Photo Acceptance - Post Screening (Stulli)
Stulli From Germany, joined Mar 2009, 48 posts, RR: 0 Posted Tue Mar 31 2009 07:38:58 UTC (5 years 4 months 3 weeks 3 days ago) and read 1940 times:
Got this one rejected now for the second time. As I understood it, the main reason was 'too grainy', which confuses me a bit. The original is a Fujichrome 100 slide, which is grainy as it is.
It was scanned at 3200 dpi, using a slide scanner, I dont't know how to get it better.
Although I know, it's kind of a taboo, asking questions like this here, I can't help asking myself, how it comes that one can easily find thousands of pitures in the database, that are much more grainy than this one. As the most of these are older, I got the idea, that maybe pictures from the past five years or so, that are not digitally taken but scanned slides are no longer requested at all?
Othic From Sweden, joined Jun 2007, 171 posts, RR: 0
Reply 1, posted
Tue Mar 31 2009 08:24:12 UTC (5 years 4 months 3 weeks 3 days ago) and read 1931 times:
size it down to about 1024x683 or 1100x733 pixels and it'll be perfect
A boy learn's much more at the airport then he do at school
Stulli From Germany, joined Mar 2009, 48 posts, RR: 0
Reply 2, posted
Tue Mar 31 2009 08:56:30 UTC (5 years 4 months 3 weeks 2 days 23 hours ago) and read 1916 times:
Sounds good, thanks
... and let's see...
Dlowwa From Canada, joined Apr 2005, 7328 posts, RR: 30
Reply 3, posted
Mon Apr 13 2009 02:45:44 UTC (5 years 4 months 1 week 4 days 5 hours ago) and read 1714 times:
Jalap From Belgium, joined Oct 2007, 355 posts, RR: 1
Reply 4, posted
Tue Apr 14 2009 02:04:08 UTC (5 years 4 months 1 week 3 days 6 hours ago) and read 1668 times:
Congratulations, nice shot! There aren't too many shots in here of Boxcars that are actually flying
Hope you'll also upload some of your slides from the 70's and 80's that you mentionned in the other thread, I would love to see them