Sponsor Message:
Aviation Photography Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
What's The Difference Between These Two?  
User currently offlineRonS From United States of America, joined Feb 2009, 762 posts, RR: 22
Posted (5 years 1 week 1 day 16 hours ago) and read 3089 times:

Hello:

Just wondering. I had a Lufthansa shot approved on here that went well, seemed well recieved. Screened right away, etc. I've had a Swiss shot around the same time and same day, same settings too I believe except the LH was shot at f/7.1 and the Swiss was shot at f5.6, both iso 200 and 1/60th. The Swiss took a while to get screened and then was sent to Mr.Johan for screening, and whatever he decides will be the outcome for it.

But, I was wondering what the difference between the two shots were. Why one got approved right away, no issue and the other must have been sent around to the screeners and then sent to Johan?

Can anybody see any differences between the two? The only thing I can see it was shot at an angle slightly south of the LH shot, on purpose to get me favorite building, the Prudential in the background. Just trying to learn the ropes a bit more. Respectfully, R

The approved LH:

View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Ronald J Stella



And the sent to Johan Swiss:

http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/big/ready/n1249222177.3329stellahbjme072009img_6364.jpg


All opinions expressed by me are my own opinions & do not represent the opinions in any way of my employers.
6 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineDazed767 From United States of America, joined May 1999, 5494 posts, RR: 51
Reply 1, posted (5 years 1 week 1 day 15 hours ago) and read 3061 times:

The colors pop out more in the first one (not that the second one is bad!). If anything the second one could have used a little more contrast IMO. They still call it Johan's queue? He's been gone from the site for 2 years now?

User currently offlineRonS From United States of America, joined Feb 2009, 762 posts, RR: 22
Reply 2, posted (5 years 1 week 1 day 15 hours ago) and read 3058 times:



Quoting Dazed767 (Reply 1):
They still call it Johan's queue?

Yeah, new for me so that is why I'm curious.

He must do some screening, a friend of mine just had one that was sent to him and approved last week. His shot was pretty old and rare though.



All opinions expressed by me are my own opinions & do not represent the opinions in any way of my employers.
User currently offlineSilver1SWA From United States of America, joined Mar 2004, 4779 posts, RR: 26
Reply 3, posted (5 years 1 week 1 day 15 hours ago) and read 3055 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting RonS (Reply 2):
He must do some screening, a friend of mine just had one that was sent to him and approved last week. His shot was pretty old and rare though.

I don't think Johan is involved in any screening anymore. Anything "left for Johan" goes to the Head Screeners if I'm not mistaken.

Your shot is probably being passed around the screening team for an overall consensus. Your first shot does have more pop and the overall scene was probably deemed special enough that is was accepted despite being borderline quality-wise. The second one, again, seems borderling (soft, dark?) and either the entire screening team or the Head Screeners are discussing behind the scenes whether or not to add it.

Just my two cents...I could be way off though.  

[Edited 2009-08-14 19:45:50]


ALL views, opinions expressed are mine ONLY and are NOT representative of those shared by Southwest Airlines Co.
User currently offlineRonS From United States of America, joined Feb 2009, 762 posts, RR: 22
Reply 4, posted (5 years 1 week 18 hours ago) and read 2949 times:

The Swiss made it in this morning. Thanks for the info about the Johan Queue, etc.

Thank you,
R



All opinions expressed by me are my own opinions & do not represent the opinions in any way of my employers.
User currently offlineSilver1SWA From United States of America, joined Mar 2004, 4779 posts, RR: 26
Reply 5, posted (5 years 1 week 17 hours ago) and read 2930 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Congrats Ron. You've got some real nice stuff accepted here lately. I really enjoy your stuff!


ALL views, opinions expressed are mine ONLY and are NOT representative of those shared by Southwest Airlines Co.
User currently offlineUnattendedBag From United States of America, joined Oct 2003, 2326 posts, RR: 1
Reply 6, posted (5 years 1 week 11 hours ago) and read 2898 times:

I would have said it was blurry. Glad to see it got on!


Slower traffic, keep right
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
This Is The Difference Between 200-400-800 ISO posted Wed Jul 10 2002 21:54:07 by BA777
What Do You Think About These Two? posted Mon Jul 16 2007 12:37:29 by Stefan171288
What Do You Think Of These Two? posted Fri Dec 8 2006 02:19:33 by SNATH
What Is The Difference? posted Thu Dec 8 2005 15:19:41 by Nirmalmakadia
Are These Two Photos The Same? posted Tue Apr 27 2004 16:59:53 by A3204eva
What Would Be The Best For These Requirements? posted Mon Apr 9 2001 16:31:46 by Tu22
HP 5370Cse/5370Cxi - What Is The Difference? posted Sun Jan 14 2001 01:42:04 by BA
Help Identifying These Two posted Sun Feb 22 2009 03:25:57 by Scbriml
Any Chance Of These Two? posted Fri Feb 29 2008 07:48:07 by MAN23R
Do These Two Have A Chance? posted Sun Feb 3 2008 13:07:23 by Upcfordcruiser