Sponsor Message:
Aviation Photography Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Giggle At Acceptance Ratio  
User currently offlineJakTrax From United Kingdom, joined Jun 2005, 4936 posts, RR: 7
Posted (4 years 10 months 1 week 1 day 16 hours ago) and read 2823 times:

Hi all,

Now I know how the ratio works but why does it always seem to plummet with one or two rejections but only creep up slowly with multiple acceptances? 7 in this morning with only one rejection and it's gone up by a whole...

2%!

I'm sure there's something going on when we go to sleep!!!

 Big grin

Karl

27 replies: All unread, showing first 25:
 
User currently offlineGabik001 From Poland, joined Jun 2005, 206 posts, RR: 1
Reply 1, posted (4 years 10 months 1 week 1 day 16 hours ago) and read 2797 times:

But how many previous rejection you had? Acceptance ratio is based on last 50 screened uploads ... I always thinking why ratio is rising that slow but I forgot there were rejection before...
Regards , Gabriel



Canon 50D gripped + Canon 70D +17-85IS USM + 18-55 STM + 100-400L IS USM + Minolta X300 w/ 35-70 f/3.5
User currently offlineBelfordrocks From Australia, joined Nov 2007, 60 posts, RR: 0
Reply 2, posted (4 years 10 months 1 week 1 day 15 hours ago) and read 2785 times:

Well it's simple maths.

For every new photo accepted/rejected, one gets 'pushed' out of your most recent 50. So if you're most recent 50 contained 40 acceptances and 10 rejections, and you get another 10 acceptances, then your ratio depends on where the acceptances and rejections are. For example, if the 10 rejections were the 10 earliest photos in the 50 most recent, then they would be pushed out, making a ratio of 100%. But if the 10 earliest results in the 50 were all acceptances, they would all get pushed out, so even if you replaced your earliest 10 acceptances with 10 new acceptances, your ratio would still stand at 80%.


User currently offlineJakTrax From United Kingdom, joined Jun 2005, 4936 posts, RR: 7
Reply 3, posted (4 years 10 months 1 week 1 day 15 hours ago) and read 2780 times:

I know all about how the math works - but does anyone else notice that their ratio seems to plummet after one rejection but not go up after multiple acceptances?

Light-hearted thread guys - something to have a laugh at. I've been trying to hit a ratio of 90% for about two months now and every time I get to 88% I get a load of rejections! I'm sure someone doesn't like the idea of me on 90%.....  Silly

Karl


User currently offlinePsych From United Kingdom, joined Nov 2004, 3048 posts, RR: 58
Reply 4, posted (4 years 10 months 1 week 1 day 13 hours ago) and read 2751 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!



Quoting JakTrax (Reply 3):
but does anyone else notice that their ratio seems to plummet after one rejection but not go up after multiple acceptances?

That's the maths for you Karl - it is a dead cert to happen that way. Rejections have an immediate hit on the ratio, but due to the system (well explained by Belfordrocks) acceptances only directly impact on the ratio at the time they are made if it just so happens that rejected photos are the ones dropping off the end of your latest 50.

For me this is a good example of the 'psychological' impact of the current system that I don't think is ideal - as discussed in my current thread. Whether there is a better system is the question for me..............

Paul


User currently offlineViv From Ireland, joined May 2005, 3142 posts, RR: 29
Reply 5, posted (4 years 10 months 1 week 1 day 12 hours ago) and read 2746 times:



Quoting JakTrax (Reply 3):
I know all about how the math works - but does anyone else notice that their ratio seems to plummet after one rejection but not go up after multiple acceptances?

Yes, this is also my experience - although it may be largely subjective. As already explained, it depends on the bunching of acceptances and rejections, as well as on the overall ratio between the two.



Nikon D700, Nikkor 80-400, Fuji X Pro 1, Fujinon 35 f/1.4, Fujinon 18 f/2
User currently offlineJakTrax From United Kingdom, joined Jun 2005, 4936 posts, RR: 7
Reply 6, posted (4 years 10 months 1 week 1 day 12 hours ago) and read 2744 times:

It's a fix! I'm destined to stay where I am forever more!!! LOL!

 Angry

Karl


User currently offlineSovietjet From Bulgaria, joined Mar 2003, 2572 posts, RR: 17
Reply 7, posted (4 years 10 months 1 week 1 day 12 hours ago) and read 2736 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

It doesn't matter rejection or not. If a new rejection "pushes out" a rejection that was previously photo number 50 then the ratio doesn't decrease.

