Sponsor Message:
Aviation Photography Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Any Tips For A New Photographer?  
User currently offlineKLM77 From Canada, joined Sep 2009, 168 posts, RR: 0
Posted (4 years 2 months 3 weeks 4 days 19 hours ago) and read 5266 times:

Hi there, i've been spotting planes for a while but today I had finally gotten a chance to to use a DSLR camrea and I took some pictures. After putting them on my desktop I cropped one photo that I really liked and I wanted to ask you photoshoppers what can be done to this picture to make it airliners worthy.

http://img13.imageshack.us/img13/8485/dsc05001edit3.jpg

15 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlinedlowwa From Canada, joined Apr 2005, 7328 posts, RR: 31
Reply 1, posted (4 years 2 months 3 weeks 4 days 19 hours ago) and read 5240 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Hi,

First crop it to an appropriate ratio (3x2 or 4x3) and then re-size it to under 1600pix, preferably 1024.

For this photo specifically, do a better crop; you've cut the tip of the KL 47's stab., and it's just a little unbalanced with too much dead space in the upper-right corner. You'll also need to do some sharpening, as the photo is relatively soft. Finally, make sure you check for dust spots, especially when you've got a blue sky background, as they show up quite easily then.

You can also check the Rejection Guide and the Editing in Photoshop Guide for some good pointers.

Tips for photography in general include finding a good book on the basics, taking an introductory course on photography, trial and error, and having fun!

Dana


User currently offlineKLM77 From Canada, joined Sep 2009, 168 posts, RR: 0
Reply 2, posted (4 years 2 months 3 weeks 4 days 18 hours ago) and read 5234 times:

Okay will try my best and will re-upload when I have finished the final copy. Thank you very much for the pointers  

Dan


User currently offlineAirlinerfanone From Finland, joined Jan 2010, 11 posts, RR: 0
Reply 3, posted (4 years 2 months 3 weeks 4 days 11 hours ago) and read 5192 times:

Hello! i have a question too! I have been spotting planes for a while, but i have tried to post few photos to A.net, but they were rejected. Im using Olympus SP-590UZ camera, and editing the photos with gimp.

Could somebody please give me some tips for photographing and editing photos?  


User currently offlineStackhouse007 From United States of America, joined Nov 2007, 417 posts, RR: 2
Reply 4, posted (4 years 2 months 3 weeks 4 days 5 hours ago) and read 5154 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Its hard to just tell you what you need to work on or learn if we can't see your previous shots that were rejected and for what reasons they were rejected. If you can provide that to us, I am sure many people will start helping get a grasp of this.

Good Luck
Kyle



Nikon D60: 18-55mm - 55-200mm / Canon 50D: 100-400mm
User currently offlineJakTrax From United Kingdom, joined Jun 2005, 4936 posts, RR: 7
Reply 5, posted (4 years 2 months 3 weeks 3 days 22 hours ago) and read 5068 times:

It's all very well someone telling you what settings you should use and what you need to do but it's a clear case of 'running before walking' if you don't understand the principles of what you're being told - i.e. why you need to be using/doing what you are. Understanding even the very basics will allow you to properly absorb what you are doing and why.

Trial and error is a good way, but I would couple that with the suggestion of reading a good photography book. Those two combined should give you all the information you need to get started.

Quoting Airlinerfanone (Reply 3):
but i have tried to post few photos to A.net, but they were rejected. Im using Olympus SP-590UZ camera, and editing the photos with gimp

I'd like to say that there's a good chance of getting acceptances here with that equipment but I'm afraid there isn't. This site seems increasingly keen to get its photographers using DSLRs and the advancements in technology mean that compacts are being slowly forced out. That's not to say it's impossible but I imagine it's pretty difficult even for veteran users of compact cameras.

Karl


User currently offlinebelfordrocks From Australia, joined Nov 2007, 60 posts, RR: 0
Reply 6, posted (4 years 2 months 3 weeks 3 days 17 hours ago) and read 4992 times:

Airlinerfanone,

I personally use an Olympus SP-560UZ, which is an older version of the SP590. It would be difficult, but not impossible to get good shots with this camera. I only have two photos on A.net, and probably a few more on my computer yet to be processed. One of the main issues I have with this camera is the focus. The autofocus is horrendous and the manual focus is such a pain the backside its essentially unusable too. But if the photos do end up in focus, then to be honest quite a good number of them might be usable. To be honest, the post-processing will be the key.

