Sponsor Message:
Aviation Photography Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Keep Canon 40D Or Get Used 5D?  
User currently offlineWILCO737 From Greenland, joined Jun 2004, 8968 posts, RR: 76
Posted (4 years 11 months 2 weeks 1 day ago) and read 5386 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
HEAD MODERATOR

Hello everybody,

a friend of mine is probably selling is Canon 5D.

I am currently using the 40D and I am pretty happy with the results and like the camera.

IF I'd get the 5D, can I use my lenses with it? From what I read, they have the same size.

Is the 5D significantly better than the 40D that it would make it worth buying it? Or maybe waiting for the 60D or saving up for the 1D Big grin

Any feedback?

Thanks

wilco737
 camera 


It it's not Boeing, I am not going.
18 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineMoose135 From United States of America, joined Oct 2004, 2299 posts, RR: 10
Reply 1, posted (4 years 11 months 2 weeks 23 hours ago) and read 5377 times:

The 5D is a full-frame sensor, right? If so, you may not be able to use all your 40D lenses on it - any that are designed solely for APS-C body cameras (like the 40D) won't work on a full-frame body - it will fit on the mount, but the mirror can actually strike the inside end of the lens.


KC-135 - Passing gas and taking names!
User currently offlineWakeTurbulence From United States of America, joined Apr 2004, 1294 posts, RR: 17
Reply 2, posted (4 years 11 months 2 weeks 23 hours ago) and read 5376 times:

I don't believe EF-S lenses will fit (ie Canon 10-22mm). Do you need a full frame camera for any particular reason? The picture quality is very high on the 5D, but the features ans speed might not be as up to date seeing as it is an older model.

I also have the 40D and I am waiting to see what comes out either tomorrow or Sep 1. There are a lot of rumors about what is actually coming out, but anything new will drive the price down of older cameras. I hope Canon comes out with a winner though.  crossfingers 
-Matt



Jetwash Images - Feel the Heat!!!
User currently offlineJakTrax From United Kingdom, joined Jun 2005, 4936 posts, RR: 7
Reply 3, posted (4 years 11 months 2 weeks 23 hours ago) and read 5376 times:

Just steer clear of EF-S lesnes, which are optimised for the smaller sensors.

Karl


User currently offlineWILCO737 From Greenland, joined Jun 2004, 8968 posts, RR: 76
Reply 4, posted (4 years 11 months 2 weeks 23 hours ago) and read 5373 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
HEAD MODERATOR



Quoting Moose135 (Reply 1):
he 5D is a full-frame sensor, right?

I think so yes.

Quoting WakeTurbulence (Reply 2):
I don't believe EF-S lenses will fit (ie Canon 10-22mm).

I have that lense and use it for my cockpit shots. Great lense IMO.

Quoting WakeTurbulence (Reply 2):
Do you need a full frame camera for any particular reason?

No, not really.

Quoting WakeTurbulence (Reply 2):
The picture quality is very high on the 5D, but the features ans speed might not be as up to date seeing as it is an older model.

The picture quality is pretty important to me as I cannot always shot in perfect conditions. Shoting through cockpit windows or strange light etc.

Maybe I'll wait for the 60D then, if I can use the same lenses...

wilco737



It it's not Boeing, I am not going.
User currently offlineWILCO737 From Greenland, joined Jun 2004, 8968 posts, RR: 76
Reply 5, posted (4 years 11 months 2 weeks 23 hours ago) and read 5373 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
HEAD MODERATOR



Quoting JakTrax (Reply 3):
Just steer clear of EF-S lesnes, which are optimised for the smaller sensors.

I have the Canon 10-22, 17-40 L, 24-105 L, 100-400 L. Can I use them all on the 5D as well?

wilco737



It it's not Boeing, I am not going.
User currently offlineWakeTurbulence From United States of America, joined Apr 2004, 1294 posts, RR: 17
Reply 6, posted (4 years 11 months 2 weeks 23 hours ago) and read 5367 times:

Everything but the 10-22. It is one of my favorite lenses, so I don't see going full-frame soon, but you never know. On a full frame the 17-40 would be a good lens and almost as wide as a 10mm on a 1.6x crop (=16mm).
-Matt



Jetwash Images - Feel the Heat!!!
User currently offlineWILCO737 From Greenland, joined Jun 2004, 8968 posts, RR: 76
Reply 7, posted (4 years 11 months 2 weeks 23 hours ago) and read 5359 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
HEAD MODERATOR



Quoting WakeTurbulence (Reply 6):
Everything but the 10-22.

Ah man, I like that lense as well. It is great.

Quoting WakeTurbulence (Reply 6):
On a full frame the 17-40 would be a good lens and almost as wide as a 10mm on a 1.6x crop (=16mm).

True, good point. Maybe I can borrow it for a couple of days and try it out.