User currently offlineThierryD From Luxembourg, joined Dec 2005, 2069 posts, RR: 51
Reply 8, posted (4 years 10 months 1 week 1 day 11 hours ago) and read 2715 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
HEAD SUPPORT



Quoting JakTrax (Reply 3):
Light-hearted thread guys - something to have a laugh at. I've been trying to hit a ratio of 90% for about two months now and every time I get to 88% I get a load of rejections! I'm sure someone doesn't like the idea of me on 90%....

Karl, try this: get an acceptance ratio of less than 50% and then upload some tremendously good shots that will eventually get accepted and you'll see how your AR plummets upwards!  Wink

Thierry



"Go ahead...make my day"
User currently offlineSilver1SWA From United States of America, joined Mar 2004, 4765 posts, RR: 26
Reply 9, posted (4 years 10 months 1 week 1 day 10 hours ago) and read 2691 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Yeah, I was on a roll with something like a string of 18 accepted in a row and my acceptance ratio slowly creeped up 10 or 12%. Got one rejection and immediately lost 2%. Made me scratch my head a little. Got 3 more acceptances since and my ratio is still frozen where it was after that one rejection.


ALL views, opinions expressed are mine ONLY and are NOT representative of those shared by Southwest Airlines Co.
User currently offlineJakTrax From United Kingdom, joined Jun 2005, 4936 posts, RR: 7
Reply 10, posted (4 years 10 months 1 week 1 day 10 hours ago) and read 2686 times:



Quoting Silver1SWA (Reply 9):
Got 3 more acceptances since and my ratio is still frozen where it was after that one rejection

It's a conspiracy!

Does make me laugh though - I know the system is in perfect working order but it's strange how it always seems to creep up slowly but zoom down so quickly!

Karl


User currently offlineLGW340 From United Kingdom, joined May 2007, 315 posts, RR: 0
Reply 11, posted (4 years 10 months 1 week 1 day 8 hours ago) and read 2657 times:

If you want an acceptance ratio to giggle at... here is mine... 18%. Lol
Its because when I was a bit younger I had a crappy 2mp camera with 4x DIGITAL zoom and I constantly attempted to upload awful pics which I truly believed were great! Now I'm 16 and on Nikon SLR equipment I'm slowly working on getting more pics accepted! On 12 pics now. Lol. My target is 30 by December! Wish me luck!  laughing 



Live life from the window seat...
User currently offlineJeffM From United States of America, joined May 2005, 3266 posts, RR: 52
Reply 12, posted (4 years 10 months 1 week 13 hours ago) and read 2586 times:



Quoting Psych (Reply 4):
For me this is a good example of the 'psychological' impact of the current system that I don't think is ideal

LOL.... you know that can be corrected easily enough by not uploading. Does it really bother you that much when you get a rejection? Seriously?


User currently offlinePsych From United Kingdom, joined Nov 2004, 3048 posts, RR: 58
Reply 13, posted (4 years 10 months 1 week 12 hours ago) and read 2574 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!



Quoting JeffM (Reply 12):
Does it really bother you that much when you get a rejection? Seriously?

Look at it this way Jeff - I am voicing the views of many who choose not to post on this issue.

Cheers.

Paul


User currently offlineClickhappy From United States of America, joined Sep 2001, 9603 posts, RR: 69
Reply 14, posted (4 years 10 months 1 week 11 hours ago) and read 2552 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
PHOTO SCREENER

I think what Jeff is saying is that - are there really people that are 'psychologically impacted' because they have a photo rejected?

Come on! If anyone is so wrapped up in their aviation photography that not getting a photo accepted on a website affects their well being - that person should seek some sort of help.

I mean - the whole concept just reeks of drama.


User currently offlinePsych From United Kingdom, joined Nov 2004, 3048 posts, RR: 58
Reply 15, posted (4 years 10 months 1 week 10 hours ago) and read 2532 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!



Quoting Clickhappy (Reply 14):
are there really people that are 'psychologically impacted' because they have a photo rejected?

In short, yes. Particularly when they struggle to understand the reasons why. I am not on about whether that is right or wrong - but it 'is'.

Now I am not saying that systems should be changed just to deal with that; just that we should be aware of these things. I wouldn't say it reeks of drama, Royal, just evidence of human nature. People are different.

Paul


User currently offlineJeffM From United States of America, joined May 2005, 3266 posts, RR: 52
Reply 16, posted (4 years 10 months 1 week 9 hours ago) and read 2519 times:



Quoting Clickhappy (Reply 14):
I think what Jeff is saying is that - are there really people that are 'psychologically impacted' because they have a photo rejected?

