Sponsor Message:
Aviation Photography Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Tamron AF 75-300mm F/4.0-5.6 LD  
User currently offlineflightkid9 From Canada, joined Jul 2010, 65 posts, RR: 0
Posted (3 years 7 months 3 weeks 5 days 6 hours ago) and read 5790 times:

I saw this lens on amazon for only $120, now at that price for any lens I would expect total garbage, but there are 47 reviews on amazon and they average out to 4 and a half stars so I took a look at it, after reading all the reviews (yes every one) It actually sounds like an alright lens. I figure at $120 I can't really go totally wrong with it but I'd like a second opinion on it (or a 50th) for any lens at this price I certainly don't expect much but do you guys think it would be any good? I'd probably mostly use it for still shots (possibly at an airshow but that would most likely be taxi-shots) I've never heard of Tamron before so I don't know if they have any good lens' or not but should I bother with this? with that many positive reviews I'm tempted to buy it to try it out, I'm not really looking to get any pictures accepted to A.net (I'm nowhere near that level of skill) but I would like some good quality shots. Thanks for any help you can give.

-Andrew


Can we make this quick? my Boeing's double-parked.
15 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineJakTrax From United Kingdom, joined Jun 2005, 4936 posts, RR: 7
Reply 1, posted (3 years 7 months 3 weeks 5 days 5 hours ago) and read 5779 times:

The four-and-a-half stars will be awarded based on the price, not the overall quality of the lens. Any lens at only $120 isn't going to be wonderful, and you can bet most of those reviews aren't from plane photographers. I'm guessing it'll do the job between 75 and 200mm (like others in its class) but my experience with cheap Tamron (and Sigma) is that they are very soft.

Depending on your expectations it may be worth a shot (it is only $120), but personally I'd spend a little more and get something better.

Karl


User currently offlineflightkid9 From Canada, joined Jul 2010, 65 posts, RR: 0
Reply 2, posted (3 years 7 months 3 weeks 5 days 4 hours ago) and read 5776 times:

Quoting JakTrax (Reply 1):

The four-and-a-half stars will be awarded based on the price, not the overall quality of the lens. Any lens at only $120 isn't going to be wonderful, and you can bet most of those reviews aren't from plane photographers. I'm guessing it'll do the job between 75 and 200mm (like others in its class) but my experience with cheap Tamron (and Sigma) is that they are very soft.

Depending on your expectations it may be worth a shot (it is only $120), but personally I'd spend a little more and get something better.

Karl

Ya I don't expect that much from it, do you know of any other lens' that go up to at least 200mm for about $200? I'm obviously not looking for the best lens, just one that has alright quality and isn't too expensive. (Has to fit a Rebel XS) Thanks

-Andrew



Can we make this quick? my Boeing's double-parked.
User currently offlineSNATH From United States of America, joined Mar 2004, 3238 posts, RR: 22
Reply 3, posted (3 years 7 months 3 weeks 5 days 2 hours ago) and read 5759 times:

Quoting flightkid9 (Reply 2):
Ya I don't expect that much from it, do you know of any other lens' that go up to at least 200mm for about $200? I'm obviously not looking for the best lens, just one that has alright quality and isn't too expensive. (Has to fit a Rebel XS) Thanks

The Canon 55-250 is considered pretty decent for the price:

http://www.the-digital-picture.com/R...-250mm-f-4-5.6-IS-Lens-Review.aspx

Tony



Nikon: we don't want more pixels, we want better pixels.
User currently offlinedvincent From United States of America, joined Jan 2007, 1743 posts, RR: 11
Reply 4, posted (3 years 7 months 3 weeks 4 days 23 hours ago) and read 5747 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

I would look at the 70-300 VC USD version of the Tamron lens, which is much much better for about $400.


From the Mind of Minolta
User currently offlineJakTrax From United Kingdom, joined Jun 2005, 4936 posts, RR: 7
Reply 5, posted (3 years 7 months 3 weeks 4 days 20 hours ago) and read 5729 times:

55-250 is a good option but like all budget lenses it's not great after 200mm. A better deal is the 75-300 USM III, which I believe is a similar price and offers a marginally better build quality. Unfortunately it lacks IS so you'd need to give it careful consideration.

I have many images in the database taken with the 75-300 - it's pretty sharp up to about 180mm.

Karl


User currently offlineSNATH From United States of America, joined Mar 2004, 3238 posts, RR: 22
Reply 6, posted (3 years 7 months 3 weeks 4 days 18 hours ago) and read 5720 times:

Quoting dvincent (Reply 4):
which is much much better for about $400.

He did say for about $200.  

Tony



Nikon: we don't want more pixels, we want better pixels.
User currently offlineflightkid9 From Canada, joined Jul 2010, 65 posts, RR: 0
Reply 7, posted (3 years 7 months 3 weeks 4 days 17 hours ago) and read 5714 times:

I was looking around some more and came upon the Canon EF-S 55-250mm f/4-5.6 IS Image Stabilizer, It is $200 on amazon and looks alright, one thing confused me though, it says in the name "Grey market non-US Product"

http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B00...X0DER&pf_rd_r=10MT2ZR5DYW9N10J629M

It looks about the same as the 55-250 but with IS. Do you guys think it would be any good? and what Does "Grey market non-US product" mean? does it mean that it's and imported product not available in the US or something? Thanks

-Andrew



Can we make this quick? my Boeing's double-parked.
User currently offlinedvincent From United States of America, joined Jan 2007, 1743 posts, RR: 11
Reply 8, posted (3 years 7 months 3 weeks 4 days 16 hours ago) and read 5706 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting SNATH (Reply 6):
He did say for about $200.  

