Dlowwa From Canada, joined Apr 2005, 7328 posts, RR: 29
Reply 4, posted (6 years 3 months 6 days 11 hours ago) and read 1940 times:
ooh...the new version looks much worse quality-wise than the first one you posted. maybe the problem lies with you saving at a lower-quality level each time you edit it or just save it in general... is the first one EXACTLY the same file as you had rejected? The second one you posted I could easily see being rejected for quality, but not so much for the first.
I'd examine your workflow and see if you aren't losing quality each time you save as a Jpeg, because there's a huge difference in quality between the first and second pictures you've posted here.
Supersellertim From United States of America, joined Jul 2008, 33 posts, RR: 0
Reply 8, posted (6 years 2 months 3 weeks 4 days 12 hours ago) and read 1708 times:
Thank you! I was stupid and thought that 1/250 would work out well shooting handheld, resulting in the blurry picture. I guess you live and learn, especially just starting out.. I really do appreciate the criticism as it has helped a large amount!