Silver1SWA From United States of America, joined Mar 2004, 4997 posts, RR: 24
Reply 2, posted (5 years 6 months 5 days 8 hours ago) and read 4739 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW PHOTO SCREENER
Quoting Scotland1979 (Reply 1): Hi!
I do not believe both images are from same photographer, if you look closer carefully at front wheels it shows little different angles ..
I think he is saying the images were taken from different photographers, but of the same subject. Both uploads were submitted under different registrations. Highly unlikely it was two different airplanes...
ALL views, opinions expressed are mine ONLY and are NOT representative of those shared by Southwest Airlines Co.
dlowwa From Canada, joined Apr 2005, 7328 posts, RR: 29
Reply 4, posted (5 years 6 months 5 days 7 hours ago) and read 4717 times:
After some checking, it appears that it is in fact PH-BFG, as BFY arrived 10 minutes before sunrise on May 20. Thanks for pointing that out, and will get the editors to change the reg. on the incorrect shot.
unattendedbag From United States of America, joined Oct 2003, 2388 posts, RR: 1
Reply 5, posted (5 years 6 months 5 days 7 hours ago) and read 4700 times:
Quoting AndrewUber (Thread starter): There are some incredibly minor differences, but I would dare say that these are most likely the same ship number, not two different ones as the data describes:
Very diplomatic way of bringing it up. I had thought the same as the 3-holer that had just vacated the runway is in the exact same position in both images making it difficult for me to resolve the idea that these two photographs were of two different aircraft.
AndrewUber From United States of America, joined Jul 2003, 2528 posts, RR: 34
Reply 9, posted (5 years 6 months 3 days 3 hours ago) and read 4310 times:
I wasn't wanting to start a firestorm - nor was I throwing any photographer under a bus. At first look I actually thought the same pic was uploaded twice by mistake (it's happened here before, no big deal). But as I later mentioned - they are both amazing shots!
Glad to see the data corrected, one of them is on the Photog's Choice top 15 right now!