Sponsor Message:
Aviation Photography Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Are We Still Buying 50Ds Or Is It Too Late?  
User currently offlinepilotalltheway From United Kingdom, joined Dec 2008, 247 posts, RR: 0
Posted (3 years 9 months 18 hours ago) and read 5880 times:

Hi folks,

Am very close now to getting my 50D - but just before I do, I need to clear this one more thing.

Seeing as the 50D is now dis-continued and was released was it in 2008(?) and I wont be upgrading the body for quite a few years is it still worth going for it and maybe buy a 7D which is newer and maybe more 'future proof' and wont be outdated maybe as quickly as the 50D would.

Just wanted to see if anyone else is still looking at buying a 50D or even if you aren't and own one or don't even own one - what are your thoughts? Go for it or pay extra and get the 7/ 60D?

Thanks a lot,

Alfie

P.S I'll be looking at getting the Canon EF-S 18-135mm F.3.5-5.6, anybody got that with the 50D or any other camera? What's it like?


Dude - where's my plane?
42 replies: All unread, showing first 25:
 
User currently offline5J From Philippines, joined Aug 2009, 26 posts, RR: 1
Reply 1, posted (3 years 9 months 14 hours ago) and read 5833 times:

The 50D is still one heck of a camera. It's still very competitive even with the swarm of new DSLRs. I'd say it's better than the 60D. The best advice i could give you though is, get the 50D, and then save some money for some L glass. The lens will matter as well, and they don't depreciate unlike bodies.

[Edited 2010-11-26 07:56:46]

[Edited 2010-11-26 07:58:02]


A.net chat squatter
User currently offlinehanbar From Netherlands, joined Dec 2007, 14 posts, RR: 0
Reply 2, posted (3 years 9 months 10 hours ago) and read 5784 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Alfie, two months ago I was wondering the same and I did the same as what 5J advises you now. I bought the 50D (I had a 400D) and it gives me everything I want. I don't need the 60 or 7D's extras. And adding the money I saved buying the 50D I have bought the 70-120 2.8 L. Man, and now I feel rich!!!!

User currently offlineSilver1SWA From United States of America, joined Mar 2004, 4779 posts, RR: 26
Reply 3, posted (3 years 9 months 1 hour ago) and read 5733 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Heck, I would still recommend the 40D! The 50D is definitely still a great buy. In fact, more so now since the price has dropped.

I bought the 40D right after it was discontinued and it was a great deal. I still love the camera. So you're in the same situation with the 50D, I don't think you can go wrong with it.



ALL views, opinions expressed are mine ONLY and are NOT representative of those shared by Southwest Airlines Co.
User currently offlineJakTrax From United Kingdom, joined Jun 2005, 4936 posts, RR: 7
Reply 4, posted (3 years 8 months 4 weeks 1 day 22 hours ago) and read 5713 times:

You may struggle getting one now (I'm aware of a few people who can't get hold of one). If you can though, go for it. Despite being discontinued it's still right up there with the most modern of today's DSLRs (heck, it's barely two years old!) and is capable of producing excellent images. Only faults I have found are that it can produce a pronounced red cast in certain light, and also it tends to 'out-resolve' many cheaper lenses. Sometimes my 28-105 can struggle keeping up with it but for the most part it's fine.

Karl


User currently offlinecpd From Australia, joined Jun 2008, 4879 posts, RR: 38
Reply 5, posted (3 years 8 months 4 weeks 1 day 20 hours ago) and read 5688 times:

Quoting JakTrax (Reply 4):
Only faults I have found are that it can produce a pronounced red cast in certain light

You can manually set white balance, right? That should solve that issue, I'd have thought.

My thoughts are the same as the others, good luck finding a 50D, I haven't seen one on sale around the shops for a long time. But everywhere has 7D though...


