Sponsor Message:
Aviation Photography Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Beginner Needs Camera  
User currently offlinethatmattguy21 From Australia, joined Jul 2010, 11 posts, RR: 0
Posted (3 years 9 months 2 weeks 2 days 18 hours ago) and read 4536 times:

Hi Guys,
I live in Sydney, Australia and I've always had a real passion for aviation since a young age. A couple of months ago I went to Sydney airport to admire some planes(without a camera) and I saw heaps of guys taking photos. I'm planning to go back in early December and want to take a good decent camera with me. My dad has a 12.1 megapixel compact camera and I don't want to spend a huge amount of money. I'm only 16 and don't have an extremely large amount of money on me.
It would be appreciated if you could give me a website to the recommended camera.

Thanks,
Matt

P.S. Could anyone recommend any really good spots around Sydney Airport to take some awesome shots.

32 replies: All unread, showing first 25:
 
User currently offlinevincyag2000 From Japan, joined Jan 2010, 32 posts, RR: 0
Reply 1, posted (3 years 9 months 2 weeks 2 days 18 hours ago) and read 4530 times:

Hey Matt,
Sup? Read my post (its still in the form.. I think under yours). I have decided towards a D90, and I'm 14. The lens kit is EXETREMELY good. I mean a 18-105 mm as a kit lens! Its an all-purpose lens which is given at the start! It comes in under $1000. I heard that there is a D95 coming up, but the problem is that the rumors are that with BODY ONLY it comes as $1199 and... with the lens it will be approximately $1500 and thats quite.. expensive for our kind.

Good luck!
vincyag2000


User currently offlineHNLPointShoot From United States of America, joined Feb 2007, 319 posts, RR: 0
Reply 2, posted (3 years 9 months 2 weeks 2 days 18 hours ago) and read 4525 times:

An entry-level body like the Canon EOS Rebel T2i (550D) with the kit lens (18-55mm) and an inexpensive long zoom like the Canon EF-S 55-250mm is probably enough for you, although I don't have any idea what spotting at SYD is like. The body and kit lens cost about $900 from B&H, and the 55-250mm lens is another $230 (not including shipping.) If you want to save some money, you could look for a used body like the 500D or 450D instead (I use the 450D with the aforementioned lenses myself), although I don't recommend buying the 1000D.

I recommend Canon only because that's what I'm most familiar with; before you commit to a specific body, go to a local camera shop and try out a camera in person. Specifically, see how a Canon (like the ones I've mentioned) compare to a similar Nikon body (like the D90 or D3100) and a similar Sony body (like the A450 or A390) and see which one you like the most.


User currently offlinevincyag2000 From Japan, joined Jan 2010, 32 posts, RR: 0
Reply 3, posted (3 years 9 months 2 weeks 2 days 17 hours ago) and read 4521 times:

Quoting HNLPointShoot (Reply 2):
I recommend Canon

The problem with Canon is its noise handling capabilities. There are many people who are unimpressed with the amount of noise produced. This is where Nikon excels.


User currently offlineNZ107 From New Zealand, joined Jul 2005, 6405 posts, RR: 39
Reply 4, posted (3 years 9 months 2 weeks 2 days 17 hours ago) and read 4517 times:

Hi Matt,

If you're wanting to get photos uploaded onto here, It's almost vital but not imperative to have a DSLR. If you're taking pictures for the enjoyment of doing so, your dad's camera should be fine. You might want to check out some auctions on ebay or the like if you want a DSLR and have a really tight budget. The Canon EOS 400D is a very capable camera and I see one on there with 2 lenses (up to 300mm) with a starting price of A$300. The equivalent Nikon is probably the D50/D60 (for price comparison) as these models are now obsolete.

Quoting thatmattguy21 (Thread starter):
P.S. Could anyone recommend any really good spots around Sydney Airport to take some awesome shots.

