I assume the reason is that I have already a head-on shot of this aircraft in the database. I also have a shot from the other side (but that was taken on a different date). Is is correct to state that if a head-on shot is in the database, another shot from either side will be rejected for double?
Walter2222 From Belgium, joined Sep 2005, 1291 posts, RR: 30 Reply 2, posted (4 years 3 months 2 weeks 3 days 16 hours ago) and read 2594 times:
Quoting Acontador (Reply 1): normally a head on and a side on should be OK as long as they show a different enough motive.
Thanks for your feedback, Andres! I am not sure that my pictures show a different enough motive (maybe that was the thought of the screener rejecting it for double?). My own motive was to shoot without any other people around the aircraft, which is not easy for a restored aircraft in a museum (unless the weather is so bad that no people want to go out in the rain, as I was doing on the date of the shot ).
Walter2222 From Belgium, joined Sep 2005, 1291 posts, RR: 30 Reply 3, posted (4 years 3 months 2 weeks 2 days 20 hours ago) and read 2531 times:
Quoting Acontador (Reply 1): if you feel strongly about it, you can always appeal.
I have put it up for appeal. The problem, however, is that, personally, I cannot see the shot anymore (because the added code, together with my long file-names, make it too long...). I wonder if the head-screeners can still see the shot??