Sponsor Message:
Aviation Photography Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Canon Lenses: USM Vs. Is?  
User currently offlineLynxboi From United Kingdom, joined Feb 2010, 5 posts, RR: 0
Posted (4 years 9 months 1 week 2 days 17 hours ago) and read 23664 times:

Hello folks,

This is my first post here and I'm after a bit of advice and help. I've always had an interest in aircraft since I can remember but it's only now that I want to get into the photography side, my main hobby is bus photography but I wish to expand out into aviation.

I recently bought a Canon EOS 500D (Rebel T1i for some) and I'm looking at buying a telephoto zoom lens; my budget is around £200-300 (US $300-470). Are there any recommendations from other forum users and photographers?

I've seen various Canon lenses available, some with the IS feature and some with USM, plus those with both oh and those without either. I understand both these features and what part they 'play' but do people generally have preference over one or the other when buying lenses for use in aviation photography? I guess I'm just interested in hearing what others have to say about these features and their usefulness.

Any help, advice or recommendations would be fantastic.

Thanks in advance.

Regards, Adam.

4 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineANITIX87 From United States of America, joined Mar 2005, 3308 posts, RR: 13
Reply 1, posted (4 years 9 months 1 week 2 days 16 hours ago) and read 23643 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

USM - ultra-sonic motor. Helps with faster focusing
IS - image stabilization. Helps keep images sharp at long focal length or long shutter speeds.

They are not at all the same thing, so, ideally, you want a lens with both. If, for budget reasons, you can only afford a lens that has one of them, go with USM for aviation. With a Canon, you can boost ISO a bit to get a shorter shutter speed and then you don't really need IS, especially if you have steady hands.

TIS



www.stellaryear.com: Canon EOS 50D, Canon EOS 5DMkII, Sigma 50mm 1.4, Canon 24-70 2.8L II, Canon 100mm 2.8L, Canon 100-4
User currently offlineJakTrax From United Kingdom, joined Jun 2005, 4936 posts, RR: 7
Reply 2, posted (4 years 9 months 1 week 2 days 15 hours ago) and read 23622 times:

I'm a Canon guy and have lived without IS for over five years - and my images have never really suffered as a result. I have used IS lenses and while it's certainly a useful feature it's far from essential. Same goes for USM motors too, although they are useful for fast-action, panning, etc. Lenses without USM are of course more prone to 'hunting' and can on occasion leave you with blurry images when they can't quite keep up. If you do airshow stuff USM is definitely a big benefit.

As for your budget, there are only three lenses I'd recommend (and one of those is slightly over)...


Canon EF75-300 f/4-5.6 USM III (around £220)

Pros
Reasonable build quality for the price (metal mount, glass front element)
Pretty sharp up to about 210mm

Cons
Very soft above about 230mm


Canon EF70-300 f/4-5.6 IS USM (around £350)

Pros
Metal mount, glass elements (including 1x UD element)
Sharp up to about 250mm
IS

Cons
Relatively poor build quality for the price (although it is made from very durable plastic)
Poor low-light performance


Canon EF55-250 f/4-5.6 IS (around £200)

Pros
Very good value
Pretty sharp throughout the range
IS

Cons
Very flimsy build quality
No USM


There is a selection of wide-angle to telephoto lenses (e.g. 18-200) also available but with that sort of focal length range they don't deliver the best quality.

If you can stretch to around £450 the EF70-200 f/4 L USM is the one to go for.

Karl


User currently offlineLynxboi From United Kingdom, joined Feb 2010, 5 posts, RR: 0
Reply 3, posted (4 years 9 months 1 week 2 days 11 hours ago) and read 23591 times:

Many thanks for the replies, especially Karl with the recommendations.

I'll have a scout round for the EF70-200 lens; any retailers you can recommend here in the UK?

I'm going to have to wait until pay day anyway as Jacob's (photography shop) charged me twice for the camera without realising!! So I'm having a bit of trouble sorting this out as neither they or my bank are accepting full responsibility - but that's another matter.

Also, thanks for the info about USM and IS, it cleared things up though have to ask, what is 'hunting' that you refer to?

Regards, Adam.


User currently offlineJakTrax From United Kingdom, joined Jun 2005, 4936 posts, RR: 7
Reply 4, posted (4 years 9 months 1 week 2 days 11 hours ago) and read 23585 times:

Adam,

www.warehouseexpress.com are very reputable. They aren't the cheapest but they are very reasonable and guarantee sealed UK stock (not imports) - any problems and their customer service team is spot-on.

If you can stretch to the 70-200 f/4 L USM I'd definitely go for that. It's sharp throughout its range, built like a tank and will produce better images at 200mm with a subsequent crop than the 70-300 f/4-5.6 IS USM will at 300mm. That's not to say, however, that the 70-300 is a bad lens. I borrowed a mate's for a day last year and apart from the low-light issues it was great. Remember, the price you pay for a lens will always reflect the image quality you're going to get out of it.

'Hunting' is a term used when the AF can't quite lock on a subject and zooms through its focus range a few times before it's successful. A USM motor significantly reduces this risk and the more advanced ring-type version (fitted to the 70-200) I've never actually known hunt.

Karl


Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Canon EF 400mm F/4 Do Is USM posted Fri Jan 25 2008 19:31:43 by GavinConroy
Canon EF-S 17-85mm 1:4-5.6 Is USM posted Mon Jul 17 2006 13:41:22 by FlyingZacko
Canon EF 70-300mm F/4-5.6 Is USM Review Wanted posted Thu Apr 6 2006 12:01:46 by Deaphen
New Canon EF 70-300mm F/4-5.6 Is USM posted Wed Oct 19 2005 00:12:17 by TRVYYZ
Canon EF 75-300mm F/4-5.6 Is USM posted Wed Mar 16 2005 01:57:38 by APFPilot1985
Canon Lenses... Choosing A New Car Is Much Easier! posted Thu Sep 16 2004 07:00:34 by Maiznblu_757
Canon Lenses With Is? posted Mon Dec 8 2003 01:56:15 by PJS800
Canon 70-200 L F4 Is USM posted Tue Dec 10 2002 16:34:45 by PRM
Canon EF 75-300mm F/4-5.6 Is USM posted Tue Jul 9 2002 14:59:50 by Granite
Canon EF 75-300 III, III USM Or IS? posted Thu Jul 12 2001 07:47:38 by AA_Cam
Tell Me About The Canon EF 70-300 Is USM posted Sat Aug 7 2010 05:03:29 by Newark727
Canon EF 400mm F/4 Do Is USM posted Fri Jan 25 2008 19:31:43 by GavinConroy
Canon EF-S 17-85mm 1:4-5.6 Is USM posted Mon Jul 17 2006 13:41:22 by FlyingZacko
Canon EF 70-300mm F/4-5.6 Is USM Review Wanted posted Thu Apr 6 2006 12:01:46 by Deaphen
New Canon EF 70-300mm F/4-5.6 Is USM posted Wed Oct 19 2005 00:12:17 by TRVYYZ
Canon EF 75-300mm F/4-5.6 Is USM posted Wed Mar 16 2005 01:57:38 by APFPilot1985
Canon Lenses... Choosing A New Car Is Much Easier! posted Thu Sep 16 2004 07:00:34 by Maiznblu_757
Canon EF-S 28-135mm Is USM posted Tue Jan 4 2011 03:35:15 by yerbol