Sponsor Message:
Aviation Photography Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Personal Messages - Please Take Note  
User currently offlineScreeners From United States of America, joined Apr 2004, 15 posts, RR: 0
Posted (5 years 8 months 2 weeks 6 days 10 hours ago) and read 4041 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
PHOTO SCREENER

Hi All

To improve our screening process and the feedback you receive we have decided to start working with abbreviations in personal comments. This will allow us to send far more personal messages than before.

For you this means you will need to be aware of the meaning of the abbreviations. For now we have decided to start using 3 very common ones. Hopefully in the near future we can expand this to encompass many more personals, and all abbreviations should be in our upload guide.

For now though

CW - Clockwise rotation needed

CCW - CounterClockwise rotation needed

HH- Heathaze/jetwash

If you know any members who do not frequent the forum please let them know.

Hope this helps

The A.net Screening Team

[Edited 2009-04-02 09:45:14]

22 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineJakTrax From United Kingdom, joined Jun 2005, 4936 posts, RR: 7
Reply 1, posted (5 years 8 months 2 weeks 6 days 10 hours ago) and read 4006 times:

Sounds like a good idea. The first two are pretty self-explanatory I think.

Karl


User currently offlinePtrjong From Netherlands, joined Mar 2005, 4002 posts, RR: 18
Reply 2, posted (5 years 8 months 2 weeks 6 days 9 hours ago) and read 3986 times:

It might be an idea to list these abbreviations here:
http://www.airliners.net/procphotos/reasons.php
Personal is currently not explained here at all, which raises a standard question here in the forum every week or so  Wink

Peter Smile



The only difference between me and a madman is that I am not mad (Salvador Dali)
User currently offlineJorge1812 From Germany, joined Apr 2004, 3149 posts, RR: 6
Reply 3, posted (5 years 8 months 2 weeks 6 days 9 hours ago) and read 3981 times:



Quoting Ptrjong (Reply 2):
It might be an idea to list these abbreviations here:

Also could be included in the e-mail, or will this few extra bites generate too much traffic when used in thousands of mails?

georg


User currently offlineAirKas1 From Netherlands, joined Dec 2003, 4028 posts, RR: 55
Reply 4, posted (5 years 8 months 2 weeks 6 days 8 hours ago) and read 3944 times:

I think this is a good idea. Got one of those personals myself today  Smile

User currently offlineUnattendedBag From United States of America, joined Oct 2003, 2342 posts, RR: 1
Reply 5, posted (5 years 8 months 2 weeks 6 days 7 hours ago) and read 3880 times:



Quoting Screeners (Thread starter):
For now we have decided to start using 3 very common ones.

Start? I have received these abbreviations in my rejection email for quite some time.



Slower traffic, keep right
User currently offlineWalter2222 From Belgium, joined Sep 2005, 1303 posts, RR: 28
Reply 6, posted (5 years 8 months 2 weeks 6 days 5 hours ago) and read 3803 times:



Quoting Screeners (Thread starter):
Hope this helps

Sure does!

PS: A frequently asked question for "contrast"-rejection is "is there not enough contrast or is there too much contrast" (eg C+ or C- could help out  Smile ... and reduce the number of posts).

Best regards,

Walter



canon 340d ;-) - EFS10-22mm f/3.5-4.5 USM - EFS18-55mm - EF28-105mm f3.5/4.5 - EF100-400mm f4.5-5.6l is usm - ...
User currently offlineSilver1SWA From United States of America, joined Mar 2004, 4858 posts, RR: 25
Reply 7, posted (5 years 8 months 2 weeks 6 days 4 hours ago) and read 3773 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Hey, the screeners remembered their password!  Wink

Quoting Walter2222 (Reply 6):
PS: A frequently asked question for "contrast"-rejection is "is there not enough contrast or is there too much contrast" (eg C+ or C- could help out ... and reduce the number of posts).

Yes! Excellent idea.