The old adage of "You get what you pay for" applies...



From the Mind of Minolta
User currently offlineSNATH From United States of America, joined Mar 2004, 3238 posts, RR: 22
Reply 9, posted (3 years 7 months 3 weeks 4 days 16 hours ago) and read 5705 times:

Quoting flightkid9 (Reply 7):
and what Does "Grey market non-US product" mean?
http://www.the-digital-picture.com/Canon-Lenses/Gray-Market.aspx

I'd pay a bit more money to get the warranty...

Quoting dvincent (Reply 8):
The old adage of "You get what you pay for" applies...

Totally.

Tony



Nikon: we don't want more pixels, we want better pixels.
User currently offlineJakTrax From United Kingdom, joined Jun 2005, 4936 posts, RR: 7
Reply 10, posted (3 years 7 months 3 weeks 4 days 14 hours ago) and read 5690 times:

'Grey' imports should be avoided really. Encounter a problem and your money's as good as thrown down a grid.

Karl


User currently offlineflightkid9 From Canada, joined Jul 2010, 65 posts, RR: 0
Reply 11, posted (3 years 7 months 3 weeks 4 days 14 hours ago) and read 5688 times:

Quoting JakTrax (Reply 10):
'Grey' imports should be avoided really. Encounter a problem and your money's as good as thrown down a grid.

Ok I see now, they're basically imported by the retailer and not Canon, I guess I'l stay clear of it. Thanks

-Andrew



Can we make this quick? my Boeing's double-parked.
User currently onlineafterburner From Indonesia, joined Jun 2005, 1210 posts, RR: 1
Reply 12, posted (3 years 7 months 3 weeks 4 days 5 hours ago) and read 5655 times:

The newer Tamron 70-300mm Di LD Macro is better. And it's still under $200.

User currently offlineLGW340 From United Kingdom, joined May 2007, 315 posts, RR: 0
Reply 13, posted (3 years 7 months 3 weeks 4 days 1 hour ago) and read 5618 times:

I would recommend the Sigma 70-300mm APO DG. It has to be the APO version though as I found that one much better having had both. This is with a 350D + Sigma 70-300 APO DG


View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © C J Goodwin




Live life from the window seat...
User currently offlinedarreno1 From United States of America, joined Jun 2010, 224 posts, RR: 0
Reply 14, posted (3 years 7 months 3 weeks 1 day 12 hours ago) and read 5522 times:

Quoting dvincent (Reply 4):
I would look at the 70-300 VC USD version of the Tamron lens, which is much much better for about $400.

I'll back you up on that! This lens will be a member of my collection for a very long time to come.



Nikon D7000 / Nikkor 105mm AF f2.8 / Nikkor 35 f1.8G / Nikkor 50 f1.8D / Nikkor 85mm / Nikkor 300mm f4 AF
User currently offlinesulman From United States of America, joined Mar 2004, 2035 posts, RR: 32
Reply 15, posted (3 years 7 months 3 weeks 1 day 4 hours ago) and read 5487 times:

Cheap telephotos really do the job in general walkaround photography; good for travel, for instance. If you're shooting aircraft, you'll find the deficiencies annoying after a while. Colour, sharpness and contrast aren't great, and they're difficult to get good results with at the long end.

That being said, like any kit, if you play to the gear's strengths it's a different story, and you can get perfectly good results for web use.

James



It takes a big man to admit they are wrong, and I am not a big man.
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Canon EF 75-300mm F/4-5.6 III USM Telephoto Zoom posted Wed Jun 6 2007 07:57:07 by Rsmith6621a
Request Opinion On Sigma AF 70-300mm F2.8 posted Sun Apr 2 2006 15:13:05 by AirMalta
300D And 75-300mm Is Help posted Tue Dec 20 2005 10:55:20 by Davejwatts
Is Canon 75-300mm Is That Much Better? posted Sun Jun 5 2005 19:04:54 by Fly747
Canon EF 75-300mm F/4-5.6 III Vs. Sigma 70-300mm F posted Wed Mar 16 2005 05:16:57 by SkyWestFan
Canon EF 75-300mm F/4-5.6 Is USM posted Wed Mar 16 2005 01:57:38 by APFPilot1985
Opinions Wanted On Canon EF 75-300mm F/4-5.6 III posted Tue Mar 8 2005 13:57:46 by PhotoLPPT
75-300mm Trick (maybee) posted Sat Jan 8 2005 20:29:55 by Dullesguy
75-300mm Tips And Tricks posted Mon May 10 2004 02:10:03 by Dullesguy
What's The Problem With My 75-300mm? posted Tue Jul 29 2003 11:57:12 by Qantas744