I understand the double, since I have another shot in the database (same day, same side of the aircraft), but I had decided to upload anyway, given that there are only three shots of this reg. in the database. I thought this motiv was different enough (close-up, showing some details which can be handy for aircraft modellers...).
The question I have is thus more related to the motiv rejection part. Is it because of the steps attached to the aircraft or is this type of close-up not wanted?
FlyingZacko From Germany, joined May 2005, 583 posts, RR: 6
Reply 1, posted (5 years 9 months 3 weeks 6 days 2 hours ago) and read 2329 times:
not sure about the motiv, but you might as well have gotten NOA_Quality or NOA_Overprocessed for your excessive use of the shadow highlight tool showing up right underneath the wing and on the belly. The photo is rather grainy right there.
Canon 40D + 24-70 f/2.8 L + 70-200 f/4 L + Speedlite 430EX
Despite all this, I´m not sure you´ll pass the double cut. Be sure to include a message to the screeners explaining why you´re uploading this double shot.
Could you paste the link to the other photo from the aircraft, so we can see it?
Good luck with it.
"Faithless is he that says farewell when the road darkens." J.R.R. Tolkien
I had put a note to the screener that I was aware that this would be a double (given that it was also my shot, on the same day and showing the same side of the aircraft), but I also noted that I thought this close-up shot was a different motiv.
I was not surprised with the double rejection, but I just want to learn more why the shot was a not acceptable motiv.
After all the feedback, I assume that it is indeed the steps that are attached to the aircraft ( as is often the case with Swedish aircraft) that caused the motiv rejection.