Take a look at these sites:

http://www.spotterswiki.com/index.php?title=Sydney_Airport_(SYD/YSSY)

http://www.samchuiphotos.com/wheretospotsyd.html

The international terminal observation deck is the easiest and most accessible. If you have use of a car, the Beach is an excellent spot to get up and close.


Cheers,
Nicholas



It's all about the destination AND the journey.
User currently offlineHNLPointShoot From United States of America, joined Feb 2007, 319 posts, RR: 0
Reply 5, posted (3 years 9 months 2 weeks 2 days 16 hours ago) and read 4504 times:

Quoting vincyag2000 (Reply 3):
The problem with Canon is its noise handling capabilities. There are many people who are unimpressed with the amount of noise produced.

Who?  


User currently offline5J From Philippines, joined Aug 2009, 26 posts, RR: 1
Reply 6, posted (3 years 9 months 2 weeks 2 days 15 hours ago) and read 4498 times:

The Nikon D90 or the Canon EOS 550D will fit you, if you're a beginner. The D7000 could also be a wise choice.


A.net chat squatter
User currently offlinevincyag2000 From Japan, joined Jan 2010, 32 posts, RR: 0
Reply 7, posted (3 years 9 months 2 weeks 2 days 15 hours ago) and read 4498 times:

Quoting HNLPointShoot (Reply 5):
Who?
http://www.photographybay.com/2008/1...on-d700-high-iso-quick-comparison/

http://virtualjottingsbyadriana.blog...0/01/canon-50d-noise-problems.html

http://photo.net/canon-eos-digital-camera-forum/00UKzG

Have I proven my point?   (no offense intended, its just the way I roll   )

Have a good day,
vincyag2000


User currently offlineHNLPointShoot From United States of America, joined Feb 2007, 319 posts, RR: 0
Reply 8, posted (3 years 9 months 2 weeks 2 days 15 hours ago) and read 4496 times:

Quoting vincyag2000 (Reply 7):
Have I proven my point?

The first link compares high ISO performance (1600 and above), which don't get used often to begin with, and shouldn't be weighted heavily when considering a body. (I've mentioned myself in another thread that I only bother with ISO 1600 occasionally, in circumstances where I'd normally use flash.) The other two of those links refer specifically to the 50D, and while there have been reports of unusual noise issues in specific individual bodies, it's not a bad camera overall.

50D & 7D Overly Noisy And Lacking Pixel Detail? (by JakTrax Nov 4 2009 in Aviation Photography)
Canon 50D Noise Levels At ISO100 (by ANITIX87 Sep 21 2010 in Aviation Photography)
EOS 50D Opinions Please? (by JakTrax Dec 22 2009 in Aviation Photography)


User currently offlinevincyag2000 From Japan, joined Jan 2010, 32 posts, RR: 0
Reply 9, posted (3 years 9 months 2 weeks 2 days 14 hours ago) and read 4490 times:

Quoting HNLPointShoot (Reply 8):
it's not a bad camera overall

I never said it was bad mate. Canon has some great cameras! Its just when COMPARED with Nikons, Nikons have a greater noise handling capability  


User currently offlinethatmattguy21 From Australia, joined Jul 2010, 11 posts, RR: 0
Reply 10, posted (3 years 9 months 2 weeks 1 day 20 hours ago) and read 4428 times:

Ok guys thanks so much for all the input and help. Could anyone think of any reasons how i can convince my parents to let me get camera such as the ones said. They know i want to be a pilot and am totally in love with aviation, so what do you think I could do.

