Sponsor Message:
Aviation Photography Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Photo Acceptance - Pre Screening (SAA738)  
User currently offlineSAA738 From United Kingdom, joined Mar 2009, 261 posts, RR: 0
Posted (5 years 2 months 1 week 6 days 23 hours ago) and read 2033 times:

Can someone please tell me what they think of these :

1. Quite a rare 3 in 1.

2. I straightened it using the runway as a guide as when I used the horizon the aircraft looked a bit lob sided.

3. I think this is creative.

4. Engine shot.
___

1. ( http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/big/ready/a1242586666.0796111.jpg )

2. ( http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/big/ready/m1242668645.1326190.jpg )

3. ( http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/big/ready/i1242724130.5938887.jpg )

4. ( http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/big/ready/q1242724522.4715043.jpg )


''To fly as fast as thought you must begin by knowing that you have already arrived'' - Richard Bach
11 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineSpiderguy252 From India, joined Feb 2009, 275 posts, RR: 0
Reply 1, posted (5 years 2 months 1 week 6 days 23 hours ago) and read 2026 times:

#1 and #2 have a nice chance, but I'm not sure about the motive of #3 (The railing, for example).

[Edited 2009-05-21 02:36:48]


Figure .09
User currently offlineAussie18 From Australia, joined Jun 2005, 1742 posts, RR: 9
Reply 2, posted (5 years 2 months 1 week 6 days 21 hours ago) and read 2004 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
PHOTO SCREENER

1 looks good.
2 looks like it needs some CW rotation and abit jaggy on the tail,doors.
3.The railing does look distract IMO but everyon has different opinion and screeners might like it.
4.Quality wise looks good.


User currently offlineSAA738 From United Kingdom, joined Mar 2009, 261 posts, RR: 0
Reply 3, posted (5 years 2 months 1 week 6 days 19 hours ago) and read 1994 times:

Thanks Spider and Aussie, I've removed number (2.) from the queue, I'll upload a better version of it later on...

What about this Boeing 734 throttle quadrant shot ?

http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/b...ready/r1242912802.7294img_2212.jpg



''To fly as fast as thought you must begin by knowing that you have already arrived'' - Richard Bach
User currently offlineJalap From Belgium, joined Oct 2007, 355 posts, RR: 1
Reply 4, posted (5 years 2 months 1 week 6 days 19 hours ago) and read 1992 times:

Wouldn't 3 and 4 lead to a double rejection?

User currently offlineSAA738 From United Kingdom, joined Mar 2009, 261 posts, RR: 0
Reply 5, posted (5 years 2 months 1 week 6 days 15 hours ago) and read 1970 times:



Quoting Jalap (Reply 4):
Wouldn't 3 and 4 lead to a double rejection?

I don't think so ?



''To fly as fast as thought you must begin by knowing that you have already arrived'' - Richard Bach
User currently offlineAcontador From Chile, joined Jul 2005, 1421 posts, RR: 30
Reply 6, posted (5 years 2 months 1 week 6 days 13 hours ago) and read 1958 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
PHOTO SCREENER

Hi,

Quoting Jalap (Reply 4):
Wouldn't 3 and 4 lead to a double rejection?

Strictly speaking, yes it would be a double, as one picture is basically a close-up of the other. Having said that, while I can see the idea of pic 3, I am not sure the end result we see works well...



Just sit back, relax and have a glass of Merlot...enjoy your life!
User currently offlineWILCO737 From Greenland, joined Jun 2004, 8971 posts, RR: 76
Reply 7, posted (5 years 2 months 1 week 6 days 13 hours ago) and read 1955 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
HEAD MODERATOR

Quoting SAA738 (Reply 5):

Quoting Jalap (Reply 4):
Wouldn't 3 and 4 lead to a double rejection?

I don't think so ?

I had the same problem once. I had a shot accepted of the whole airplane and the nose close up got rejected for double as it was same day, same aircraft. So I fear yours might face the same problem.

Just saw Acontador posted as well... Thanks.

wilco737

[Edited 2009-05-21 12:45:44]


It it's not Boeing, I am not going.
User currently offlineSAA738 From United Kingdom, joined Mar 2009, 261 posts, RR: 0
Reply 8, posted (5 years 2 months 1 day 18 hours ago) and read 1765 times:

Opinions on these please ?

I know they're not the greatest quality shots, but they show something '''different'...

http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/big/ready/g1243887691.4822817.jpg

http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/b...dy/s1243952456.5397picture139a.jpg



''To fly as fast as thought you must begin by knowing that you have already arrived'' - Richard Bach
User currently offlineAirKas1 From Netherlands, joined Dec 2003, 3971 posts, RR: 55
Reply 9, posted (5 years 2 months 1 day 17 hours ago) and read 1762 times:

The 2nd (wing) shot is nice, but also grainy I think.

User currently offlineSpiderguy252 From India, joined Feb 2009, 275 posts, RR: 0
Reply 10, posted (5 years 2 months 1 day 17 hours ago) and read 1758 times:

The second one may be rejected straightaway; the terminal is too far away. As for the first, I'm not too sure of the disturbance at the bottom of the image, but since they are not blocking any part of the aircraft, you could give it a try.


Figure .09
User currently offlineSAA738 From United Kingdom, joined Mar 2009, 261 posts, RR: 0
Reply 11, posted (5 years 2 months 1 day 12 hours ago) and read 1738 times:

I've taken out the EK wing view shot for now, it does seem a little grainy. I'll give the 1time tail shot a go though...

What about these (thanks to Darren for the edits) :

http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/b...ready/r1243969373.0179img_2212.jpg

http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/b...ready/t1243973770.4519img_0047.jpg

http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/b...ready/b1243974022.5875img_0051.jpg



''To fly as fast as thought you must begin by knowing that you have already arrived'' - Richard Bach
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Photo Acceptance - Pre Screening (Spiderguy252) posted Thu May 21 2009 00:16:28 by Spiderguy252
Photo Acceptance - Pre Screening (hamstax) posted Wed May 20 2009 18:01:57 by Hamstax
Photo Acceptance - Pre- Screening (Westjet22) posted Mon May 18 2009 18:30:23 by Westjet22
Photo Acceptance - Pre Screening (SA006) posted Sun May 17 2009 13:37:25 by SA006
Photo Acceptance - Pre-Screening (Nirmalmakadia) posted Sun May 17 2009 11:28:26 by Nirmalmakadia
Photo Acceptance - Pre-Screening (Gabriel3630) posted Sun May 17 2009 06:51:03 by Gabriel3630
Photo Acceptance - Pre-Screening (Lufthansi) posted Sat May 16 2009 09:41:56 by Lufthansi
Photo Acceptance - Pre Screening (Zacsg132) posted Sat May 16 2009 07:52:52 by Zacsg132
Photo Acceptance - Pre Screening (Alasdair1982) posted Wed May 13 2009 09:55:49 by Alasdair1982
Photo Acceptance - Pre Screening (jalap) posted Tue May 12 2009 13:20:15 by Jalap