Sponsor Message:
Aviation Photography Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Confused With Key Technical Concept.  
User currently offlinecondor981 From Costa Rica, joined Mar 2010, 9 posts, RR: 0
Posted (4 years 4 months 2 weeks 3 days 18 hours ago) and read 2341 times:

Hello, I am having difficulty understanding some key technical concepts regarding lenses and apertures. I own a Canon lens EF- S 18-200mm f/3.5-5.6 IS. I was trying to understand if the autofocus will work on this lens if I attach a 2x II Canon extender magnifying accesory. On the Canon site it says it will provide autofocus if:

"With the EF 2x II, AF is possible with any EOS body if the lens has an f/2.8 or faster maximum aperture, and compatible Image Stabilization lenses maintain the IS feature when used with any current EOS camera. "

Can someone tell me if AF will work on my lens at all focal lengths if I get the 2x extender?

Thanks for the advice.

9 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlinedlowwa From Canada, joined Apr 2005, 7328 posts, RR: 30
Reply 1, posted (4 years 4 months 2 weeks 3 days 17 hours ago) and read 2316 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

I think you've answered your own question:

Quoting condor981 (Thread starter):
I own a Canon lens EF- S 18-200mm f/3.5-5.6 IS
Quoting condor981 (Thread starter):
With the EF 2x II, AF is possible with any EOS body if the lens has an f/2.8 or faster maximum aperture

You need f/2.8, you have f/3.5+ = no you can't use AF at any focal length, nor should you try a TC with that lens, you'd lose way too much light, and the quality would be terrible.


User currently offlinesovietjet From Bulgaria, joined Mar 2003, 2604 posts, RR: 17
Reply 2, posted (4 years 4 months 2 weeks 3 days 14 hours ago) and read 2273 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

So then how were these photos taken? It says 600mm + 2X and the 600mm is an F4 lens.


View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Steve Morris


View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Suresh A. Atapattu



User currently offlineSilver1SWA From United States of America, joined Mar 2004, 4783 posts, RR: 26
Reply 3, posted (4 years 4 months 2 weeks 3 days 14 hours ago) and read 2271 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting sovietjet (Reply 2):
So then how were these photos taken? It says 600mm + 2X and the 600mm is an F4 lens.

Manual focus?



ALL views, opinions expressed are mine ONLY and are NOT representative of those shared by Southwest Airlines Co.
User currently offlineua935 From United Kingdom, joined Feb 2004, 610 posts, RR: 6
Reply 4, posted (4 years 4 months 2 weeks 3 days 14 hours ago) and read 2263 times:

"So then how were these photos taken? It says 600mm + 2X and the 600mm is an F4 lens."

I believe both phtogs concerned have EOS 1 Series bodies, you get AF to F8 with a 1 Series.

[Edited 2010-04-18 23:32:22]


Live every second like you mean it
User currently onlineJRadier From Netherlands, joined Sep 2004, 4680 posts, RR: 50
Reply 5, posted (4 years 4 months 2 weeks 3 days 14 hours ago) and read 2252 times:

Besides the autofocus point, as far as I know the extender doesn't even fit on that lens. Another point is that you really don't want a marginal lens such as the 18-200 on a marginal extender like the 2x.....


For once you have tasted flight you will walk the earth with your eyes turned skywards, for there you have been and ther
User currently offlineAviopic From Netherlands, joined Mar 2004, 2681 posts, RR: 42
Reply 6, posted (4 years 4 months 2 weeks 3 days 12 hours ago) and read 2228 times:

All Canon bodies apart from the 1D series require at least F5.6 for AF to work(F7.1 for a 1D) thus to retain AF with a 2.0 TC a F2.8 lens is needed or a F4.0 for a 1.4 TC.
This is not a technical limitation though but just decided by Canon for you who burned this limitation into the bodies operating software.
Tape the outer 2 contacts and you'll be fine although I personally wouldn't put a 2.0 TC inbetween body and a 18-200.



