Sponsor Message:
Aviation Photography Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Pictures Of Military Jets  
User currently offlineDelta88 From United States of America, joined May 2009, 57 posts, RR: 0
Posted (4 years 9 months 2 days 22 hours ago) and read 4614 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

I live in abington MA. But on Cape Cod there is a militart base called Otis AB. Is it safe to take pictures of some of the aircraft. I was in a small aircraft with my girlfriend and her grandfather who is a pilot. I took some pictures but then we got word on the radio that picture taking is FORBINDEN. I want to post them but should I?!? I don't want to do anything illegal. If it isn;t safe or legal i will destroy the film with the pictures.  Confused  Confused  Confused


707,717,727,738,744,752,762ER,763ER,772ER,MD82,MD-83,MD-88, DC-9-10,DC-10-10,A320
8 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineIamlucky13 From United States of America, joined Aug 2007, 235 posts, RR: 0
Reply 1, posted (4 years 9 months 2 days 22 hours ago) and read 4598 times:

You are completely free to take pictures from public property. The only exceptions I know of to that is publicly owned property of limited access where you might need specific permission, such as actually on the grounds of the base or in a courtroom, and the violation of reasonable expectation of privacy, meaning voyeurism.

This freedom has been consistently and repetitively upheld in US courts. Unless there's more to the story you haven't shared, whoever told you picture taking was forbidden is off their rocker, and frankly, I'm confused how anyone on the ground knew you were taking pictures.


User currently offlineJeffM From United States of America, joined May 2005, 3266 posts, RR: 52
Reply 2, posted (4 years 9 months 2 days 19 hours ago) and read 4574 times:



Quoting Iamlucky13 (Reply 1):
whoever told you picture taking was forbidden is off their rocker, and frankly, I'm confused how anyone on the ground knew you were taking pictures.

...ummmm..not exactly... There are plenty of military bases you cannot fly over and take pictures. Continuing to do so after being warned not to isn't a very smart thing to do. Don't you think the base knows you are there flying around in your little put put plane?


User currently offlineBkmjet From United States of America, joined Jul 2009, 5 posts, RR: 0
Reply 3, posted (4 years 9 months 2 days 16 hours ago) and read 4536 times:

They can make taking pictures illegal if it jeopardizes national security, just like they can take away your free speech if it jeopardizes security. If that's the case at this base, the military can do it

User currently offlineIamlucky13 From United States of America, joined Aug 2007, 235 posts, RR: 0
Reply 4, posted (4 years 9 months 2 days 9 hours ago) and read 4496 times:

Flying in restricted airspace would definitely count as an important detail the OP didn't share.

BKMjet, I was unaware of prohibitions on photography that would be otherwise illegal but could jeopardize national security, so I went looking for more information. From what I found, it sounds like being outside of a military facility is still in the clear. Case law would suggest that those who wish visual information to be protected (beyond copyright, etc), have to make reasonable efforts to protect it in order to have a case.

If anyone is aware of a drastically different interpretation of the law, it would be helpful to share it and support it with sources. This is my main source:

http://books.google.com/books?id=rJH...&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=3


User currently offlineJeffM From United States of America, joined May 2005, 3266 posts, RR: 52
Reply 5, posted (4 years 9 months 1 day 20 hours ago) and read 4440 times:



Quoting Bkmjet (Reply 3):
This is my main source:

LOL.... rotfl .yea, that will help a lot. That document has been laughed at for years. You are going to need a whole lot more then that document to keep you out of trouble when you land and the police are waiting for you for photographing a military installation after being told not to.

Go stand outside your local military airfield and wave that paper in their face when the MPs drive up. I'm sure they will understand.


User currently offlineIamlucky13 From United States of America, joined Aug 2007, 235 posts, RR: 0
Reply 6, posted (4 years 9 months 1 day 17 hours ago) and read 4419 times:

Jeff, you seem to be talking about a different case than I am. You're talking about taking photographs while in restricted airspace. It's quite typical for conditions to be placed on behavior during entry into restricted areas. That's not in dispute.

The case that Delta88 originally seemed to be describing was taking photographs from outside of a restricted area.

If you maintain that the latter case is illegal, at least under certain circumstances, please explain it instead of supposing that ridicule will assist the OP, or myself for that matter, in learning the answer.


User currently offlineMoose135 From United States of America, joined Oct 2004, 2238 posts, RR: 11
Reply 7, posted (4 years 9 months 1 day 16 hours ago) and read 4408 times:

Looking at the NY sectional chart, there is a restricted area, R-4101, northwest of Otis, which is used for live fire exercises. Other than that, there is no restricted airspace around Otis, only the standard Class D airspace that any airport with an operating tower would have. If you are outside of the Class D and R-4101, you should be able to do pretty much anything you want.

Places that really have things they want to hide, like out around Groom Lake, are surrounded by a large restricted area so that you can't get close enough to photograph them without violating the restricted area.



KC-135 - Passing gas and taking names!
User currently offlineScooter01 From Norway, joined Nov 2006, 1186 posts, RR: 8
Reply 8, posted (4 years 9 months 1 day 7 hours ago) and read 4355 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

This reminds me of a pic I saw on a certain A.netter's profile:
http://i32.tinypic.com/2hx7gbq.jpg

Scooter01  biggrin   duck 



"We all have a girl and her name is nostalgia" - Hemingway
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Some Pictures Of Nasa 747 + Orbiter Configuration. posted Sat Dec 27 2008 08:53:04 by Eksath
Taking Shots Of Fighter Jets posted Fri Sep 12 2008 14:10:53 by CaliSam
High Resolution Pictures Of Concorde posted Fri Feb 1 2008 02:27:55 by Knacksen
In-person Pictures Of New United Suites? posted Tue Jan 22 2008 17:35:31 by Mnevans
Anyone Seen Pictures Of These Rare 747s? posted Wed Oct 24 2007 14:54:35 by NA
Pictures Of Spotting Locations posted Thu Oct 18 2007 03:56:15 by TransIsland
Behind The Scene Pictures Of Endeavour posted Fri Aug 3 2007 06:55:41 by Eksath
Is Taking Pictures Of Planes In The US Illegal? posted Tue Apr 4 2006 02:58:16 by Stealth777
Maximum Number Of Pictures Of A Specific Aircraft posted Thu Mar 30 2006 21:30:19 by Johndm1957
Anyone Heard Of Airbus-jets.ch? posted Mon Jan 3 2005 19:56:34 by Fergulmcc