Sponsor Message:
Aviation Photography Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Photo Acceptance - Post Screening (Jalap)  
User currently offlineJalap From Belgium, joined Oct 2007, 355 posts, RR: 1
Posted (5 years 3 months 1 week 2 days 12 hours ago) and read 2400 times:

Hello again  Smile

I'm a bit disappointed with 2 rejections today (slidescans, like always in my cases):

The first is a good old centering rejection, I was afraid this might happen but was hoping to get it through, partly because there only are 4 shots in the DB now. I just like the shot a lot, it's one of the best liveries on a plane ever and let's face it, the sky here is more interesting than the grass:

http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/rejections/big/20090608_x1243714040.6634f-giai_1192_bru.jpg

I'm tempted to appeal but it'll be hopeless with the current standards, I'm afraid. Anybody has an opinion on this?

The second had 3 rejection reasons: overexposed and contrast I can understand, I've had a hard time getting this scan - which was in fact a bit underexposed - more or less okay. I agree that I settled with this result too soon. But there also was a quality rejection and that's a bit surprising for it seems to imply that it's just not an interesting composition while I think that this shot kind of honours the typical nose of the DC8 in a nice way:

http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/rejections/big/20090608_a1243708785.1585n-awe2_ost.jpg

Worth a new try to get a better edit or should I just not bother with this one anymore?

Any opinions or advice would be very much appreciated  Smile

cheers,
Jan

2 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineWhisperjet From Germany, joined Nov 2007, 569 posts, RR: 8
Reply 1, posted (5 years 3 months 1 week 2 days 11 hours ago) and read 2388 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
PHOTO SCREENER

Hi Jan,

it was me who rejected the two pictures.
I really like the first picture, the plane has a great livery and the quality is acceptable too. However, the plane is much too low in frame to be accepted here. We highly appreciate your efforts to show us some old stuff but we also have to keep in mind that screening must be as consistent as possible.

As you seem to understand why the DC-8 was rejected for contrast and overexposed I will explain why I also added quality as a third rejection. The motive of you picture is fine, the nose of the DC-8 looks special and that justifies such a front view. The quality rejection has nothing to to with the composition or the motive, I just added it because I think that the overall quality of the scan is not good enough. The quality might be good enough for a sideon of a nowadays rare plane/airline but a closeup of a DC-8 similar to yours is not too hard to get even today.

Hope this helps!

Stefan



Nobody is perfect - not even a perfect fool.
User currently offlineJalap From Belgium, joined Oct 2007, 355 posts, RR: 1
Reply 2, posted (5 years 3 months 1 week 2 days 3 hours ago) and read 2352 times:

Thank you very much for this reply Stefan, it's highly appreciated!

Now I've got hopes again for the DC8 and I'll try to get a better edit done soon, although it'll be very hard to turn this good-looking slide into a good-looking digital image because of the light conditions... .

For the Fokker, well, it'll look good on myaviation, I could attempt to do a different crop like I've succesfully done with several other shots but you just can't do that every time you have a centering issue and still state everywhere that you hate shots with parts of the plane cut off  blockhead 

bye,
Jan


Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Photo Acceptance - Post Screening (Westjet22) posted Sun Jun 7 2009 20:44:05 by Westjet22
Photo Acceptance - Post Screening (Jorge1812) posted Sat Jun 6 2009 14:36:56 by Jorge1812
Photo Acceptance - Post-Screening (ehvk) posted Thu Jun 4 2009 08:26:30 by Ehvk
Photo Acceptance - Post Screening (sfb26180) posted Tue Jun 2 2009 15:06:11 by Sfb26180
Photo Acceptance - Post Screening (Alasdair1982) posted Tue Jun 2 2009 06:06:18 by Alasdair1982
Photo Acceptance - Post Screening (SNATH) posted Mon Jun 1 2009 22:46:23 by SNATH
Photo Acceptance - Post Screening (Apache) posted Sat May 30 2009 07:36:29 by Apache
Photo Acceptance - Post- Screening Motiv (Ekkaihla) posted Thu May 28 2009 21:16:52 by Ekkaihla
Photo Acceptance - Post Screening (SA006) posted Thu May 28 2009 19:57:42 by SA006
Photo Acceptance - Post-screening (airkas1) posted Thu May 28 2009 13:54:03 by AirKas1