ALL views, opinions expressed are mine ONLY and are NOT representative of those shared by Southwest Airlines Co.
User currently offlineChukcha From Australia, joined Mar 2006, 1991 posts, RR: 7
Reply 8, posted (5 years 8 months 2 weeks 6 days 2 hours ago) and read 3732 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Great idea. It is definitely better to receive abbreviated messages than no messages at all.

Another rejection that is often quite obscure is 'motive'. Some photos are rejected for 'motive' for an awkward crop and therefore salvageable. How about maybe using a single word 'CROP'?

Some messages could also be suggested for 'editing', like 'HALO', etc.

Cheers,
Andrei

[Edited 2009-04-02 17:20:29]

User currently offlineCpd From Australia, joined Jun 2008, 4881 posts, RR: 37
Reply 9, posted (5 years 8 months 2 weeks 5 days 2 hours ago) and read 3553 times:



Quoting Walter2222 (Reply 6):
PS: A frequently asked question for "contrast"-rejection is "is there not enough contrast or is there too much contrast" (eg C+ or C- could help out Smile ... and reduce the number of posts).

Exactly right. Good idea.

Perhaps even C++ (for lots more contrast needed) or C+ for a little bit more contrast, etc.


User currently offlineCodeshare From Poland, joined Sep 2002, 1854 posts, RR: 1
Reply 10, posted (5 years 8 months 2 weeks 4 days 11 hours ago) and read 3469 times:

Splendid.

BTW: C is for Cookie  Wink

KS/codeshare



How much A is there is Airliners Net ? 0 or nothing ?
User currently offlineINNflight From Switzerland, joined Apr 2004, 3767 posts, RR: 60
Reply 11, posted (5 years 8 months 2 weeks 4 days 11 hours ago) and read 3465 times:



Quoting Walter2222 (Reply 6):
(eg C+ or C- could help out

Would that mean the images has too much contrast or needs more contrast?  Wink



Jet Visuals
User currently offlineChukcha From Australia, joined Mar 2006, 1991 posts, RR: 7
Reply 12, posted (5 years 8 months 1 week 18 hours ago) and read 3037 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!



Quoting Screeners (Thread starter):
To improve our screening process and the feedback you receive we have decided to start working with abbreviations in personal comments.

Just curious - has anyone received these abbreviated messages? Seemed like a good idea; pity if it didn't take off.

Cheers,
Andrei


User currently offlineAussie18 From Australia, joined Jun 2005, 1757 posts, RR: 9
Reply 13, posted (5 years 8 months 1 week 17 hours ago) and read 3022 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
PHOTO SCREENER

I received a message today in a rejection"aircraft to high in frame",Good explanation really as I found it easy to identify the problem.

User currently offlineAirKas1 From Netherlands, joined Dec 2003, 4028 posts, RR: 55
Reply 14, posted (5 years 8 months 1 week 17 hours ago) and read 3020 times:

In line of the comments;

I got one (for category) a few days ago, but with an acceptance! I don't know who the screener in question was, but just wanted to let you know that that action was much appreciated  Smile


User currently offlineChukcha From Australia, joined Mar 2006, 1991 posts, RR: 7
Reply 15, posted (5 years 8 months 1 week 11 hours ago) and read 2973 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

I've received plenty or rejections with and without personal messages; here, I'm just wondering whether the abbreviated messages are going to become common (and consistent) practice, or it was just a good but un-workable idea.

Cheers,
Andrei


User currently offlineClickhappy From United States of America, joined Sep 2001, 9664 posts, RR: 68
Reply 16, posted (5 years 8 months 1 week 7 hours ago) and read 2929 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
PHOTO SCREENER

I don't know that all screeners are using abbreviated messages.

I prefer to type mine out, I think a few others feel the same way.


User currently offlineJumboJim747 From Australia, joined Oct 2004, 2465 posts, RR: 44
Reply 17, posted (5 years 8 months 1 week 5 hours ago) and read 2891 times:



Quoting Clickhappy (Reply 16):
I don't know that all screeners are using abbreviated messages.

