NIKV69 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 1, posted
Tue Mar 3 2009 19:26:15 UTC (5 years 9 months 3 weeks 1 day 22 hours ago) and read 2114 times:
#1 may get motive, some dead space behind the wing I would crop it a little closer to the winglet. It's a little dark and could use some CCWR.
#2 just lacks the quality for here. Lighting and could use a better crop.
#3 is a great shot and seems to have the quality but needs a better crop. Little tighter and a little more USM.
DeltaAVL From United States of America, joined Mar 2007, 1893 posts, RR: 6
Reply 2, posted
Wed Mar 4 2009 13:28:03 UTC (5 years 9 months 3 weeks 1 day 4 hours ago) and read 2060 times:
Quoting NIKV69 ( Reply 1): #3 is a great shot and seems to have the quality but needs a better crop. Little tighter and a little more USM.
Agreed, looks like this one could be saved with some simple editing.
"We break, We bend, With hand in hand, When hope is gone, Just hang on." -Guster
Aussie18 From Australia, joined Jun 2005, 1757 posts, RR: 9
Reply 3, posted
Thu Mar 5 2009 00:35:38 UTC (5 years 9 months 3 weeks 17 hours ago) and read 2019 times:
1st one looks underexposed and motive probably
2nd one the lighting isnt too good with the suns position.
Boost contrast and add some USM on 3rd Image,Also agree with tighter crop more close to engines.
Gabriel3630 From Brazil, joined Jul 2008, 43 posts, RR: 0
Reply 4, posted
Thu Mar 5 2009 10:42:17 UTC (5 years 9 months 3 weeks 6 hours ago) and read 1994 times:
Watch carefully the Cyans an Blues.
I guess the first one is not very very good quality.
Take a look at the 2th an 3th, and compare your edition.