Thanks,
Matt


User currently offlinevincyag2000 From Japan, joined Jan 2010, 32 posts, RR: 0
Reply 11, posted (3 years 9 months 2 weeks 1 day 18 hours ago) and read 4415 times:

Quoting thatmattguy21 (Reply 10):

Hey Matt,
I am in the same situation as you. I am 14, my parents know I want to be a pilot (and they support my choice   ), and they know I LOVE aviation. Well, what I did to get a camera was this. First of all, I displayed my affection of photography by taking photos with our current family camera (it was a point and shoot so don't worry-- you can do it too) and then showing it to them. Keep on doing it until they know you have a passion of photography. Then, try and butter them into buying it by hinting by giving information about different DSLR's or otherwise go direct and ask them for one for your birthday. If they really know you have a passion of photography and you love it, they won't hesitate  

Good luck! (and trust me, you will be able to   )
Vincyag2000


User currently offlinePascalstil From United Kingdom, joined May 2009, 40 posts, RR: 0
Reply 12, posted (3 years 9 months 2 weeks 6 hours ago) and read 4341 times:

I have had a 5MP point and shoot camera since the time it was quite rare to get 5MP on a non-professional camera.
Last year I finally got to the point to buy a DSLR, although I didnt have too much money to spend. After discussing with a friend, who is professional photographer and showing him some of my photos, I decided to go for the Canon EOS 1000D. It is a nice price for a starter, and the advantage with Canon compared to other brands is that they always keep using the same lens mounts, so if you spend money on a good lens now, and in 10 years you buy a new camera, you can still use that lens.


User currently offlinecpd From Australia, joined Jun 2008, 4879 posts, RR: 38
Reply 13, posted (3 years 9 months 2 weeks 5 hours ago) and read 4332 times:

Hi, I posted the following in your other message:


If you are in Sydney - I'd recommend Nikon on Broadway for anything Nikon related. They do not have any online store, though they do have a website:

http://www.nikononbroadway.com/

The guy who runs the place is very easy to deal with - and the customer service is great.

I first dealt with them to get an Nikon SB-900 speedlight, and since that I continue to go back to them, if only for the fact I don't get the run around and that they know what they are talking about. Their prices are also very reasonable.

I don't know if there are any similar Canon minded stores.

I don't have any particular camera recommendations - except that the kind of cameras and lenses most people use do cost $$$$. How much $$$$ do you wish to spend. Keep in mind that at Sydney airport, you usually need the traditional Canon 100-400mm or Nikon "Nikkor"80-400mm VR lens because you usually need to take long-distance photos.

Quoting vincyag2000 (Reply 9):
They know i want to be a pilot and am totally in love with aviation, so what do you think I could do.

Work really hard in school - get good results in the exams, they might just get you the camera you want. As for being a pilot, again, do the best you can do in school - and then go sign up for the Air Force. If you love flying, that's as good a place as any to get started.


User currently offlineFedexL1011 From United States of America, joined Jan 2010, 133 posts, RR: 0
Reply 14, posted (3 years 9 months 1 week 6 days 22 hours ago) and read 4316 times:

Hi
If you dont have a fair amount of money like i do then i would recommend i think the Sony a380 or the newer Sony would do good its fair priced and it has IIRC 14 or 15 and it has the ever added to Sony line up of accessories

EDIT: Sony's current line up of inexpensive entry-level cameras are two choices the A290 or the A390 the A290 is MRSP (US)$441 and the A390 is MRSP (US)$500 the latter has live view a tiltible LCD screen (if your in to that) and thats all the A390 has different from the A290 both have 14.2 megapixels 2.7 screen and Anti-dust technology

Sorry if I made you feel like i was selling to you  duck   duck 

Regards J.R. In SEA  wave 

[Edited 2010-10-12 22:22:13]


722,732,733,735,737,738,739,744,752,753,763,772,319,320,321,DH8,CRJ2,CRJ7,CRJ9,E175,E145
User currently offlineGeezer From United States of America, joined Aug 2010, 1479 posts, RR: 2
Reply 15, posted (3 years 9 months 1 week 21 hours ago) and read 4189 times:

