Sponsor Message:
Aviation Photography Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Photo Acceptance - Post Screening (supersellertim)  
User currently offlineSupersellertim From United States of America, joined Jul 2008, 33 posts, RR: 0
Posted (5 years 3 months 3 weeks 2 days 21 hours ago) and read 1765 times:

Darn it. This on got rejected for:
Quality
Overexposed
Level
http://www.airliners.net/procphotos/...0090401_y1238262080.2708img184.jpg

Any way to possibly make it better?

8 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineSupersellertim From United States of America, joined Jul 2008, 33 posts, RR: 0
Reply 1, posted (5 years 3 months 3 weeks 2 days 21 hours ago) and read 1764 times:

Just thinking, it seems to been enlarged from what I had previewed in the upload que and in photoshop. Any reason for this?

User currently offlineDlowwa From Canada, joined Apr 2005, 7328 posts, RR: 31
Reply 2, posted (5 years 3 months 3 weeks 2 days 21 hours ago) and read 1759 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!



Quoting Supersellertim (Thread starter):
Overexposed

Just bring down the brightness/exposure a bit (the highlights/details on the nose look blown-out).

Quoting Supersellertim (Thread starter):
Level

Looks like it needs a slight CW rotation

Quoting Supersellertim (Thread starter):
Quality

hmmm.... can't see the problem with quality... maybe someone else can chime in?


User currently offlineSupersellertim From United States of America, joined Jul 2008, 33 posts, RR: 0
Reply 3, posted (5 years 3 months 3 weeks 2 days 20 hours ago) and read 1750 times:

Alright. I have changed it a bit:
Big version: Width: 1024 Height: 731 File size: 813kb


[Edited 2009-04-01 17:25:39]

User currently offlineDlowwa From Canada, joined Apr 2005, 7328 posts, RR: 31
Reply 4, posted (5 years 3 months 3 weeks 2 days 19 hours ago) and read 1735 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

ooh...the new version looks much worse quality-wise than the first one you posted. maybe the problem lies with you saving at a lower-quality level each time you edit it or just save it in general... is the first one EXACTLY the same file as you had rejected? The second one you posted I could easily see being rejected for quality, but not so much for the first.

I'd examine your workflow and see if you aren't losing quality each time you save as a Jpeg, because there's a huge difference in quality between the first and second pictures you've posted here.

Dana


User currently offlineSupersellertim From United States of America, joined Jul 2008, 33 posts, RR: 0
Reply 5, posted (5 years 3 months 3 weeks 2 days 10 hours ago) and read 1693 times:

You know, I agree with you. I will work with that.

User currently offlineSupersellertim From United States of America, joined Jul 2008, 33 posts, RR: 0
Reply 6, posted (5 years 3 months 1 week 6 days ago) and read 1523 times:

Alright... What do you think about this:
http://img4.imageshack.us/img4/117/img0333c123.jpg


User currently offlineDlowwa From Canada, joined Apr 2005, 7328 posts, RR: 31
Reply 7, posted (5 years 3 months 1 week 5 days 21 hours ago) and read 1507 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!



Quoting Supersellertim (Reply 6):
Alright... What do you think about this:

Looks pretty blurry, probably due to the fact that you were panning in less than ideal lighting conditions. Also a little low in the frame and could use some slight CCW rotation.

Exposure and quality look ok, but, yeah, the big killer here is that it's blurry.

Dana


User currently offlineSupersellertim From United States of America, joined Jul 2008, 33 posts, RR: 0
Reply 8, posted (5 years 3 months 1 week 5 days 20 hours ago) and read 1503 times:

Thank you! I was stupid and thought that 1/250 would work out well shooting handheld, resulting in the blurry picture. I guess you live and learn, especially just starting out.. I really do appreciate the criticism as it has helped a large amount!

Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Photo Acceptance - Post Screening (ChiefNWA) posted Sun Mar 29 2009 20:53:24 by ChiefNWA
Photo Acceptance - Post Screening (RMgrantonic) posted Sun Mar 29 2009 19:38:41 by RMgrantonic
Photo Acceptance - Post Screening (Thomas2) posted Sun Mar 29 2009 11:41:42 by Thomas2
Photo Acceptance - Post-screening (TupolevTu154) posted Sun Mar 29 2009 09:00:59 by TupolevTu154
Photo Acceptance - Post-Screening (A1rl1ner1965) posted Sun Mar 29 2009 05:58:00 by A1rl1ner1965
Photo Acceptance - Post Screening (dvincent) posted Sat Mar 28 2009 05:15:27 by Dvincent
Photo Acceptance - Post Screening (cvervais) posted Fri Mar 27 2009 20:29:17 by Cvervais
Photo Acceptance - Post-screening (MikeIrwin) posted Fri Mar 27 2009 13:52:02 by MikeIrwin
Photo Acceptance - Post Screening (Braby) posted Thu Mar 26 2009 12:48:15 by Braby
Photo Acceptance - Post-Screening (points) posted Thu Mar 26 2009 12:43:07 by Points