Now I'll show you my two photos:


View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Roland Dai
View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Roland Dai



Now both were essentially taken from the same location. Lighting is key here, as you don't want the ISO to be too high (though anywhere under 640 should be usable with good post-processing). Now, if you have a good photo, this is my usual post-proessing process.

1. Open photo

2. Level and crop. If the image is of good quality, do a tight crop, if it isn't that good, leave a bit of space on both sides. It then means less pixels for the aircraft, meaning less visible flaws.

3. Contrast/levels. the SP560 has a tendency to make the photos very misty, I don't know if thats the case with the 590. Adjust colour and everything.

4. For ISO 400 and above shots, I do a bit of noise reduction here, before resizing. (use "Reduce Noise", strength 1-2, preserve details 0% and colour noise 0%). For lower ISO shots, omit this step.

5. Sharpen small details. One of the main distinguishing features between DSLR and bridge photos is that the minor details aren't as strong in a bridge than a DSLR. I try to compensate by doing some manual sharpening in the tiny detailed parts, such as any writing on the aircraft (but not the reg), logos, visible pitot tubes, lights etc.

6. Remove chromatic noise/purple fringing- On the 560 the pruple fringing is very heavy, and also to a lesser extent the green fringing. Remove them by selecting the affected area, then "Reduce colour noise- 100%" in the "Remove Noise" tool. Repeat for each affected section. They should look a lot more normaler now

7. Resize. 1024x683 is ideal, nothing bigger than that.

8. Magic Wand to select the sky. This is easy, set tolerance to about 12-15, and just hold shift and select the entire sky.

9. Select Inverse

10. Sharpen- this is my second round of sharpening, where I do the entire aircraft instead of just the small details. I use amount 50-120% (use your discretion here), 0.3px and threshold 0. This boosts the overall sharpness, but should still be slightly soft.

11. Reduce noise. Not necessary 100% of the time, but go to "Reduce Noise", then use strength 10, preserve details anywhere bwteen 15-30%. It will remove quite a bit of the noise.

12. My third and final round of sharpening, I use 100-300%, 0.2px. This just sharpens the very outer edges, giving it a crisp look. This is the final touch of sharpening, and after this, your photo should be ready to go.

13. Sometimes I like to some other minor edits too. Sydney's main spotting area is near the beach so sometimes if the sea colour is too strong I milden it a bit. Perhaps do a final touch of sharpening on the gear, and any other parts that are normally soft. In the end, your photo should be literally picture perfect.

It's a long process, sometimes taking over 20 minutes per photo depending on how picky I am, but tthe end result will be a lot more presentable and a lot more DSLR-like. Good luck!

Cheers,
Belfordrocks


User currently offline66chargerfan From Canada, joined Aug 2005, 21 posts, RR: 0
Reply 7, posted (4 years 2 months 3 weeks 2 days 21 hours ago) and read 4928 times:

i think the 1st and best thing to do on the PS is crop it to the settings that a.net needs...looks pretty a.net worthy

User currently offlineKLM77 From Canada, joined Sep 2009, 168 posts, RR: 0
Reply 8, posted (4 years 2 months 3 weeks 2 days 18 hours ago) and read 4912 times:

Well thanks to dlowwa's tips, and the how to edit in photoshop guide, I was able to re-upload the picture and it got accepted!   So once agian I want to give many thanks to dlowwa for being the first to take a look at my picture and giving me the helpful pointers.  

User currently offlinestevemchey From United States of America, joined Feb 2009, 365 posts, RR: 0
Reply 9, posted (4 years 2 months 3 weeks 2 days 16 hours ago) and read 4898 times:

Why so modest? Let's see the shot...  
View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Dan Miclea



User currently offlineJakTrax From United Kingdom, joined Jun 2005, 4936 posts, RR: 7
Reply 10, posted (4 years 2 months 3 weeks 2 days 15 hours ago) and read 4886 times:

Well done! Obviously shots with compacts are still very much alive and well here. To be honest for static shots I think they do just fine but in lower light or with fast-moving subjects I reckon it'd be much harder. Still, nothing wrong in trying - one may receive a surprise!