Agree with you there i prefer the human touch even to rejected messages  Smile
Cheers



On a wing and a prayer
User currently offline2H4 From United States of America, joined Oct 2004, 8956 posts, RR: 60
Reply 18, posted (5 years 8 months 1 week 4 hours ago) and read 2883 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
DATABASE EDITOR



Quoting JumboJim747 (Reply 17):
Agree with you there i prefer the human touch even to rejected messages

Agreed. It's amazing what even a few words can do to change the tone and put a positive spin on a rejection.

Once or twice, after receiving a rejection with no remark at all, I've gotten frustrated with dealing with the photo and have given up in exasperation.

But with a remark along the lines of "Nice shot, but it's a bit too _______", I feel a lot more motivated to go that extra mile, make some changes, and have another go at it.

2H4



Intentionally Left Blank
User currently offlineChukcha From Australia, joined Mar 2006, 1991 posts, RR: 7
Reply 19, posted (5 years 8 months 6 days 22 hours ago) and read 2823 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!



Quoting JumboJim747 (Reply 17):

Agree with you there i prefer the human touch even to rejected messages

Guys, you missing my point. I much prefer the non-abbreviated messages myself. Unfortunately though, I rarely get them.

What I'm talking about is that abbreviated messages are better than no messages at all; it is abbreviated ones versus "no messages'. If a screener feels like typing out - great, I guess nobody could keep him from that.

But if the screener feels like he is pressed for time and ordinarily would write nothing at all, typing a widely understood abbreviation would only take a split second, but the photographer would still get his vital piece of information.

Cheers,
Andrei


User currently offlineDanny From Poland, joined Apr 2002, 3515 posts, RR: 3
Reply 20, posted (5 years 8 months 6 days 10 hours ago) and read 2755 times:



Quoting Screeners (Thread starter):
CW - Clockwise rotation needed

CCW - CounterClockwise rotation needed

HH- Heathaze/jetwash

Why not make them rejection reasons? Rather than have general "angle" simply have two: CCW and CW?


User currently offlineCodeshare From Poland, joined Sep 2002, 1854 posts, RR: 1
Reply 21, posted (5 years 8 months 5 days 10 hours ago) and read 2683 times:

I agree here, that makes things a lot more simple.

KS/codeshare



How much A is there is Airliners Net ? 0 or nothing ?
User currently offlineChukcha From Australia, joined Mar 2006, 1991 posts, RR: 7
Reply 22, posted (5 years 8 months 5 days 2 hours ago) and read 2636 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!



Quoting Danny (Reply 20):
Why not make them rejection reasons?

Good idea, but I don't think they are quite ready yet to make any major changes before most bugs are fixed. In the meantime, abbreviations could be a nice compromise.

Andrei


Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Screening Delays, Take Note posted Sat Jan 31 2009 02:03:00 by TimdeGroot
Take Note - An Unannounced Change, Or A Bug? posted Sat Dec 29 2007 13:01:29 by Psych
Please Take A Look At My Pictures posted Sat Aug 26 2000 04:44:38 by Usairways@clt
Please Take A Look posted Tue Aug 1 2000 15:39:25 by LGW
A Personal Note Of Thanks To TZ And Ed posted Sun Aug 31 2008 00:46:41 by Psych
Reject Reason: Personal Level . Help Me Please posted Sun May 28 2006 20:37:35 by Andrei
REJECT-personal Angle? Help Me Please posted Mon May 15 2006 15:00:21 by Andrei
My Personal Rejection Thread - Advice Please posted Fri Apr 28 2006 06:49:52 by INNflight
Photo Usage Request For Book - Advice Please! posted Wed Mar 25 2009 12:17:54 by Irish251
40D Colour Adjustment Advice Please. posted Mon Mar 16 2009 12:43:36 by Qantas744