My advice to young or "beginner" photographers;
Great photos are made by great photographers, not just by specific cameras. First, read every photo magazine and book you can get your hands on. The guys who write all the articles are ALL great photographers. Learn all you can about what make sharp photos; ( such as avoiding hand held shots anytime you can use a tripod, unipod, bean bag, sand bag, or anything else that keeps the camera steady) Learn about depth of field, good composition, etc. Without the basics, no camera is going to make great pictures.
Many of the photos on A.net are of subjects that are very difficult to take sharp photos of; ( moving airplanes, most at great distances.)
My advice to any novice, regardless of age, is don't try to start at the "top", start at the "bottom"; go to airshows, where you can get close to the planes, ( which are NOT moving ) and learn by taking lots of photos with an inexpensive camera) of which there are too many to count; I will mention just one example; I have a little Fuji Finepix 1000 that I have made some remarkable pictures with. 12X optical zoom, 10 mega pixels, a view finder ( such as it is ) and it's VERY portable. I keep the thing on my belt in a small nylon pouch almost all the time. I frequently use it mounted on a small cheap unipod from Walmart (18 bucks U.S.) The camera, $189 bucks U.S. The thing has a very sharp lens; I actually have some hand-held photos of some very detailed interiors in a very famous building in downtown Chicago that I have made into 18" X 24" matted & framed prints that were good enough to get me "invited" to do a "show" there! I'm mentioning all of this to make a point; it's not just the camera, and not just the guy holding the camera, that makes good pictures of anything. You MUST "know about" photography. This only comes about from reading, studying, and taking lots of pictures.
One last bit of advice; don't get "caught up" in the big ongoing battle between Nikon verses Canon ! They both make fabulous cameras, but you need not have either to make fabulous photographs.

When you feel like you know how to take pictures, then you can start worrying about which Nikon or which Canon to buy. Lean by taking pictures of the "easy" stuff, ( non-moving subjects ) before you try to do the "hard stuff"; There is a lot to learn about photography; ( I have been studying it for about 65 years now, and I'm still learning more every day! )
Worrying about how to get your pictures on A.net before you are a competent, experienced photographer is like putting the cart before the horse!



Stupidity: Doing the same thing over and over and over again and expecting a different result; Albert Einstein
User currently offlineBrendanKEL From Canada, joined Jul 2010, 2 posts, RR: 0
Reply 16, posted (3 years 9 months 2 days 3 hours ago) and read 4060 times:

Matt, i am 16 aswell and just started like you. I'm currently using a Canon EOS Rebel XS, but ffor you i'd recommend the Xsi because it is a slight advantage over mine,

User currently offlinepicturethis From United Kingdom, joined Oct 2006, 196 posts, RR: 7
Reply 17, posted (3 years 9 months 16 hours ago) and read 3997 times:

When I was in your position 4 years ago I got a 2 year old Canon 300D second-hand and a 75-300mm IS USM (which is still worth a fair amount today). This all came to £500. The lens cost more than the camera, but do you need a long lens in Sydney? You sure do where I go.

If, like you say, you want to keep it relatively cheap, i'd get a second hand model from 2007/2008 in great condition. (One careful lady owner etc...)

Deep down I reckon your parents will know it isn't such a bad investment, i've had my camera 4 years. Compared to shelling out on a PS3, 32" LCD TV and games etc.. its not a bad investment plus you get to go outside and enjoy your interest in aviation and meet some decent people.

Plus as you get older you might find other uses for your camera, such as taking photos of the good times at university. Compared to your mates little cameras, yours will blow theirs out of the water quality wise and they will enjoy the quality. It can be used for all kinds of things not just aviation pics. I take photos for the student mag with mine.

Good luck but I'd not recommend paying big bucks for a brand new camera, get a decent 2nd hand one and have some spare cash for a decent lens, bag and card etc..



Make sure they know we're playing the game, but we don't need to play the game because we've already won the game.
User currently offlineJakTrax From United Kingdom, joined Jun 2005, 4936 posts, RR: 7
Reply 18, posted (3 years 9 months 15 hours ago) and read 3990 times:

Quoting vincyag2000 (Reply 3):
The problem with Canon is its noise handling capabilities. There are many people who are unimpressed with the amount of noise produced. This is where Nikon excels
Quoting vincyag2000 (Reply 9):
I never said it was bad mate. Canon has some great cameras! Its just when COMPARED with Nikons, Nikons have a greater noise handling capability

Jeez! All us Canon owners had better switch then as your images are obviously much better than ours!   

