Sponsor Message:
Aviation Photography Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Nikon Shooters: NX2 Or Lightroom 3?  
User currently offlineuser47 From United States of America, joined Jun 2010, 47 posts, RR: 0
Posted (5 years 7 months 4 days 20 hours ago) and read 5738 times:

I've been thinking about picking up a copy of NX2. Do any of you use it? Thoughts? I'm considering NX2 or Lightroom for dabbling. I'm a bit of a puritan with my photography, one of those purists who believes you should only crop and watermark photos with an editor, straighten at the very most. It's possible that I might start doing a little more than cropping 'n straightening. I have been doing some research and it seems there is no clear victor or leader, for Nikonians at least. Perhaps there is a difference when dealing with the unique scenarios inherent with aviation photography?

Since I've not had any utility in editing I'm currently using Picasa. (I know, I know...)

Thanks in advance for your thoughts and feedback.


[Edited 2010-10-30 17:42:48]

Have I mentioned I love planes? :-)
4 replies: All unread, jump to last
User currently offlinecpd From Australia, joined Jun 2008, 5058 posts, RR: 34
Reply 1, posted (5 years 7 months 4 days 19 hours ago) and read 5715 times:

Lightroom 3.

Capture NX2 is slow and clunky. I have it myself, and never use it now. It's just not the right tool for mass processing, editing of photos.

Lightroom 3 is better - this coming from someone who also doesn't like Lightroom 3 (I tried it for a while, but now use CS5 Master Collection).

Yes, CNX2 supports the dust-off reference image, but that's a dubious benefit as well, for if you turn off the camera, that reference image is voided (sensor cleaning runs at startup and shutdown).

I can see no benefit to use CNX2 over Lightroom 3. CNX2 should really be a plugin for Photoshop, rather than a standalone program.

[Edited 2010-10-30 18:33:57]

[Edited 2010-10-30 18:34:55]

User currently offlineRonS From United States of America, joined Feb 2009, 763 posts, RR: 19
Reply 2, posted (5 years 7 months 4 days 16 hours ago) and read 5697 times:

I don't know anything about NX2, and I'm merely a Canon user. But I have a software crush on LR3 right now. Dan talked highly of it for a while, I finally got it a week ago, and i'm amazed at the noise reduction abilities.

I also am a longtime Picasa user, and as you probably know, the sharpening works, but is a bit rough. The sharpening on LR3 is quite smooth, although I generally export to PS4 for Smart Sharpening. I also like the lens correction profile, especially when using a UWA.

Chris, what are the advantages of CS5 over LR3? Right now I'm really psyched about LR3


All opinions expressed by me are my own opinions & do not represent the opinions in any way of my employers.
User currently offlinecpd From Australia, joined Jun 2008, 5058 posts, RR: 34
Reply 3, posted (5 years 7 months 4 days 10 hours ago) and read 5673 times:

No difference. CS5 has the same benefits of LR3 in RAW processing (noise reduction, lens correction profiles), but otherwise - it's horses for courses, as the old saying goes.

CS5 that I have (Windows version) is the whole entire software suite with the following stuff:

After Effects CS5
Adobe Bridge CS5
Adobe Contribute CS5
Adobe Device Central CS5
Adobe Dreamweaver CS5
Adobe Encore CS5
Adobe ExtendScript Toolkit CS5
Adobe Extension Manager CS5
Adobe Fireworks CS5
Adobe Flash Builder 4
Adobe Flash Catalyst CS5
Adobe Flash Professional CS5
Adobe Illustrator CS5
Adobe InDesign CS5
Adobe Media Encoder CS5
Adobe OnLocation CS5
Adobe Photoshop CS5 (64 bit)
Adobe Photoshop CS5 (32 bit)
Adobe Pixel Blender Toolkit 2
Adobe Soundbooth CS5
Mocha for After Effects CS5

It's basically the full suite of everything. I don't recommend that for anyone here, unless you are in the digital media industry. I get the Master Collection very cheap through a special agreement with Adobe (courtesy of my employer) - so it's very economical for me to use that (plus I have a need for that). Otherwise, that lot is enormously expensive.

Also - LR3 for me alone doesn't cut it, I need to use Photoshop to process my photos.

User currently offlineviv From Ireland, joined exactly 11 years ago today! , 3142 posts, RR: 23
Reply 4, posted (5 years 7 months 4 days 7 hours ago) and read 5648 times:

Neither is necessary. Get the shot right when you take it.

Nikon D700, Nikkor 80-400, Fuji X Pro 1, Fujinon 35 f/1.4, Fujinon 18 f/2
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Help With Nikon Please - Strange Halos posted Tue Oct 26 2010 12:31:50 by JakTrax
Canon 50D Vs Nikon D90 posted Fri Sep 10 2010 12:48:10 by pilotalltheway
Nikon Introduces The D3100 posted Thu Aug 19 2010 06:38:27 by 5J
Nikon D90+70-300VR posted Fri May 14 2010 03:21:30 by bustin
Nikon D90 Vs Canon 500D posted Mon May 10 2010 10:15:13 by pilotalltheway
Check Out This Navy Seal Nikon posted Sun May 9 2010 12:11:48 by clickhappy
Need Some Advice From Nikon Photographers posted Tue May 4 2010 19:16:19 by WRUIZJR
Yet More Nikon Questions posted Sat May 1 2010 19:49:22 by 757MDE
Wich Nikon Lens? posted Wed Apr 21 2010 03:06:43 by torbjorn94
Nikon Lenses posted Sun Apr 11 2010 18:44:13 by vaca05
Sigma 120-400 Or Nikon 80-400? posted Wed Jul 6 2011 16:57:42 by Jaeps
EOS 450D (Rebel XSi) Or Nikon D5000? posted Sun Feb 28 2010 00:43:56 by 5J
Nikon 80-200 F2.8 Or Sigma 50-500 posted Sat Dec 5 2009 07:58:35 by 744flyer
Canon Or NIKON. posted Fri Apr 24 2009 22:44:15 by GF777
Power Lense Sunsets, AF Or MF?(Nikon)? posted Wed Aug 27 2008 10:54:31 by Soon7x7