Thanks for the advide.

wilco737



It it's not Boeing, I am not going.
User currently offlineAviopic From Netherlands, joined Mar 2004, 2681 posts, RR: 42
Reply 8, posted (4 years 11 months 2 weeks 23 hours ago) and read 5355 times:



Quoting Moose135 (Reply 1):
any that are designed solely for APS-C body cameras (like the 40D) won't work on a full-frame body - it will fit on the mount, but the mirror can actually strike the inside end of the lens.

This only applies to Canon EF-s glass, third party APS/c glass will work just fine without any problem or danger.
Ofcourse you will miss the corners at wide angle.

I would take the 5D and keep the 40D as well, it's great to have a backup body on hand.


Willem



The truth lives in one’s mind, it doesn’t really exist
User currently offlineWILCO737 From Greenland, joined Jun 2004, 8968 posts, RR: 76
Reply 9, posted (4 years 11 months 2 weeks 23 hours ago) and read 5353 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
HEAD MODERATOR



Quoting Aviopic (Reply 8):
I would take the 5D and keep the 40D as well, it's great to have a backup body on hand.

Well, I have the 350D (my older camera) as sort of backup. I know it is a different category, but do I need 3 bodies?
I will ask my buddy for how much he'll sell the 5D and then I can get rid of the 350D...

wilco737



It it's not Boeing, I am not going.
User currently offlineDlowwa From Canada, joined Apr 2005, 7328 posts, RR: 30
Reply 10, posted (4 years 11 months 2 weeks 23 hours ago) and read 5353 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

10-22 - cropped sensor format only (i.e. won't work on 5D)

17-40 L - full frame (5D ok)

24-105 L - full frame

100-400 L - full frame

Basically the only lens you wouldn't be able to use is 10-22mm. Keep in mind however, that the 10-22 behaves like a 16-35mm on Canon's (1.6) cropped sensor, so with the 17-40, you've pretty much got that range covered on the full frame anyway.

You will lose on the long end however, as you'll get the true 100-400, not the 160-640 it behaves like on the cropped sensor. If you do a lot of long range shooting, this will be a big negative. Another negative for the 5D will be it's low frame rate, only 3fps. If you do any kind of high-speed shooting this might be a problem.

On the other hand, as already mentioned, the full frame will give you the wide angle with the lenses you already have (even without the 10-22) and because it's full-frame and the pixel density isn't too high, the hi-ISO is much much better than with any cropped sensor camera (40D/50D/60D/etc...)

You have to decide if losing the long range shooting and frame rate are more important than gaining the great hi-ISO performance and overall better IQ.

Dana


User currently offlineWILCO737 From Greenland, joined Jun 2004, 8968 posts, RR: 76
Reply 11, posted (4 years 11 months 2 weeks 23 hours ago) and read 5347 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
HEAD MODERATOR



Quoting Dlowwa (Reply 10):
You will lose on the long end however, as you'll get the true 100-400, not the 160-640 it behaves like on the cropped sensor. If you do a lot of long range shooting, this will be a big negative. Another negative for the 5D will be it's low frame rate, only 3fps. If you do any kind of high-speed shooting this might be a problem.

Good point. From the cockpit I sometimes really do need the 400 (640) to get closer to the other airplanes. But on the other hand I shot with the 10-22 in the cockpit as well. But because I have the 17-40 that would be fine.
Would it make sense then to get the 1,4x converter with the 400 and the 5D? That would give me a good zoom and the quality of the 5D.

Quoting Dlowwa (Reply 10):
reat hi-ISO performance

These 2 shots were taken handheld with the 10-20 and ISO 3200:


View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Wilco737
View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Wilco737



And I was quite pleased with the result.

Of course I had to use noise ninja to get rid of some noise and grain there.

wilco737



It it's not Boeing, I am not going.
User currently onlineFighterPilot From Canada, joined Jun 2005, 1374 posts, RR: 23
Reply 12, posted (4 years 11 months 2 weeks 22 hours ago) and read 5331 times:



Quoting WILCO737 (Reply 4):
Quoting WakeTurbulence (Reply 2):
I don't believe EF-S lenses will fit (ie Canon 10-22mm).

I have that lense and use it for my cockpit shots. Great lense IMO.



Quoting WILCO737 (Reply 7):

Quoting WakeTurbulence (Reply 6):
Everything but the 10-22.

Ah man, I like that lense as well. It is great.



Quoting WILCO737 (Reply 11):
These 2 shots were taken handheld with the 10-20 and ISO 3200:

Keep the 40D! We wanna see more shots like the ones above!

My 2 cents

Cal  airplane 



*Insert Sound Of GE90 Spooling Up Here*
User currently offlineChampfence From United States of America, joined Jan 2007, 53 posts, RR: 0
Reply 13, posted (4 years 11 months 2 weeks 22 hours ago) and read 5331 times:



Quoting WILCO737 (Reply 11):
And I was quite pleased with the result.

Of course I had to use noise ninja to get rid of some noise and grain there.

The 5D will be much less noisy than the 40D at 3200 and will require less PP noise reduction, leaving you with sharper images. If it were me, I'd go the 5D route in a heartbeat, but that's me!