User currently offlineJakTrax From United Kingdom, joined Jun 2005, 4936 posts, RR: 7
Reply 6, posted (3 years 8 months 4 weeks 1 day 15 hours ago) and read 5662 times:

Quoting cpd (Reply 5):
You can manually set white balance, right? That should solve that issue, I'd have thought

Yes, but many choose to use AWB, which seems to do a better job of producing the red cast than many other Canon cameras. For a lot of people manually setting the WB is a chore - I rarely do it manually as it's easy enough to remove the cast in Photoshop. Plus of course light can change so quickly, especially here in the UK at this time of year.

Call me lazy but it works for me most of the time.

Karl


User currently offlineSilver1SWA From United States of America, joined Mar 2004, 4779 posts, RR: 26
Reply 7, posted (3 years 8 months 4 weeks 1 day 13 hours ago) and read 5652 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting JakTrax (Reply 6):
Yes, but many choose to use AWB, which seems to do a better job of producing the red cast than many other Canon cameras. For a lot of people manually setting the WB is a chore - I rarely do it manually as it's easy enough to remove the cast in Photoshop. Plus of course light can change so quickly, especially here in the UK at this time of year.

Call me lazy but it works for me most of the time.

LOL It's as easy as taking one shot. Press, click, set...DONE.



ALL views, opinions expressed are mine ONLY and are NOT representative of those shared by Southwest Airlines Co.
User currently offlinepilotalltheway From United Kingdom, joined Dec 2008, 247 posts, RR: 0
Reply 8, posted (3 years 8 months 4 weeks 1 day 11 hours ago) and read 5629 times:

Thanks alot guys!

Gonna go for it - have seen a bundle deal with the the 28-135mm and I see you have it Karl, it any good?

I just fear that it starts at too far a focal length, but for my aviation shots it shouldn't be too much of a problem for now.

Cheers,

Alfie



Dude - where's my plane?
User currently offlineSNATH From United States of America, joined Mar 2004, 3238 posts, RR: 22
Reply 9, posted (3 years 8 months 4 weeks 1 day 11 hours ago) and read 5616 times:

Quoting 5J (Reply 1):
The 50D is still one heck of a camera.

Clearly, you have very low standards.   Many folks got a 50D and then dumped it and went back to their 40D. The extra MPs would be nice if they didn't come with more noise, softness, and worse high ISO performance...

Quoting 5J (Reply 1):
I'd say it's better than the 60D.

A brick painted like a camera is better than the 60D.

Quoting Silver1SWA (Reply 3):
Heck, I would still recommend the 40D!

Ryan here has totally the right attitude... 40D all the way!!!

Tony



Nikon: we don't want more pixels, we want better pixels.
User currently offline5J From Philippines, joined Aug 2009, 26 posts, RR: 1
Reply 10, posted (3 years 8 months 4 weeks 1 day 2 hours ago) and read 5556 times:

Quoting SNATH (Reply 9):
Clearly, you have very low standards.

I didn't say it was the best, i just said it can still hold its own against other DSLRs  



A.net chat squatter
User currently offlineJakTrax From United Kingdom, joined Jun 2005, 4936 posts, RR: 7
Reply 11, posted (3 years 8 months 4 weeks 1 day ago) and read 5545 times:

Quoting SNATH (Reply 9):
Clearly, you have very low standards. Many folks got a 50D and then dumped it and went back to their 40D. The extra MPs would be nice if they didn't come with more noise, softness, and worse high ISO performance...



I nearly went back with my 30D until I realised that the 50D (if you got a good copy) is actually a very decent camera. Mine definitely seems to have better lower ISO performance than the 30D (which was very similar to the 40D), and the extra detail in images is noticeable. Unfortunately that extra detail comes at a price and images straight from the camera can look much softer than those from previous models. This perhaps isn't helped by the 50D's reputation for being very choosy with lenses.

In light of a few dodgy batches which obviously did the rounds I think the 50D has taken a pretty unfair bashing during its time on the market, mainly due to teething problems upon release. Ask most users here now and I'm willing to bet they wouldn't swap for a 30/40D. It appears to be one of those cameras which takes some getting used to, but once you're familiar with its pros and cons it's fine. Took me ages to find a set of lenses that worked perfectly with it, but once you've locked an L on the front the performance is fantastic.

