Sponsor Message:
Aviation Photography Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Camera For A Newbie  
User currently offlineSpeedbird9 From United Kingdom, joined Jan 2008, 240 posts, RR: 0
Posted (7 years 3 days 5 hours ago) and read 4446 times:

I went to Heathrow the other day to take some photos and started thing about getting agood camera for it could anyone recommened a good camera and if necessary a lens also i dont need the worlds best one which is like a pen knife with secret little functions and a cup holder just a decent one that takes good photos with agood zoom/lens  camera 

Thanks  Smile

13 replies: All unread, jump to last
User currently offlineOly720man From United Kingdom, joined May 2004, 7154 posts, RR: 11
Reply 1, posted (7 years 3 days 4 hours ago) and read 4433 times:

Plenty of previous threads about this.

How much money have you got or are prepared to spend? For a DSLR and decent lens you're looking at a few hundred £££. It's better to have a more basic body and higher quality lens.

Canon and Nikon are the big players with a wide choice of bodies and lenses. You may be able to get a reasonable body second hand or reconditioned which may leave more to spend on a good lens.

The Sony A200 does have some reasonable reviews, but the choice of lenses is limited at the moment.

Otherwise go for a high end compact like the Canon SX10.

And don't forget the experience of the person holding the camera is important as well. A camera can take good photos, but equally it can take bad ones if the wrong settings are used or the conditions aren't right.

wheat and dairy can screw up your brain
User currently offlineRonS From United States of America, joined Feb 2009, 763 posts, RR: 19
Reply 2, posted (7 years 3 days 4 hours ago) and read 4433 times:

Start by researching the Canon 1000D or Nikon D60. What's your budget?

My Canon 1000D (they call it the Rebel XS in the States) plus a 70-200MM f/4 lens. The Canon is an entry level body with a good lens. The lens was $550 alone. And if you have the money I would say get it. If not, Canon makes a 55-250 lens, not as good quality and slower, but for $199. Besides knowing your budget, you also need to know your distance. If aircraft are far away from your spotting location, you'll need a longer telephoto lens.

Here's a shot for you Mr. Speedbird, taken with the above combo:

View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Ronald J Stella

All opinions expressed by me are my own opinions & do not represent the opinions in any way of my employers.
User currently offlineSpeedbird9 From United Kingdom, joined Jan 2008, 240 posts, RR: 0
Reply 3, posted (7 years 3 days 3 hours ago) and read 4422 times:

my budget is about £500

User currently offlineOly720man From United Kingdom, joined May 2004, 7154 posts, RR: 11
Reply 4, posted (7 years 2 days 8 hours ago) and read 4354 times:

Looking around, Wilkinson's have a 1000D body at £304. (wilkinson.co.uk)
A Canon 75-300 III USM is around £150. (camerabox.co.uk)

If you photosearch on the lens here you'll find nearly 1700 photos, and some with the 1000D so it is an effective combination.

wheat and dairy can screw up your brain
User currently offlineJakTrax From United Kingdom, joined Jun 2005, 4938 posts, RR: 7
Reply 5, posted (7 years 2 days 6 hours ago) and read 4347 times:

Quoting Oly720man (Reply 4):
some with the 1000D

The combo Oly720man recommends is a fine one, and I'm guessing the images he's looked at are my friend's - Gavin Bowler (do a search with his name in 'keywords' to check out his images).

The 75-300 F4-5.6 USM III is a cheap lens but it delivers a fair bit for your money. Firstly, it's pretty well-built for the price, with a metal mount and glass front element. It's also very sharp up to about 200mm, especially between F8 and 11. Colour and contrast reproduction can sometimes appear a bit muddy and the lens suffers from serious softness issues above about 220mm, but overall I recommend it as a former owner.

The Sony A200 is another option, and can be had with kit lens for around £250 I believe. A better body I'd say than the 1000D, and there is a budget 75-300 lens available, however the Canon for me wins the day with its ability to use every single lens in Canon's enviable and unrivalled range.


User currently offlineEddiek From New Zealand, joined May 2009, 3 posts, RR: 0
Reply 6, posted (6 years 12 months 1 day 5 hours ago) and read 4203 times:

If you are considering low end Nikon DSLRs, don't be tempted into purchasing the D40/D40x/D60 owing to lens compatibilities. You cannot use AF lenses on these cameras unless you're prepared to manually focus them. And sometimes you just simply can't do it.

Also note the D60 tends to underexpose which can make shooting in changing light challenging. The twin lens kit that came with mine is well suited to the camera, I generally shoot with the 55-200 AFS VR but there are some days when it can be a dog of a thing to use.

My recommendation would be the D90 as an entry level camera if you can stretch your budget that far, if not, have a look at the D80.

User currently offlineUSAir_757 From United States of America, joined Jun 2000, 996 posts, RR: 8
Reply 7, posted (6 years 12 months 1 day ago) and read 4178 times:

Don't be afraid to look into the underdog aka Pentax.

