Sponsor Message:
Aviation Photography Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Is Photo Editing Always Necessary?  
User currently offlineSV777KiloAlpha From Saudi Arabia, joined Dec 2003, 267 posts, RR: 3
Posted (4 years 10 months 6 days 16 hours ago) and read 3857 times:

Hi all,

I'm new to photography and just bought a Canon 450D and EF70-200 f/4L IS USM lens. I plan to go spotting soon. My question is do I need to get a photo editing software such as photoshop in order to get my photos approved? If yes, which is the best and easiest to use?

Thanks,
Faisal.


PPL since 2006
16 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineJakTrax From United Kingdom, joined Jun 2005, 4936 posts, RR: 7
Reply 1, posted (4 years 10 months 6 days 16 hours ago) and read 3850 times:

If you want to upload successfully here you will always need to do at least a small amount of editing, regardless of how perfect your original image is. I've had a couple accepted where I haven't had to crop but generally you'll need to chop your picture down to size a bit (or a lot?) and centre the subject properly. You will also need to resize as A.net won't accept anything larger than 1mb.

You've got some nice kit there and that lens will go some way to reducing the amount of editing you'll need to do. But remember, the camera and lens are only as good as the person holding them, so make sure to learn about shooting techniques for aviation, which are often different to other branches of photography. Also, if you have the memory capacity, try to shoot in JPEG and RAW, at the very highest quality the camera will allow. Of course the less editing needed, the better you become.

Finally, if you're just getting prints done, editing isn't particularly necessary. I've always been a firm believer that a good image is made in-camera and not in Photoshop, and although I think it's an integral part of modern photography, I don't think the ability to superbly edit makes you a better photographer. It makes you a better manipulator!

Cheers,

Karl


User currently offlineSV777KiloAlpha From Saudi Arabia, joined Dec 2003, 267 posts, RR: 3
Reply 2, posted (4 years 10 months 6 days 16 hours ago) and read 3841 times:

Thanks Karl for your valuable input.

Cheers.



PPL since 2006
User currently offlineKukkudrill From Malta, joined Dec 2004, 1123 posts, RR: 5
Reply 3, posted (4 years 10 months 6 days 16 hours ago) and read 3837 times:

HI Faisal,

Yes you certainly do. Your best bet is Photoshop Elements. It's not the easiest to use but it's the best, unless you go for the full Photoshop which is much more expensive (and which is not necessary for a.net purposes). You do not need the latest versions of Elements - for a long time I got by perfectly well with Elements 2, which is ancient, so if you can get an older version at a lower cost go for it.

A couple more pieces of advice. Firstly, a.net has some pretty tight tolerances: for example, the line between sharp enough and oversharpened is very fine and easy to overstep. It will take you time to learn to edit a photo to a.net standards so don't be discouraged if you don't succeed quickly.

Secondly, always remember to take photos for fun not for a.net. Don't let a.net influence your shooting style too much.

Good luck,
Charles



Make the most of the available light ... a lesson of photography that applies to life
User currently offlineSV777KiloAlpha From Saudi Arabia, joined Dec 2003, 267 posts, RR: 3
Reply 4, posted (4 years 10 months 6 days 14 hours ago) and read 3803 times:

Thank you Charles for your informative input. I'm not a software friendly person. Hence, the need for an easy to use editing program.

Take care,
Faisal.



PPL since 2006
User currently offlineContrail25 From United States of America, joined Aug 2009, 159 posts, RR: 0
Reply 5, posted (4 years 10 months 6 days 14 hours ago) and read 3802 times:



Quoting Kukkudrill (Reply 3):
Secondly, always remember to take photos for fun not for a.net. Don't let a.net influence your shooting style too much.

That's the key! If you take it too seriously you'll get all wound up and not enjoy the shooting/editing process as much.

Back to the primary subject:

I use a free photo editor, GIMP. Not as powerful as others out there, but I've been using it for years now and am very comfortable with it. I haven't tried to edit RAW images in it yet, but JPEGs and just about any other format else work just fine.


User currently offlineMat1979 From France, joined Dec 2005, 90 posts, RR: 0
Reply 6, posted (4 years 10 months 4 days 15 hours ago) and read 3685 times:



Quoting SV777KiloAlpha (Thread starter):
My question is do I need to get a photo editing software such as photoshop in order to get my photos approved?

Yes

Quoting SV777KiloAlpha (Thread starter):

If yes, which is the best and easiest to use?

That is a hard question as people usually will advise the one they use.

As for the best, you do not need the best, as good enough will be... enough.
As for the easiest one, that does not matter too much, because once you get used to using the software, it will be easy.

About money, you can't go wrong with gimp as it's open source and free (http://www.gimp.org).
The gimp would be my advice.


User currently offlineDvincent From United States of America, joined Jan 2007, 1741 posts, RR: 11
Reply 7, posted (4 years 10 months 4 days 11 hours ago) and read 3661 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

The only "editing" I do for a.net is manually downsampling images, sharpening with masks, and that's it. Everything else is done in Lightroom as part of the RAW conversion process (and is usually good enough to spool large amounts of images to photo hosting). That can be automated or batch operations performed, and people looking on my smugmug aren't going to care if the horizontal stab is slightly jagged because I didn't do selective sharpening on it.


From the Mind of Minolta
User currently offlineSV777KiloAlpha From Saudi Arabia, joined Dec 2003, 267 posts, RR: 3
Reply 8, posted (4 years 10 months 4 days 6 hours ago) and read 3622 times:



Quoting Dvincent (Reply 7):

Forgive my ignorance, but I did not understand.



