Sponsor Message:
Aviation Photography Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Photo Acceptance - Post Screening (2H4)  
User currently offline2H4 From United States of America, joined Oct 2004, 8955 posts, RR: 60
Posted (4 years 11 months 11 hours ago) and read 5381 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
DATABASE EDITOR

Well, these were all rejected for being soft. Not an uncommon rejection for me, but due to the rarity of these shots, I'd love to be able to fix them (if possible).


http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/rejections/big/20090827_e1250694216.4518trainyard8-17-2009064retouchedcropfinaljjm.jpg



http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/rejections/big/20090827_s1250693949.9827trainyard8-17-2009039retouchedcropfinaljjm2.jpg


http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/rejections/big/20090827_b1250715857.2314m1250693316.4527trainyard8-17-2009116retouchedcropfinaljjm3.jpg

I suspect they might be beyond repair, but welcome any tips or advice. Thanks in advance for any help.

2H4


Intentionally Left Blank
12 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineClickhappy From United States of America, joined Sep 2001, 9603 posts, RR: 69
Reply 1, posted (4 years 11 months 10 hours ago) and read 5361 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
PHOTO SCREENER

They look almost OOF. What were the technical details of the shots?

User currently offline2H4 From United States of America, joined Oct 2004, 8955 posts, RR: 60
Reply 2, posted (4 years 11 months 9 hours ago) and read 5352 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
DATABASE EDITOR



Quoting Clickhappy (Reply 1):
They look almost OOF. What were the technical details of the shots?

First shot:
1/800
f7.1
200mm

Second shot:
1/1600
f5.6
200mm

Third shot:
1/1250
f5.6
105mm

All taken with a D50 and the Nikon 18-200 VR lens.

2H4



Intentionally Left Blank
User currently offlineClickhappy From United States of America, joined Sep 2001, 9603 posts, RR: 69
Reply 3, posted (4 years 11 months 9 hours ago) and read 5346 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
PHOTO SCREENER

There is no need to shoot with a shutter speed so high, especially with marginal glass like the 18-200. You should be shooting in Aperture priority, with the Ap set to f/8. This will solve your constant 'soft' problem.

User currently offline2H4 From United States of America, joined Oct 2004, 8955 posts, RR: 60
Reply 4, posted (4 years 11 months 8 hours ago) and read 5344 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
DATABASE EDITOR



Quoting Clickhappy (Reply 3):
There is no need to shoot with a shutter speed so high, especially with marginal glass like the 18-200. You should be shooting in Aperture priority, with the Ap set to f/8. This will solve your constant 'soft' problem.

Good tip, thank you. I'm (obviously) still learning...

2H4



Intentionally Left Blank
User currently offlineClickhappy From United States of America, joined Sep 2001, 9603 posts, RR: 69
Reply 5, posted (4 years 11 months 8 hours ago) and read 5335 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
PHOTO SCREENER

It is a common mistake - and one I learned the hard way (lots of poor shots).

User currently offlineMHO From United States of America, joined Jun 2006, 209 posts, RR: 0
Reply 6, posted (4 years 11 months 6 hours ago) and read 5324 times:

I would suggest moving the f-stop to 8 or 9. That should give you more depth of field and help out with focus and soft spots.


Interesting photos - what's the story here?



It's better to be a little behind than a big ass
User currently offline2H4 From United States of America, joined Oct 2004, 8955 posts, RR: 60
Reply 7, posted (4 years 11 months 1 hour ago) and read 5292 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
DATABASE EDITOR



Quoting MHO (Reply 6):
Interesting photos - what's the story here?

I found some fuselages on their way to final assembly at Renton.

2H4



Intentionally Left Blank
User currently offlineCvervais From United States of America, joined Sep 2003, 610 posts, RR: 2
Reply 8, posted (4 years 10 months 4 weeks 1 day 20 hours ago) and read 5263 times:

Yeah, I also fell victim to the the higher the shutter speed the better mentality when I started. It seemed to make sense, the faster the shutter the less motion would affect the shot so it should be tack sharp right? Well, not so much.

I don't know if it's because the longer shutter speeds let more light in and therefore more detail but, when I slowed things down to 1/800 or below my images started coming alive.

Now, if I could just edit them worth a damn maybe I'd have more on here Big grin


User currently offlineRuudb From Netherlands, joined Jun 2005, 164 posts, RR: 5
Reply 9, posted (4 years 10 months 4 weeks 1 day 17 hours ago) and read 5255 times:

I am not really sure if your problem will be solved by using f8, I have tried an 18-200 and it isn't the sharpest lens Nikon ever produced, especially loads of vignetting in the low end and sharpness is ok till 135mm, so using 200mm on this lens is one of the main causes I think.
You could have better opted for your 180mm lens  Wink


User currently offline2H4 From United States of America, joined Oct 2004, 8955 posts, RR: 60
Reply 10, posted (4 years 10 months 3 weeks 6 days 10 hours ago) and read 5146 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
DATABASE EDITOR



Quoting Ruudb (Reply 9):
You could have better opted for your 180mm lens

Yes, I considered doing so, but I didn't think I'd be able to hold it steady enough. I didn't have my tripod and also wasn't able to use the ground, as I was standing among thorn bushes.  Smile

2H4



Intentionally Left Blank
User currently offlineRuudb From Netherlands, joined Jun 2005, 164 posts, RR: 5
Reply 11, posted (4 years 10 months 3 weeks 6 days 10 hours ago) and read 5143 times:

I think the 180 at 2.8 is sharper as the 18-200 on 180 at 5.6 and as I see the shuttertimes you used it would have been not to difficult to do it without VR (kind of understatement  Big grin ).

User currently offline2H4 From United States of America, joined Oct 2004, 8955 posts, RR: 60
Reply 12, posted (4 years 10 months 3 weeks 6 days 8 hours ago) and read 5133 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
DATABASE EDITOR



Quoting Ruudb (Reply 11):

Well, I'll chalk this up to having learned the hard way.  ashamed 

Thanks for the advice, though.

2H4



Intentionally Left Blank
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Photo Acceptance - Post-Screening(sovietjet) posted Wed Aug 26 2009 15:02:09 by Sovietjet
Photo Acceptance - Post Screening (Walter2222) posted Tue Aug 25 2009 15:46:42 by Walter2222
Photo Acceptance - Post Screening (TopGun3) posted Mon Aug 24 2009 09:28:28 by TopGun3
Photo Acceptance - Post Screening (HAL) posted Sun Aug 23 2009 12:18:28 by HAL
Photo Acceptance - Post-Screening (nikog) posted Sun Aug 23 2009 08:36:05 by Nikog
Photo Acceptance - Post Screening (DJdeRidder) posted Sat Aug 22 2009 16:08:28 by DJdeRidder
Photo Acceptance - Post Screening (contrail25) posted Sat Aug 22 2009 10:09:00 by Contrail25
Photo Acceptance - Post Screening (Astro777lover) posted Sat Aug 22 2009 09:49:16 by Astro777lover
Photo Acceptance - Post Screening (Plainplane) posted Thu Aug 20 2009 04:27:45 by Plainplane
Photo Acceptance - Post Screening (Bruce) posted Mon Aug 17 2009 00:21:08 by Bruce