Sponsor Message:
Aviation Photography Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Best Camera For Night Photos  
User currently offlineairplane09 From United States of America, joined Oct 2009, 15 posts, RR: 0
Posted (3 years 10 months 2 weeks 1 day 12 hours ago) and read 15108 times:

I Currently have a Cannon 10 mega pixel camera and it does not take good night photos I need something affordtable i.e ($100-$200)

19 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlinephotopilot From Canada, joined Jul 2002, 2738 posts, RR: 18
Reply 1, posted (3 years 10 months 2 weeks 1 day 9 hours ago) and read 15082 times:

Look, let's be honest here. You've got champagne tastes and a beer budget. For the price range you want, you'll get mediocre performance at best. And megapixels per se don't matter. What matters is the size of the chip. You'll need to do some reading and research as well.

For outstanding night performance, I'd suggest looking into the Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX3. I'm continually blown away by what this little camera will do for me at night. Here's a sample. But it's approx $400 USD.

http://i3.photobucket.com/albums/y55/Steve_YYZ/Habana%20-%20Dusk%20to%20Dawn/CentroCaronNightStreet.jpg

http://i3.photobucket.com/albums/y55/Steve_YYZ/Habana%20-%20Dusk%20to%20Dawn/PlazaVieja.jpg

http://i3.photobucket.com/albums/y55/Steve_YYZ/Habana%20-%20Dusk%20to%20Dawn/Ayesteran.jpg

http://i3.photobucket.com/albums/y55/Steve_YYZ/Habana%20-%20Dusk%20to%20Dawn/CapitolioNoche-2.jpg

[Edited 2010-11-06 17:06:48]

User currently offlineairplane09 From United States of America, joined Oct 2009, 15 posts, RR: 0
Reply 2, posted (3 years 10 months 2 weeks 1 day 8 hours ago) and read 15065 times:

Thanks but I am only a high school student so I can't really raise my budget. How does that camera do in broad daylight?

User currently offlineuser47 From United States of America, joined Jun 2010, 47 posts, RR: 0
Reply 3, posted (3 years 10 months 1 week 5 days 19 hours ago) and read 14879 times:

Christmas is coming up...


Have I mentioned I love planes? :-)
User currently offlineairplane09 From United States of America, joined Oct 2009, 15 posts, RR: 0
Reply 4, posted (3 years 10 months 1 week 5 days 18 hours ago) and read 14869 times:

Quoting user47 (Reply 3):

Well my parents would not like the price tag!


User currently onlineoly720man From United Kingdom, joined May 2004, 6728 posts, RR: 11
Reply 5, posted (3 years 10 months 1 week 5 days 16 hours ago) and read 14849 times:

Quoting airplane09 (Thread starter):
I Currently have a Cannon 10 mega pixel camera and it does not take good night photos I need something affordtable i.e ($100-$200)

Which camera is it and are you using the Manual setting? The default Av & Tv settings won't necessarily extend the shutter speed range far enough for night photos.

The Canon A480, a 10MP compact, has shutter speeds from 15 seconds which should be enough in many situations.

Otherwise, if there just isn't enough light, no camera will take a decent night photo unless you've got one with a Bulb 'B' setting, and a remote shutter release (or a very steady hand on the button for a long time), so you can take photos over many minutes or even hours.



wheat and dairy can screw up your brain
User currently offlineairplane09 From United States of America, joined Oct 2009, 15 posts, RR: 0
Reply 6, posted (3 years 10 months 1 week 2 days 11 hours ago) and read 14698 times:

Quoting oly720man (Reply 5):
Which camera is it and are you using the Manual setting? The default Av & Tv settings won't necessarily extend the shutter speed range far enough for night photos.

Camera Is a Canon Powershot A1000 IS

Quoting oly720man (Reply 5):

The Canon A480, a 10MP compact, has shutter speeds from 15 seconds which should be enough in many situations.

Otherwise, if there just isn't enough light, no camera will take a decent night photo unless you've got one with a Bulb 'B' setting, and a remote shutter release (or a very steady hand on the button for a long time), so you can take photos over many minutes or even hours.


Not much of a camera expert can you please explain carefully!
Thanks for helping

[Edited 2010-11-12 14:16:51]

User currently onlineoly720man From United Kingdom, joined May 2004, 6728 posts, RR: 11
Reply 7, posted (3 years 10 months 6 days 23 hours ago) and read 14574 times:

Quoting airplane09 (Reply 6):
Not much of a camera expert can you please explain carefully!