When will folks realise that Canon and Nikon are about the same overall? Where one is slightly better the other will excel in another area, and vice-versa. If Nikon were miles ahead with noise don't you think we'd all own them? I'm not being funny but can you quote sources please? And reliable ones as opposed to the irrelevant ones you've linked to?

Some Nikons handle noise better than some Canons, and it works the other way too. I can point you in the direction of many comparisons where a Canon's low ISO performance outstrips Nikon's - as well as instances of the opposite. I appreciate you are only 14 years old but making a statement like, "When COMPARED with Nikons, Nikons have a greater noise handling capability" is very wide of the mark.

Finally, to clear things up regarding the 50D, it appears that there was a bad batch initially that seemed to produce excessive noise. An isolated fault and not a camera trait. I have had my 50D for 12 months nearly and its noise performance is better than anything I've owned before. And having compared it to several Nikons, I can attest to the fact that there isn't anyhting in it when viewing with the naked eye.

Karl


User currently offline5J From Philippines, joined Aug 2009, 26 posts, RR: 1
Reply 19, posted (3 years 9 months 13 hours ago) and read 3981 times:

In other words, you can never go wrong with both Canon and Nikon.


A.net chat squatter
User currently offlineJakTrax From United Kingdom, joined Jun 2005, 4936 posts, RR: 7
Reply 20, posted (3 years 9 months 13 hours ago) and read 3975 times:

Quoting 5J (Reply 19):
you can never go wrong with both Canon and Nikon

Or Sony these days for that matter - although their choice of lenses is still some way behind the 'big two'.

Karl


User currently offlineviv From Ireland, joined May 2005, 3142 posts, RR: 29
Reply 21, posted (3 years 9 months 13 hours ago) and read 3975 times:

Quoting 5J (Reply 19):
you can never go wrong with both Canon and Nikon.

You can. Both Nikon and Canon have some mediocre lenses.



Nikon D700, Nikkor 80-400, Fuji X Pro 1, Fujinon 35 f/1.4, Fujinon 18 f/2
User currently offlineJakTrax From United Kingdom, joined Jun 2005, 4936 posts, RR: 7
Reply 22, posted (3 years 9 months 9 hours ago) and read 3948 times:

Viv, I think he was referring to bodies only.

Karl


User currently offlineGeezer From United States of America, joined Aug 2010, 1479 posts, RR: 2
Reply 23, posted (3 years 8 months 4 weeks 1 day 1 hour ago) and read 3897 times:

A young fellow wanting to buy a "fairly inexpensive" camera to do aviation photography, needs advice; you have already received some VERY good advice; one young man says, "buy a very good used camera".......I believe that's good advice for anyone, regardless of your age. Best way I know of to save lots of bucks: the only catch is, how does one go about getting a "great deal" on a used camera? There isn't enough room here to explain all that, but I can point you in the general direction . Obviously, you are "online"; get on eBay; spend a bunch of time looking at what cameras and lenses are bringing. There are many bargains to be had on eBay. I have personally bought tons of stuff on eBay, and I have only been "disappointed" one time. ( A Nikor micro lens, described as "perfect condition" that looked like it had been used to hammer nails with) But I was so far ahead of the game, money wise, that I wrote it off to experience and forgot about it. It's true, there is much to learn about buying on eBay, but it has saved me tons of money.