The truth lives in one’s mind, it doesn’t really exist
User currently offlineJohnKrist From Sweden, joined Jan 2005, 1399 posts, RR: 6
Reply 7, posted (4 years 4 months 2 weeks 3 days 12 hours ago) and read 2215 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
HEAD SUPPORT

Quoting JRadier (Reply 5):
Besides the autofocus point, as far as I know the extender doesn't even fit on that lens

That's correct, it will noy physically fit as part of the extender actually goes inside the lens. You can use a 3rd party extender on many lenses that can't take the Canon extender but then you will lose even more in quality. You'd be better off getting a 70-300IS which is not that much more money wise than an extender, and it has IS.



5D Mark III, 7D, 17-40 F4 L, 70-200 F2.8 L IS, EF 1.4x II, EF 2x III, Metz 58-AF1
User currently offlinecondor981 From Costa Rica, joined Mar 2010, 9 posts, RR: 0
Reply 8, posted (4 years 4 months 2 weeks 3 days 1 hour ago) and read 2142 times:

Thanks a lot guys who responded. I will definetely not get the extender. I will most probably invest in a new lens, most probably the EF 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6 L IS USM. I have read great reviews about it. I am still trying to have my first picture accepted in this site, and I have to admit, its not easy at all!

Once again, thanks and keep shooting  


User currently offlineJakTrax From United Kingdom, joined Jun 2005, 4936 posts, RR: 7
Reply 9, posted (4 years 4 months 2 weeks 2 days 23 hours ago) and read 2109 times:

Quoting condor981 (Reply 8):
Thanks a lot guys who responded. I will definetely not get the extender. I will most probably invest in a new lens, most probably the EF 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6 L IS USM. I have read great reviews about it. I am still trying to have my first picture accepted in this site, and I have to admit, its not easy at all

Just remember, buying great lenses won't suddenly make your pictures ten times better. In fact, with a complex lens such as the 100-400L you may actually get disappointing results initially until you learn how to handle a long zoom. I recently bought Sigma's 100-300 F4 EX IF lens and although optically fantastic it took a few shoots to learn its strong and weak points. I still haven't quite mastered it yet and I have over 20 years experience behind me!

As for extenders, the general concensus is that you should steer clear of the 2x completely, as the drop in quality is just too steep. There are conflicting reports concerning the 1.4x - most agree however that the loss in quality is hardly noticeable unless you 'pixel-peep'. I guess it depends on how sharp your copy of the lens is and indeed how good a copy of the extender you've ended up with.

It's perhaps irrelevant anyway as I'm fairly sure neither extender is compatible with your lens. On a final note, I don't really know what the big deal is with losing AF - it's not like anyone is forcing you to use an extender. With the new manual focus modes available on the newer bodies manual can actually be more accurate!

Karl


Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Confused With Rejections posted Mon May 3 2004 16:51:18 by Mikedlayer
Technical Problem With Canon 300/4 L.... posted Wed Apr 6 2005 00:10:17 by Patroni
Some Help With Unsharp Mask posted Wed Apr 14 2010 10:19:00 by p38Ace
Telescope With Inbuilt 7MP Camera From Zeiss posted Wed Mar 24 2010 14:11:06 by oly720man
Canon 70-200 With Shake Enhancement posted Fri Mar 5 2010 08:53:19 by Lemmy
Help With Sigma 150-500mm OS posted Tue Mar 2 2010 20:21:54 by P38Ace
New Sigma Lenses: 50-500 / 70-200 With OS posted Sat Feb 20 2010 20:42:40 by SNATH
Any Experiences With The Canon 400mm 5.6? posted Thu Feb 18 2010 06:24:53 by SNATH
Big Aircraft With Small Registration Number posted Wed Feb 3 2010 10:58:58 by Asuspine
What's Up With The Queue? posted Wed Feb 3 2010 06:25:02 by SNATH