Sponsor Message:
Aviation Photography Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Photo Acceptance - Post Screening (Walter2222)  
User currently offlineWalter2222 From Belgium, joined Sep 2005, 1300 posts, RR: 28
Posted (5 years 1 month 4 weeks 16 hours ago) and read 3047 times:

Hi,

I had this one rejected for "double":

http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/r...7_crw_10646_rt8_wvb_1200px_ed2.jpg

I assume the reason is that I have already a head-on shot of this aircraft in the database. I also have a shot from the other side (but that was taken on a different date). Is is correct to state that if a head-on shot is in the database, another shot from either side will be rejected for double?

Thanks for your inputs!

Best regards,

Walter


canon 340d ;-) - EFS10-22mm f/3.5-4.5 USM - EFS18-55mm - EF28-105mm f3.5/4.5 - EF100-400mm f4.5-5.6l is usm - ...
4 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineAcontador From Chile, joined Jul 2005, 1421 posts, RR: 30
Reply 1, posted (5 years 1 month 4 weeks 16 hours ago) and read 3040 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
PHOTO SCREENER

Hi Walter,

No, normally a head on and a side on should be OK as long as they show a different enough motive.
In any case, if you feel strongly about it, you can always appeal.

Cheers, Andrés.



Just sit back, relax and have a glass of Merlot...enjoy your life!
User currently offlineWalter2222 From Belgium, joined Sep 2005, 1300 posts, RR: 28
Reply 2, posted (5 years 1 month 4 weeks 16 hours ago) and read 3034 times:



Quoting Acontador (Reply 1):
normally a head on and a side on should be OK as long as they show a different enough motive.

Thanks for your feedback, Andres! I am not sure that my pictures show a different enough motive (maybe that was the thought of the screener rejecting it for double?). My own motive was to shoot without any other people around the aircraft, which is not easy for a restored aircraft in a museum (unless the weather is so bad that no people want to go out in the rain, as I was doing on the date of the shot  Smile ).

Best regards,

Walter



canon 340d ;-) - EFS10-22mm f/3.5-4.5 USM - EFS18-55mm - EF28-105mm f3.5/4.5 - EF100-400mm f4.5-5.6l is usm - ...
User currently offlineWalter2222 From Belgium, joined Sep 2005, 1300 posts, RR: 28
Reply 3, posted (5 years 1 month 3 weeks 6 days 20 hours ago) and read 2971 times:



Quoting Acontador (Reply 1):
if you feel strongly about it, you can always appeal.

Hi Andres,

I have put it up for appeal. The problem, however, is that, personally, I cannot see the shot anymore (because the added code, together with my long file-names, make it too long...). I wonder if the head-screeners can still see the shot??

Best regards,

Walter



canon 340d ;-) - EFS10-22mm f/3.5-4.5 USM - EFS18-55mm - EF28-105mm f3.5/4.5 - EF100-400mm f4.5-5.6l is usm - ...
User currently offlineWalter2222 From Belgium, joined Sep 2005, 1300 posts, RR: 28
Reply 4, posted (5 years 1 month 3 weeks 4 days 18 hours ago) and read 2915 times:



Quoting Acontador (Reply 1):
No, normally a head on and a side on should be OK as long as they show a different enough motive.
In any case, if you feel strongly about it, you can always appeal.

Unfortunately, also rejected on appeal  Sad

Best regards,

Walter



canon 340d ;-) - EFS10-22mm f/3.5-4.5 USM - EFS18-55mm - EF28-105mm f3.5/4.5 - EF100-400mm f4.5-5.6l is usm - ...
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Photo Acceptance - Post Screening (Walter2222) posted Sun Jul 5 2009 07:51:07 by Walter2222
Photo Acceptance - Post Screening (Walter2222) posted Mon Jun 29 2009 23:15:28 by Walter2222
Photo Acceptance - Post Screening (TopGun3) posted Mon Aug 24 2009 09:28:28 by TopGun3
Photo Acceptance - Post Screening (HAL) posted Sun Aug 23 2009 12:18:28 by HAL
Photo Acceptance - Post-Screening (nikog) posted Sun Aug 23 2009 08:36:05 by Nikog
Photo Acceptance - Post Screening (DJdeRidder) posted Sat Aug 22 2009 16:08:28 by DJdeRidder
Photo Acceptance - Post Screening (contrail25) posted Sat Aug 22 2009 10:09:00 by Contrail25
Photo Acceptance - Post Screening (Astro777lover) posted Sat Aug 22 2009 09:49:16 by Astro777lover
Photo Acceptance - Post Screening (Plainplane) posted Thu Aug 20 2009 04:27:45 by Plainplane
Photo Acceptance - Post Screening (Bruce) posted Mon Aug 17 2009 00:21:08 by Bruce