But even before you do that, here's the BEST ADVICE I can give anyone, whether you are just starting out, or whether you are a "pro" with tons of experience; the very first thing you must do, is to become knowledgeable about digital cameras, lenses, etc. The very best way I know of to do just that, is to spend $15 dollars (U.S.) for the current issue of "PC How-To Guide"/ Digital Photography Buyer's Guide. The current issue has a lot of stuff on the front cover, ( don't all magazines?)
such as "Mega-Zoom Shootout", "Our Top Picks", plus "Hands On Reviews Of 20 Sony, Canon, Nikon, Fuji, Pentax,Panasonic, and Kodak digital cameras. If you spend a couple of evenings reading and studying this publication, you will learn more about digital photography and what camera to buy than all of the photographers on A.net, all rolled into one can tell you.
That's a very "big" statement, I realize; I do not wish to step on anyone's toes here! Obviously, when you look through all the photographers who up-load pics to A.Net, you are looking at many of the worlds best, most experienced photographers, that just goes without saying it. But NO ONE can make smart buying decisions, without first having a thorough knowledge of the subject, and the equipment available.

Above all, stay OUT of the current big "Canon/ Nikon" bruhaha! These two great companies produce and sell probably more cameras than all other manufacturers put together; There are many good reasons to buy one or the other; but there are ALSO many other fine cameras "out there", and there are also some pretty good reasons to buy some of them.

Here's just one small example; these days, one of the "hot technologies" is VR; Vibration Reduction; it' great if you have it; but different makers use different "schemes" to achieve it; many makers build it into each lens they make; others, notably Sony, (which does not have years and years of designing fine lenses, such as Nikon and Canon have), build their VR into the camera body, thus allowing one to save big on buying a bunch of lenses. Is one way "better" than the other? We could be here forever, debating about that!

Just three days ago, I happened to "bump into" a fellow, who was taking pictures with a tripod mounted camera, in a wooden covered bridge, in my tiny little village in western Indiana; we got to talking.........I said, Wacha shootin with?
"A Sony A-900 says he"; ( I immediately know I'm talking to A. a "Pro"; B. A very "serious" amateur; C. A rich guy, or D. all three. The A-900 is a full frame, $2,700 "body only" camera. He proceeded to explain to me that it used "in body" VR, and that he used a whole line of fine Minolta lenses with it, and that for many things, he loved it. I then mentioned that I was about to buy a new digital Nikon; in-as -much as I already happen to own 7 Nikon lenses, and I wanted the new camera to "support" them; we then discussed various Nikon models, and he said, step over here to my R.V. Whereupon he produces a Nikon D-90, a D-700, a D-300S, a brand new D-7000, and a D-3S ! ( We're talking about $11,000 worth of just Nikon bodies, plus the $2,700 Sony! Suffice to say, I was rather "surprised" to see one guy with all this camera gear, but I think he was even more surprised to bump into an "old" guy, out in "the sticks" who knew what every one of these things was worth! I then explained that, while I am pretty "familiar" with high-end equipment, I had been studying the afore-mentioned publication for several weeks now, before shelling out my hard-earned cash for a new camera. I think he was even more impressed by that.

Then the guy pulls out his iPad, and proceeds to show me the most incredible collection of images I have ever seen;
Mostly scenics........each shot in ordinary sunlight, then a duplicate taken with infra red; This just blew me away! I have done precious little IR work using IR film, with a Nikon F-5, but I had not the slightest idea how one goes about it, using a digital camera. He explained that, first, you buy a digital camera body, then you pay a technician $400 to remove the IR filters from it, and PRESTO! You have a dedicated IR camera; "So what if you want to use regular light again, with it" asks I? Then you pay another $400 to have the IR filters replaced ! ( He now has 3 "dedicated" IR bodies! )

I'm mentioning all of this for one reason; to illustrate how important having knowledge is!

While we were looking at all these pictures, I said, "holy cow, that looks like a Segway on the floor! " He replied, it is a Segway, and have you ever ridden one ? I said the only Segway I have ever seen "up close", is every time I go to Midway Airport In Chicago, I always see this female Chicago cop whizzing around the terminal on one.
He took the thing out, extended the "steering column", and proceeded to give me a 5 minute briefing on "how to ride a Segway", then I got on the thing and rode it all over the parking lot of the Bridgeton Mill. There are no words to convey what it's like to ride a Segway ! Incredible, fantastic, crazy, fabulous............none of these do it justice ! If it were not for the fact that I'm planning to buy some new camera gear, I'd probably be out looking at Segways !

