Photo Acceptance - Post Screening (supersellertim) — Aviation Photography Forum

Sponsor Message:


My Starred Topics \| Profile \| New Topic \| Forum Index \| Help \| Search

Photo Acceptance - Post Screening (supersellertim)

Supersellertim From United States of America, joined Jul 2008, 33 posts, RR: 0
Posted (4 years 1 month 3 weeks 3 days 18 hours ago) and read 1287 times:

Darn it. This on got rejected for:
Quality
Overexposed
Level
http://www.airliners.net/procphotos/...0090401_y1238262080.2708img184.jpg

Any way to possibly make it better?

8 replies: All unread, jump to last

Supersellertim From United States of America, joined Jul 2008, 33 posts, RR: 0
Reply 1, posted (4 years 1 month 3 weeks 3 days 18 hours ago) and read 1286 times:

Just thinking, it seems to been enlarged from what I had previewed in the upload que and in photoshop. Any reason for this?

Dlowwa From Canada, joined Apr 2005, 7247 posts, RR: 32
Reply 2, posted (4 years 1 month 3 weeks 3 days 18 hours ago) and read 1281 times:

AIRLINERS.NET CREW
HEAD SCREENER

Quoting Supersellertim (Thread starter):
Overexposed

Just bring down the brightness/exposure a bit (the highlights/details on the nose look blown-out).

Quoting Supersellertim (Thread starter):
Level

Looks like it needs a slight CW rotation

Quoting Supersellertim (Thread starter):
Quality

hmmm.... can't see the problem with quality... maybe someone else can chime in?

Supersellertim From United States of America, joined Jul 2008, 33 posts, RR: 0
Reply 3, posted (4 years 1 month 3 weeks 3 days 18 hours ago) and read 1272 times:

Alright. I have changed it a bit:

Big version: Width: 1024 Height: 731 File size: 813kb

[Edited 2009-04-01 17:25:39]

Dlowwa From Canada, joined Apr 2005, 7247 posts, RR: 32
Reply 4, posted (4 years 1 month 3 weeks 3 days 17 hours ago) and read 1257 times:

AIRLINERS.NET CREW
HEAD SCREENER

ooh...the new version looks much worse quality-wise than the first one you posted. maybe the problem lies with you saving at a lower-quality level each time you edit it or just save it in general... is the first one EXACTLY the same file as you had rejected? The second one you posted I could easily see being rejected for quality, but not so much for the first.

I'd examine your workflow and see if you aren't losing quality each time you save as a Jpeg, because there's a huge difference in quality between the first and second pictures you've posted here.

Dana

Supersellertim From United States of America, joined Jul 2008, 33 posts, RR: 0
Reply 5, posted (4 years 1 month 3 weeks 3 days 7 hours ago) and read 1215 times:

You know, I agree with you. I will work with that.

Supersellertim From United States of America, joined Jul 2008, 33 posts, RR: 0
Reply 6, posted (4 years 1 month 1 week 6 days 22 hours ago) and read 1045 times:

Alright... What do you think about this:

http://img4.imageshack.us/img4/117/img0333c123.jpg

Dlowwa From Canada, joined Apr 2005, 7247 posts, RR: 32
Reply 7, posted (4 years 1 month 1 week 6 days 19 hours ago) and read 1029 times:

AIRLINERS.NET CREW
HEAD SCREENER

Quoting Supersellertim (Reply 6):
Alright... What do you think about this:

Looks pretty blurry, probably due to the fact that you were panning in less than ideal lighting conditions. Also a little low in the frame and could use some slight CCW rotation.

Exposure and quality look ok, but, yeah, the big killer here is that it's blurry.

Dana

Supersellertim From United States of America, joined Jul 2008, 33 posts, RR: 0
Reply 8, posted (4 years 1 month 1 week 6 days 18 hours ago) and read 1025 times:

Thank you! I was stupid and thought that 1/250 would work out well shooting handheld, resulting in the blurry picture. I guess you live and learn, especially just starting out.. I really do appreciate the criticism as it has helped a large amount!

Top Of Page

Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics: