Sponsor Message:
Aviation Photography Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Own Watermark Allowed Now?  
User currently offlineRotate From Switzerland, joined Feb 2003, 1491 posts, RR: 16
Posted (4 years 4 months 2 weeks 6 days 3 hours ago) and read 2845 times:


View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Algimantas



Really great shot! Wondering how he did it .. , probably the cam is ifxed at the stabilizer or what? Anyway ...
I can see also a small watermark down on the right. Are these "own" watermarks allowed now? Any clarification?

Thx vm

Robin


ABC
5 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlinecpd From Australia, joined Jun 2008, 4879 posts, RR: 38
Reply 1, posted (4 years 4 months 2 weeks 6 days 3 hours ago) and read 2833 times:

To my knowledge, a small unobtrusive one has always been allowed.

User currently offlinedlowwa From Canada, joined Apr 2005, 7328 posts, RR: 31
Reply 2, posted (4 years 4 months 2 weeks 6 days 2 hours ago) and read 2805 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting cpd (Reply 1):
To my knowledge, a small unobtrusive one has always been allowed.

Yes, it's in the Airliners.net Rejections Guide under 'Copyright'

Quote:
A small copyright notice in a corner is acceptable, but please remove any other text or graphics from your photos, including all internet addresses (URLs). If you prefer to add a copyright notice onto your pictures please make sure that they are not visible on the thumbnail. This can be checked on confirmation page of the upload progress where you can see the thumbnail of your picture as it will appear when your picture gets added to the database.


User currently onlinedendrobatid From United Kingdom, joined Nov 2004, 1663 posts, RR: 62
Reply 3, posted (4 years 4 months 2 weeks 6 days 2 hours ago) and read 2791 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
HEAD SCREENER

The image should not have been added with the URL showing but otherwise the watermark is acceptable. It is unobtrusive and in the corner. It can barely be seen on the full sized image, never mind the thumbnail
It was my mistake that I forgot about the URL not being allowed and I am asking for a re-upload.
Nice photo though  

Mick Bajcar


User currently offlineRotate From Switzerland, joined Feb 2003, 1491 posts, RR: 16
Reply 4, posted (4 years 4 months 2 weeks 5 days 15 hours ago) and read 2650 times:

Thx vm for clarification ...

Robin



ABC
User currently offlineJohnKrist From Sweden, joined Jan 2005, 1399 posts, RR: 6
Reply 5, posted (4 years 4 months 2 weeks 5 days 14 hours ago) and read 2632 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
HEAD SUPPORT

Really nice image!
I didn't know personal watermarks are accepted, and it feels kind of that it is since a taxi way light that covers a small part of a tire leads to a rejection, but a watermark on the fuselage does not?



5D Mark III, 7D, 17-40 F4 L, 70-200 F2.8 L IS, EF 1.4x II, EF 2x III, Metz 58-AF1
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Shots With Window Frame Included: Now Allowed? posted Tue Jan 19 2010 09:29:52 by SNATH
Can I Post Comments On My Own Photos? posted Wed Feb 10 2010 00:00:50 by SNATH
Your Own Favourite Of 2009 posted Mon Dec 21 2009 03:10:06 by Ptrjong
I Am Not Allowed To Take Pictures In Flight? posted Sun Dec 6 2009 04:06:31 by Keta
New Queue Limit Now In Force? posted Thu Nov 5 2009 12:21:33 by JakTrax
Are Viewing Patterns Different Now? posted Sat Oct 3 2009 04:04:04 by Psych
Airliners.net Is Now On Twitter posted Wed Aug 26 2009 00:34:12 by PanAm_DC10
HDR Images Allowed? posted Tue Jun 23 2009 18:45:34 by UnattendedBag
Now I Have A PS7 Question posted Mon Apr 13 2009 18:37:31 by Sleekjet
Lightroom's Graduated Adjustment - Allowed? posted Mon Mar 23 2009 16:51:42 by Dvincent