I have always known that it is very valuable to have as much knowledge as possible, about anything you plan to spend much money on, but I have to think that the "paltry" $15 I spent on this new buying guide is the best "investment" I have made in a long time. I recommend anyone wanting to buy a new camera, lens, camcorder, printer or photo software do the same thing.

Charley



Stupidity: Doing the same thing over and over and over again and expecting a different result; Albert Einstein
User currently offlineNZ107 From New Zealand, joined Jul 2005, 6405 posts, RR: 39
Reply 24, posted (3 years 8 months 4 weeks 23 hours ago) and read 3891 times:

Quoting Geezer (Reply 23):
Above all, stay OUT of the current big "Canon/ Nikon" bruhaha! These two great companies produce and sell probably more cameras than all other manufacturers put together; There are many good reasons to buy one or the other; but there are ALSO many other fine cameras "out there", and there are also some pretty good reasons to buy some of them.

Well that depends on what your plans are in the future, if buying a DSLR. Of course being young and all, trends change and so cameras might not be something in particular that people keep an interest in so then it'd be ok - it won't cost too much in the long run.

However, going for Canon or Nikon allows the ambition to start saving up on decent lenses which then can be interchanged among the various bodies from the same manufacturer when someone reaches that point. Take me for example. I started off with a Canon 400D with a clear goal in the future of owning a 100-400mm. Since then, I've upgraded to a 40D and I'll soon have a 100-400mm lens in my possession (which I've already bought). Of course it's not just about the big companies but if you know what you're after, you may as well start going along a particular line instead of having to spend more money in switching lines. Not just that, but there'll be a bigger market for onselling equipment from the big companies as these are the more common brands.


Just my 2c..



It's all about the destination AND the journey.
25 cpd : But if you intend on getting serious later down the track, then Canon and Nikon are where you'll find the current best cameras. I started off with a
26 JakTrax : I think the reason Charley says that, "You will learn more about digital photography and what camera to buy than all of the photographers on A.net" is
27 Post contains images Geezer : Well, I see a few of you have noticed my "comments" ! ( I just hope the young fellas out there looking to buy cameras paid attention to what I wrote.)
28 NZ107 : Indeed, like you've said, times have changed. Not only in the camera gear itself but in the way you can dispose of the gear too. The likes of ebay pr
29 cpd : At the same time, it's extremely bad advice telling someone to buy a brand that doesn't have much in the way of a system, and then later on, when the
30 Post contains images 5J : Yep, was referring to bodies only. I agree.
31 NZ107 : Agreed. Well put, Chris.
32 Post contains images trustdado : as they say.. its not camera...its the user!
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Best Beginner SLR Camera (2009) posted Tue Mar 17 2009 17:09:29 by Daaash8
Is The Canon 400D A Good Camera For A Beginner? posted Thu Jan 22 2009 19:06:32 by Brasila684
Camera For A Beginner posted Wed Dec 31 2008 04:19:46 by Cristiqs
Beginner Camera posted Sun Jan 13 2008 05:54:12 by Lloyd1196
What's The Best Beginner Camera? posted Sat Jun 17 2006 04:23:32 by FlyMatt2Bermud
Would This Be A Good Beginner Camera? posted Tue Jul 8 2003 21:34:14 by Airplanepics
Beginner Photographer: Needs Help posted Mon Nov 4 2002 19:09:30 by GotAirbus
Best Camera For Beginner To Start With? posted Thu Sep 26 2002 20:09:31 by UALrampORD
I'm A Beginner With A Digital Camera- Help! posted Tue Mar 26 2002 17:19:06 by SixStarAnsett
What Camera Can You Recommend For A Beginner? posted Thu Apr 19 2001 19:49:30 by Hkg_clk