PPL since 2006
User currently offlineGPHOTO From United Kingdom, joined Aug 2004, 829 posts, RR: 25
Reply 9, posted (4 years 10 months 4 days 5 hours ago) and read 3615 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
DATABASE EDITOR



Quoting Kukkudrill (Reply 3):
for a long time I got by perfectly well with Elements 2, which is ancient

Well said!

I'm still using the very old Photoshop Elements 3.0. It does all I need so why upgrade? About the only useful tool it was lacking was Curves, but I found a free plug-in on the internet that added it.

In the main, the only editing needed for here should be very simple and straightforward in principle.

Best regards,

Jim



Erm, is this thing on?
User currently offlineINNflight From Austria, joined Apr 2004, 3765 posts, RR: 60
Reply 10, posted (4 years 10 months 4 days 5 hours ago) and read 3601 times:

Where's the post processing guide Thierry wrote now? I'm sure that would be a great help!


Jet Visuals
User currently offlineThierryD From Luxembourg, joined Dec 2005, 2068 posts, RR: 51
Reply 11, posted (4 years 10 months 4 days 4 hours ago) and read 3593 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
HEAD SUPPORT



Quoting INNflight (Reply 10):
Where's the post processing guide Thierry wrote now?

I never wrote a post processing guide. Only a guide to rejection reasons.  Wink

Thierry



"Go ahead...make my day"
User currently offlineINNflight From Austria, joined Apr 2004, 3765 posts, RR: 60
Reply 12, posted (4 years 10 months 4 days 2 hours ago) and read 3568 times:

Ermmm............... my bad Big grin


Jet Visuals
User currently offlineJakTrax From United Kingdom, joined Jun 2005, 4936 posts, RR: 7
Reply 13, posted (4 years 10 months 4 days ago) and read 3539 times:



Quoting INNflight (Reply 10):
Where's the post processing guide Thierry wrote now?

Jid wrote one - are you perhaps thinking of that?

Karl


User currently offlineDairy From Germany, joined Nov 2003, 240 posts, RR: 0
Reply 14, posted (4 years 10 months 3 days 14 hours ago) and read 3497 times:

I have taken many picture yet that all have been rejected - only just one pic got accepted on a.net and that was an unedited picture if I remeber correctly  Smile should been lucky after reading your comments here. of course I do think that editing is necessary. but the way to edit picture is not always clear to me, after reading the 'offical' a.net-statements about it.
and of course after regarding some picture here which show the same aircraft in the same position, on the same day, maybe in the same moment.

there are a lot of examples, here is just one example - the first A380 of Lufti (LH).


View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © French Frogs Aviation Pictures
View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © T.Laurent



I like these two pics, but I cant understand how both could get accepted. they are quite different: light conditions, the colour-depth. the hangar in the background doesnt seem to be white like in the first pic, the other shows a complete other colour. I would like to know, why both are OK here?!



A318/A319/A320/A321 AB3/A306/A310/A333/A343/A346 732/733/735/736/744/752/763/764/772/773 DH3 F70 F100 CR2 CR1 CR7 ATR42
User currently offlineDvincent From United States of America, joined Jan 2007, 1741 posts, RR: 11
Reply 15, posted (4 years 10 months 3 days 14 hours ago) and read 3493 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Look at the positions of the shadows. It's two different times of day. The first one was with a higher sun, the other one was with a lower one. That explains why the lighting looks different.


From the Mind of Minolta
User currently offlineJakTrax From United Kingdom, joined Jun 2005, 4936 posts, RR: 7
Reply 16, posted (4 years 10 months 2 days 23 hours ago) and read 3422 times:



Quoting Dvincent (Reply 15):
Look at the positions of the shadows. It's two different times of day. The first one was with a higher sun, the other one was with a lower one. That explains why the lighting looks different.

 checkmark 

In the first image the hangar isn't reflecting as much light due to the height of the sun, whereas in the second the light is concentrated on the hangar doors.

Quoting Dairy (Reply 14):
only just one pic got accepted on a.net and that was an unedited picture if I remeber correctly

I can't see this happening, unless you had a very tired screener on the day.....

ALL images as far as I'm aware need at least some kind of editing, no matter how small an amount. Obviously the less editing necessary the better the image when it came out of the camera.

Karl


Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
What Is Your Choice For Photo Editing ProGraMs? posted Sun Dec 24 2000 02:23:12 by BO__einG
Photo Editing Help posted Tue Aug 18 2009 16:05:47 by Astro777lover
Screen Size For Photo Editing posted Fri Apr 10 2009 20:33:58 by Paparadzi
Good And Free Photo Editing Programs posted Sun Aug 31 2008 14:02:36 by 76794p
Ideal Photo Editing Screen posted Thu Mar 6 2008 04:46:54 by Deaphen
The Best Photo Editing Program? posted Thu Feb 21 2008 12:59:41 by CaptainDanieL
Photo Editing Help posted Sun Feb 3 2008 06:06:13 by Pilotealpha
Photo Editing Software Recomondations posted Tue Dec 4 2007 16:19:53 by Deltajet757
Notebook Screens (PC/MAC) For Photo Editing posted Fri Aug 10 2007 14:29:53 by AKE0404AR
Seeking Some Advice On Photo Editing posted Sat Jun 23 2007 07:42:13 by Shutterbug