Sponsor Message:
Aviation Photography Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Will The Canon EF-S 55-250mm F/4.0-5.6 Is Do?  
User currently offlineAM744 From Mexico, joined Jun 2001, 1784 posts, RR: 0
Posted (5 years 6 months 3 weeks 23 hours ago) and read 5908 times:

I was browsing Amazon.com and came across the Canon EF-S 55-250mm lens. I haven't got a telephoto lens for my Rebel XSI yet and was wondering if this lens will cut it for aviation photography (A.net quality).

I'm a bit concerned about the 5.6 maximum aperture at 250mm though, but then again, I'll use it mostly at MEX where get intense sunlight most of the time.

This lens will act as a 400mm right? So. Do you guys have experience with this particular lens? I'm just learning the ropes and I'm hesitant on getting an L series at this point.

(Disclaimer: I'm aware that the crop factor compromises light capture and image quality.)

6 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineJakTrax From United Kingdom, joined Jun 2005, 4936 posts, RR: 7
Reply 1, posted (5 years 6 months 3 weeks 21 hours ago) and read 5897 times:

Hi,

Almost any lens will get results worthy of this site - it's actually more to do with the person behind the camera than anything else. The 55-250 is an extremely cheap lens, especially when you consider it has IS. Whether this constitutes good value is debatable. It is very poorly built in my opinion (lots of plastic!) but what do you expect for such a low price?

To be fair, the reviews I've seen highly recommend it - apparently it's pretty well-behaved for such a budget lens.Surprisingly sharp but obviously falling away at the long end. Of course bear in mind that if this lens was to cost £400 the reviews would perhaps be different!

You get what you pay for, and although in this instance I think you're getting quite a bit of lens for your money I'd still recommend saving a little more and going for something better. The 70-300 F5-5.6 IS USM (not to be confused with the cheap 75-300s) is second only to the L and DO ranges in Canon's telephoto line-up and a few hundred dollars cheaper. It is a very sharp lens indeed between F8 and F11. Of course if you have the cash I'd recommend the 70-200 F4 L at the drop of a hat, but the lack of reach bothers some people.

Finally, the 55-250 will still only act as a 250mm at the long end. The 1.6x crop factor is just that, and will never extend the maximum focal length of a lens. The results may look similar to 400mm but at the end of the day the depth-of-field etc. guarantees that a 250mm lens will always remain a 250mm lens.

Karl


User currently offlineCvervais From United States of America, joined Sep 2003, 610 posts, RR: 2
Reply 2, posted (5 years 6 months 3 weeks 17 hours ago) and read 5866 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

I thought the EF-S lenses were made for crop frame cameras and therefore don't need the conversion factor.

User currently offlineJakTrax From United Kingdom, joined Jun 2005, 4936 posts, RR: 7
Reply 3, posted (5 years 6 months 3 weeks 15 hours ago) and read 5851 times:

The crop-factors are in the bodies and therefore an 18-55 lens will never be anything but. Similarly, a 55-250 will always be a 55-250. If the focal lengths were differential it wouldn't say clearly on it, "I am a 55-250mm EF-S lens".

Karl


User currently onlineSilver1SWA From United States of America, joined Mar 2004, 4851 posts, RR: 26
Reply 4, posted (5 years 6 months 3 weeks 12 hours ago) and read 5834 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!



Quoting Cvervais (Reply 2):
I thought the EF-S lenses were made for crop frame cameras and therefore don't need the conversion factor.

EF-S lenses are designed to fit Canon's crop camera bodies. The difference between EF and EF-S is in the mount. Something to consider is whether or not some day down the road the OP wants to upgrade to a full-frame camera. EF-S lenses do not work on full-frame cameras. However an EF lens will work on both crop and full-frame cameras.



ALL views, opinions expressed are mine ONLY and are NOT representative of those shared by Southwest Airlines Co.
User currently offlineRonS From United States of America, joined Feb 2009, 762 posts, RR: 22
Reply 5, posted (5 years 6 months 2 weeks 6 days 10 hours ago) and read 5780 times:

I had this lens for a week. It was pretty good. I don't have images accepted with it, but it wasn't the lens's fault. It has a nice reach and was fairly sharp for the money. I think the price on this is around $199-250, which I believe a good value. Ultimately I decided to return it for the 70-200 f/4 L for $550 though.

If you need examples just send me an email and I'll send you some.

Ron



All opinions expressed by me are my own opinions & do not represent the opinions in any way of my employers.
User currently offlineAM744 From Mexico, joined Jun 2001, 1784 posts, RR: 0
Reply 6, posted (5 years 6 months 2 weeks 5 days 22 hours ago) and read 5749 times:



Quoting RonS (Reply 5):
I had this lens for a week. It was pretty good. I don't have images accepted with it, but it wasn't the lens's fault. It has a nice reach and was fairly sharp for the money.

Thanks for the feedback. I ordered the EF-S, just to learn the ropes. Reviews claim that IS on this particular lens does work. Hopefully I'll get better glass when my skills grant it. Big grin


Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Canon EF 24-105mm F/4 L Is Lens: Tight Zoom Ring? posted Mon Sep 17 2007 00:12:31 by SNATH
Does Anyone Have The Canon EF 28mm F/1.8 USM Lens? posted Wed Jun 27 2007 12:06:55 by SNATH
Canon EF 55-200mm F/4.5-5.6 II USM Telephoto Zoom posted Sun Jan 7 2007 03:34:22 by PilotNTrng
Canon EF-S 17-85mm 1:4-5.6 Is USM posted Mon Jul 17 2006 13:41:22 by FlyingZacko
The Canon EF 70-200mm F/4L USM posted Mon Jul 3 2006 03:35:04 by Aero145
The Canon EF 50mm F/1.8 II Lens posted Fri Apr 21 2006 00:57:36 by Aero145
The Canon EF 70-200mm 1:4L USM posted Mon Apr 17 2006 00:57:27 by Flyingzacko
Canon EF 70-300mm F/4-5.6 Is USM Review Wanted posted Thu Apr 6 2006 12:01:46 by Deaphen
New Canon EF 70-300mm F/4-5.6 Is USM posted Wed Oct 19 2005 00:12:17 by TRVYYZ
Canon EF 75-300mm F/4-5.6 Is USM posted Wed Mar 16 2005 01:57:38 by APFPilot1985