Karl


User currently offlineFedexL1011 From United States of America, joined Jan 2010, 141 posts, RR: 0
Reply 12, posted (3 years 8 months 4 weeks 23 hours ago) and read 5539 times:

Hi all,
Im looking at getting a SLR( trust me im on topic) and have looked at the 20D and 30D as they are lower priced are they still good? Is it the same rep as the 50D?

Regards
J.R. In SEA



722,732,733,735,737,738,739,744,752,753,763,772,319,320,321,DH8,CRJ2,CRJ7,CRJ9,E175,E145
User currently offlinecpd From Australia, joined Jun 2008, 4879 posts, RR: 38
Reply 13, posted (3 years 8 months 4 weeks 23 hours ago) and read 5536 times:

They are cheaper because they are much older - so I'd suggest not going any earlier than 40D or 50D if you can find them.

Quoting JakTrax (Reply 11):
but once you've locked an L on the front the performance is fantastic.

I saw some excellent images out of the 50D from the RAAF FA-18/F handover ceremony. In dark conditions, the images were pretty clean.


User currently offlinepilotalltheway From United Kingdom, joined Dec 2008, 247 posts, RR: 0
Reply 14, posted (3 years 8 months 4 weeks 19 hours ago) and read 5521 times:

Ok.

Well, at first I wont be buying any L glass.

So what would you recommend instead?

-Alfie



Dude - where's my plane?
User currently offlineJakTrax From United Kingdom, joined Jun 2005, 4936 posts, RR: 7
Reply 15, posted (3 years 8 months 4 weeks 19 hours ago) and read 5518 times:

Quoting pilotalltheway (Reply 14):
So what would you recommend instead?



L glass! 

Seriously though, a big drawback of the 50D (and a reason why it often gets slated) is it's fussiness with lenses. I currently own only one cheap(er) lens (28-105 II, not 28-135, although they're in the same range) and in some situations communications between camera and glass aren't too clever. With Ls however there isn't an issue.

I'm not advising against the 50D here but I know many who've been disappointed with its performance when coupled with cheap lenses. I once used an 18-55 kit lens on mine and the camera just chewed the thing up! On the flip side I know people who are successfully using 50Ds with budget lenses, but I suspect the copy needs to be absolutely spot on. Check out a friend's images (with the 75-300 USM III) here:

http://www.airliners.net/search/phot..._id+desc&page_limit=15&thumbnails=

It is an excellent body but for the most part you need to get the maximum out of it by buying good lenses.

Quoting FedexL1011 (Reply 12):
Im looking at getting a SLR( trust me im on topic) and have looked at the 20D and 30D as they are lower priced are they still good? Is it the same rep as the 50D?

The only reason I'd avoid a 20D is because of the age (I'm thinking about shutter actuations and servicing here, not capability). It's a great camera but the 30D addressed the 20's (very few) minor issues. Both the 30 and 40D are great cameras, andsome of the complaints about the 50D are testimony to that.

Karl


User currently offlinepilotalltheway From United Kingdom, joined Dec 2008, 247 posts, RR: 0
Reply 16, posted (3 years 8 months 4 weeks 18 hours ago) and read 5512 times:

Karl, I remember you saying you heard that the Canon 18-135mm wasn't bad?

-Alfie



Dude - where's my plane?
User currently offlinedazbo5 From United Kingdom, joined Mar 2005, 2903 posts, RR: 2
Reply 17, posted (3 years 8 months 4 weeks 18 hours ago) and read 5509 times:

Quoting pilotalltheway (Reply 16):
, I remember you saying you heard that the Canon 18-135mm wasn't bad?

