UnattendedBag From United States of America, joined Oct 2003, 2240 posts, RR: 1 Reply 5, posted (3 years 11 months 2 weeks 3 days 12 hours ago) and read 1908 times:
Quoting JeffSFO (Thread starter): making it the top image in its first 24 hours on the site:
Dlowwa From Canada, joined Apr 2005, 7236 posts, RR: 32 Reply 6, posted (3 years 11 months 2 weeks 3 days 11 hours ago) and read 1900 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW HEAD SCREENER
Quoting ElDanno (Reply 2): How long's it take to get a photo accepted?
Currently looking at about an 8 or 9 day wait to get a photo screened.
Now getting said photo accepted, that will depend on the quality. If the quality's good, then it will be accepted after having been screened, if the quality's no good, it won't be.
Plainplane From United States of America, joined Mar 2008, 803 posts, RR: 1 Reply 7, posted (3 years 11 months 2 weeks 3 days 11 hours ago) and read 1899 times:
JeffSFO From United States of America, joined Dec 2004, 820 posts, RR: 5 Reply 8, posted (3 years 11 months 2 weeks 3 days 11 hours ago) and read 1889 times:
Thanks for all the nice comments, guys.
Quoting Dlowwa (Reply 1): ... that's quite the start, and is going to be hard to follow up, but good luck, and keep 'em coming!
Quoting Cpd (Reply 3): That's some good competition you've beaten too - the MiG with the creative turbulent wake, 747 overhead view and a derelict looking A380.
I think I just lucked out this time around because of the unique subject matter as opposed to the aesthetic quality of the image (there really isn't any). I'm guessing it's just functionally interesting to see two major runways shut down at a busy airport like SFO. I thought twice about submitting it but was rewarded this time around. Third time's a charm I guess--my previous two submissions didn't make the cut.
Sponsor Message: 
From United States of America, joined Dec 2004, 820 posts, 
From Canada, joined Apr 2005, 7236 posts, 
From Australia, joined Jun 2008, 4879 posts, 
Here it is again: 
Printer friendly format 
