HAL From United States of America, joined Jan 2002, 2519 posts, RR: 53 Posted (3 years 10 months 3 days 12 hours ago) and read 3917 times:
I've tried contacting some of the more prolific (and good) pilot-photogs here on A.net, but haven't heard anything back yet. My question that I'll pose here to any airline pilot who has had an air-to-air shot accepted is this: What equipment & settings did you use to get your photo? And which aircraft did you shoot from? I'm asking because I've had a couple of dozen shots from the cockpit rejected, and only one accepted:
The others were all rejected for soft/blurry, which was a direct result of the aberration caused by shooting through an inch of acrylic/glass/heating wires/dust/bug smears. I'm especially interested in the shots of aircraft below your altitude, which would require shooting through the glass at a lower angle, increasing the effect of that aberration.
Examples of good shots (that I've tried mimicking to no avail) are:
ThierryD From Luxembourg, joined Dec 2005, 2060 posts, RR: 52
Reply 1, posted (3 years 10 months 3 days 10 hours ago) and read 3878 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW HEAD SUPPORT
Well David, apparently you don't consider me as being one of the "good pilot-photogs" here but I'll try to answer your questions anyway.
What I've come to realize is that the aircraft/windows is/are one (if not THE) major factor when it comes to successful A2A shots.
During my time on the Fokker 70/100 I hadn't too much trouble getting some good A2A photos:
I was a bit lucky here as we were low and almost perpendicular to the airport.
A few things you'll have to consider to maximize your chances of getting a good A2A photo:
- Shoot as perpendicular to the window as possible
- Keep the lens as close to the window as possible to avoid unnecessary reflections (and of course avoid shooting through dirt or bug remains )
- when photographing aircraft in midair, shoot with shutter priority with a high speed of 1/800 or more; this will help you compensate for the relatively high speeds of the aircraft
- consider exposure compensation and/or complete manual settings as most cameras are overburdened with the light conditions up there and normally tend to overexpose
- take as many pictures as possible (I heard some guys (especially spanish ones... ) tend to shoot 100+ photos to get one right )
Getting good A2A photos is a real challenge and if the conditions aren't right (e.g. other aircraft too far away or appearing in the lower part of the window frame) it just won't work no matter how good the equipment or the photog are but with the above hints you might increase your chances.
To add to Thierry's list:
Get as close to the window as you can, remove lens hood.
Scratches are far less important as one might think and they won't show up if your focal point is far away.
Thus a slightly longer lens is preferred together with a relative wide aperture(to reduce DOF to a minimum).
Shot through 75 year old DC2 windows(and they are scratched).
HAL From United States of America, joined Jan 2002, 2519 posts, RR: 53
Reply 3, posted (3 years 10 months 1 day 9 hours ago) and read 3629 times:
Quoting ThierryD (Reply 1): Well David, apparently you don't consider me as being one of the "good pilot-photogs" here but I'll try to answer your questions anyway
Thierry - I did send you a note, but I'm guessing an e-mail snafu was the problem since I didn't hear back from anyone.
Thanks guys for your suggestions. I've been doing pretty much all you offered, so I guess I'll have to just wait for those 'perfect conditions' as I blow through hundreds of shots. Up close, no lens hood, high shutter speeds & manual settings are what I've been doing lately. So I guess it's just a matter of patience.
As a side note, I found the windows on the A320 were a bit better than the 767, and the DC-10 was the worst of all. And if the window is curved (i.e. 747 front window, 767 2nd window), there's almost no way to compensate for the distortion. One suggestion I found helpful was turning off the windshield heat just before you begin shooting. When the elements are powered up they create a small area of expansion immediately around each wire that degrades the image. With the elements off, the glass/acrylic seems to be a bit more uniform. Of course be sure to follow the manufacturer's/airline's guidelines & policies regarding pushing those switches.
It's too bad though... I've seen some amazing sights from the front office that just don't quite meet the high standards of A.net. I'm sure a lot of people would love to see them, but I do understand the need to keep the 'riff-raff' out of the database.
Thanks again Thierry and Aviopic for your suggestions.
One smooth landing is skill. Two in a row is luck. Three in a row and someone is lying.