Where to start? You need a certain amount of light to create an image. In routine daytime operation the camera metering can determine a combination of shutter speed and aperture that will give the correct amount of light to hit the CCD (the sensor in the camera). The various camera settings, sport/landscape/etc give different combinations. For sports you want a fast exposure (leading to a large aperture), for landscape a small aperture (leading to a slow shutter speed). If you imagine the amount of light to give the correct exposure as a cylinder, it can be a short, fat cylinder or a long, thin cylinder. Short+fat = short shutter speed and large aperture, long and thin = long exposure and small aperture.

There are other technical issues that come into play with small and larger apertures that are related to the lens performance, as well as the size of the CCD. A large aperture gives a small depth of field so only the main object on the photo is in focus - a single sportsman, for example - whereas a small aperture has a large depth of field - everything in the field of view is in focus,

The preset settings on some cameras (sport/landscape/etc) will give the camera's selection of the best combination of shutter speed and aperture, i.e. one choice.

If the camera has aperture priority, shutter priority or manual, this lets the photographer have more control over the exposure, i.e. you tell the camera what shutter or aperture to use and the camera chooses the corresponding aperture or shutter, according to the light level. And manual control is complete control over the camera, so you choose both the shutter and aperture.

I've just had a look at a 1000IS review and it has a longest shutter speed of 15 seconds which I expect will be set up in the Special Scenes Night Scene (6th image down on the page below).

http://www.steves-digicams.com/camer...n-powershot-a1000-is-review-3.html

There doesn't seem to be a shutter speed displayed (but the camera's manual should help here), but there is a +/-0 indicator on the left side of the view which will be an exposure compensation, to allow longer or shorter exposures than the camera decides.

Beware that at night, streetlights and other bright sources of light can mislead the camera's metering. It's better to overexpose at night to stop grainy images. Each element in the CCD (and there are 10million in this camera) needs a certain amount of light (individual photons) to hit it to register any light intensity at all and at night there aren't as many.

Some cameras, but not this one, have B as the slowest shutter speed and this allows the shutter speed to be anything you want for long exposures, but this generally needs a remote shutter release and lock, and good batteries.



wheat and dairy can screw up your brain
User currently offlineEpten From Macedonia, joined Sep 2007, 184 posts, RR: 0
Reply 8, posted (3 years 10 months 6 days 18 hours ago) and read 14541 times:

Buy a $10 tripod. Any camera with a tripod will make jaw droppingly good night photos.... provided that the subject doesn't move.

For moving objects, what determines the quality of the photos is much more the lens than the body, mexapixels, shmegapixels.


User currently offlineGeezer From United States of America, joined Aug 2010, 1479 posts, RR: 2
Reply 9, posted (3 years 10 months 4 days 1 hour ago) and read 14447 times:

I just read the above post from a young high-school student.

Quoting oly720man (Reply 7):


Where to start? You need a certain amount of light to create an image. In routine daytime operation the camera metering can determine a combination of shutter speed and aperture that will give the correct amount of light to hit the CCD (the sensor in the camera). The various camera settings, sport/landscape/etc give different combinations. For sports you want a fast exposure (leading to a large aperture), for landscape a small aperture (leading to a slow shutter speed). If you imagine the amount of light to give the correct exposure as a cylinder, it can be a short, fat cylinder or a long, thin cylinder. Short+fat = short shutter speed and large aperture, long and thin = long exposure and small aperture.

oly720man, my hat is off to you ! That was a masterful lesson in photography; I especially enjoyed the analogy about thinking of the correct amount of light for an exposure as being like a cylinder ! I have been reading about photography for many, many years now, and I have never heard that before; it is so simple, so "apropo" it is elegant ! I will file that away in my brain, and hopefully, have it available the next time I find myself attempting to explain proper exposure to a newcomer !

Every time I log onto A.net, I am reminded of how fortunate we are to have available to us, the combined knowledge and experience of so many people, in so many countries, all over the world, and they all have a mutual interest in aviation and airplanes !

And Epten, I couldn't agree more, about the value of a tripod !

Incidently, I see you are from Macedonia; I live quite near a small city in western Indiana, named "Brazil" ; there is a very nice small restaurant in Brazil, that is owned by a fabulous young man who came to this country from Macedonia; he not only serves great food, but I really enjoying chatting with him every time I go there to eat dinner. I would like to think that any American going to another country and running a business, would be as good of an "example" of Americans, as this young man is for Macedonia.............but somehow, I seriously doubt if that's ever the case !

Charley



Stupidity: Doing the same thing over and over and over again and expecting a different result; Albert Einstein
User currently offlineairplane09 From United States of America, joined Oct 2009, 15 posts, RR: 0
Reply 10, posted (3 years 9 months 3 weeks 1 day 5 hours ago) and read 14177 times:

How does the tripod have any effect for good night quality photos?