That is what I was implying.

Things that psychologically impact me would be like loosing a job, a loved one, a pet, a car wreck, having the house burn down, a good friend move away....etc., but having someone tell me to try again my airplane picture isn't exactly what they are looking for (regardless of the reason or lack of..) falls into the "oh well" category which is like checking your Power Ball numbers and finding out I'm not an instant millionaire again.

Royal's advice on possibly seeking help if a rejection really bothers you might have some real merit.


User currently offlineJalap From Belgium, joined Oct 2007, 355 posts, RR: 1
Reply 17, posted (4 years 10 months 6 days 21 hours ago) and read 2446 times:



Quoting JeffM (Reply 16):
Things that psychologically impact me would be like loosing a job, a loved one, a pet, a car wreck, having the house burn down, a good friend move away....etc., but having someone tell me to try again my airplane picture isn't exactly what they are looking for (regardless of the reason or lack of..) falls into the "oh well" category which is like checking your Power Ball numbers and finding out I'm not an instant millionaire again.

I don't believe you  Wink

If a rejection falls into that kind of "oh well" category than you have no incentive to try and improve yourself. Your Power Ball numbers are pure random, "oh well" is justified there. But getting a shot rejected means you need to improve certain skills and I think a mild curse after a rejection would be a much healthier reaction. One is allowed to be ambitious when it comes to acceptance ratio and even though this is just for fun, you have every right to be disappointed when you fail your ambitions.

If I play a game, I want to win - or at least play the best I can. If I fail doing that then I actually am "psychologically impacted", a series of events starts playing in my head. First a curse, then disappointment, then analysis and finally a plan to do better next time. And apart from those first 2 stages this actually is fun  Smile


User currently offlineDehowie From Australia, joined Feb 2004, 1057 posts, RR: 33
Reply 18, posted (4 years 10 months 6 days 19 hours ago) and read 2435 times:



Quoting Jalap (Reply 17):
But getting a shot rejected means you need to improve certain skills and I think a mild curse after a rejection would be a much healthier reaction.

Ahh i think by this you imply that a photo is deficient or lacking because a screener chooses to not tick the accept button.
Believe me there is way more to photography and aviation photography than wanting or needing the acceptance of the screeners here or anywhere for that matter.
Not having a photo here for whatever reason is not indicatie of the value either of the image or the person taking it.
Yes lots of people try and fail because of techincal deficiences but there are hundreds of images that never get seen here as they dont "fit the mold".
What one sceener likes another doesnt.
I've had shots bounced from here that have made money as they fit someone elses mold just not ANET's.
I used to get peeved because i wanted a particular image to be viewed in a particular way now i really dont care.
People take it far to personally..



2EOS1DX,EF14.2.8LII,17TS,85/1.2,16-35L,24-70LII,24L,70-200F2.8LII,100-400,300/400/500/800L
User currently offlineJalap From Belgium, joined Oct 2007, 355 posts, RR: 1
Reply 19, posted (4 years 10 months 6 days 18 hours ago) and read 2418 times:



Quoting Dehowie (Reply 18):

Quoting Jalap (Reply 17):
But getting a shot rejected means you need to improve certain skills and I think a mild curse after a rejection would be a much healthier reaction.

Ahh i think by this you imply that a photo is deficient or lacking because a screener chooses to not tick the accept button.

Hmm, yes because I was only referring to getting shots accepted here. The "certain skills" I was referring to are the ones needed to get a photo to "fit the mold".

So I do stand corrected, an "oh well" reaction would be justified for those who very well master the skills to get a shot accepted but aim for the outer edges of the "mold"  Smile


User currently offlineThierryD From Luxembourg, joined Dec 2005, 2069 posts, RR: 51
Reply 20, posted (4 years 10 months 6 days 17 hours ago) and read 2397 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
HEAD SUPPORT



Quoting Jalap (Reply 17):
If a rejection falls ... ...fun

This is a very good post and explains the "issue" quite well.

Getting pictures accepted on A.net can be seen as a game where the uploader is the player and the screeners are the referees.
Sometimes you win, sometimes you loose; sometimes you take it easy and then sometimes you argue with the referees.
And like every game one likes to play, one tries to become better and better and it's only natural that sometimes people get frustrated when they don't or if they have the feeling they don't become better.