On a lower MP camera it maybe fine, but with the 50D, you really need quality glass as the camera will quite often outresolve the cheaper glass and show up any flaws it may have. If you're serious about a 50D, you need to factor in the cost of quality lenses in the future. Lenses you have now will work fine, but you'll soon see their limitations. I wouldn't waste money on the purchase of cheaper lenses as a stop gap; save the cash until you have the funds for higher spec lenses. It's L's all the way with the higher spec cameras if you want to get the best from them, or Sigma EX etc.

Darren



Equipment: 2x Canon EOS 50D; Sigma 10-20 EX DC HSM, 50-500 EX APO DG, Canon 24-105 f/4 L, Speedlite 430EX
User currently offlinepilotalltheway From United Kingdom, joined Dec 2008, 247 posts, RR: 0
Reply 18, posted (3 years 8 months 4 weeks 18 hours ago) and read 5506 times:

Quoting dazbo5 (Reply 17):
I wouldn't waste money on the purchase of cheaper lenses as a stop gap; save the cash until you have the funds for higher spec lenses.

Oh, I'd really better start saving for a while then for some L-age.

Am only 14 

-Alfie



Dude - where's my plane?
User currently offlineJakTrax From United Kingdom, joined Jun 2005, 4936 posts, RR: 7
Reply 19, posted (3 years 8 months 4 weeks 18 hours ago) and read 5501 times:

Alfie,

The 28-135 is a fairly decent lens - it just depends on how good your copy is and how it sits with your 50D. In all honesty I imagine it'll be okay.

The 7D and 60D will probably have similar issues, but these cameras I believe aren't quite so temperamental.

Why not look at some lower end cameras and use the cash you save to buy a good lens? I whole-heartedly recommend the EF70-200 f/4 L. Best lens I've ever owned!

Image quality will be determined by the lens, not the camera. As I awlays say, a budget body with good glass will always beat an expensive body with cheap plastic.

Karl


User currently offlineJohnKrist From Sweden, joined Jan 2005, 1399 posts, RR: 6
Reply 20, posted (3 years 8 months 4 weeks 17 hours ago) and read 5493 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
HEAD SUPPORT

Quoting JakTrax (Reply 19):
a budget body with good glass will always beat an expensive body with cheap plastic.

Absolutely correct, a Lada with a Porsche engine will outrun a Porsche with a Lada engine  
If you are 14 I'd even recommend going XXXD end get a 70-200 L F4 lens.



5D Mark III, 7D, 17-40 F4 L, 70-200 F2.8 L IS, EF 1.4x II, EF 2x III, Metz 58-AF1
User currently offlinepilotalltheway From United Kingdom, joined Dec 2008, 247 posts, RR: 0
Reply 21, posted (3 years 8 months 4 weeks 17 hours ago) and read 5489 times:

Meh.

I dont like the ergonomics of the 450D, 500D, 550D!

The 50D was the cheapest of the Canon range that felt ''right'' in my hands (rather large ones too!)

-Alfie



Dude - where's my plane?
User currently offlineJakTrax From United Kingdom, joined Jun 2005, 4936 posts, RR: 7
Reply 22, posted (3 years 8 months 4 weeks 17 hours ago) and read 5487 times:

But would you rather have reduced ergonomics but fantastic image quality? Besides, you get used to the feel of the camera you own. The lens is the real investment; the tool. The camera is just what makes it all work. The lens will last you a long time and will hardly lose any value when (if?) you come to sell.

You'll have long forgotten about the 50D in 5 years but you'll still be using the 70-200 with the latest batch of DSLRs.

Karl


User currently offline5J From Philippines, joined Aug 2009, 26 posts, RR: 1
Reply 23, posted (3 years 8 months 4 weeks 17 hours ago) and read 5487 times:

As what the others were saying above, you could get the same "right" feel with a 40D. It's even cheaper than the 50D and some say that noise performance is better with the 40. But you'll need some luck to find one nowadays, though.


A.net chat squatter
User currently offlineSilver1SWA From United States of America, joined Mar 2004, 4779 posts, RR: 26
Reply 24, posted (3 years 8 months 4 weeks 13 hours ago) and read 5464 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting pilotalltheway (Reply 21):
I dont like the ergonomics of the 450D, 500D, 550D!

