NIKV69 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 1, posted
Tue Mar 3 2009 19:26:15 UTC (6 years 11 months 2 weeks 2 days 23 hours ago) and read 2420 times:
#1 may get motive, some dead space behind the wing I would crop it a little closer to the winglet. It's a little dark and could use some CCWR.
#2 just lacks the quality for here. Lighting and could use a better crop.
#3 is a great shot and seems to have the quality but needs a better crop. Little tighter and a little more USM.
DeltaAVL From United States of America, joined Mar 2007, 1893 posts, RR: 5
Reply 2, posted
Wed Mar 4 2009 13:28:03 UTC (6 years 11 months 2 weeks 2 days 5 hours ago) and read 2366 times:
Quoting NIKV69 ( Reply 1): #3 is a great shot and seems to have the quality but needs a better crop. Little tighter and a little more USM.
Agreed, looks like this one could be saved with some simple editing.
"We break, We bend, With hand in hand, When hope is gone, Just hang on." -Guster
Aussie18 From Australia, joined Jun 2005, 1779 posts, RR: 9
Reply 3, posted
Thu Mar 5 2009 00:35:38 UTC (6 years 11 months 2 weeks 1 day 18 hours ago) and read 2325 times:
1st one looks underexposed and motive probably
2nd one the lighting isnt too good with the suns position.
Boost contrast and add some USM on 3rd Image,Also agree with tighter crop more close to engines.
Gabriel3630 From Brazil, joined Jul 2008, 43 posts, RR: 0
Reply 4, posted
Thu Mar 5 2009 10:42:17 UTC (6 years 11 months 2 weeks 1 day 8 hours ago) and read 2300 times:
Watch carefully the Cyans an Blues.
I guess the first one is not very very good quality.
Take a look at the 2th an 3th, and compare your edition.