Sponsor Message:
Aviation Photography Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Protection Of Image Copyright - New Idea  
User currently offlineANITIX87 From United States of America, joined Mar 2005, 3308 posts, RR: 13
Posted (4 years 5 months 2 weeks 2 days 16 hours ago) and read 4342 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Hello.

There have been, especially recently, many threads regarding illegal use of images and copyright theft (including one I may have been a little heated in).

I decided to suggest an idea here (I considered putting in Site Related, so please move it if need be) of a simple, easy method to additionally protect all the images photographers have worked so hard to get uploaded here.

DISABLE RIGHT-CLICKING.

Yes, I realize this will not solve all the issues, but I feel it will go a LONG way in giving photographers piece of mind (myself included) and, as I said, is just a single line of code (that I believe can even be applied to the style-sheet used for the website, to save time). As there are no functions on this website that require right-clicking, I don't believe any of the functionality will be lost.

I'm curious to see what others might think of this idea. Again, I realize this will not put an end to copyright theft and illegal use, but it may help significantly.

TIS


www.stellaryear.com: Canon EOS 50D, Canon EOS 5DMkII, Sigma 50mm 1.4, Canon 24-70 2.8L II, Canon 100mm 2.8L, Canon 100-4
12 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlinemat1979 From France, joined Dec 2005, 90 posts, RR: 0
Reply 1, posted (4 years 5 months 2 weeks 2 days 15 hours ago) and read 4311 times:

Quoting ANITIX87 (Thread starter):
I'm curious to see what others might think of this idea. Again, I realize this will not put an end to copyright theft and illegal use, but it may help significantly.

Hi TIS
I do not think of it as a good idea as it will indeed have little impact on anyone willing to get the image (printscreen, or get the url via the html code).
Although the violators will be more aware that they are using the image illegaly, it is not a valid argument i believe because 98% of them are aware of this already (especially regarding commercial use).

However it will be a pain for most users who just want to use the image as a screensaver or save their prefered pictures just for the love of having and collecting awesome pics.

My opinion  


User currently offlineSpiderguy252 From India, joined Feb 2009, 290 posts, RR: 0
Reply 2, posted (4 years 5 months 2 weeks 2 days 15 hours ago) and read 4299 times:

Anybody can get around that rule by screen dumping and subsequently cropping the output on a simple software like Paint for example. Or they can just hit Ctrl+S, save the entire page and pick the jpeg from the folder where it was saved. It's terribly simple. Google's Orkut back in the day employed the same technique but then realized it was ineffective and pointless. Regardless of whether a solution exists to curb illegal image use, this is not it.

Quoting mat1979 (Reply 1):
However it will be a pain for most users who just want to use the image as a screensaver or save their prefered pictures just for the love of having and collecting awesome pics.

This is a very valid point. In fact, I am one of them, as are I'm sure many others here.  



Figure .09
User currently offlinecpd From Australia, joined Jun 2008, 4879 posts, RR: 37
Reply 3, posted (4 years 5 months 2 weeks 2 days 13 hours ago) and read 4247 times:

Quoting ANITIX87 (Thread starter):
DISABLE RIGHT-CLICKING.

The scripts to disable right clicking can also be disabled easily as well.

The other method is to load the images dynamically through a Flash player instead.


User currently offlineChukcha From Australia, joined Mar 2006, 1980 posts, RR: 7
Reply 4, posted (4 years 5 months 2 weeks 2 days 12 hours ago) and read 4227 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

I upload pictures on a website that has right-clicking disabled. One thing that totally puts me off is that you can't use any copy-and-paste on that site. I use this function quite a bit here while uploading, copying bits of text from my previous uploads, aircraft registrations, aircraft types, etc. Disabling right-clicking would be pain in the a** for me as a photographer. Also copy-and-paste comes in handy when using this forum (for instance, copying photo ID's and photographers' names for The Real Treasure Of Airliners.net thread. All up, disabling right-clicking would be a major impediment to me as a user.

By the way, if I wanted to save pictures from that website on my computer I could always use Print Screen button.

[Edited 2010-05-10 17:39:50]

User currently offlineManuCH From Switzerland, joined Jun 2005, 3011 posts, RR: 47
Reply 5, posted (4 years 5 months 2 weeks 2 days 8 hours ago) and read 4157 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
HEAD MODERATOR

Disabling right-clicking makes a site look extremely cheap and amateur-ish. I definitely don't think that's a good idea. Furthermore, as others pointed out, the measure can be circumvented in a matter of seconds by anyone.


Never trust a statistic you didn't fake yourself
User currently offlineANITIX87 From United States of America, joined Mar 2005, 3308 posts, RR: 13
Reply 6, posted (4 years 5 months 2 weeks 2 days 1 hour ago) and read 4052 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting Chukcha (Reply 4):
I upload pictures on a website that has right-clicking disabled. One thing that totally puts me off is that you can't use any copy-and-paste on that site. I use this function quite a bit here while uploading, copying bits of text from my previous uploads, aircraft registrations, aircraft types, etc. Disabling right-clicking would be pain in the a** for me as a photographer.

