 : A panorama-photo like that is not allowed I presume. Besides that, the size is all wrong. It's blurry.
174 Beechcraft : Unfortunatly it is blurred. Denis
175 Post contains links and images DanieL737800 : Could these get accepted ?
176 Post contains links and images Neophyte : Hey guys, what do you think about this 5 pictures? 1. Just minutes after main gear collapse... it´s a scan from paper photo. 2. ... and here on after
177 Post contains images Braby : Hi, Could i have some feedback on this image, not sure if the bright reflections would count against it and be a cause for rejection? Cheers Braby
178 Post contains links and images Comair25 :
179 Post contains images Dlowwa : Hmmm... as I mentioned before, I'm not an expert on cockpit shots, so for the first one I'd have to say maybe...there's a little grain, and it's not
180 Comair25 : yes looking for feedback. What needs to be changed?
181 Aussie18 : First 2 look okay,few jaggies around in places and 3rd one looks too dark/backlight. Looks to have some serious quality issues,blurry,heathaze,soft e
182 Dlowwa : It looks good. No major flaws. If you're shooting Jpeg, then FINE would be the best setting. However, if you are familiar with processing RAW that wo
183 Post contains links Aussie18 : This afternoon i decided to get some of my old scanned images and have a go at scanning them in and seeing how they would turn out,picked a few which
184 Post contains links and images Flipdewaf : These looking any better? 1. 2. 3. 4. I think the lighting wasn't very good on the first one. Thanks Fred
185 Post contains links Nikog : Hi to all, I need opinion on this one: http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/b...dy/l1235311150.9713img_1308_1d.jpg It was rejected before for centering
186 Post contains links Mictheslik : A few from me...new monitor so not too sure.... 1 http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/b...319971.4447micanetchinookzh776.jpg 2 http://www.airliners.net
187 Post contains images Sketty222 : Are these ok? Would they make the cut?
188 Post contains links Jetmatt777 : Hey guys, Can someone look this one over, I'm not really sure about the IQ. http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/b...0560.6953jetmatt777-87554-coex.jpg
189 Dlowwa : Seeing as how you've removed all but one of the images you're asking about, I'll comment on the Qantas 747SP.. All you need to do is pull up other (l
190 Jetmatt777 : Thanks Dana, is the image as a whole dark, or just the sky area? On my monitor it seems fairly bright. Time to re-calibrate.
191 Aussie18 : Easyjet looks to be blurry around Stabiliser of the wing Ryanair is blurry in fuzzy on parts of Ryanair titling EK777 looks blurry around nose and ma
192 Post contains links and images Dlowwa : As a whole. I'd suggest something like this: Dana
193 Post contains links and images Spurusho : Too soft and blurry?
194 Aussie18 : front of it around Lufthansa letters looks quite soft/blurry,also windows aswell,one for personal collection imo.
195 Spurusho : Thought so myself; but wanted a second opinion. Thanks. It's a PP problem, due to incorrect sharpening/eraser settings during TIFF editing; the RAW f
196 Post contains links Nikog : Hi to all, Need opinion on this one: http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/b...dy/s1235401257.0273img_1463_1b.jpg Thanks
197 Sketty222 : The thing is, they look clear and sharp on my laptop and then as soon as I upload them here they look like the above. Any ideas on how I can change t
198 Dlowwa : I'd say you've got some quality issue relating to softness/oversharpening. Look at the leading edge of the wing and the bottom of the red band on the
199 Post contains links and images Sketty222 : This is the original photo before editing (reduced to 1GB from 4GB by uploading it to photobucket)
200 Dlowwa : Well, that shot does look better exposure and sharpening-wise, but it's still too small to tell if the original has the quality needed. I'd say somet
201 Post contains links Jetmatt777 : Dana, thanks fo your help. I forgot to pull it out of the queue, and it got nailed for dark. How's this? http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/b...82.626
202 Dlowwa : Better... I'd give it a touch more brightness and contrast myself, but it might be good enough now. Dana
203 Aussie18 : Looks dark still IMO. The original you posted does seem okay,might make the cut with a good work process in editing Maybe your monitor isnt set up co
204 Post contains links and images Spurusho : I suppose white backgrounds are not acceptable at all? I was walking to a better location when this one happen to pass by over the beach (green water
205 Post contains links and images Spurusho : One more
206 Post contains links Nikog : Hi to all, Need opinion on this one: http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/b...y/s1235486191.2257img_1748_1cf.jpg Thanks
207 Conoramoia : If you wouldn't mind,as I expected it got rejected for''soft''. please reply to this and then further arrangments...or not(depends on you) can be mad
208 Post contains links Moderators : Hello everybody, I am sure you all read this thread: http://www.airliners.net/aviation-fo...on_photography/read.main/327286/1/ Most of you guys asked
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Pre- Screening Thread No. 4 posted Sun Sep 7 2008 05:27:50 by WILCO737
Pre-Screening Thread No. 3 posted Mon Aug 25 2008 22:29:52 by Flynavy
Another Pre-screening Thread.. posted Sun Oct 15 2006 20:28:43 by SA006
Post - Screening Thread Part 2 posted Thu Oct 23 2008 01:07:13 by Moderators
Post- Screening Thread #1 (help after rejection) posted Fri Sep 12 2008 01:11:15 by WILCO737
Pre-Screen Thread #2 posted Wed Jul 9 2008 15:17:46 by Diamond
Pre-screening posted Fri Mar 7 2008 15:35:06 by Thetford569
The Ultimate Pre-Screen Thread Part I posted Mon Mar 3 2008 19:19:04 by Jorge1812
Pre-screening Help posted Sat Mar 1 2008 17:56:49 by Carloscane
Pre-Screening Please posted Mon Feb 11 2008 23:43:07 by Carlos
Pre-Screening Please posted Mon Feb 11 2008 23:43:07 by Carlos