Sponsor Message:
Aviation Photography Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Two "bad" Motivs....  
User currently offlineCodeshare From Poland, joined Sep 2002, 1854 posts, RR: 1
Posted (4 years 9 months 1 day 7 hours ago) and read 2832 times:

Looks like the Ruslan a 'no no' ?

http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/r...0_b1247495935.0957ks220407-200.jpg

http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/r...5_a1247150422.3763ks020407-054.jpg

Second one, sorry for the small photo, is already appealed and rejected. Just basically a close up of the main gear, like many other here.

Why is it that a different look is penalised?

KS/codeshare

[Edited 2009-07-20 23:45:41]


How much A is there is Airliners Net ? 0 or nothing ?
6 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineAirKas1 From Netherlands, joined Dec 2003, 3943 posts, RR: 56
Reply 1, posted (4 years 9 months 1 day 5 hours ago) and read 2800 times:

First one might have someething to do with the crop around the #1 engine and/or tail.
Too bad the second shot was also rejected, it looks like a nice shot.

Sorry I can't be more helpful, but I don't know for sure why you got motive.


User currently offlineAussie18 From Australia, joined Jun 2005, 1731 posts, RR: 9
Reply 2, posted (4 years 9 months 1 day 5 hours ago) and read 2794 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
PHOTO SCREENER

First one is definately a weird awkward crop,Seems to show too much of the aircraft at the rear after the wing for a close up shot and cropping out a engine is quite distracting for the shot aswell.
Second one its hard to tell from small thumbnail pic,maybe it doesnt include enough detail from the angle to justify it for a close up of the undercarriage gear.

Cheers Mark.


User currently offlineWILCO737 From Greenland, joined Jun 2004, 8898 posts, RR: 76
Reply 3, posted (4 years 9 months 1 day 2 hours ago) and read 2755 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
HEAD MODERATOR



Quoting Codeshare (Thread starter):
Second one, sorry for the small photo, is already appealed and rejected. Just basically a close up of the main gear, like many other here.

I have seen so many gear close ups recently and I like them somehow. It is hard to tell from the small picture, but it looks like a nice angle and it seems to show how the gear sits there on the ground. I like it... Sad it got rejected  Sad

wilco737



It it's not Boeing, I am not going.
User currently offlineLexy From United States of America, joined Jun 2006, 2515 posts, RR: 9
Reply 4, posted (4 years 9 months 1 day 1 hour ago) and read 2736 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

I think with the gear shot, you may have had a better chance if you showed more of the gear. Like an angled shot of the rear mains perhaps.

On the first shot, it's definatly the crop. I see where the number one engine has been cut which can be quite distracting. Also, you want to focus more on the nose and wing/wingbox area. Not so much on getting the aft portion of the airplane in the shot. I would suggest a slightly different crop on that then a re-upload.



Nashville, Tennessee KBNA
User currently offlineRonS From United States of America, joined Feb 2009, 762 posts, RR: 23
Reply 5, posted (4 years 9 months 1 day 1 hour ago) and read 2730 times:

I see what you were trying to do. I can appreciate how hard it is to get some sunlight to fall on the gear too, with that huge wide wing that hangs low over the wheels. I've found it very difficult to get the light on it!


All opinions expressed by me are my own opinions & do not represent the opinions in any way of my employers.
User currently offlineWhisperjet From Germany, joined Nov 2007, 561 posts, RR: 8
Reply 6, posted (4 years 9 months 22 hours ago) and read 2693 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
PHOTO SCREENER

Hi,

it was me who rejected the first picture for motive. As already mentioned before, the cut engine looks awkward. Like Lexy said, concentrate more on the front part from the nose to the end of the gear bay.

Stefan



Nobody is perfect - not even a perfect fool.
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Two "how Are They" Photos posted Sun Jan 14 2007 07:41:42 by Airplanenut
A.net Photographer "self Potrait" Part Two! posted Sun Aug 11 2002 02:02:03 by BigPhilNYC
Anyone Collecting "Air & Cosmos"? posted Tue Jul 14 2009 10:59:37 by Mario340
"..you Are The Very First Who Wants Money .." posted Mon Jul 6 2009 20:37:28 by Eksath
"Your Camera Does Not Matter" posted Tue Jun 30 2009 23:21:58 by Eksath
"second" Screening? posted Sun Jun 14 2009 17:00:58 by Jawed
What Are The "must Haves" In AV-Photography posted Wed Jun 10 2009 13:41:11 by Jorge1812
Pic Rejected "soft" posted Wed Jun 10 2009 12:25:40 by JohnDroog
Photo Not Showing In The "Top Of Last 24 Hours" posted Sat May 16 2009 04:19:59 by NicolasRubio
"One Recent Photo That Made You Go Wow" Mark 8 posted Sun May 3 2009 09:33:48 by Javibi