User currently offlineFedexL1011 From United States of America, joined Jan 2010, 142 posts, RR: 0
Reply 11, posted (3 years 9 months 3 weeks 1 day 4 hours ago) and read 14172 times:

Quoting airplane09 (Reply 10):
How does the tripod have any effect for good night quality photos?

Others correct me if im wrong but it makes the shot more steadier and it allows more clearer and crisper shot because of the the steadiness provided by the tripod. Again correct me if im wrong.

Regards,
J.R. In SEA



722,732,733,735,737,738,739,744,752,753,763,772,319,320,321,DH8,CRJ2,CRJ7,CRJ9,E175,E145
User currently offlineDazed767 From United States of America, joined May 1999, 5498 posts, RR: 51
Reply 12, posted (3 years 9 months 3 weeks 1 day 3 hours ago) and read 14163 times:

I use the A480 at work and while you can pick up a refurbished model for $69 on adorama, it's quite a little camera (and we take photos mostly at night with a mini tripod). Even has a macro feature which works really good. If my A560 ever takes a dump, I might try and get a refurb A480 while I still can.

http://www.flickr.com/photos/z00mpics/4599700094/ a sample shot (not mine).


User currently offlineJakTrax From United Kingdom, joined Jun 2005, 4936 posts, RR: 7
Reply 13, posted (3 years 9 months 3 weeks 1 day 1 hour ago) and read 14133 times:

Dazed767,

That's a nice shot for a compact. Good WB too given the differing light sources - did you set that manually?

Karl


User currently offlinedlowwa From Canada, joined Apr 2005, 7328 posts, RR: 30
Reply 14, posted (3 years 9 months 3 weeks 1 day ago) and read 14132 times:

Quoting airplane09 (Reply 10):
How does the tripod have any effect for good night quality photos?

It allows for much slower shutter speeds than you would be able to use hand-held. I took this shot with a 30 second exposure, something that would be impossible hand-held without shake-induced blur.

http://img683.imageshack.us/img683/804/imgp17074800.jpg

Because of the longer exposure made possible by the tripod, I could shoot at ISO100 and a narrower aperture for better sharpness and more depth of field. You can see in this 100% crop the sharpness and lack of noise that would otherwise be present at a higher ISO and wider aperture that you would need if shooting hand-held. These are the benefits of using a tripod, a tool that is pretty much mandatory for any kind of static night shooting.

http://img823.imageshack.us/img823/9352/imgp17074crop.jpg


User currently offlineDazed767 From United States of America, joined May 1999, 5498 posts, RR: 51
Reply 15, posted (3 years 9 months 2 weeks 4 days 10 hours ago) and read 13976 times:

Quoting Dazed767 (Reply 12):
http://www.flickr.com/photos/z00mpics/4599700094/ a sample shot (not mine).
Quoting JakTrax (Reply 13):
That's a nice shot for a compact. Good WB too given the differing light sources - did you set that manually?

Not mine  

I'm sure there are better options now since that camera was introduced last summer, maybe A3100IS.


User currently offlinesoon7x7 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 16, posted (3 years 9 months 2 weeks 4 days ago) and read 13932 times:

I have found low ISO setting, tripod (get a good one), cable release, and automatic cameras on all manual settings. (TIP) You can auto focus, then tape the focus barrel, switch to all manual. Sometimes hard to manual focus in the dark while on the other hand, auto focus can be fooled into an auto search due to a brilliant light hitting the camera. either way...these are not quick snapshots...they take time and practice...even some goof up shots can actually come out unusual.
WTC, New York,...
This image I took from the top of the Empire state building. I used 100 ISO daylight film. The winds on the observation deck were 72 knots. I had some family from Sweden shield the camera and tripod with open jackets. the exposure was 4 seconds @ f/11.
fillflash
Alternatively if you have control over the scene then you can use fill flash and ambient light to create a more controlled shot. either way,...the camera best suited for night work should have all manual capability if you want optimum results. This image was recorded with a D300. Flash burst plus 4 seconds ambient light, low ISO...g


User currently offlineairplane09 From United States of America, joined Oct 2009, 15 posts, RR: 0
Reply 17, posted (3 years 9 months 1 week 6 days 6 hours ago) and read 13776 times:

What would you say about any Nikon or Sony for that matter

User currently offlinerolfen From Germany, joined Jan 2006, 1809 posts, RR: 2
Reply 18, posted (3 years 9 months 1 week 5 days 8 hours ago) and read 13730 times:

Quoting airplane09 (Reply 17):
What would you say about any Nikon or Sony for that matter

I suggest you buy a cheap, second-hand SLR, and learn photography basics. The camera is nothing but a tool, like a brush would be a tool for a painter. I think that is the way of thought of most photographers here.