BRB


User currently offlineJeffSFO From United States of America, joined Dec 2004, 836 posts, RR: 4
Reply 14, posted (4 years 11 months 2 weeks 22 hours ago) and read 5322 times:

Why go with a 5D when you can get a 5D Mark II? It might cost more but in my opinion, it's a far superior camera (I have both). The low light performance is excellent, the view screen is much better, the automatic sensor cleaning is very handy, and the near medium format resolution makes things very handy for cropping. I could go on and on, but I've had so many good results with the Mark II that I can't say enough about it. Anyway, if you're going to spend some money, I think it's worth looking into.

User currently offlineWILCO737 From Greenland, joined Jun 2004, 8968 posts, RR: 76
Reply 15, posted (4 years 11 months 2 weeks 22 hours ago) and read 5315 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
HEAD MODERATOR



Quoting FighterPilot (Reply 12):
Keep the 40D! We wanna see more shots like the ones above!

One shot like this is in the queue currently. Still needs a couple of days until screening.

Quoting Champfence (Reply 13):
The 5D will be much less noisy than the 40D at 3200 and will require less PP noise reduction, leaving you with sharper images. If it were me, I'd go the 5D route in a heartbeat, but that's me!

Sounds good. But I am not always shoting at night or low light.

Quoting JeffSFO (Reply 14):
Why go with a 5D when you can get a 5D Mark II?

I don't know if it is a mark II or not, have to ask him which one it is.

wilco737



It it's not Boeing, I am not going.
User currently offlineJeffSFO From United States of America, joined Dec 2004, 836 posts, RR: 4
Reply 16, posted (4 years 11 months 2 weeks 22 hours ago) and read 5305 times:



Quoting WILCO737 (Reply 15):
Quoting JeffSFO (Reply 14):
Why go with a 5D when you can get a 5D Mark II?

I don't know if it is a mark II or not, have to ask him which one it is.

There's a 99.9% chance that your friend is selling the 5D original because the 5D Mark II is a new model. My suggestion is to consider the 5D Mark II if you want to buy a 5D series body.


User currently offlineAviopic From Netherlands, joined Mar 2004, 2681 posts, RR: 42
Reply 17, posted (4 years 11 months 2 weeks 21 hours ago) and read 5305 times:



Quoting WILCO737 (Reply 9):
but do I need 3 bodies?

No you don't but there ain't no point in selling it for a nickel either.
I keep 'm all and planned to make a nice display sometime in the future, should be good with a Canon AE1, EOS 620, 50QD, D30, 10D, 20D, 50D, 1Dmk3  Big grin
I now regret to have sold my Olympus Om10, Zenith, Praktica etc.....  Sad

Quoting WILCO737 (Reply 9):
I will ask my buddy for how much he'll sell the 5D

In the shop they go for 1000 to 1200 EU with warranty.
So without warranty it should well below 1000,- EU



The truth lives in one’s mind, it doesn’t really exist
User currently offlineWILCO737 From Greenland, joined Jun 2004, 8968 posts, RR: 76
Reply 18, posted (4 years 11 months 2 weeks 21 hours ago) and read 5295 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
HEAD MODERATOR



Quoting JeffSFO (Reply 16):
There's a 99.9% chance that your friend is selling the 5D original because the 5D Mark II is a new model. My suggestion is to consider the 5D Mark II if you want to buy a 5D series body.

Actually I am quite happy with the 40D and never really thought about getting a new camera. I don't know what he is using (mark II or not). Will ask him tomorrow. Don'tknow how old his camera is, he wants to sell it as he isn't using it anymore.

Quoting Aviopic (Reply 17):
In the shop they go for 1000 to 1200 EU with warranty.
So without warranty it should well below 1000,- EU

Hmm, ok. Thanks for that.

Quoting Aviopic (Reply 17):
AE1, EOS 620, 50QD, D30, 10D, 20D, 50D, 1Dmk3  
I now regret to have sold my Olympus Om10, Zenith, Praktica etc.....  

 laughing  nice Line up Big grin

wilco737



It it's not Boeing, I am not going.
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Eos 40d Or 50d posted Wed Aug 5 2009 02:28:13 by Stef247
Canon 40D - Two Lenses - Which Is Best? posted Tue Dec 30 2008 17:00:15 by 797
Canon 40D Price Drop posted Tue Dec 16 2008 08:55:23 by SNATH
Help Please...Canon 40D Pics Appearing "soft" posted Fri Nov 21 2008 11:35:57 by Rtl
Canon 40D Vs. 400D (revisited) posted Sat Nov 15 2008 18:37:16 by Silver1SWA
Canon 40D - Error 99? posted Thu Nov 6 2008 14:40:49 by Sovietjet
Canon 40D Problems... posted Sat Aug 30 2008 04:22:19 by JakTrax
Is It Worth Upgrading To The Canon 40D? posted Thu Mar 13 2008 00:09:38 by Deaphen
I Need Help With My New Canon 40d posted Tue Feb 12 2008 05:30:46 by Roni957
Canon 40D Vs 400D posted Mon Dec 3 2007 07:36:52 by Airportmanager