Sponsor Message:
Aviation Photography Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Photo Acceptance - Post Screening (A388)  
User currently offlineA388 From Netherlands Antilles, joined May 2001, 9781 posts, RR: 11
Posted (5 years 4 months 1 week 1 day 23 hours ago) and read 2013 times:

Dear members/screeners,

My below photo got rejected:


http://www.airliners.net/procphotos/...9994335.4525usafe4rccur170409a.jpg


Is there a way to save this photo?


A388

9 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineVarig767 From Netherlands, joined Jan 2005, 243 posts, RR: 3
Reply 1, posted (5 years 4 months 1 week 1 day 22 hours ago) and read 1996 times:



Quoting A388 (Thread starter):
Is there a way to save this photo?

Depends on rejection reason. I suspect the fence is causing a motive rejection. It is more useful to announce the rejection-reason(s) in post-screening.

Kind regards, Martijn


User currently offlineAirKas1 From Netherlands, joined Dec 2003, 3984 posts, RR: 55
Reply 2, posted (5 years 4 months 1 week 1 day 22 hours ago) and read 1989 times:

Hi Roger, what was the rej. reason?

User currently offlineOly720man From United Kingdom, joined May 2004, 6705 posts, RR: 11
Reply 3, posted (5 years 4 months 1 week 1 day 21 hours ago) and read 1979 times:

Rejected for dark?

http://i4.photobucket.com/albums/y120/oly720man/b747.jpg



wheat and dairy can screw up your brain
User currently offlineA388 From Netherlands Antilles, joined May 2001, 9781 posts, RR: 11
Reply 4, posted (5 years 4 months 1 week 1 day 20 hours ago) and read 1973 times:

How stupid of me, please find below the rejections reasons:

There is a problem with the contrasts in these photo(s). The whites in the
image are not pure white, or the blacks are not pure black.
There may be several reasons for this problem, and depending this, it may
or may not be possible to correct it. If you want to read more about this
problem, and about possible ways to correct it and hopefully attempt a
re-upload, please go to

http://www.airliners.net/procphotos/reasons.php#contrast

The transition between solid lines on these photos have a very jagged
appearance. This may be due to general oversharpening of the image, but
there may also be other reasons for this problem.
In some cases the jagged appearance can be corrected. If you want to read
more about this problem, and about possible ways to correct it and
hopefully attempt a re-upload, please go to

http://www.airliners.net/procphotos/reasons.php#oversharpened

Should I darken the photo a bit as mentioned already? I take it that the sharpening rejection lies in the letters on the fuselage but how can not sharpen that section selectively, the letters are just too thin to avoid jagged edges in that area.


Best regards,

A388


User currently offlineWhisperjet From Germany, joined Nov 2007, 567 posts, RR: 8
Reply 5, posted (5 years 4 months 1 week 1 day 20 hours ago) and read 1970 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
PHOTO SCREENER

Hi Roger,

I think your picture could be saved if you start up with a new edit from scratch.
The titles and the vertical stabilizer are quite jagged and the contrast is off.
The picture also looks quite grainy to me.

Stefan



Nobody is perfect - not even a perfect fool.
User currently offlineA388 From Netherlands Antilles, joined May 2001, 9781 posts, RR: 11
Reply 6, posted (5 years 4 months 1 week 1 day 20 hours ago) and read 1961 times:



Quoting Whisperjet (Reply 5):
Hi Roger,

I think your picture could be saved if you start up with a new edit from scratch.
The titles and the vertical stabilizer are quite jagged and the contrast is off.
The picture also looks quite grainy to me.

Stefan

Okay thanks Stefan. I will have a look at it. The graininess is an issue I sometimes have difficulty with. The fact that I also use an older version of PS (version 2.0) also plays its part. Editing photos with the newer versions seems to be far better than the relic 2.0 version it seems.

I will have a look at it again and thanks again  Smile

Best regards,

A388


User currently offlineAirKas1 From Netherlands, joined Dec 2003, 3984 posts, RR: 55
Reply 7, posted (5 years 4 months 1 week 1 day 19 hours ago) and read 1958 times:



Quoting A388 (Reply 4):
Should I darken the photo a bit as mentioned already? I take it that the sharpening rejection lies in the letters on the fuselage but how can not sharpen that section selectively, the letters are just too thin to avoid jagged edges in that area.

He said, that the image might be a bit dark too, not that you should make it darker  Wink
A solution for the sharpening might be to sharpen in layers.


User currently offlineA388 From Netherlands Antilles, joined May 2001, 9781 posts, RR: 11
Reply 8, posted (5 years 4 months 1 week 1 day 18 hours ago) and read 1944 times:



Quoting AirKas1 (Reply 7):
He said, that the image might be a bit dark too, not that you should make it darker
A solution for the sharpening might be to sharpen in layers.

Hi AirKas, it's been a long time hearing from you. Nice to see your reply here. I will also take into account your tip.

Best regards,

A388


User currently offlineWhisperjet From Germany, joined Nov 2007, 567 posts, RR: 8
Reply 9, posted (5 years 4 months 1 week 1 day 14 hours ago) and read 1924 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
PHOTO SCREENER



Quoting A388 (Reply 7):
The fact that I also use an older version of PS (version 2.0) also plays its part. Editing photos with the newer versions seems to be far better than the relic 2.0 version it seems.

I still use some old Photshop Elements version that came with a scanner for jpg files and I'm still satisfied with it (though I also have CS3 for RAW files that I take from time to time).

Maybe you should consider getting a noise reduction programm, eg Neat Image. Properly used the output files look much better.

Stefan



Nobody is perfect - not even a perfect fool.
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Photo Acceptance - Post Screening (McG) posted Sun Apr 26 2009 01:23:40 by McG1967
Photo Acceptance-Post Screening (flat13) posted Fri Apr 24 2009 03:19:49 by Flat13
Photo Acceptance-Post Screening (chukcha) posted Thu Apr 23 2009 17:44:30 by Chukcha
Photo Acceptance - Post Screening (Varig767) posted Thu Apr 23 2009 13:29:59 by Varig767
Photo Acceptance-Post Screening (othic) posted Thu Apr 23 2009 01:04:36 by Othic
Photo Acceptance-Post Screening (WithaK) posted Thu Apr 23 2009 00:13:16 by WithaK
Photo Acceptance - Post Screening (NZ107) posted Wed Apr 22 2009 02:56:52 by NZ107
Photo Acceptance - Post-Screening (stevemchey) posted Sun Apr 19 2009 13:32:16 by Stevemchey
Photo Acceptance - Post Screening (Vzlet) posted Sat Apr 18 2009 06:15:09 by Vzlet
Photo Acceptance - Post Screening (Carlos) posted Sat Apr 18 2009 01:04:19 by Carlos