All that of course has not the same psychological impact like loosing your job or a loved one but it has an impact after all, just like it would have an impact on you if the postman left you a soaked newspaper at your doorstep (only a random example  Wink).

Thierry



"Go ahead...make my day"
User currently offlineDvincent From United States of America, joined Jan 2007, 1742 posts, RR: 11
Reply 21, posted (4 years 10 months 6 days 17 hours ago) and read 2389 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Hey, I finally busted through to 90% after this weekend. I've been stuck in the mid-80s for a long time.  Wink

I agree with Thierry in that it's like a game. I don't get too upset with rejects but sometimes I do get confused (in which case I email the screeners respectfully and I get a helpful reply) or I had a feeling about something in the image. Just like I feel a little disappointed when the Red Sox or Patriots lose, I do feel a little let down when I get a bunch of rejects in a row.

It's a lot like Top Chef on TV - the judges at judge's table can be harsh, but as one chef said, "It feels harsh because they are right."

At least they are most of the time, hence the appeal function.



From the Mind of Minolta
User currently offlineJeffM From United States of America, joined May 2005, 3266 posts, RR: 52
Reply 22, posted (4 years 10 months 6 days 6 hours ago) and read 2310 times:



Quoting Jalap (Reply 17):
But getting a shot rejected means you need to improve certain skills

mmmm.....no. The criteria for acceptance here mean little to normal photographic aesthetics. They actually stifle real growth imo.


User currently offlineNIKV69 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 23, posted (4 years 10 months 6 days 2 hours ago) and read 2278 times:



Quoting Clickhappy (Reply 14):
I think what Jeff is saying is that - are there really people that are 'psychologically impacted' because they have a photo rejected

Yes including one who is no longer with us!  biggrin 


User currently offlineStrikeeagle From United Kingdom, joined Jan 2005, 12 posts, RR: 0
Reply 24, posted (4 years 10 months 5 days 13 hours ago) and read 2235 times:

HI ,
This post has generated some very interesting responses , so to add to the debate
lets look at something here that needs clarification , if one suffers with say a nerve related
illness it is very likely that rejections could cause problems for the person concerned but
this does not only affect these types of people. As i understand it the screening team often
receive abuse from photographers who feel that they have received a raw deal in-fact this is
highlighted in the recent announcement ( new screening positions ) note that there is a
mention that you must be able to cope with abusive people - now those abusive people
will not all have a mind related problem or be such that they need help from a mental health
team - this is not a drama its a real issue and it boils down to this - its about which side of
the fence one stands on one side the photographer the other side the screen er and the view
can be different depending on which side one stands , it will always be this way i suspect
and thus there is always the risk of confrontation because of the very nature of what is at
stake and a win or loose situation . Those people who can push negative results aside and
move on without it causing problems are in a good position no doubt but we are not all like
that people react to different situations in different ways , I certainly don't accept that it is
right to be rude or abusive to the team when things don't go right - if one feels they have had
a harsh decision go against them then they have the right to defend their corner in a polite
manner .

All the best
Anthony.


25 Viv : Not so. I care little about rejections here, but constantly try to improve my photography - it's called being "inner-directed" or "self-motivating".
26 Jalap : Nevertheless, getting shots accepted here requires "certain skills". Rather a lot of them even. So my statement, made from the perspective of a rathe
27 JakTrax : Having read through recent posts (I've been away for a few days) and noticed that the thread has been channelled relevantly into a slightly different
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Something Strange With My Acceptance Ratio? posted Fri Sep 5 2008 17:38:41 by JakTrax
Acceptance Ratio Not Going Up posted Mon Aug 18 2008 11:12:54 by JakTrax
Acceptance Ratio - Am I Missing Something? posted Mon Jan 28 2008 07:06:46 by JakTrax
Tell Us Your Acceptance Ratio! posted Tue May 15 2007 17:59:27 by Boeingfreak
Calculating Acceptance Ratio - How? posted Thu May 10 2007 18:43:19 by Deaphen
Acceptance Ratio Only Going One-way!? posted Sat Dec 2 2006 12:01:48 by ThierryD
How To Find Out Your Acceptance Ratio? posted Mon Aug 21 2006 18:28:36 by JK
Acceptance Ratio Stat posted Sat Jul 22 2006 21:11:18 by Lanpie
How's Your Acceptance Ratio Doing? posted Tue Jul 11 2006 21:43:23 by 9VSPO
Let's See Your Acceptance Ratio! posted Tue May 2 2006 18:08:38 by Aero145