Karl


User currently offlinecpd From Australia, joined Jun 2008, 4879 posts, RR: 39
Reply 11, posted (4 years 2 months 3 weeks 2 days 15 hours ago) and read 4877 times:

What a nice mage. Well done!

User currently offlineAirWillie6475 From United States of America, joined Jan 2005, 2448 posts, RR: 1
Reply 12, posted (4 years 2 months 3 weeks 2 days 12 hours ago) and read 4856 times:

When you're tracking a moving plane, say on the taxiway, is it better to follow the airplane and then take the shot or is it better to point the camera at one spot and take the picture when the airplane comes into view? Whats the best shutter speed for moving airplanes say on taxiway, runway, or in air?

User currently offlinecpd From Australia, joined Jun 2008, 4879 posts, RR: 39
Reply 13, posted (4 years 2 months 3 weeks 2 days 12 hours ago) and read 4854 times:

Quoting AirWillie6475 (Reply 12):
When you're tracking a moving plane, say on the taxiway, is it better to follow the airplane and then take the shot or is it better to point the camera at one spot and take the picture when the airplane comes into view? Whats the best shutter speed for moving airplanes say on taxiway, runway, or in air?

Point the centre focus spot on one detail near the middle of the plane (or where ever is convenient), and then track that detail as smoothly as you can - keeping both of them lined up the whole time. As the plane moves along, just track that detail, be it a door, or a particular window as smoothly as possible.

If you get it right, you'll get some lovely panning type shots if the conditions are right for that. This applies for DSLR / SLR cameras, don't know how well you'll go with a point and shoot camera because I've never used a modern one.

I can't give advice particular to point-and-shoot cameras.

[Edited 2010-04-21 00:48:03]

User currently offlineAirlinerfanone From Finland, joined Jan 2010, 11 posts, RR: 0
Reply 14, posted (4 years 2 months 3 weeks 2 days 6 hours ago) and read 4832 times:

Hello!

Belfordrocks, thank you so much for your tips, i will use them! Are there any good "Add on's" for 590? Like some tubes/lenses of different sizes?

Thanks: AFO   


User currently offlinebelfordrocks From Australia, joined Nov 2007, 60 posts, RR: 0
Reply 15, posted (4 years 2 months 3 weeks 1 day 21 hours ago) and read 4794 times:

I dont think there are any accessories for the 590, there might be cosmetically (grips, lens caps etc). If you look to try to upgrade your camera, the best thing you can do buy yourself a tripod (they're around $30 or so), and try to get that shutter low. At the long end of the 590's zoom, use no higher than 1/400-ish. Yes perhas there might be a bit of blur here and there for some photos, but for the others the extra quality in terms of reduced noise is well worth it.

Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Any Tips For Aviation Photography Beginners? posted Wed Apr 15 2009 02:51:48 by Miniflyer
Rejection Help For A New Photographer posted Thu Feb 21 2008 11:49:37 by BlueElephant
D-HJMD Prescreen For A New Photographer posted Sun Jan 27 2008 11:09:29 by D3930
Flying To HNL - Any Tips For Air-to-air Photos? posted Tue Dec 18 2007 17:38:09 by Jawed
Which Lense To Go For? (New Photographer) posted Tue May 3 2005 03:22:40 by 9VSRH
Advice For New Photographer posted Sun Sep 14 2003 19:58:58 by Mia777
Any Tips For Taking Night Shots? posted Wed Aug 13 2003 06:20:10 by Mirrodie
Does Anyone Have Any Tips For Me? posted Mon Aug 26 2002 17:33:34 by Skymileman
Any Tips For Someone Going To SLC, CVG, And Syr? posted Sun Jun 16 2002 19:31:55 by Skymileman
New To All Of This, Any Tips? :) posted Sun Oct 2 2005 16:50:56 by Bticehurst