The 50D was the cheapest of the Canon range that felt ''right'' in my hands (rather large ones too!)

I'm not up to speed on current prices but, is there much of a price difference among the XXXD line and the 50D?

I say if you can find a 40D, get one and pair it with the 70-200 F/4L and you're gold. I'm not suggesting the 40D because I don't believe in the 50D. I'm recommending based entirely by price.



ALL views, opinions expressed are mine ONLY and are NOT representative of those shared by Southwest Airlines Co.
25 JakTrax : Another piece of sound advice. My only worry about a second-hand 40D would be the amount of actuations it has on it. You wouldn't want to buy one onl
26 NZ107 : The next series up from the entry level cameras just feel a whole lot better in any case. The bigger and more sturdy grip makes a difference for sure
27 JakTrax : That's just reminded me of one other thing.... Remember that a 50D paired with L glass is a great start but not an automatic ticket entitling the own
28 ANITIX87 : The 18-135 is great. It lacks a USM focus motor, but it's plenty fast on my 50D, even for aviation. I have several images in the database taken with
29 FedexL1011 : amazon has some and B&H frequents having one Regards J.R. In SEA P.S. You are right it is noticeably cheaper
30 pilotalltheway : Little of topic, what's the equivalent of L glass in the Nikon range? -Alfie
31 Post contains images JakTrax : ED I think? Are you thinking of jumping ship to Nikon now? Just to make things even simpler? Karl
32 Post contains images pilotalltheway : I'm umming and arring after our conversation yesterday! -Alfie
33 JakTrax : Nikon are very good too but too many upsets during a decision just make things worse. You are clearly a little confused and adding more to the fray wi
34 pilotalltheway : Indeed. I've always thought about the D90, being the other camera that I was looking at. It's not new to me, I've read up on it and know about it too.
35 JakTrax : The D90 is of course a cracking camera, although it's perhaps a tier down from the 50D. Still, I've always rated Nikon's bodies over Canon's to be hon
36 pilotalltheway : Hi again everyone! I now have my 50D! Hooray! I have just the body, now really need to know what lens I should get first, which starts off at around t
37 Post contains images JohnKrist : Congrats! Now get a lens and get out there
38 Post contains images pilotalltheway : I need to know which one to purchase first! -Alfie
39 Post contains images JakTrax : I'd say the 70-200 f/4 L but you know that already. wide-angle to telephoto lenses usually don't provide the best quality, so I can only really recomm
40 pilotalltheway : Great, cheers Karl. -Alfie
41 FedexL1011 : I agree alot when i get money(and a camera) thats what im buying first. Do you use a tripod with that kind of lens?
42 Post contains images pilotalltheway : I've bitten the bullet! My 70-200 f/4.0L is on the way! -Alfie
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Photo Hits Up? Or Is It Just Me? posted Tue Dec 29 2009 17:43:04 by JakTrax
Blurry? Or Is It Time For Me To Move On? posted Wed Oct 31 2007 13:35:17 by Kereru
Overworked Or Is It Acceptable? posted Sat Jul 8 2006 23:39:36 by Frippe
Some Strange Rejections - Or Is It Me... posted Wed Mar 1 2006 13:36:59 by DerekF
When Is It "Too Much" Dust In Your Lense... posted Tue Nov 29 2005 10:04:50 by Speedbird128
Bad Double - Or Is It? posted Thu Jan 15 2004 23:54:57 by Work4bmi
Should I Upgrade My Camera...or Is It Good Enough? posted Sun Sep 28 2003 04:56:03 by Syncmaster
When Is It Far Enough Or Too Far? posted Fri Nov 9 2001 21:50:21 by Airplanenut
Buying A 7D Or 5DmkII In HKG... Still Good? posted Fri Feb 5 2010 13:49:30 by airtrainer
When Is It In Flight And When Still Airport posted Wed Dec 16 2009 06:37:08 by Jorge1812