Sponsor Message:
Aviation Photography Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Lens Options  
User currently offlineStuart1044 From United Kingdom, joined Apr 2007, 93 posts, RR: 2
Posted (5 years 5 months 4 days 22 hours ago) and read 2620 times:

Hi All,

Currently i have a Nikon D60 with the 18-55mm lens, and i am looking to save up for a longer lens. Trouble is i am not sure which to go for, i have singled out the following two:


Nikon 55-200mm


Tamron 70-300mm

I really like the prospect of the VR ability on the Nikon lens, but would prefer the longer (300mm) Tamron.

Any thoughts?

[Edited 2009-04-15 06:36:49]

9 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineConoramoia From Ireland, joined Oct 2007, 499 posts, RR: 2
Reply 1, posted (5 years 5 months 4 days 21 hours ago) and read 2608 times:

well if you think that you'll be able to get the shots you want with the 200mm then buy that,but if not you must realize that the quality in the 300mm is going to be lower and will involve more post-editing,

cheers

conor


User currently offlineRuudb From Netherlands, joined Jun 2005, 164 posts, RR: 5
Reply 2, posted (5 years 5 months 4 days 21 hours ago) and read 2603 times:

Better buy a 70-300mm VR from Nikon, maybe it costs a bit more but it is a good value lens for the money.

User currently offlineCpd From Australia, joined Jun 2008, 4879 posts, RR: 38
Reply 3, posted (5 years 5 months 4 days 21 hours ago) and read 2598 times:

I was going to suggest another couple of Nikkor lenses, until I looked at the price of the 55-200mm.

I think the 55-200mm might be your only option. 70-300mm VR is very costly in comparison, and the 300mm F/4 AF-S prime a bit more still.


User currently offlineStuart1044 From United Kingdom, joined Apr 2007, 93 posts, RR: 2
Reply 4, posted (5 years 5 months 4 days 21 hours ago) and read 2594 times:

I was thinking sort of that way, the VR lenses are very costly, but are obviously worth it.

I reckon i could manage with the 55-200mm lens and benefit from quality due to the VR factor


User currently offlineIamlucky13 From United States of America, joined Aug 2007, 242 posts, RR: 0
Reply 5, posted (5 years 5 months 4 days 13 hours ago) and read 2557 times:



Quoting Stuart1044 (Reply 4):
I was thinking sort of that way, the VR lenses are very costly, but are obviously worth it.

I reckon i could manage with the 55-200mm lens and benefit from quality due to the VR factor

When the light is good, VR does little if anything for you. As shutter speeds start to get lower is when you'll appreciate it.

If you think you'll shooting a lot in the evening or overcast conditions, I'd take the Nikon in a heartbeat (it's sharpness is a little more consistent, but there's a few specific conditions where the Tamron beats it), but if not it's more of a toss-up. The Tamron looks to have slower AF, but if the locations you typically spot from put you a long ways from the planes, you might want the extra length.

FYI, some reviews

Tamron:
http://www.slrgear.com/reviews/showproduct.php/product/455/cat/23
Nikon:
http://www.slrgear.com/reviews/showproduct.php/product/1088/cat/13


User currently offlineStuart1044 From United Kingdom, joined Apr 2007, 93 posts, RR: 2
Reply 6, posted (5 years 5 months 3 days 22 hours ago) and read 2504 times:

hey, thanks for the input guys.

Just had a look around and I can get the 55-200 VR for £178

http://www.amazon.co.uk/dp/B000O13A9...g=kelkmpcpc-2nd-ce-21&linkCode=asn

and the 70-300 Tamron for £120

http://www.warehouseexpress.com/prod...um=comparison&utm_campaign=1030157

I mainly will be spotting around Manchester EGCC, where on the 'mound' you are pretty damn close, however, when they use the other runway it is a bit difficult to get them, i think the 55-200 would be long enough. The conditions in Manchester are usually grey, however we occasioanlly get some sun  Smile


User currently offlineChase From United States of America, joined Nov 2005, 1054 posts, RR: 0
Reply 7, posted (5 years 4 months 2 weeks 1 day 15 hours ago) and read 2102 times:

If it helps your frame of mind any, bear in mind that the 200mm lens on a D60, with its EPS-C sized sensor, is equivalent to a 320mm lens on a full-frame camera. That's the kind of mentral trickery that, if I were in your shoes, would get me off the fence and down the camera shop  Wink

User currently offlineStuart1044 From United Kingdom, joined Apr 2007, 93 posts, RR: 2
Reply 8, posted (5 years 4 months 2 weeks 22 hours ago) and read 2051 times:

I think i am going to go for the 55-200mm vr. I was having a look at th 70-300mm vr but i'm a bit short on cash at the moment. I think the 55-200 will be long enough.

Once i get it some shots will follow  Smile


User currently offlineJanneman From Netherlands, joined Sep 2007, 2 posts, RR: 0
Reply 9, posted (5 years 4 months 2 weeks 9 hours ago) and read 2016 times:

If you want a good lens that is affordable buy the 120-400 from Sigma.
Last year i traded a Nikon 80-400 in for this one and it is really better in every way,and i only had the Nikon for five months. Big grin
I wished that Nikon made a lens like that.  Sad
Good luck with your search.


Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Good Sony Zoom Lens For 2,100ft Distance posted Mon Mar 16 2009 17:22:10 by DL767captain
Nikon Lens Suggestions Please! posted Fri Mar 13 2009 16:15:05 by Tarantulalv
Photo Acceptance - Lens Related Pre Screen (Silver1SWA) posted Mon Mar 9 2009 15:47:53 by Silver1SWA
Your Shots With Canon 1.4 Extender On F/4 Lens Pls posted Fri Feb 20 2009 07:46:40 by RonS
Need Help Choosing Camera And Lens posted Sat Jan 31 2009 23:55:04 by ReVolut1on
Yet Another Lens Thread posted Wed Jan 28 2009 10:42:36 by CaliSam
Any Cheap Fisheye Lens For Nikon? posted Mon Jan 26 2009 14:13:13 by LH4116
Just Got A New Lens With Bad Calibration posted Mon Jan 26 2009 12:31:11 by Ronstar2
Keep The 18-55MM Kit Lens? Is Needed? posted Sat Jan 17 2009 08:36:28 by Ronstar2
Canon Lens Have The Edge posted Wed Jan 7 2009 19:04:12 by Gunship01