Sponsor Message:
Aviation Photography Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Own Watermark Allowed Now?  
User currently offlineRotate From Switzerland, joined Feb 2003, 1491 posts, RR: 15
Posted (5 years 5 months 12 hours ago) and read 3110 times:

View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Algimantas

Really great shot! Wondering how he did it .. , probably the cam is ifxed at the stabilizer or what? Anyway ...
I can see also a small watermark down on the right. Are these "own" watermarks allowed now? Any clarification?

Thx vm


5 replies: All unread, jump to last
User currently offlinecpd From Australia, joined Jun 2008, 4904 posts, RR: 36
Reply 1, posted (5 years 5 months 12 hours ago) and read 3098 times:

To my knowledge, a small unobtrusive one has always been allowed.

User currently offlinedlowwa From Canada, joined Apr 2005, 7328 posts, RR: 29
Reply 2, posted (5 years 5 months 12 hours ago) and read 3070 times:

Quoting cpd (Reply 1):
To my knowledge, a small unobtrusive one has always been allowed.

Yes, it's in the Airliners.net Rejections Guide under 'Copyright'

A small copyright notice in a corner is acceptable, but please remove any other text or graphics from your photos, including all internet addresses (URLs). If you prefer to add a copyright notice onto your pictures please make sure that they are not visible on the thumbnail. This can be checked on confirmation page of the upload progress where you can see the thumbnail of your picture as it will appear when your picture gets added to the database.

User currently offlinedendrobatid From United Kingdom, joined Nov 2004, 1721 posts, RR: 61
Reply 3, posted (5 years 5 months 11 hours ago) and read 3056 times:

The image should not have been added with the URL showing but otherwise the watermark is acceptable. It is unobtrusive and in the corner. It can barely be seen on the full sized image, never mind the thumbnail
It was my mistake that I forgot about the URL not being allowed and I am asking for a re-upload.
Nice photo though  

Mick Bajcar

User currently offlineRotate From Switzerland, joined Feb 2003, 1491 posts, RR: 15
Reply 4, posted (5 years 5 months ago) and read 2915 times:

Thx vm for clarification ...


User currently offlineJohnKrist From Sweden, joined Jan 2005, 1407 posts, RR: 5
Reply 5, posted (5 years 4 months 4 weeks 1 day 23 hours ago) and read 2897 times:

Really nice image!
I didn't know personal watermarks are accepted, and it feels kind of that it is since a taxi way light that covers a small part of a tire leads to a rejection, but a watermark on the fuselage does not?

5D Mark III, 7D, 17-40 F4 L, 70-200 F2.8 L IS, EF 1.4x II, EF 2x III, SPEEDLITE 600EX-RT
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Shots With Window Frame Included: Now Allowed? posted Tue Jan 19 2010 09:29:52 by SNATH
Can I Post Comments On My Own Photos? posted Wed Feb 10 2010 00:00:50 by SNATH
Your Own Favourite Of 2009 posted Mon Dec 21 2009 03:10:06 by Ptrjong
I Am Not Allowed To Take Pictures In Flight? posted Sun Dec 6 2009 04:06:31 by Keta
New Queue Limit Now In Force? posted Thu Nov 5 2009 12:21:33 by JakTrax
Are Viewing Patterns Different Now? posted Sat Oct 3 2009 04:04:04 by Psych
Airliners.net Is Now On Twitter posted Wed Aug 26 2009 00:34:12 by PanAm_DC10
HDR Images Allowed? posted Tue Jun 23 2009 18:45:34 by UnattendedBag
Now I Have A PS7 Question posted Mon Apr 13 2009 18:37:31 by Sleekjet
Lightroom's Graduated Adjustment - Allowed? posted Mon Mar 23 2009 16:51:42 by Dvincent