Keyboard commands for copy and paste would still work with right-clicking disabled.

Clearly this idea isn't too popular, haha. On to the next person.

TIS



www.stellaryear.com: Canon EOS 50D, Canon EOS 5DMkII, Sigma 50mm 1.4, Canon 24-70 2.8L II, Canon 100mm 2.8L, Canon 100-4
User currently offlinedlednicer From United States of America, joined May 2005, 545 posts, RR: 7
Reply 7, posted (4 years 5 months 2 weeks 1 day 20 hours ago) and read 3961 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
DATABASE EDITOR

Disabling right-clicking is just an annoyance. All one has to do is to disable JavaScript and you can right-click to heart's content. In Firefox, Tools>Options...>Content and then remove the check from the box next to "Enable JavaScript"

User currently offlineSilver1SWA From United States of America, joined Mar 2004, 4838 posts, RR: 26
Reply 8, posted (4 years 5 months 2 weeks 1 day 20 hours ago) and read 3950 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting ManuCH (Reply 5):
Disabling right-clicking makes a site look extremely cheap and amateur-ish. I definitely don't think that's a good idea. Furthermore, as others pointed out, the measure can be

I agree with most of what has been said except this. The lack right clicking ability or lack of save as function from the right click menu is something commonly seen on highly protected websites often run by pretty large professional organizations. I'm not seeing how it would make this place look cheap.



ALL views, opinions expressed are mine ONLY and are NOT representative of those shared by Southwest Airlines Co.
User currently offlineChukcha From Australia, joined Mar 2006, 1980 posts, RR: 7
Reply 9, posted (4 years 5 months 2 weeks 1 day 14 hours ago) and read 3883 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting ANITIX87 (Reply 6):
Keyboard commands for copy and paste would still work with right-clicking disabled.

Still. it would be a major annoyance to me personally. We've had enough annoyances with this website recently, don't you think?


User currently offlinecpd From Australia, joined Jun 2008, 4879 posts, RR: 37
Reply 10, posted (4 years 5 months 2 weeks 1 day 14 hours ago) and read 3874 times:

Quoting Silver1SWA (Reply 8):
I agree with most of what has been said except this. The lack right clicking ability or lack of save as function from the right click menu is something commonly seen on highly protected websites often run by pretty large professional organizations. I'm not seeing how it would make this place look cheap.

It's pretty frowned upon by large professional organisations that I know of, and largely frowned upon in the web-design community. It's not a very nice user experience.

Formula1.com is a notable exception - they insist on the copyright message being thrown up on each press of the right click menu - but they can't stop you from seeing the source of images through methods such as Firebug plugin for Firefox.

For me, I'm not bothered by right clicking, people will grab your images no matter what you do - you just have to watermark the image robustly, right across detailed parts of the image where it will be most difficult to remove the watermark.


User currently offlineSpiderguy252 From India, joined Feb 2009, 290 posts, RR: 0
Reply 11, posted (4 years 5 months 2 weeks 1 day 3 hours ago) and read 3802 times:

Quoting cpd (Reply 10):
For me, I'm not bothered by right clicking, people will grab your images no matter what you do - you just have to watermark the image robustly, right across detailed parts of the image where it will be most difficult to remove the watermark.

Also, at one point you have to accept that the Internet, being the way it is; people are bound to flick your images one way or another, watermark or no watermark. To ensure that your photos don't get used in any way AT ALL, you'd be better off not uploading them. Just a passing thought.  



Figure .09
User currently offlineRyan h From Australia, joined Aug 2001, 1558 posts, RR: 1
Reply 12, posted (4 years 5 months 2 weeks 1 day 2 hours ago) and read 3784 times:

Chukcha, I agree 100% that disabling right click will not work.

It is easy to get around.



South Australian Spotter
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Loss Of Image Quality When Leveling. posted Tue Feb 2 2010 20:35:00 by Flight
Fall In The Price Of Image Rights? posted Wed Oct 14 2009 11:30:47 by Whisperjet
Rejection Process- New Idea posted Tue Apr 29 2003 07:10:42 by Cabbott
Has This Happened To Anyone (BBC Theft Of Image). posted Tue Aug 13 2002 13:01:47 by Cathay111
New Type Of Copyright Issue! posted Tue Dec 10 2002 22:52:36 by Vir380
Photos Of New Aer Lingus Regional posted Tue Mar 9 2010 11:14:56 by conoramoia
Photos Of New SriLankan A320s posted Tue Jun 16 2009 03:41:40 by Kflyer
MSNBC Breach Of Copyright posted Fri Feb 13 2009 13:22:48 by Njgtr82
Allegations Of Composite Image - Mariusz Adamski posted Wed Sep 10 2008 12:33:29 by Dendrobatid
New Terms Of Use And Privacy Policy posted Wed Mar 5 2008 15:42:05 by Flyheligirl