condor981 From Costa Rica, joined Mar 2010, 9 posts, RR: 0 Posted (3 years 7 months 4 weeks 1 day 13 hours ago) and read 2105 times:
Hello, I am having difficulty understanding some key technical concepts regarding lenses and apertures. I own a Canon lens EF- S 18-200mm f/3.5-5.6 IS. I was trying to understand if the autofocus will work on this lens if I attach a 2x II Canon extender magnifying accesory. On the Canon site it says it will provide autofocus if:
"With the EF 2x II, AF is possible with any EOS body if the lens has an f/2.8 or faster maximum aperture, and compatible Image Stabilization lenses maintain the IS feature when used with any current EOS camera. "
Can someone tell me if AF will work on my lens at all focal lengths if I get the 2x extender?
JRadier From Netherlands, joined Sep 2004, 4617 posts, RR: 51 Reply 5, posted (3 years 7 months 4 weeks 1 day 8 hours ago) and read 2016 times:
Besides the autofocus point, as far as I know the extender doesn't even fit on that lens. Another point is that you really don't want a marginal lens such as the 18-200 on a marginal extender like the 2x.....
For once you have tasted flight you will walk the earth with your eyes turned skywards, for there you have been and ther
Aviopic From Netherlands, joined Mar 2004, 2681 posts, RR: 44 Reply 6, posted (3 years 7 months 4 weeks 1 day 7 hours ago) and read 1992 times:
All Canon bodies apart from the 1D series require at least F5.6 for AF to work(F7.1 for a 1D) thus to retain AF with a 2.0 TC a F2.8 lens is needed or a F4.0 for a 1.4 TC.
This is not a technical limitation though but just decided by Canon for you who burned this limitation into the bodies operating software.
Tape the outer 2 contacts and you'll be fine although I personally wouldn't put a 2.0 TC inbetween body and a 18-200.
The truth lives in one’s mind, it doesn’t really exist
JohnKrist From Sweden, joined Jan 2005, 1381 posts, RR: 6 Reply 7, posted (3 years 7 months 4 weeks 1 day 6 hours ago) and read 1979 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW HEAD SUPPORT
Quoting JRadier (Reply 5): Besides the autofocus point, as far as I know the extender doesn't even fit on that lens
That's correct, it will noy physically fit as part of the extender actually goes inside the lens. You can use a 3rd party extender on many lenses that can't take the Canon extender but then you will lose even more in quality. You'd be better off getting a 70-300IS which is not that much more money wise than an extender, and it has IS.
5D Mark III, 7D, 17-40 F4 L, 70-200 F2.8 L IS, EF 1.4x II, EF 2x III, Metz 58-AF1
condor981 From Costa Rica, joined Mar 2010, 9 posts, RR: 0 Reply 8, posted (3 years 7 months 4 weeks 20 hours ago) and read 1906 times:
Thanks a lot guys who responded. I will definetely not get the extender. I will most probably invest in a new lens, most probably the EF 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6 L IS USM. I have read great reviews about it. I am still trying to have my first picture accepted in this site, and I have to admit, its not easy at all!
JakTrax From United Kingdom, joined Jun 2005, 4936 posts, RR: 7 Reply 9, posted (3 years 7 months 4 weeks 18 hours ago) and read 1873 times:
Quoting condor981 (Reply 8): Thanks a lot guys who responded. I will definetely not get the extender. I will most probably invest in a new lens, most probably the EF 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6 L IS USM. I have read great reviews about it. I am still trying to have my first picture accepted in this site, and I have to admit, its not easy at all
Just remember, buying great lenses won't suddenly make your pictures ten times better. In fact, with a complex lens such as the 100-400L you may actually get disappointing results initially until you learn how to handle a long zoom. I recently bought Sigma's 100-300 F4 EX IF lens and although optically fantastic it took a few shoots to learn its strong and weak points. I still haven't quite mastered it yet and I have over 20 years experience behind me!
As for extenders, the general concensus is that you should steer clear of the 2x completely, as the drop in quality is just too steep. There are conflicting reports concerning the 1.4x - most agree however that the loss in quality is hardly noticeable unless you 'pixel-peep'. I guess it depends on how sharp your copy of the lens is and indeed how good a copy of the extender you've ended up with.
It's perhaps irrelevant anyway as I'm fairly sure neither extender is compatible with your lens. On a final note, I don't really know what the big deal is with losing AF - it's not like anyone is forcing you to use an extender. With the new manual focus modes available on the newer bodies manual can actually be more accurate!