There are some consumer cameras which try to take decisions at your place, and some do a good job. I was really impressed by one of my friend's, but I forgot the name and model, I'll get it for you if I find it out.

If you want to be knowledgeable in technical details, like people who answered your posts here, get an old, second-hand SLR. For $100 you might have a hard time finding a digital SLR, which mean 35mm film, with film processing costs that go with it.

Otherwise, just get whatever you can find for $100 (or less) and try to improve your artistic skills. Even a cellphone cam would do.

But if you want to get technical, I think that budget of yours is just a tad under the minimum budget for that.



rolf
User currently offlineGeezer From United States of America, joined Aug 2010, 1479 posts, RR: 2
Reply 19, posted (3 years 9 months 4 days 10 hours ago) and read 13455 times:

Quoting soon7x7 (Reply 16):
This image I took from the top of the Empire state building. I used 100 ISO daylight film. The winds on the observation deck were 72 knots. I had some family from Sweden shield the camera and tripod with open jackets. the exposure was 4 seconds @ f/11.

I have been on the observation deck of the Empire State Bldg. when it was windy.........but 72 kts ? WoW ! T think I would have been heading for the elevator ! I wish I could have seen the family holding their coats to block the wind from blowing the camera and tripod off the roof, while you are making a 4 sec. time exposure ! ( in 72 kts. "breeze" ) Even better, how about another camera with a fast lens to "capture" this "effort ? Seriously though, it's a great photo, and I love hearing about anyone going to "great lengths" to get a great shot.

I LOVE the photo of the business jet ! I just bought a new 300s so I'll try to use that trick first chance I get !

This may be a tad off topic............but was the on-camera flash sufficient to light up the jet, or was a bigger off camera unit used ? BTW......thanks for sharing both photos.........I love them.

Charley



Stupidity: Doing the same thing over and over and over again and expecting a different result; Albert Einstein
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
The Best Camera For Aircraft Photos? posted Fri Apr 29 2005 10:11:50 by JoyA380B747
Best Camera For Spotting? posted Sun Feb 13 2005 22:29:36 by BMI701EGCC
Recommended ISO For Night Photos posted Fri Jan 2 2004 18:57:55 by Lugonza_2001
Best Camera For Beginner To Start With? posted Thu Sep 26 2002 20:09:31 by UALrampORD
Cheap Camera For Collecting My Own Airliner Photos posted Sat May 5 2007 08:59:43 by Yellowstone
Best LAX Hotel for Aircraft Photos? posted Sun Feb 12 2006 21:06:58 by JAT74L
Camera Settings For Night Shots... posted Wed Oct 27 2004 19:59:29 by Osu_av8or
Best Settings For My Camera? Sony F717 posted Thu Apr 15 2004 14:58:51 by Warszawa
Best Scanner And Digital Camera For Spotting posted Tue Mar 9 2004 08:04:14 by N612UA
Best & Economical Digital Camera For Aviation Pics posted Fri Feb 27 2004 11:22:09 by HAWK21M
Best Camera For Spotting? posted Thu Aug 4 2011 03:12:32 by allezerloot
Using Different 'F' Values For Night Photos posted Wed Dec 8 2010 10:40:27 by alanelrfc
Best Camera For Spotting? posted Sun Feb 13 2005 22:29:36 by BMI701EGCC
Recommended ISO For Night Photos posted Fri Jan 2 2004 18:57:55 by Lugonza_2001
Best Camera For Beginner To Start With? posted Thu Sep 26 2002 20:09:31 by UALrampORD
Cheap Camera For Collecting My Own Airliner Photos posted Sat May 5 2007 08:59:43 by Yellowstone
Best LAX Hotel for Aircraft Photos? posted Sun Feb 12 2006 21:06:58 by JAT74L
The Best Camera For Aircraft Photos? posted Fri Apr 29 2005 10:11:50 by JoyA380B747
Best Camera For Nighttime Shots? posted Sat Jul 21 2012 20:51:14 by PHX787
Best Camera For Taking Images posted Thu Apr 12 2012 00:39:35 by avfan
Best Settings For Night Shooting posted Tue Feb 21 2012 21:05:28 by evall95
Best Camera For Spotting? posted Thu Aug 4 2011 03:12:32 by allezerloot
Using Different 'F' Values For Night Photos posted Wed Dec 8 2010 10:40:27 by alanelrfc
Best Camera For Spotting? posted Sun Feb 13 2005 22:29:36 by BMI701EGCC
Recommended ISO For Night Photos posted Fri Jan 2 2004 18:57:55 by Lugonza_2001
Best Camera For Beginner To Start With? posted Thu Sep 26 2002 20:09:31 by UALrampORD
Best Video Camera For Aircraft? posted Tue Jul 31 2012 05:16:01 by Giancavia