Flpuck6 From United States of America, joined Jun 1999, 2123 posts, RR: 28 Posted (13 years 5 months 1 week 2 days 20 hours ago) and read 1133 times:
Just curious to know how it is some photos can be in the photo queue for so long while for the new uploads, it is quite obvious the photos were uploaded the night before? (And the photogs were not necessarily before me in the line)
I know, patience is a virtue. I've just never had to wait as long.
Dazed767 From United States of America, joined May 1999, 5510 posts, RR: 51
Reply 4, posted (13 years 5 months 1 week 2 days 13 hours ago) and read 1005 times:
I've gotten 1 or 2 photos that passed without Johan having to screen it, but I still have a good 6 that have been waiting at least a month? I think once he comes back from vacation/taking a break, things will move much quicker.
Chris28_17 From United States of America, joined Jul 2000, 1439 posts, RR: 9
Reply 5, posted (13 years 5 months 1 week 2 days 11 hours ago) and read 998 times:
Im not really a complainer but all my uploads for the last 4 months or so have all been uploaded within 2 days or so as "high quality". I just got back from europe and sent in some shots that i really think are badass, better than some earlier ones of mine which were marked "HQ" and yet every single one of them are sitting in the queue scratching themselves... (i'm a tasteful one, eh?)
Joe pries From United States of America, joined May 2000, 1957 posts, RR: 52
Reply 7, posted (13 years 5 months 1 week 2 days ago) and read 946 times:
im sure when johan gets back things will move along again- i have some sitting in the que for a while now and im sure its not because they are borderline so must be waiting for johan to get back to move em along
Flpuck6 From United States of America, joined Jun 1999, 2123 posts, RR: 28
Reply 8, posted (13 years 5 months 1 week 2 days ago) and read 946 times:
I'm all about the HQ screening. I would, however, also be a fan of the old way of first-come-first-serve for the non-HQ photos. Sure, HQ photos get added right away. But then for the regular photos, if there was someway for them to be added on a consistent basis, I think that may add an aspect of efficiency.
I am not implying that a.net disrespects people and I say this with all my own respect: I think it is only a matter of respect that people's photos in the non-HQ line get looked at in a timely fashion. That's all from my end.
Aer Lingus From Ireland, joined May 2000, 1582 posts, RR: 0
Reply 9, posted (13 years 5 months 1 week 1 day 23 hours ago) and read 934 times:
Chris - I think the HQ line is taking a little longer at the minute. I have three shots that I submitted on the 24th that I think are better than some of my previous HQ uploaded shots. Im still waiting.
Either that or they aren't as good as I think they are and they've been "dumped" in the regular queue