You could pick up a K10D w/ kit lens lightly used on ebay for a good deal. Pentax FA 80-200 and 800-320 lenses are going cheap these days, or if you want new, the Pentax DA55-300 ED is a very good lens for a very reasonable price. As for backwards compatibility, any Pentax K mount lens will work on it. All K-AF lenses WILL autofocus regardless of how old.

The above comments about the Nikon D40[X]/D60 are correct, those cameras have no internal AF motor, so older Nikon AF lenses won't be AF lenses in actuality on those cameras.

If you don't *need* a DSLR, you could look at the Kodak Z series cameras or the Pentax X70. In my experience, the Kodak Z series cameras are very reasonably priced for what they can do. Cameras such as that are VERY hard on batteries, though.

[Edited 2009-06-03 11:28:33]

-Cullen Wassell @ MLI | Pentax K5 + DA18-55WR + Sigma 70-300 DL Macro Super
User currently offlineDonjoaoresort From India, joined Apr 2009, 1 posts, RR: 0
Reply 8, posted (6 years 12 months 12 hours ago) and read 4129 times:


Any suggestions for Sony camera ?


User currently offlineJakTrax From United Kingdom, joined Jun 2005, 4938 posts, RR: 7
Reply 9, posted (6 years 12 months 11 hours ago) and read 4127 times:

Quoting Donjoaoresort (Reply 8):
Any suggestions for Sony camera ?

The A200 is supposedly a vary capable camera and is pretty cheap at the moment (here in the UK anyway).


User currently offlineTopGun3 From Canada, joined Aug 2005, 283 posts, RR: 0
Reply 10, posted (6 years 11 months 3 weeks 5 days 16 hours ago) and read 4022 times:

I got over 2400 pics in the DB shooting Minolta/Sony equipment. It is definitely decent enough for Airliners.

I'd rather be flying.
User currently offlineDl767captain From United States of America, joined Mar 2007, 2539 posts, RR: 0
Reply 11, posted (6 years 11 months 3 weeks 4 days 13 hours ago) and read 3966 times:

I would look at the Sony Alpha line. There's a great A300 (or some variant) which is being phased out but it's a great deal right now, otherwise the A200 is a great starter camera, that's what I got and it's awesome for newbies

User currently offlineMisterdsdan From United Kingdom, joined Apr 2006, 33 posts, RR: 0
Reply 12, posted (6 years 11 months 3 weeks 3 days 3 hours ago) and read 3924 times:

I'm looking at investing in a Sony A200 soon, as much as the range of Sony lenses may be limited it mustn't be forgotten that the Sony alpha cameras can use old Minolta lenses which can be found cheap on eBay (and from reviews I've read they are wonderful lenses!).

With reference to your budget:
Sony A200 (with kit 17-70mm lens) : £260 (amazon)
Camera Bag (a whole different kettle of fish!) : ~£50
CompactFlash memory card 4GB : ~£25

And as far as lenses go the Sony 55-200 (SAL55200) gets very well reviewed : £130 new
Also the old minolta lenses are supposedly very good, primarily the 'beercan' 70-210mm and 'big beercan' 75-300mm. I'm not 100% sure of the prices of old Minolta lenses but I have a few 'watched' on eBay so will let you know.

If you are considering Sony then the best place for reviews of cameras and lenses (Sony, Minolta, Tamron, Sigma) is www.dyxum.com it seems.

I hope this was useful, possibly best to take my enthusiasm with a pinch of salt as I don't actually own an A200....yet. I'm waiting for my exams to be over!!


User currently offlineJpc11 From United States of America, joined Feb 2009, 40 posts, RR: 0
Reply 13, posted (6 years 11 months 3 weeks 3 days ago) and read 3911 times:


I think you should get a nikon D40. What is your budget?

jpc11  camera 

Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Is The Canon 400D A Good Camera For A Beginner? posted Thu Jan 22 2009 19:06:32 by Brasila684
Camera For A Beginner posted Wed Dec 31 2008 04:19:46 by Cristiqs
Looking For A Cheap Cost Video Camera For Aviation posted Thu Dec 25 2008 11:23:09 by Navymmw
Good Camera For Low Altitude Spotting! posted Sat Dec 13 2008 14:04:49 by Virginblue4
Photo Tips For Newbie - Please Help posted Tue Feb 26 2008 14:30:42 by Mdfernott
LAX Imperial Hill Tips For A Newbie posted Mon Dec 3 2007 22:15:56 by Grockpilot
Cheap Camera For Collecting My Own Airliner Photos posted Sat May 5 2007 08:59:43 by Yellowstone
A Good Camera For A Starter posted Mon Aug 21 2006 02:18:57 by Flyboy14295
EOS 350D/Rebel XT Advices For A Newbie To (D)SLR posted Tue Feb 28 2006 17:39:09 by Jorge1812
Suggestions For A Newbie? posted Tue Feb 21 2006 05:27:51 by Aviacentre